yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using the reaction quotient to predict a pressure change | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A one liter reaction vessel contains 1.2 moles of carbon monoxide, 1.5 moles of hydrogen gas, and 2.0 moles of methanol gas. How will the total pressure change as the system approaches equilibrium at constant temperature?

So, our carbon monoxide is reacting with our hydrogen in a one to two ratio to give us methanol, and this reaction is reversible. We also know the equilibrium constant for this reaction is 14.5 at some temperature, and we know that the temperature is staying constant.

So, we are going to break this problem up into two parts. In part one, we're going to try to figure out, using the reaction quotient, whether our system is at equilibrium or not.

For this reaction, our reaction quotient ( Q ) is the product concentration ( [CH_3OH] ) or methanol, divided by the concentration of our hydrogen gas squared, because of that stoichiometric coefficient. In the denominator, we have our carbon monoxide concentration.

We can calculate ( Q ) by plugging in the concentrations of these at this particular moment in time, and we can calculate the concentrations using the volume of the vessel, which is 1 liter, and the mole quantities. We know that concentration is just moles divided by volume. Since we're dividing everything by one, the initial concentrations will be the same as the number of moles.

So, if you write that out for carbon monoxide, the initial concentration is 1.2 M; for hydrogen, it's 1.5 M; and for methanol, it is 2.0 M.

Now we can plug these concentrations into our expression for ( Q ), and then we get in our numerator 2.0, and our denominator is ( (1.5^2) \times 1.2 ). If we plug this all into our calculators, what I got is that our ( Q ) for this particular moment in time, with these concentrations, is 0.74.

So, this tells us, first of all, we know that ( Q ) is not equal to ( K_c ). So that means we are not at equilibrium, not at equilibrium, which means that our pressures are indeed going to change because the system is going to try to reach equilibrium.

The second thing we can do using the reaction quotient is figure out how the concentrations will change. Now that we know our reaction quotient ( Q_c ) is less than ( K ), we can visualize this on a number line.

If we look at all possible values of ( Q ), we know that when ( Q ) is zero, we have all reactants; when ( Q ) is infinitely large, we have all products, and then we have all of the possible values in between. What we're really worried about here is just looking at the relative value of ( Q ) and ( K ) and seeing how the reaction concentrations are going to shift.

So, ( Q ) we can put on a number line is somewhere around here, and ( K ) is 14.5, so we'll say it's somewhere around here. This is our ( Q ), and this is our ( K ). We can see that ( Q ) is less than ( K ) on our number line, and so what's going to happen is, in order to reach equilibrium, our concentrations are going to shift to the right to get ( Q ) closer to ( K ).

This means what's going to happen is the reaction is going to shift to favor making more products. So, if we look back at the balanced reaction, what's going to happen here is it's going to shift to favor the products.

So, I'm making that top arrow a little bit more bold, and to tie this into what the problem wants to know, we can figure out how the shift to make more products will affect the total pressure.

Total pressure for a system that has a bunch of gas molecules in it—we know that total pressure is related to the moles, the moles of gas in the system. So since we're shifting to favor the reactants, and on the reactant side we are making one mole of gas and we're starting with three moles of reactant gas, we're favoring the side that has fewer gas molecules.

So that means as we shift to favor the products, we're going to reduce the number of gas molecules in the system, and that's going to reduce our ( P_{total} ).

So, the answer is that ( P_{total} ) is going to decrease as our reaction approaches equilibrium, and that is because our reaction quotient ( Q ) is less than ( K ).

More Articles

View All
Zeros of polynomials (with factoring): common factor | Polynomial graphs | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
So we’re given a p of x; it’s a third degree polynomial, and they say plot all the zeros or the x-intercepts of the polynomial in the interactive graph. The reason why they say interactive graph, this is a screenshot from the exercise on Khan Academy, whe…
15 Expensive Things That Are Worth The Money
Remember the banana duct tape to a wall that sold for 120,000? Yeah, okay, not everything that’s expensive is worth the money, but some things are. When you finally get rich, you’ll want to know where you should focus your spending. So here are 15 expensi…
Why New Years Resolutions Fail & How To Succeed
Most New Year’s resolutions fail. So in this video, I want to talk about the science of why they fail and how to avoid that so your New Year’s resolutions actually succeed. I want to tell you about three of my New Year’s resolutions for 2020. The first o…
The reason why you can't focus: How to fix your concentration scientifically
Are you constantly feeling overwhelmed, unable to focus on work or studying, and finding yourself getting lost in the world of social media? But what if I told you that the key to improving your focus could be right in front of you — your room? In this …
Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage | World History | Khan Academy
As we enter into the 3rd century BCE, we see the Roman Republic, which was founded in 509 BCE, has now exerted control over most of the Italian Peninsula. But it’s not the only power in the Mediterranean. We have the remnants of Alexander the Great’s empi…
Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person
I’ve been asked to talk to you today about an essay that I wrote, uh, for the New York Times, um, last year, which went under a rather dramatic, uh, heading. Uh, it was called “Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person.” And perhaps we can just begin, um, we’re…