yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

What we know for certain about the universe—and what we don't | Michelle Thaller | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Evie, you ask a wonderful question: how many galaxies are there? And this is something that we actually don’t know the answer to, but I can tell you a wonderful story about what we do know. So let me first talk about what a galaxy is.

And a galaxy is a family of stars, but usually in the hundreds of billions of stars. We live in a galaxy called the Milky Way, and there are about 500 billion stars, we think, in the Milky Way Galaxy. Galaxies are absolutely huge. The Milky Way Galaxy is about 100,000 light-years across, and that’s not really a number I can get my mind around, seeing as one light-year is about six trillion miles, so our single galaxy is 100,000-times-six-trillion miles across. It’s absolutely huge.

The best analogy I know is that if you think about the sun—the sun is a giant thing, the sun is so big you can fit a million Earths inside it. It’s really, really big. And if we made the sun the size of a dot of an “i,” so pretend that the sun is only the size of—like take a regular page of a book, look at the dot of an “i,” if the sun were that big, how big would our one Milky Way Galaxy be? It would be about the size of the earth. So that’s how big a single galaxy is. If the sun were the dot of an “i,” the Milky Way Galaxy would be roughly the size of our planet.

Now how many galaxies do we know of? And this is a wonderful result from the Hubble Space Telescope. The Hubble Space Telescope decided to try to answer that question, and what it did is it looked at an area of the sky that, as far as we knew, was blank; it was just black; we couldn’t see many stars there, we didn’t see any galaxies there, and it decided to take a very, very deep distant look at the universe.

Now, the way the Hubble Space Telescope (and any camera) works is it works kind of like a “light bucket.” You can actually open up the eyes of the telescope and tell it to just keep staring, and the longer it stares the fainter and more distant objects you can see. For those of you that like photography, it’s called doing a time exposure. You leave your camera open for a certain amount of time and you can see fainter and fainter things.

Well, incredibly, the Hubble Space Telescope kept its eyes open on this one little part in the sky for more than a month, and it just let any light come and build up this beautiful image, and what we discovered is that in this empty part of the sky—empty we say!—we counted over 5000 galaxies. Five thousand galaxies we didn’t even know were there. They were just so faint we’d never seen them before.

When we finally had a sensitive enough telescope up in space and we were able to keep it staring at a tiny little part of the sky for a month, 5000 galaxies turned out to be hiding there that we’d never seen. So, how much of the sky was this tiny little part that the Hubble Space Telescope looked at?

So let’s go back to the dot of an “i.” So think about the dot of an “i” in a book, and now hold that book at arm’s length. It’s a tiny little point; you can almost barely see the dot of an “i” held at arm’s length. That’s how much of the sky the Hubble Space Telescope counted 5000 galaxies in.

And if you do the statistics, if you take that little dot in the sky, and by the way we’ve done this, we’ve taken other deep images in different regions of the sky, and we get about the same count of galaxies anywhere we look. If you do the math, tiny little dot all over the sky, 5000 galaxies in each dot, there are actually several trillion galaxies that we can see with the Hubble Space Telescope if we had the time to observe the entire sky.

So we know that there are several trillion galaxies that the Hubble Space Telescope can see, but is that really the number? Is that how many galaxies there really are? The universe we think is far larger than we’re able to see right now.

So we’re actually building telescopes that are so powerful—the James Webb Space Telescope we hope will launch in the year 2020, and that will be so powerful it will be able to see every...

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett: How to Invest for 2023
So 2022 was a rough year for investors, and people are worried about what’s ahead. That’s not a secret. The US stock market has been down over 20 percent, and this only tells part of the story. There are many stocks that were formerly high flyers that are…
The Physics of Slingshots, with Jörg - Smarter Every Day 31
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome to Smarter Every Day. Today we— (Jörg) Nope. [Chuckles] Welcome to the Slingshot Channel. Laughs As you can see, today I’ve been taken over by Germans. We’re going to look at slingshots today. The physics of slingshots. So wh…
Khan Academy India Talent Search 2017
Hi, I’m Sal Khan, founder of the Khan Academy, and I just want to let you know about our India talent search. As you might know, Khan Academy, we’re a not-for-profit with a mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. To us, t…
Employment unit overview | Teacher resources | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
Hi teachers, Welcome to the unit on employment. So, what’s covered here? Well, I think many of us, I don’t know if you fall into this category, but I remember the first time that I had a job, and they made me fill out all of these forms when I took that …
Pick Partners With Intelligence, Energy and Integrity
In terms of picking people to work with, I have high intelligence, high energy, and high integrity. I find that’s the three-part checklist that you cannot compromise on. You need someone who’s smart or they’re heading in the wrong direction, and you’re no…
Transforming exponential graphs | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told the graph of y = 2^x is shown below. All right, which of the following is the graph of y = 2^(-x) - 5? So there’s two changes here: instead of 2^x, we have 2^(-x) and then we’re not leaving that alone; we then subtract five. So let’s take them…