yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Multiple points of influence due to separation of powers and checks and balances | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In several videos, we have touched on the idea of separation of powers between three branches of government in the United States. You have the legislative branch that writes laws and decides on the budget for the government. You have the executive branch that runs the actual government, and then you have the judicial branch that decides on the constitutionality of laws and actions by the government, as well as interprets existing laws.

Connected to this idea of separation of powers, where each of these branches are somewhat independent but not completely independent, is that they all have checks and balances on each other. We've talked about, in multiple videos, how the executive can veto a law by the legislative. The legislative can override that veto. The legislative decides on the budget that the executive has to run the government.

The judicial branch decides on constitutionality. The executive branch decides who is even going to become a justice in the Supreme Court. So when you have the separation of powers and you have these checks and balances, it provides multiple opportunities to influence policy and the actions of government.

There's two ways that you could view influence. You could view it as a positive thing. After all, it's government by the people; the people are sovereign, so they should be able to influence what the government does. But sometimes a cynical view of influence is, well, who gets to influence? Is it really by the people, or are there other interests, maybe driven by things like money, that have undue influence?

Just to get a sense of how folks can influence or where there are points of influence, first, what laws get passed or what gets funded—that's decided in the budget. Now, as an individual, as a citizen, you can write letters to your congressperson. You can petition them; you can call them up; you can show up at town halls that they hope to hold in order to speak your voice.

But there's also interest groups. Now, interest groups could be corporate interest groups; they could be unions; they could be professions. These interest groups will oftentimes also lobby Congress in order to influence what gets funded or the laws that get passed or don't get passed. The word lobbying really is just this idea of trying to influence the government.

Now, a major way— a major point of influence in the United States—is when there are elections: who actually gets elected. You can imagine there could be direct support or endorsement for different candidates. Money, especially with mass media becoming more and more important, becomes a bigger and bigger part of elections. So you can donate at an individual level, or you often see now—and this is a very controversial area—where there are heated debates on to what degree large donations can be made, to what degree corporations can influence elections.

But who gets elected is perhaps the biggest lever on our government. For example, even if your main concern is judicial, and the judicial is the one branch that is most immune from elections, Supreme Court justices are not elected; they are appointed by the president with approval from the Senate. But if you did care who is going to be in the judiciary, well, there would be a strong motivation to influence who is going to be president.

Then, even once they are president, there might be some influence, some lobbying on who they appoint to the judiciary. If a law gets passed by Congress, there's still another outlet: you could petition the executive to veto that law.

So, I'll leave you there. The main takeaway from this is that because of these checks and balances and separation of powers, there are multiple levers of influence in the government, and I've just touched on a few of them. An interesting thing to always think about is how much of our current levers of influence—especially as they exist today in our modern government—how much of this was intended by the founders of our country, the authors of the Constitution, and how much is based on things that we could have never predicted?

They could have never predicted the size of the country. They could have never predicted the influence of mass media. They could have never perhaps predicted the influence of money. Who knows? I will leave you with that question.

More Articles

View All
Progressive Aspect | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello, grammarians! Let’s talk about the progressive aspect. So, we talked about the simple aspect as something that is just the most bare form. It’s what you see here: I walk, I will walk, I walked. But aspect allows us to talk about things that are on…
Carl Jung - How to Find Your Purpose
Your purpose is the reason you are here on Earth. It’s the thing that you were built for. So it’s an incredibly important thing to figure out because it’s the thing that guides you. Without a purpose, you’re lost. You have no North Star. Your life will fe…
Earth's fossil record | Evolution | Middle school biology | Khan Academy
[Instructor] Life on Earth has existed for billions of years. Humans know this, not because we’ve been around the whole time, but instead, thanks to the discovery of fossils, which tell us about organisms that lived in the distant past. Scientists have fo…
When there aren't gains from trade | Basic economics concepts | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
So let’s say we’re in a very simplified world where we have two countries: Country A and Country B. They’re each capable of producing apples or bananas or some combination of them. What this chart tells us is if Country A put all of their energy behind ap…
Discretionary and rulemaking authority of the federal bureaucracy | Khan Academy
In many videos, we have talked about how a bill can become a law. It first gets introduced into the legislative branch, which in the United States is the U.S. Congress at the federal level. If it passes both houses of Congress, then the bill will go to th…
How Do You Make a Skateboard Out of Trash? | Short Film Showcase
My name is Mac Primo. I’m an artist, director, stuff maker. I was contacted by the World Wildlife Fund; it’s here for Earth Hour. They asked 15 artists from around the world to take stuff that already exists, repurpose it, give it a new life. That’s prett…