yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Discontinuities of rational functions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So we have this function ( f(x) ) expressed as a rational expression here, or defined with a rational expression. We're told that each of the following values of ( x ) selects whether ( f ) has a zero, a vertical asymptote, or a removable discontinuity.

Before even looking at the choices, what I'm going to do—because you're not always going to have these choices here, sometimes you might just have to identify the vertical asymptotes, or the zeros, or the removable discontinuities—is I'm going to factor this out. Hopefully, I’m going to factor the numerator and the denominator to make things a little bit more clear.

We're going to think about what ( x ) values make the numerator and/or the denominator equal to 0. So, the numerator... can I factor that? Well, let's see. What two numbers, their product is negative 24 and they add to negative 2?

Let’s see, that would be negative 6 and positive 4. So we could write ( (x - 6)(x + 4) ). Did I do that right? Negative 6 times 4 is negative 24, and negative 6x plus 4x is negative 2x, yep, that's right.

All right, now, in the denominator, let’s see. ( 6 \times 4 = 24 ) and ( 6 + 4 = 10 ). So we could say ( 6(x + 4) ).

Let’s look at the numerator first: the numerator ( 0 ) if ( x = 6 ) or ( x = -4 ). The denominator ( 0 ) if ( x = -6 ) or ( x = -4 ).

So let’s think about it: can we simplify what we have up here a little bit? I mean, it might just be jumping out at you. You have ( (x + 4) ) divided by ( (x) ). Why can't we simplify this expression a little bit and just write this whole thing... write our original expression as being ( \frac{x - 6}{x + 6} ), where if we want to be algebraically equivalent, we have to constrain the domain where ( x ) cannot be equal to -4.

This is interesting because before, when ( x = -4 ), we had all this weird ( \frac{0}{0} ) stuff, but we were able to remove it, and we were able to make it just kind of this extra condition. If you were to graph it, it would show up as a little bit of a removable discontinuity, a little bit of a point discontinuity. It's just one point where the function is actually not defined.

So, in this situation—and this is typical—where there's a thing that you can factor out that was making the numerator and the denominator equal to 0, but you can factor that out, so it no longer does it. That's going to be a removable discontinuity. So, ( x = -4 ) is a removable discontinuity.

Once you've factored out all the things that would make it a removable discontinuity, then you can think about what's going to be a zero and what's going to be a vertical asymptote. If you've factored out everything that's common to the numerator and the denominator, if what's left makes the numerator equal to zero, well then it's going to make this whole expression equal to zero, and so you're dealing with a ( 0 ).

At ( x = 6 ), 6 would make the numerator equal to 0. ( 6 - 6 = 0 ). So there you’re dealing with a ( 0 ). To make the denominator equal to zero, you get ( x = -6 ); that would make the denominator equal zero. So that's a vertical asymptote.

It's called a vertical asymptote because as you approach this value, approaching negative six either from values smaller than negative six or larger than negative six, the denominator is going to become a very small positive number or a very small negative number. It's going to approach zero either from above or below, and so when you divide by that, you're going to get very large positive values or very large negative values.

So your graph does stuff like that. You have a vertical asymptote. It might either do something like that, or it might do something like this.

Let's do another one. All right, so same drill. Like before, always pause the video and see if you can work it out on your own.

Let me factor it. So let’s see, two numbers—the product is negative 32—they're going to have to have different signs: 8 and 4. Since they have to add up to positive 4, we want the larger one to be positive. So ( (x + 8)(x - 4) ), yep, I think that's right.

Then divided by this... ( 4 \times 4 = 16 ) and ( -4 + -4 = -8 ). So this is ( (x - 4)(x - 4) ).

Now this is really, really interesting because you might say, “Oh, I have ( (x - 4)(x - 4) ). Maybe ( x = 4 ) is a removable discontinuity.” It would have been unless you had... if you didn’t have this over here, because ( x = 4 ), even after you factor this, is still going to make the function not defined.

So this function is actually equivalent to ( \frac{x + 8}{x - 4} ). I don't have to put that extra little constraint like I did before. I don’t have to put this little constraint that describes this removable discontinuity because that constraint is still there after I've factored out, after I've canceled out this ( (x - 4) ) with this ( (x - 4) ).

And so here, we have... this is actually an algebraically equivalent expression to this one right over here. Now we can think about what the zeros, the vertical asymptotes, or the removable discontinuities are going to be.

Well, something that makes the numerator zero without doing it to the denominator is going to be a zero. ( x = -8 ) makes the numerator equal to zero without making the denominator equal to zero; it would make the denominator equal to negative 12.

So, you can literally just evaluate ( h(-8) ) and it would equal ( \frac{0}{-12} ), which is equal to 0.

So that's why we call it a ( 0 ). What about ( x = 4 )? Well, ( x = 4 ) is going to make the denominator only equal to 0. So that's going to give us a vertical asymptote.

And we're all done.

More Articles

View All
Subtracting rational expressions: factored denominators | High School Math | Khan Academy
Pause this video and see if you can subtract this magenta rational expression from this yellow one. All right, now let’s do this together. The first thing that jumps out at you is that you realize that these don’t have the same denominator, and you would …
Human population dynamics| Human populations| AP Environmental Science| Khan Academy
What we have here is a really interesting visual that shows world population growth from 1750 all the way to 2100. Obviously, this isn’t 2100 yet, so it’s doing some projecting for roughly the next 80 years. It also shows the absolute world population ove…
Visual introduction to parabolas
In this video, we are going to talk about one of the most common types of curves you will see in mathematics, and that is the parabola. The word “parabola” sounds quite fancy, but we’ll see it’s describing something that is fairly straightforward. Now, i…
Gilded Age versus Silicon Valley | GDP: Measuring national income | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
Let’s give ourselves a little bit more food for thought on this labor versus capital question. So, like we’ve mentioned many, many, many times, in order to produce anything, you need a little bit of both. Or you maybe need a lot of both. You need labor, a…
Why I’m Selling My Stocks
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here, and the time has come for me to sell. This is after we’ve seen one of the strongest stock market recoveries in recent history. The S&P 500, the Nasdaq, and the Dow are all trading near their all-time high. But no…
Mitigation and Adaptation: Human Stories of Hope | Explorers In The Field
(soothing guitar music) Climate change is a human story. The causes of climate change are man-made, and the solutions must be man-made. How much of the landscape— In order to reduce climate change, in order to adapt to these changes and to mitigate our i…