yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Adding and subtracting fractions with negatives | 7th grade | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's say we wanted to figure out what (3 \frac{7}{3}) minus (-\frac{7}{3}) minus (\frac{11}{3}) is. Pause this video and see if you can have a go at it before we do it together.

All right, now let's work on this together. You might be tempted to deal with the (-\frac{7}{3}) and the (\frac{11}{3}) first because they already have a common denominator. But you have to realize that with subtraction, you can't use the associative property. It's not this: ((a - b) - c) for example, which is what you would typically do first. It is not the same thing as this right over here. So you have to be very, very, very careful.

But what we could do is rewrite this. Instead of saying "subtracting something minus something else," we could rewrite it in terms of addition. What do I mean by that? Well, if I have (3 \frac{7}{3}), I'll start with that.

Subtracting something is the same thing as adding that something's opposite. So subtracting (-\frac{7}{3}) is the same thing as adding the opposite of (-\frac{7}{3}), which is just (\frac{7}{3}). And subtracting (\frac{11}{3}) is the same thing as adding the opposite of (\frac{11}{3}), which is (-\frac{11}{3}).

Now, with addition, you can use the associative property. You could add these two first or you could add these two first. I like adding these two first because they have the same denominator. So if I have (\frac{7}{3}) plus (-\frac{11}{3}), what is that going to get me?

Well, we have a common denominator. We could rewrite it like this: (3 \frac{7}{3}) plus a common denominator of three. We could write (7 + (-11)) in the numerator. So (7 + (-11)) is the same thing as (7 - 11) because subtracting something is the same thing as adding its opposite.

So, for adding (-11), the same thing as subtracting (11). So (7 + (-11))—you might want to get a number line out—but hopefully, you've gotten some practice. Now, that is going to be (-4). That is (-4).

And so now we have (3 \frac{7}{3}) plus (-\frac{4}{3}). Now we definitely need to find a common denominator. So let me rewrite this. This is equal to (3 \frac{7}{3}) plus (-\frac{4}{3}) or I could write this as even (-\frac{4}{3}). Either way.

But if we want to have a common denominator, it looks like (21) is going to be the least common multiple of (7) and (3). So let's rewrite each of these as something over (21).

From (7) to (21), we multiply by (3). So (3 \times 3 = 9). And then from (3) to (21), we multiply by (7). So if we have (-4) times (7), that is (-28).

And so this is going to be equal to (\frac{9 + (-28)}{21}), which is the same thing as (\frac{9 - 28}{21}) because subtracting a number is the same thing as adding its opposite.

And so this gets us—let's see—if (9 - 9 = 0) and then we're going to have (19) more to go below zero. So this is (-\frac{19}{21}) or we could write that as (-\frac{19}{21}) and we are done.

More Articles

View All
REVEALING MY BRAND NEW HOME TOUR!
What’s up, guys? It’s Graham here. So, I’m really excited to be able to share this video with everyone because I just closed on my new home, and the time has finally come that I could tour you around, show you the new spot, and then, as I’m sure everyone …
The FASTEST Way To Pay Off Debt
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here! So we’re gonna be starting this video off with some very scary statistics. I hope you’re sitting down; you’ve been warned because this is getting out of hand. The average American is now up to thirty-eight thousand dolla…
Change in period and frequency from change in angular velocity: Worked examples | Khan Academy
We’re told that a large tire spins with angular velocity (4 \Omega). A smaller tire spins with half the angular velocity. I’m assuming half the angular velocity of the large tire. How does the period (T{\text{large}}) of the large tire compare with the pe…
Scratch your brain #Shorts
Scratching out one of your notes means you’re noting that the note no longer needs to be noted. Try saying that five times really fast. These are shower thoughts. Another tongue twister: the more I light my lighter, the lighter my lighter gets until it’s…
Expected value of a binomial variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
So I’ve got a binomial variable ( x ) and I’m going to describe it in very general terms. It is the number of successes after ( n ) trials, where the probability of success for each trial is ( p ). This is a reasonable way to describe really any binomial …
Hierarchies of Competence
Generally speaking, it’s not the case that our hierarchies of competence are reasonably functional and not only are they functional, they’re valuable. We need to know who the competent people are, and we need to reward them. Even more importantly, we need…