yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Conclusion for a two-sample t test using a P-value | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A sociologist studying fertility in France and Switzerland wanted to test if there was a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have. The sociologists obtained a random sample of women from each country. Here are the results of their test:

You can see a hundred percent sample from France, 100 sample from Switzerland. They actually don't have to be the same sample size. We have our sample means, our sample standard deviations. You have the standard error of the mean, which for each sample would be our estimate of the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean.

And here it says t-test for the means of these different populations being different. Just to make sure we can make sense of this, let's just remind ourselves what's going on. The null hypothesis is that there's no difference in the mean number of babies that women in France have versus the mean number of babies that women in Switzerland have. That would be our null hypothesis—the no news here hypothesis.

Our alternative would be that they are different, and that's what we have right over here. It's a t-test to see if we have evidence that would suggest our alternative hypothesis. What we do is we assume the null hypothesis. From that, you're able to calculate a t statistic, and then from that t statistic and the degrees of freedom, you are able to calculate a p-value.

If that p-value is below your significance level, then you say, "Hey, this was a pretty unlikely scenario. Let me reject the null hypothesis," which would suggest the alternative. But if your p-value is greater than your significance level, then you would fail to reject your null hypothesis, and so you would not have sufficient evidence to conclude the alternative.

So what's going on over here? You really just have to compare this value to this value. It says, "At the alpha is equal to 0.05 level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have?" Well, we can see that our p-value, 0.13, is greater than our alpha value, 0.05.

Because of that, we fail to reject our null hypothesis. To answer their question, no, there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and suggest the alternative.

More Articles

View All
Rental Income Podcast Interview: How I bought 3 properties by 22 years old
Inspiring interviews with today’s top landlords. This is the Rental Income Podcast. And now, Damle. My guest on the podcast today had incredible timing when he decided to start buying rental properties. He bought three properties at what, looking back on…
Michael Burry just sold all his stocks and the reason why is terrifying
So Michael Burry just did something unthinkable in the world of investing: he sold his entire portfolio of stocks. Every single last one! Now, this action is so unconventional that it deserves your attention. As a professional investor working at an inves…
This is why we can't have nice things
This is a video about things like cars, phones, and light bulbs and an actual conspiracy that made them worse. This video was sponsored by NordVPN, more about them at the end of the video. I am outside Livermore Fire Station, number six. And in here, they…
The Uncertainty Principle | Genius
[bell] Ernst, my good man. Ah. Two tins of the usual, professor? Indeed. And I would like you to meet my good friend, and thorn in my scientific side, Dr. Niels Bohr. Hello. An honor to meet you, sir. Ernst, are you familiar with Heisenberg’s uncertainty…
History and prehistory | The Origin of Humans and Human Societies | World History | Khan Academy
[Instructor] Anatomically modern human beings have been on this planet for roughly 200,000 years. And even though that’s a small fraction of the amount of time the Earth has been around, which is over 4 billion years, on a human scale, it’s an incredibly …
BLOW YOUR MIND!
Hey Vsauce, I’ve got a quick and fun video for you today because I made a mistake. Last week on Episode 10 of ING, I showed a picture and I said, “cat and dogs cooperating.” However, if you look at the picture for more than a second, you can tell that it’…