yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using the reaction quotient to predict a pressure change | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A one liter reaction vessel contains 1.2 moles of carbon monoxide, 1.5 moles of hydrogen gas, and 2.0 moles of methanol gas. How will the total pressure change as the system approaches equilibrium at constant temperature?

So, our carbon monoxide is reacting with our hydrogen in a one to two ratio to give us methanol, and this reaction is reversible. We also know the equilibrium constant for this reaction is 14.5 at some temperature, and we know that the temperature is staying constant.

So, we are going to break this problem up into two parts. In part one, we're going to try to figure out, using the reaction quotient, whether our system is at equilibrium or not.

For this reaction, our reaction quotient ( Q ) is the product concentration ( [CH_3OH] ) or methanol, divided by the concentration of our hydrogen gas squared, because of that stoichiometric coefficient. In the denominator, we have our carbon monoxide concentration.

We can calculate ( Q ) by plugging in the concentrations of these at this particular moment in time, and we can calculate the concentrations using the volume of the vessel, which is 1 liter, and the mole quantities. We know that concentration is just moles divided by volume. Since we're dividing everything by one, the initial concentrations will be the same as the number of moles.

So, if you write that out for carbon monoxide, the initial concentration is 1.2 M; for hydrogen, it's 1.5 M; and for methanol, it is 2.0 M.

Now we can plug these concentrations into our expression for ( Q ), and then we get in our numerator 2.0, and our denominator is ( (1.5^2) \times 1.2 ). If we plug this all into our calculators, what I got is that our ( Q ) for this particular moment in time, with these concentrations, is 0.74.

So, this tells us, first of all, we know that ( Q ) is not equal to ( K_c ). So that means we are not at equilibrium, not at equilibrium, which means that our pressures are indeed going to change because the system is going to try to reach equilibrium.

The second thing we can do using the reaction quotient is figure out how the concentrations will change. Now that we know our reaction quotient ( Q_c ) is less than ( K ), we can visualize this on a number line.

If we look at all possible values of ( Q ), we know that when ( Q ) is zero, we have all reactants; when ( Q ) is infinitely large, we have all products, and then we have all of the possible values in between. What we're really worried about here is just looking at the relative value of ( Q ) and ( K ) and seeing how the reaction concentrations are going to shift.

So, ( Q ) we can put on a number line is somewhere around here, and ( K ) is 14.5, so we'll say it's somewhere around here. This is our ( Q ), and this is our ( K ). We can see that ( Q ) is less than ( K ) on our number line, and so what's going to happen is, in order to reach equilibrium, our concentrations are going to shift to the right to get ( Q ) closer to ( K ).

This means what's going to happen is the reaction is going to shift to favor making more products. So, if we look back at the balanced reaction, what's going to happen here is it's going to shift to favor the products.

So, I'm making that top arrow a little bit more bold, and to tie this into what the problem wants to know, we can figure out how the shift to make more products will affect the total pressure.

Total pressure for a system that has a bunch of gas molecules in it—we know that total pressure is related to the moles, the moles of gas in the system. So since we're shifting to favor the reactants, and on the reactant side we are making one mole of gas and we're starting with three moles of reactant gas, we're favoring the side that has fewer gas molecules.

So that means as we shift to favor the products, we're going to reduce the number of gas molecules in the system, and that's going to reduce our ( P_{total} ).

So, the answer is that ( P_{total} ) is going to decrease as our reaction approaches equilibrium, and that is because our reaction quotient ( Q ) is less than ( K ).

More Articles

View All
Mohnish Pabrai SELLS his Alibaba Stock!
All right team, in this video we are talking about Monash Proprietor’s most recent 13F filings. So this gives us an update to what he was doing with his US listed stocks in the third quarter, of which he owns three: Micron’s, Heritage, and Alibaba. And le…
How to Conserve Water | National Geographic
Today, I’m in Colorado, a state that can see more snow than Alaska. Standing here in the banks of this frozen reservoir, it’s easy to understand why water seems like a limitless resource. But the fact is, in the United States, we could face a national wat…
Lewis diagrams | Atoms, isotopes, and ions | High school chemistry | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to introduce ourselves to a new way of visualizing atoms. As you can imagine from the title here, that’s going to be Lewis diagrams. But before I even get into that, let’s do a little bit of review of what we already know about …
How Long Will You Live?
10,000 years ago, the average human life lasted just over 30 years, and then a hundred years ago that number was up to 50. If you were born in the last few decades in the developed world, then your life expectancy is 80 years. But that is, of course, assu…
Why Moths are Obsessed with Lamps | National Geographic
The story of the lamp in the moth is one of fatal attraction. The theory is that these primarily nocturnal insects have evolved to travel by the light of the moon and the stars. This way of travel is called transverse orientation. An easy way to think abo…
9 CRUCIAL MOMENTS TO ADOPT SILENCE LOCK YOUR MOUTH | STOICISM INSIGHTS
Imagine a world where your silence can speak louder than words, where your calm can overpower the chaos around you. Today we’re diving deep into the art of silence, a concept so powerful yet so underrated in our noisy, hectic world. I want you to think ab…