yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Identifying corresponding parts of scaled copies | Geometry | 7th grade | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We are told that figure two is a scaled copy of figure one, and we can verify that by comparing corresponding sides. Corresponding sides are sides that have the same relative position; they're playing the same role in each of the diagrams, even if the diagrams are scaled versions of each other, even if they are different sizes.

So, for example, if we were to compare segment EA right over here, it looks like it corresponds to segment OP. The length of EA is three, while the length of OP is one, two, three, four, five, six. For this to be a scaled copy, the scaling factor from the corresponding side in figure one to the corresponding side in figure two should be a factor of 2. So it’s times 2 right over there.

But let's just answer the questions that they're asking us, and then we can also verify that it is a scaled copy. What point on figure one corresponds to point Q on figure two? All right, pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, so point Q on figure two is right over there. So what point on figure one corresponds to that? Well, it would be playing the same role; it would be in the same relative position. It looks like this point right over here, point B, is in that same relative position. So point B corresponds to point Q on figure two.

Identify the side of figure two that corresponds to segment DC in figure one. Pause this video again and see if you can figure that out.

All right, so segment DC in figure one is that right over there. Your eye might immediately catch that, hey, the segment that's playing the same role in figure two is this one right over here. That is segment NM; put the line over it to make sure that I'm specifying the segment.

We can once again verify the scale factor to ensure that this is a scaled copy. For these two to correspond to each other and for these to be scaled copies of each other, DC has a length of one, two, three, four, and NM has a length of one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight. So once again, we are verifying that our scale factor is two.

More Articles

View All
Solving exponential equations using exponent properties | High School Math | Khan Academy
Let’s get some practice solving some exponential equations, and we have one right over here. We have (26^{9x + 5} = 1). So pause the video and see if you can tell me what (x) is going to be. Well, the key here is to realize that (26^0) is equal to 1. Any…
Khanmigo has new features and is now FREE for teachers!
Hi, I’m Michelle, a professional learning specialist here at KH Academy and a former classroom teacher just like you. Meet Kigo, your AI-powered teaching ally who’s transforming education into an immersive journey. We’re excited to tell you that Kigo is …
Long run supply curve in constant cost perfectly competitive markets | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
[Man] Alright, now let’s dig a little bit more into analyzing perfectly competitive markets, and in particular, we’re gonna focus on the long run. Remember, the long run is the time span where firms can enter and exit the market. Or, another way to think …
Catch of the Week - Burn Blubber | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
[Music] That bird is up there waiting to get a little snack. All right guys, I got a more need to bite. Boy, need to bite bad! We’re on! We’re on! R on! Let’s get him! It’s going to be a nice one, baby! Look at that! Mark, that’s what you want right ther…
How To ADAPT To The Digital Pivot | Meet Kevin Asks Mr. Wonderful
There are no starving artists anymore. They’re not starving. They’re getting salaries of over a quarter million dollars a year if they’re any good, because they can tell the story and digitize the service or product online and entice customer acquisition.…
Where Do Great Startup Ideas Come From? – Dalton Caldwell and Michael Seibel
In all three of these cases, these folks had the problem they had experience with, and in hindsight, there was an obvious opportunity to make something 10x better. But most people thought they were idiots, and that’s probably the overarching theme. They h…