yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked examples: Summation notation | Accumulation and Riemann sums | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We're told to consider the sum 2 plus 5 plus 8 plus 11. Which expression is equal to the sum above? And they tell us to choose all answers that apply. So, like always, pause the video and see if you can work through this on your own.

When you look at the sum, it's clear you're starting at two, you're adding three each time, and we also are dealing with four total terms. Now, we could try to construct an equation here or an expression using sigma notation, but instead what I like to do is look at our options. We really only have to look at these two options here and expand them out. What sum would each of these be?

Well, this is going to be the same thing as we're starting at n equals 1. So this is going to be 3 times when n equals 1, 3 times 1 minus 1, and then plus... then we'll go to n equals 2, 3 times 2 minus 1. Then we're going to go to n equals 3, so plus 3 times 3 minus 1. And then finally we're going to go to n equals 4, so plus 3 times when n equals 4. This is 3 times 4 minus 1.

So just to be clear, this is what we did when n equals 1. Let me write it down: n equals 1, this is what we got; when n equals 2, this is what we got; when n equals 3, and this is what we got when n is equal to four. We stopped at n equals four because that tells us right over there, we start at n equals one and we go all the way to n equals four.

So what does this equal? Let's see. 3 times 1 minus 1 is 2, so this is looking good so far. 3 times 2 minus 1, that's 6 minus 1, that is 5, so still looking good. 3 times 3 minus one, that's nine minus one; once again, still looking good. Three times four minus one, that is eleven. So we like this choice; I would definitely select this one.

Now, let's do the same thing over here. When n is equal to 0, it's going to be 2 plus 3 times 0, so that's just going to be 2. And then plus, when n is equal to 1, it's going to be 2 plus 3 times 1, which is 5. This is starting to look good now. When n is equal to... this was n equals 0, this was n equals 1, so now we're at n equals 2. So at n equals 2, 2 plus 3 times 2 is 2 plus 6, which is 8.

And this makes sense; every time we increase n by 1, we are adding another 3, which is consistent with what we saw there. We start at 2 when n equals 0; this is just that 3n is just 0. So you start at 2, and then every time you increase n by 1, you keep adding 3 again. Finally, when n is equal to 3, 2 plus 3 times 3 is 2 plus... or is 11, I should say. And so this also is exactly the same sum.

So I feel good about both of these. Let's do one more example. So we're here, we're given the sum, and we're saying choose one answer: which of these is equivalent to this sum right over here? Well, like we did before, let's just expand it out. And what's different here is that we just have a variable, but that shouldn't make it too much more difficult.

So let's do the situation, and I'll write it out. Let's do the situation when n is equal to one. When n is equal to one, it's going to be k over 1 plus 1, k over 1 plus 1. And I'll write it out; this is n is equal to 1. Then plus, when n is equal to 2, it's going to be k over 2 plus 1. This is n is equal to 2.

And then we're going to keep going. When n is equal to 3, it's going to be k over 3 plus 1, that's n is equal to 3. And then plus, finally, because we stop right over here at n equals 4, when n equals 4, it's going to be k over 4 plus 1; that's when n is equal to 4.

So this is all going to be equal; I'll just write it over here. This is equal to k over 2 plus k over 3 plus k over 4 plus k over 5, which is exactly this choice right over here. Actually, if I had looked at the choices ahead of time, I might have even been able to save even more time by just saying, well, look, actually, if you just try to compute the first term when n is equal to 1, it would be k over 2.

Well, only this one is starting with a k over 2. This one has no k's here, which is sketchy. They're trying to look at the error where you try to replace the k with the number as well, not just the n. So that's what they're trying to do here. Here they're trying to... let's see, well this... this isn't as obvious what they're even trying to do.

Right over here, where they put the k in the denominator, and here if you swapped the n and the k's, then you would have gotten this thing right over here. So we definitely feel good about choice A.

More Articles

View All
CGP Grey was WRONG
As Mark Twain once quipped, “If I had more time I would have written a shorter letter.” There’s a pair of videos on my channel that were in the works for over a year. The Tekoi Videos. One exploration and one explanation. And while the exploration video …
Equilibrium, allocative efficiency and total surplus
What we’re going to do in this video is think about the market for chocolate, and we’re going to think about supply and demand curves. But we’re going to get an intuition for them in a slightly different way. In particular, for the demand curve, we will …
You Can't Trust Your Ears
I want you to listen to these two sounds and decide which is higher. So this is sound A. (sample sound buzzing) And this is sound B. (sample sound buzzing) Okay, so to me, sound A is clearly higher, but that’s strange because sound A was just a 100 hertz …
Abolishing sweatshops would hurt the poor
So I’ve been banned from Hensley’s channel, so I have to conduct this conversation here. If I can, Shoot 06 said, “What’s wrong with prostitution in the industrialized world?” Hemsley replied, “It’s fed by women from the poorest parts of the world becau…
"The MILLIONAIRE Investing Advice For EVERYONE" | Kevin O'Leary
I say start small, start small! Dip your toe in the water, see how it works, get a feel for it. So why are people not investing? They’re scared, disciplined, scared! Evan, no, they’re scared. But it troubles me immensely now to realize that there’s a hund…
Peter Lynch: How to Achieve a 29% Annual Return in the Stock Market
Peter Lynch is definitely someone you should be studying if you want to learn about investing. During his time running the Fidelity Magellan Fund, Lynch averaged a 29.2% annual return, consistently more than double the S&P 500 stock market index, maki…