yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Conclusion for a two-sample t test using a P-value | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A sociologist studying fertility in France and Switzerland wanted to test if there was a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have. The sociologists obtained a random sample of women from each country. Here are the results of their test:

You can see a hundred percent sample from France, 100 sample from Switzerland. They actually don't have to be the same sample size. We have our sample means, our sample standard deviations. You have the standard error of the mean, which for each sample would be our estimate of the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean.

And here it says t-test for the means of these different populations being different. Just to make sure we can make sense of this, let's just remind ourselves what's going on. The null hypothesis is that there's no difference in the mean number of babies that women in France have versus the mean number of babies that women in Switzerland have. That would be our null hypothesis—the no news here hypothesis.

Our alternative would be that they are different, and that's what we have right over here. It's a t-test to see if we have evidence that would suggest our alternative hypothesis. What we do is we assume the null hypothesis. From that, you're able to calculate a t statistic, and then from that t statistic and the degrees of freedom, you are able to calculate a p-value.

If that p-value is below your significance level, then you say, "Hey, this was a pretty unlikely scenario. Let me reject the null hypothesis," which would suggest the alternative. But if your p-value is greater than your significance level, then you would fail to reject your null hypothesis, and so you would not have sufficient evidence to conclude the alternative.

So what's going on over here? You really just have to compare this value to this value. It says, "At the alpha is equal to 0.05 level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have?" Well, we can see that our p-value, 0.13, is greater than our alpha value, 0.05.

Because of that, we fail to reject our null hypothesis. To answer their question, no, there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and suggest the alternative.

More Articles

View All
Best Film on Newton's Third Law. Ever.
There are a lot of misconceptions out there, and this is a video about one of the most common ones. So I went around asking people, “What makes the Moon go around the Earth?” and they told me, “The Earth puts a gravitational force on the moon.” But does …
The 5 personality traits of Self-Made Millionaires
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, let’s face it, there are enough videos already out there showing you how to make a million dollars. Theoretically, if everyone just stuck to the same advice strategically, pretty much you can guarantee you’ll be …
Expression for compound or exponential growth
You put $3,800 in a savings account. The bank will provide 1.8% interest on the money in the account every year. Another way of saying that is that the money in the savings account will grow by 1.8% per year. Write an expression that describes how much m…
Desire Is a Contract You Make to Be Unhappy
Desire is a contract you make with yourself to be unhappy until you get what you want. You start becoming disturbed because you want something, and then you work really hard to get that thing. You’re miserable in the meantime, and then when you get that t…
Countries inside Countries
When it comes to neighbors, most countries have several options: like North to Canada or South to Mexico. But there are countries that don’t have this freedom of choice, not because they’re islands but because they’re trapped in another country. For examp…
A Pitbull Becomes a Service Dog | Cesar Millan: Better Human Better Dog
For the past five years, Johns faced a brain tumor in the fight of his life. His weakened state has caused Goliath to become fixated on protecting him. Today, Goliath faces Caesar’s final challenge, which will determine if he’s balanced enough to be of se…