yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Torque and kinematics conceptual example


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We are told a student hangs blocks with different masses from a pulley of mass m and radius r and releases them from rest. The student measures the time of the fall t and the magnitude of the angular velocity omega sub f when the block reaches a distance d below the axle. There is considerable friction between the axle and pulley.

Which of the following plots could show the student's measurements as a function of the applied torque on the pulley? So pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own.

Alright, so let's first understand what these axes are and then we'll talk a little bit about what's going on with this mass-pulley system. On our horizontal axis here, we have our applied torque. Now, where is the applied torque in this system? Well, you're going to have some mass here and we assume we're on a planet, or probably on Earth, so you're going to have gravity pulling down on this.

You're going to have the force of the weight of this object pulling down, and we know that this has radius r. So that force times that radius is going to be the applied torque. Of course, the more mass you have, the more weight you're going to have, and you're going to have more torque. So this is really showing that as the student applies larger and larger masses, right over here, we're going to have more and more torque.

Now, what is in our vertical axis right over here? Omega sub f divided by t. So this is our final angular velocity once this thing has gone down a distance d, that's what they tell us, divided by the time it took to get there. Well, if we assume that it started from a standstill, you could view this as your angular acceleration.

So this is the angular acceleration as a function of applied torque. I could write angular acceleration right over there, or you could say your average angular acceleration over that time period from when you start to time t.

So what do we think would happen? Well, if you have small masses here, it would create a small torque, but if you have considerable friction, which they talk about right over here, then there's considerable friction between the axle and pulley. For small masses right over here, the torque will likely not be strong enough to overcome the friction.

In that situation, you would not have any angular acceleration; everything would just stay still. But then at some point, once your mass gets large enough, right over here, then your torque will be large enough to overcome the friction between the axle and the pulley.

So which of these graphs describe that, or which of these plots? Well, this first one describes a situation when you have a low applied torque. You have a high angular acceleration; that does not make sense, so we should rule that out.

This one kind of shows angular acceleration is indifferent to applied torque, and that doesn't make sense. The more applied torque you have, the larger masses here should indicate more angular acceleration, so that doesn't make sense.

Now, both of these show an upward trend, where as you have more applied torque, you have more angular acceleration. So which of these would you pick? Well, this one here on the right kind of paints a picture that as soon as you have any applied torque, you start having angular acceleration.

And if this was a frictionless system, if there was very little friction here, maybe this would make sense. But as we talked about, for low masses which generate low weight, they would generate low applied torque and wouldn't be able to overcome friction. So you should not have some angular acceleration for low torques, but then as the torque gets larger, you will overcome the friction and then start to accelerate the system.

So I would pick B.

More Articles

View All
Negative definite integrals | Integration and accumulation of change | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We’ve already thought about what a definite integral means. If I’m taking the definite integral from ( a ) to ( b ) of ( f(x) \, dx ), I can just view that as the area below my function ( f ). So, if this is my y-axis, this is my x-axis, and ( y ) is equ…
Turbulent Flow is MORE Awesome Than Laminar Flow
A portion of this video was sponsored by Cottonelle. This is like a scientist trap. It certainly is; case in point, that is Space Station commander Chris Hadfield. What this isn’t is turbulent. Nope, this is largely laminar flow. “Did somebody say peculia…
Comparing fractions with same numerator | Math | 3rd grade | Khan Academy
Let’s compare 5⁄6 and 5⁄8. Let’s think about what they mean. 5⁄6 means five out of six pieces. If you have a whole, let’s say a whole cake, and you cut it into six pieces, 5⁄6 is five of those six pieces. 5⁄8 again is five pieces. That’s something that’s…
Gaining the Trust of the Gorillas | Dian Fossey: Secrets in the Mist
KELLY STEWART: Dian Fossey was definitely a pioneer. I do not think that word has been overused. Before that, nobody had done a long-term study of gorillas. Nobody had studied them month after month and year after year. IAN REDMOND: She wanted to be the …
Introduction to contractions | The Apostrophe | Punctuation | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians! Hello David! Hello Paige! So today we’re going to talk about contractions, which are another use for our friend the apostrophe. So David, what is a contraction? So something that apostrophes are really good at doing is showing when le…
BRA GUN??? -- Mind Blow #17
A bra gun holster? An electromagnet plus balls equals woooo! Vsauce, Kevin here. This is Mind Blow. Touch screens are okay, but how about touching a force field? Using infrared sensors, this multi-touch system allows a traditional monitor to be manipulat…