yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Using the reaction quotient to predict a pressure change | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A one liter reaction vessel contains 1.2 moles of carbon monoxide, 1.5 moles of hydrogen gas, and 2.0 moles of methanol gas. How will the total pressure change as the system approaches equilibrium at constant temperature?

So, our carbon monoxide is reacting with our hydrogen in a one to two ratio to give us methanol, and this reaction is reversible. We also know the equilibrium constant for this reaction is 14.5 at some temperature, and we know that the temperature is staying constant.

So, we are going to break this problem up into two parts. In part one, we're going to try to figure out, using the reaction quotient, whether our system is at equilibrium or not.

For this reaction, our reaction quotient ( Q ) is the product concentration ( [CH_3OH] ) or methanol, divided by the concentration of our hydrogen gas squared, because of that stoichiometric coefficient. In the denominator, we have our carbon monoxide concentration.

We can calculate ( Q ) by plugging in the concentrations of these at this particular moment in time, and we can calculate the concentrations using the volume of the vessel, which is 1 liter, and the mole quantities. We know that concentration is just moles divided by volume. Since we're dividing everything by one, the initial concentrations will be the same as the number of moles.

So, if you write that out for carbon monoxide, the initial concentration is 1.2 M; for hydrogen, it's 1.5 M; and for methanol, it is 2.0 M.

Now we can plug these concentrations into our expression for ( Q ), and then we get in our numerator 2.0, and our denominator is ( (1.5^2) \times 1.2 ). If we plug this all into our calculators, what I got is that our ( Q ) for this particular moment in time, with these concentrations, is 0.74.

So, this tells us, first of all, we know that ( Q ) is not equal to ( K_c ). So that means we are not at equilibrium, not at equilibrium, which means that our pressures are indeed going to change because the system is going to try to reach equilibrium.

The second thing we can do using the reaction quotient is figure out how the concentrations will change. Now that we know our reaction quotient ( Q_c ) is less than ( K ), we can visualize this on a number line.

If we look at all possible values of ( Q ), we know that when ( Q ) is zero, we have all reactants; when ( Q ) is infinitely large, we have all products, and then we have all of the possible values in between. What we're really worried about here is just looking at the relative value of ( Q ) and ( K ) and seeing how the reaction concentrations are going to shift.

So, ( Q ) we can put on a number line is somewhere around here, and ( K ) is 14.5, so we'll say it's somewhere around here. This is our ( Q ), and this is our ( K ). We can see that ( Q ) is less than ( K ) on our number line, and so what's going to happen is, in order to reach equilibrium, our concentrations are going to shift to the right to get ( Q ) closer to ( K ).

This means what's going to happen is the reaction is going to shift to favor making more products. So, if we look back at the balanced reaction, what's going to happen here is it's going to shift to favor the products.

So, I'm making that top arrow a little bit more bold, and to tie this into what the problem wants to know, we can figure out how the shift to make more products will affect the total pressure.

Total pressure for a system that has a bunch of gas molecules in it—we know that total pressure is related to the moles, the moles of gas in the system. So since we're shifting to favor the reactants, and on the reactant side we are making one mole of gas and we're starting with three moles of reactant gas, we're favoring the side that has fewer gas molecules.

So that means as we shift to favor the products, we're going to reduce the number of gas molecules in the system, and that's going to reduce our ( P_{total} ).

So, the answer is that ( P_{total} ) is going to decrease as our reaction approaches equilibrium, and that is because our reaction quotient ( Q ) is less than ( K ).

More Articles

View All
The More You Want, the Worse It Gets | The Seven Deadly Sins | GREED
How do you catch a monkey? There’s a simple and effective way to do it without hurting the animal. Once there was a farmer who cut a hole in a coconut, which was just big enough for the monkey to slide in his hand. He tied the coconut to a tree and put a …
One Step at a Time | Life Below Zero
Long walk on a cold day. Thing I’ve learned about injuries is listen to your body. If your body’s hurting, it’s trying to tell you something. In this case right here, this leg’s trying to tell me not to use it. Just got to take it easy, take it one step …
See the Ancient Whale Skull Recovered From a Virginia Swamp | National Geographic
When I first went to the site in the bottom of the river, you see these whale bones and shark teeth just poking out. The river’s raging; it’s like holding on to a car going 65 miles an hour down the highway. Everything east of the Route 95 on the east sid…
When to use multiplication
We are told there are 10 students in the poetry club this week. Each student wrote two poems. What does the expression 10 times 2 represent? They give us some choices. Pause this video and see if you can work that out. All right, so there are 10 students…
ROBINHOOD STRIKES BACK - THEIR RESPONSE!
Well, ladies and gentlemen, it happened. Amid all the controversy surrounding the recent $0 trade announcement started by the internet bully Charles Schwab, Robin Hood just seemed like it was destined for loss with no competitive advantage whatsoever. Tha…
ChatGPT Asked: What is the Most Important Principle for Investing
I was asked a question from chat GPT. Interesting, so I’ll tell you. Although I suspect you probably can get an equally good answer from chat GPT, the most important principle is about what I call the Holy Grail of investing. And that’s about diversifica…