yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Graphical limit at asymptotic discontinuity


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

All right, we have a graph of ( y ) is equal to ( f(x) ), and we want to figure out what is the limit of ( f(x) ) as ( x ) approaches negative three. If we just look at ( x = -3 ), it's really hard to see, at least based on how this graph looks, what ( f(-3) ) is. If anything, it looks like we have an asymptotic discontinuity here.

It looks like, on the left side of ( x = -3 ), we're approaching, I guess you could say, infinity; and on the right side, it looks like we're approaching infinity as well. We could just look at that and say, "Well, look, what is ( f(-5) )?" Well, it's 4. ( f(-4) ) looks like it's around, I don't know, around 8. ( f(-3) ) is off the charts. If we continued with this trend, and if we were to asymptote towards this line right over here, this vertical asymptote, it looks like as we get closer and closer to negative 3, the value of the function at that point is approaching—it's getting closer and closer to infinity.

At least that's what it looks like from what we can see on this graph as we approach negative 3 from the left-hand side. Let's think about what's happening as we approach negative 3 from the right-hand side. So this is ( f(-1) ), ( f(-2) ), and ( f(-2.5) ) looks like it's up here someplace. ( f(-2.9) ) would be even higher, and ( f(-2.999) ) looks like it would just once again approach infinity.

So this type of limit, in some context, you would say that this limit doesn't exist, doesn't exist in the formal sense. So that's one way to think about it. In some contexts, you will hear people say that this limit, since from the left and from the right, it looks like it's going to infinity. Sometimes you will see people say that it is approaching infinity, and so this is depending on what type of class or context you're in. But in the traditional sense of the limit, or in the technical sense, there are ways that you can define limits where this would make a little bit more sense. However, the traditional definition of a limit would be you would say that this limit does not exist.

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett’s Most Iconic Interview Ever (Long Lost Footage)
Being a sound investor really just requires a certain control of your temperament and the ability to know what you know and know what you don’t know, and occasionally [Music] act. The greatest investor of our time, but you’ll find him in Omaha, Nebraska. …
Opening a bank account | Banking | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
So let’s think about what’s involved when you decide to open up a bank account. Well, the first step is where you want to open it and what type of account you want to open. So your choice of bank might depend on things like the interest that they might g…
Connecting f, f', and f'' graphically | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We have the graphs of three functions here, and what we know is that one of them is the function f, another is the first derivative of f, and then the third is the second derivative of f. Our goal is to figure out which function is which— which one is f, …
The Many Gods of the Hindu Faith | The Story of God
To Hindus, there’s not one God; there are millions. Busy little thare in the holy city of Varanasi, I’m meeting historian Benda Paranjape to find out how Hindus see their gods. At every corner of the lane, you see a shrine. No corner can leave without hav…
Shelter From a Snowstorm | Primal Survivor
MAN (VOICEOVER): But even here, there’s no escape from the storm. I have to get out of this freezing wind. Best I can do is just find a quick shelter behind the wind shadow of these trees. [wind howling] I dig down through the snow at the base of a spru…
Warren Buffett Shares His 2,600 Year Old Investment Advice
First investment primer that I know of, and it was pretty good advice, was delivered in about 600 BC by Aesop. And Aesop, you’ll remember, said a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Incidentally, Aesop did not know it was 600 BC; he was smart, but …