yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Discontinuities of rational functions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So we have this function ( f(x) ) expressed as a rational expression here, or defined with a rational expression. We're told that each of the following values of ( x ) selects whether ( f ) has a zero, a vertical asymptote, or a removable discontinuity.

Before even looking at the choices, what I'm going to do—because you're not always going to have these choices here, sometimes you might just have to identify the vertical asymptotes, or the zeros, or the removable discontinuities—is I'm going to factor this out. Hopefully, I’m going to factor the numerator and the denominator to make things a little bit more clear.

We're going to think about what ( x ) values make the numerator and/or the denominator equal to 0. So, the numerator... can I factor that? Well, let's see. What two numbers, their product is negative 24 and they add to negative 2?

Let’s see, that would be negative 6 and positive 4. So we could write ( (x - 6)(x + 4) ). Did I do that right? Negative 6 times 4 is negative 24, and negative 6x plus 4x is negative 2x, yep, that's right.

All right, now, in the denominator, let’s see. ( 6 \times 4 = 24 ) and ( 6 + 4 = 10 ). So we could say ( 6(x + 4) ).

Let’s look at the numerator first: the numerator ( 0 ) if ( x = 6 ) or ( x = -4 ). The denominator ( 0 ) if ( x = -6 ) or ( x = -4 ).

So let’s think about it: can we simplify what we have up here a little bit? I mean, it might just be jumping out at you. You have ( (x + 4) ) divided by ( (x) ). Why can't we simplify this expression a little bit and just write this whole thing... write our original expression as being ( \frac{x - 6}{x + 6} ), where if we want to be algebraically equivalent, we have to constrain the domain where ( x ) cannot be equal to -4.

This is interesting because before, when ( x = -4 ), we had all this weird ( \frac{0}{0} ) stuff, but we were able to remove it, and we were able to make it just kind of this extra condition. If you were to graph it, it would show up as a little bit of a removable discontinuity, a little bit of a point discontinuity. It's just one point where the function is actually not defined.

So, in this situation—and this is typical—where there's a thing that you can factor out that was making the numerator and the denominator equal to 0, but you can factor that out, so it no longer does it. That's going to be a removable discontinuity. So, ( x = -4 ) is a removable discontinuity.

Once you've factored out all the things that would make it a removable discontinuity, then you can think about what's going to be a zero and what's going to be a vertical asymptote. If you've factored out everything that's common to the numerator and the denominator, if what's left makes the numerator equal to zero, well then it's going to make this whole expression equal to zero, and so you're dealing with a ( 0 ).

At ( x = 6 ), 6 would make the numerator equal to 0. ( 6 - 6 = 0 ). So there you’re dealing with a ( 0 ). To make the denominator equal to zero, you get ( x = -6 ); that would make the denominator equal zero. So that's a vertical asymptote.

It's called a vertical asymptote because as you approach this value, approaching negative six either from values smaller than negative six or larger than negative six, the denominator is going to become a very small positive number or a very small negative number. It's going to approach zero either from above or below, and so when you divide by that, you're going to get very large positive values or very large negative values.

So your graph does stuff like that. You have a vertical asymptote. It might either do something like that, or it might do something like this.

Let's do another one. All right, so same drill. Like before, always pause the video and see if you can work it out on your own.

Let me factor it. So let’s see, two numbers—the product is negative 32—they're going to have to have different signs: 8 and 4. Since they have to add up to positive 4, we want the larger one to be positive. So ( (x + 8)(x - 4) ), yep, I think that's right.

Then divided by this... ( 4 \times 4 = 16 ) and ( -4 + -4 = -8 ). So this is ( (x - 4)(x - 4) ).

Now this is really, really interesting because you might say, “Oh, I have ( (x - 4)(x - 4) ). Maybe ( x = 4 ) is a removable discontinuity.” It would have been unless you had... if you didn’t have this over here, because ( x = 4 ), even after you factor this, is still going to make the function not defined.

So this function is actually equivalent to ( \frac{x + 8}{x - 4} ). I don't have to put that extra little constraint like I did before. I don’t have to put this little constraint that describes this removable discontinuity because that constraint is still there after I've factored out, after I've canceled out this ( (x - 4) ) with this ( (x - 4) ).

And so here, we have... this is actually an algebraically equivalent expression to this one right over here. Now we can think about what the zeros, the vertical asymptotes, or the removable discontinuities are going to be.

Well, something that makes the numerator zero without doing it to the denominator is going to be a zero. ( x = -8 ) makes the numerator equal to zero without making the denominator equal to zero; it would make the denominator equal to negative 12.

So, you can literally just evaluate ( h(-8) ) and it would equal ( \frac{0}{-12} ), which is equal to 0.

So that's why we call it a ( 0 ). What about ( x = 4 )? Well, ( x = 4 ) is going to make the denominator only equal to 0. So that's going to give us a vertical asymptote.

And we're all done.

More Articles

View All
HE'S FOLLOWING YOU! -- DONG!
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here, and if you need more DONG, don’t worry, because I’m bringing you more things you could do online now, guys. “JaydenMarkAnderson” recommended Clubcreate, where you can make your own remixes right inside your browser. As we liste…
How to Become Undefeatable (according to Seneca) | Stoic Philosophy
When Seneca claimed that the wise man is safe from injury, his friend Serenus asked: “What then? Will there be no one who will try to do an injury to the wise man?”. “Yes,” said Seneca, “they will try, but the injury will not reach him.” He argued that th…
Refraction of light | Physics | Khan Academy
We see incredible optical illusions all around us almost every day, right? But what causes them? One of the main reasons is that when light goes from one medium to another, like say from vacuum or air into glass, it changes its speed, because of which it …
pH and solubility | Equilibrium | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Changing the pH of a solution can affect the solubility of a slightly soluble salt. For example, if we took some solid lead(II) fluoride, which is a white solid, and we put it in some distilled water, the solid is going to reach an equilibrium with the io…
Rare Exclusive Interview With The Greatest Watchmaker Alive l F.P.Journe
Say Mr. Wonderful here, and why am I speaking French even though it’s broken? I’m in Geneva, Switzerland, in the Canton Duvo at the legendary design and manufacturing facility of FPJ. Now, why today? Because we are in the middle of the beginning of Watch…
Drugs for a Fine (Clip) | To Catch a Smuggler | National Geographic
You said this was what, again? Okay, just give me a second to positive for ketamine hydrochloride, which is a DEA controlled substance. It’s illegal to transport into the U.S. It’s illegal to have in the U.S. without a prescription. I honestly didn’t kno…