yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Conclusion for a two-sample t test using a P-value | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A sociologist studying fertility in France and Switzerland wanted to test if there was a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have. The sociologists obtained a random sample of women from each country. Here are the results of their test:

You can see a hundred percent sample from France, 100 sample from Switzerland. They actually don't have to be the same sample size. We have our sample means, our sample standard deviations. You have the standard error of the mean, which for each sample would be our estimate of the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean.

And here it says t-test for the means of these different populations being different. Just to make sure we can make sense of this, let's just remind ourselves what's going on. The null hypothesis is that there's no difference in the mean number of babies that women in France have versus the mean number of babies that women in Switzerland have. That would be our null hypothesis—the no news here hypothesis.

Our alternative would be that they are different, and that's what we have right over here. It's a t-test to see if we have evidence that would suggest our alternative hypothesis. What we do is we assume the null hypothesis. From that, you're able to calculate a t statistic, and then from that t statistic and the degrees of freedom, you are able to calculate a p-value.

If that p-value is below your significance level, then you say, "Hey, this was a pretty unlikely scenario. Let me reject the null hypothesis," which would suggest the alternative. But if your p-value is greater than your significance level, then you would fail to reject your null hypothesis, and so you would not have sufficient evidence to conclude the alternative.

So what's going on over here? You really just have to compare this value to this value. It says, "At the alpha is equal to 0.05 level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have?" Well, we can see that our p-value, 0.13, is greater than our alpha value, 0.05.

Because of that, we fail to reject our null hypothesis. To answer their question, no, there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and suggest the alternative.

More Articles

View All
Alien Oceans | Explorers in the Field
(peaceful music) When I was a kid looking up at the stars, I really always wondered how did we get here and are we alone? My name is Bethany Ehlmann. I’m a professor of planetary science at Caltech and Research Scientist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Labora…
My morning routine
So I’ve really avoided making a morning routine video, specifically because I feel like there’s just so many of them on YouTube, and I feel like morning routines are generally overrated. You know, everyone’s seen thumbnails on YouTube of like, “The One Mo…
How to be a Pirate Quartermaster. 📈 💎 📈
(Recruit) So how does this work exactly? (Quartermaster) If you’d like to be a pirate, you need to understand it is a business. You can’t have a crew or a ship or a brand without a business model to support them. But pirate business is like any other. Ma…
Rob Riggle Ice Climbing in Iceland | Running Wild With Bear Grylls
BEAR GRYLLS: OK, Rob. Your front points– your crampons are your main weight-bearing things. Good lord. BEAR GRYLLS (VOICEOVER): Comedian Rob Riggle and I are in a race against time, searching to find a case of supplies before nightfall. But first, we’ve …
Top 10 Most Expensive Headphones In The World
Today we’re looking at the top 10 most expensive headphones in the world. Welcome to A Lux Calm, the place where future billionaires come to get inspired! Hey there, Alack Sirs, today is a great day to pump up the volume and listen up because we’re talki…
The Deadliest Thing in the Universe
13.8 billion years; that’s how long the universe has existed. Older than the planets, stars, as old as time itself. The universe is measurably vast. To put it into perspective, if we reduce that time scale down to a single year, the entirety of recorded h…