yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Would You Have a More Honest Workplace If Everything Were Recorded? | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

A deliberately development organization is first of all a mouthful. So we call it a DDO for short. And it’s sort of an answer to the question: if an organization is so valued developing the capabilities of its people that it would want to create a culture that could immersively gather every member of that culture into an ongoing developmental personal kind of learning journey, what would that culture look like? What would such an organization look like?

And that’s what we set out to discover. In the process, what we learned is that in the ordinary organization, most people are doing a second job that nobody’s paying them for. That second job has to do with looking good, hiding their weaknesses, covering their inadequacies, managing other people’s favorable impressions of them. You can say that’s human nature, but it also turns out to be incredibly costly in ways that we don’t think enough about.

If I keep hiding my weaknesses, the likelihood that I’m going to overcome them shrinks to near zero, and the organization has to keep essentially paying for the consequences of my limitations. They’re paying me full-time salary for part-time work. So imagine an organization where people would feel safe enough that they would kind of consider they were hired not because anybody thought they were perfect, but because people thought they were good and that they could learn. One of their jobs there is to learn.

In such a culture, you get actually supported for revealing your mistakes. You could say that there’s kind of an entrepreneurial stance toward people development. The watchword of entrepreneurialism is not to avoid failure, but to fail frequently and to fail fast and to fail forward. So imagine a culture where people were encouraged to do that, so they would keep learning and getting better, and then you would be imagining a DDO, a deliberately developmental organization.

I think another really important feature of these cultures that anyone would quickly notice if you spent a little time in them is a kind of transparency. The way in which people often express it is, "I am who I am at work." In other words, they’re not living a divided life. This is what we mean by the notion that in ordinary organizations we’re all doing a second job. We’re trying to look good; we’re always trying to kind of be at our best.

In these organizations, that quickly gets seen as a way of essentially avoiding one of the most precious and valuable things that the culture has to offer you, which is the opportunity to just be the same person at work that you are when you’re not at work. That means, you know, the good, the bad, and what you might think is the ugly.

Bridgewater talks about this as radical transparency. This means that in the ordinary organization, everybody agrees it’s unprofessional to talk critically about people behind their backs, and everybody participates in it. Some of you listening right now are thinking, "I don’t do that." Okay, you may not be a speaker, but I bet you’ve been a listener to such communications. You didn’t say to the other person, "I think it’s unprofessional and wrong for you to be talking about Ralph to me behind his back."

So one way or the other, passively or actively, we have all participated in what we know to be unprofessional behavior. In Bridgewater, there is no back to be behind. Why? Because hold on to your hats. In every office and in every meeting room, there is tape recording equipment, and every conversation is being tape recorded.

Not in a creepy NSA kind of way, but if I’m having a conversation, for instance, if you report to me and I’m having a conversation about you with my boss and you’re not in the room, then I’ve now been talking about you. You don’t have to ferret through 400 tapes and see if somebody mentioned your name. I have an obligation to send you an email and let you know you were discussed in this meeting at such and such a time on such and such a day. Feel free if you want to listen to the tape.

So there’s absolutely—I know it drives people, you know, people get very struck by this—but it’s just one of a number of features that quickly give you the sense. We’re talking about a whole different way of being at work.

More Articles

View All
Jordan Peterson Comments on the Queen's Passing
How could the death of the queen affect the boundaries between English-speaking communities around the world? Well, I suppose it could go one of two ways. You know, one is that, and this would be a terrible thing, it’s such bad timing in some sense, you …
Refugees Welcomed in New York | Explorer
[music playing] HOST: Of approximately 61,000 residents in Utica, New York, nearly 11,000 are immigrants and refugees. And 450 or more arrive here each year. Utica was a manufacturing town in the 1970s and 1980s. Some of our factories began to leave, and…
How to Build Better Habits
We all brush our teeth. I mean, I hope we do. At some point in our childhood, someone told us that it was really important for us to brush our teeth. And we believed them. We were convinced. Society from then on has largely embraced the act of brushing te…
The movement that inspired the Holocaust - Alexandra Minna Stern and Natalie Lira
As a new widow, Sarah Rosas Garcia was already struggling to support her nine children when her oldest daughter was picked up by local authorities. Andrea Garcia had been accused of skipping school and being sexually promiscuous, so the authorities respon…
Genius: Aretha Chain of Fools Trailer | National Geographic
[Applause] [Music] I’m writing a new song. It’s gonna hit you hard. I thought you were my man. It’ll get under your skin, right down to the ball. It’s gonna be a whole new vibe that brings people together. I’m just unlinking your chains. Well, you only go…
How can an atheist call Hitler evil?
Andrew made a video, uh, in which he asks the question to atheists, was Hitler evil? Um, I think the gist of his question is the idea—uh, the idea behind it is that, uh, because atheists don’t have a universal sense of right and wrong, can they condemn Hi…