yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How To Change The World? Get The Small Things Right – Dalton Caldwell and Michael Seibel


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Let's say that changing the world is like uprooting a tree, like a big old tall tree. Imagine there were two founders. One founder knew that trees have roots, and the other founder had no idea. Right? Like the trees with roots person, they have an advantage. They have a very large advantage. The tree without roots person, they're gonna have a lot of very horrible, uh, how do I freeze this? On the job learning.

So yeah, it's not moving. Like we don't get it. Like we’re pushing it, and it won't fall over. Yeah, we've done all the math. Like if the tree ends right where the ground begins, like pushing like this, it should work.

Hey, this is Michael Cybel with Dalton Caldwell, and welcome to Rookie Mistakes. We asked YC founders for their rookie mistakes so we could share them with you and help you avoid them.

Here's the next comment that was written by a YC founder: "We built a product because we thought the world should be a certain way, not because we had a customer who actually wanted to buy the thing we were building." This is coming from a pure place, and we look at our heroes, right? We look at Elon Musk. We look at Steve Jobs, and we have this model of people that forced the universe to their will.

And Elon, electric cars of the future! I am going to impart electric cars. I'm going to make it happen. And again, he kind of did. Good for him, right? But for most of us mere mortals, it's pretty hard to force people to want the thing that you're selling or the thing that you think is good for them.

It's really hard. If someone doesn't want something, to like debate them and convince them they do actually want it when they don't actually want it. Most people don't have organic experience with sales, and so they kind of, their vision is like, "Oh, I walked onto a used car lot to look around, and this genius salesforce person convinced me to buy this car." And it's like, that's not even how it works in real life. You didn't just randomly walk on the used car lot. Nobody who doesn't want to touch that.

You made a great point. Do you know what? You know what kind of idea we always come up with is, guess what? Buying a car sucks, and dealing with car salesmen sucks. Buying a house sucks! Let's just like build a website and we'll get rid of car dealers. So this is an example of that. It's like you kind of run into something that's annoying, and you're like, "Yeah, let's just get rid of that." And again, I'm with you. Let's get rid of that! You know, I don't like buying a car either.

But I think what happens when you, again, haven't done the research, yeah, is you were like, "Oh, actually, there's a reason car dealers exist." And oh, and actually, there's incentives for these, you know. This is like, like the more you dig into that, you realize that you can't just wave a magic wand and make car dealers go away. You can't just sprinkle software on the property.

Yeah, or like realtors. Like buying a house: why is it so hard to buy a house? Well, you know, yeah, I don't even know how to summarize that, but like a lot of founders want to believe they can just like start a company and revolutionize the home sales process, right?

So I feel where it's coming from, but in practice, the simplistic engineering efficiency arguments don't always work when applied to the real world.

Yeah, I mean, you know about this from hiring, right? Like, haven't you seen this with hiring? I see this all the time. I see the hiring startup applies to YC, and the thesis is always the same: I'm an engineer, I'm a genius engineer, and I'm being assessed by a non-technical recruiter. This is a crime! Like this is a crime against humanity.

Like it's, um, dehumanizing that I have to go through this experience, and if only the hiring manager was empowered with software, the entire recruiting team and all recruiters would just go away, disappear off the face of the earth through the hiring manager and software.

And what's weird is that, like, I kind of believe the premise; like I believe an engineer is better at determining whether another engineer is good or bad. However, I also look at the way the world is organized, and I ask myself, well if...

More Articles

View All
Crossing a Snow Packed River | Primal Survivor
The big danger here is I could fall through, and depending on how deep it is, if it’s deep, that river could suck me under the ice. So, I’ve got to come up with a plan. This is where a little bit of, uh, mountaineering strategy comes in. Get my snow shov…
Drawing particulate models of reaction mixtures | Chemical reactions | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
In a previous video, we used a particulate model like this to understand a reaction—not just understand the reaction, but to balance the chemical reaction as well. When I hand drew these particles, the atoms in this particulate model here, I tried to draw…
Cynthia Nixon on Playing Nancy Reagan | Killing Reagan
Nancy Reagan is a fiercely devoted champion lover guard dog of her husband. She’s a political person, not so much in that she’s an issues person, but that she feels the temperature in the room. She can feel who’s on her side and who’s on her husband’s sid…
A day in my life.
This is a day in the life of a private jet broker. I get into the office at six a.m., three hours before my team. I like getting in early to catch up on work and establish my plan of action for the rest of the day. I then call my clients in Asia, do email…
My Response To MeetKevin | The Full Story
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So I need to make a video about this because there’s a lot you need to hear. A little over three years ago, this guy reached out to me over email and said we had a lot in common. He told me that he had been watching …
Introduction to average rate of change | Functions | Algebra I | Khan Academy
So we have different definitions for d of t on the left and the right, and let’s say that d is distance and t is time. So this is giving us our distance as a function of time. On the left, it’s equal to 3t plus one, and you can see the graph of how distan…