yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Can Universal Basic Income / Social Democracy Fix America’s Inequality? | Jeffrey Sachs | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

There’s a proposal around that’s got a lot of interest called universal basic income where everybody is guaranteed at least a certain level of income in the society. Some free market economists like Milton Friedman talked about a negative income tax which in effect had the same features of guaranteeing a certain level of income for everybody as a base.

I think from a human rights and decency standard there’s a lot of sense to the idea that everybody in a society should be able to meet their basic needs. There’s on the other hand this sense if you give someone a check whether they’re trying, not trying, working, not working. If there’s no effort, no conditionality involved at all maybe we’re going to get a lot of people that are absolutely doing nothing on the backs of those who are really working.

So the incentive issues are real even if the sensitivity and decency issues are also real. I think that one way to handle this is a little bit more rounded rather than seeing a universal basic income as a check and kind of an unconditional check that’s just handed out as income. I like the idea of social democracy as it’s applied in real countries in Europe, the Netherlands and Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany.

The idea is everybody has access to publicly financed healthcare. Everybody has access to quality publicly financed education including college tuitions. Not a trillion dollars of crushing student debt, but tuitions paid for. Everybody has access to not only guaranteed vacation, but paid vacation. Everybody has access to quality childcare so that moms can go to work knowing that their kids are in a healthy, nurturing environment.

Everybody has access to maternity leave so that moms and also paternity leave, dads can stay home with their kids for several months. It’s kind of decent where you say we have all this wonderful technology, this wealth. Why don’t we live decently, not miserably? If people want a market income beyond that they’ve got to go work for it.

If, of course, they’re disabled or for some reason can’t then there’s added social support but it’s not cash in people’s pockets. It’s decency. It’s public service. It’s basic needs met. I see it as basically living decent lives in decent societies. They have a very different spirit to them. There aren’t a lot of super rich Wall Street hedge fund misanthropes – and I’ll use the term advisably because I find a lot of people on Wall Street don’t give a damn about anybody else except they care about their money.

And I find that really weird. But you don’t find that kind of idea in northern Europe because it’s really looked down upon. And people don’t like it when people are money grubbing. They’re kind of shunned. So the social ethos is different.

I remember once I was running to the airport in Oslo and I fly business class and I’m constantly moving around on trips relentlessly around the world. And I ran up and said, “Where’s the business class line to board?” And the guy looked at me like I was crazy and he said, “Excuse me, we’re boarding the Scandinavian way. Get back in line.”

And I just thought okay, that’s pretty cool actually, you know. Everybody’s in line and let’s all get on the plane. It’s a social spirit. It’s the idea that we like – well by the way this is not people tearing their clothes and living in hair shirts and not enjoying themselves. They like their vacations. They like their boats in the Stockholm archipelago. They like six weeks on their island.

So they live beautifully. But they don’t want gazillions. They don’t want to do it at the expense of others. They want to do it as a society. God, if America could just get a little of that back rather than a president who believes in killers and losers. Sick, but that’s what we got and that is what’s degrading American society.

Not just the technical issues. Not just the rising inequality but this spirit that you’re a winner or you’re a loser. And if you’re a loser get out of the way. That’s Ayn Rand talki...

More Articles

View All
Surrounded By Monkeys: What This Photographer Loves About His Job | National Geographic
I’ve been studying gelat monkeys on and off for eight years now, and I’ve seen some incredible things. Whether it’s the live birth of a gelat infant from just a few meters away, to um some intense fights where I’m just kind of stuck in the middle and gela…
Worked example: Calculating mass percent | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
So right over here, I have the molecular formula for glucose. And so let’s just say that I had a sample of pure glucose right over here. This is my little pile of glucose. I’m not even going to tell you its mass, but based on the molecular formula, can yo…
Why Science Says It's Good for Kids to Lie | National Geographic
[Music] My name is Ellen. I’m a research assistant at Kong Leaf Development Lab. This is where we do our deception studies, and here we play three games with the kids. You’ve been doing such a good job, and we got off to such a good start that I kind of w…
How I started selling private jets!
People always ask me all the time, “How did you get started selling private jets?” I used to work in this nightclub restaurant almost every night, and this one gentleman who used to come in had a jet on his tie pin. I would ask him, “Why would you have a …
How to Pee in Space | StarTalk
So we have to ask Mike, “Yes, have you ever peed in your pants in space?” “Yes, we didn’t call it the UCD; we called it the MAG.” “The MAG? The Maximum Absorbency Garment? It was a diaper?” “Diaper! Yes, we wore a diaper on launch and entry, and while …
Breaking apart 3-digit addition problems | 2nd grade | Khan Academy
Mike isn’t sure how to add 189 + 608, help Mike by choosing an addition problem that is the same as 189 + 608. Now let’s look at these choices. Let’s just start with this first choice. Actually, all of these choices start with having 1 hundred; they all…