yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Conclusion for a two-sample t test using a P-value | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A sociologist studying fertility in France and Switzerland wanted to test if there was a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have. The sociologists obtained a random sample of women from each country. Here are the results of their test:

You can see a hundred percent sample from France, 100 sample from Switzerland. They actually don't have to be the same sample size. We have our sample means, our sample standard deviations. You have the standard error of the mean, which for each sample would be our estimate of the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean.

And here it says t-test for the means of these different populations being different. Just to make sure we can make sense of this, let's just remind ourselves what's going on. The null hypothesis is that there's no difference in the mean number of babies that women in France have versus the mean number of babies that women in Switzerland have. That would be our null hypothesis—the no news here hypothesis.

Our alternative would be that they are different, and that's what we have right over here. It's a t-test to see if we have evidence that would suggest our alternative hypothesis. What we do is we assume the null hypothesis. From that, you're able to calculate a t statistic, and then from that t statistic and the degrees of freedom, you are able to calculate a p-value.

If that p-value is below your significance level, then you say, "Hey, this was a pretty unlikely scenario. Let me reject the null hypothesis," which would suggest the alternative. But if your p-value is greater than your significance level, then you would fail to reject your null hypothesis, and so you would not have sufficient evidence to conclude the alternative.

So what's going on over here? You really just have to compare this value to this value. It says, "At the alpha is equal to 0.05 level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have?" Well, we can see that our p-value, 0.13, is greater than our alpha value, 0.05.

Because of that, we fail to reject our null hypothesis. To answer their question, no, there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and suggest the alternative.

More Articles

View All
YC Tech Talks: Machine Learning
[Music] foreign [Music] Welcome to YC Tech Talks Machine Learning. I’m Paige from our work at a startup team, the team that helps people get jobs at YC startups. So for tonight’s event, we have Founders who are going to be talking about interesting proble…
The Problem With Financial Minimalism
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So lately, I’ve noticed a big push towards the concept of financial minimalism. For those of you that are not aware, this is the concept in which you cut out every expense in your life that does not add to your overall e…
Time past between two clock faces
We are asked how much time has passed from the time on the left, so right over here, to the time on the right, which we see right over here. They say that the time passed is less than 12 hours. So like always, pause this video and see if you can answer th…
How winds affect planes!
You can make it to South Africa; however, this is with no wind. So now, this was the winds last week at 35,000 ft. We’re going to put a 50-knot wind, and normally you could see that the winds around the world generally go from west to east. So, even thou…
How Much $ You Need To Live Off Dividends (FOREVER)
What’s up? Grandma’s guys here, so let’s talk about how much you really need invested to live entirely off the dividends. I’ve tried just about every passive income idea that you could think of—from side hustles, real estate, intentions, marketing progra…
Jane Goodall's Inspiration | StarTalk
Back in the 1960s, Jane Goodall, with no formal training in science at the time. I mean, holding aside her four-year-old exploits. The fact is, in the real world, people look, well, what’s your resume? Where did you get your degrees in science? She had no…