yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

_-substitution: defining _ | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is give ourselves some practice in the first step of u substitution, which is often the most difficult for those who are first learning it. That's recognizing when u substitution is appropriate and then defining an appropriate u.

So let's just start with an example here. Let's say we want to take the indefinite integral of (2x + 1) times the square root of (x^2 + x , dx). Does u substitution apply here? And if it does, how would you define that u? Pause the video and try to think about that.

Well, we just have to remind ourselves that u substitution is really trying to undo the chain rule. If we remind ourselves what the chain rule tells us, it says look, if we have a composite function, let's say (F(G(x))), and we take the derivative of that with respect to (x), that is going to be equal to the derivative of the outside function with respect to the inside function, so (f'(G(x))) times the derivative of the inside function.

So u substitution is all about, well, do we see a pattern like that inside the integral? Do we see a potential inside function (G(x)) where I see its derivative being multiplied? Well, we see that over here. If I look at (x^2 + x), if I make that the (u), what's the derivative of that?

Well, the derivative of (x^2 + x) is (2x + 1), so we should make that substitution. If we say (u) is equal to (x^2 + x), then we could say (\frac{du}{dx}), the derivative of (u) with respect to (x), is equal to (2x + 1).

If we treat our differentials like variables or numbers, we can multiply both sides by (dx), which is a little bit of hand-wavy mathematics, but it's appropriate here. So we could say (2x + 1) times (dx).

Now what's really interesting is here we have our (u) right over there. Notice we have our (2x + 1 , dx). In fact, it's not conventional to see an integral rewritten the way I'm about to write it, but I will.

I could rewrite this integral—you should really view this as the product of three things. Oftentimes, people just view the (dx) as somehow part of the integral operator, but you could rearrange it. This would actually be legitimate; you could say the integral of the square root of (x^2 + x) times (2x + 1 , dx).

And if you wanted to be really clear, you could even put all of those things in parentheses or something like that. So here, this is our (U), and this right over here is our (DU).

We could rewrite this as being equal to the integral of the square root of (U) because (x^2 + x) is (U), times (DU), which is much easier to evaluate. If you are still confused, you might recognize it if I rewrite this as (u^{\frac{1}{2}}) because now we could just use the reverse power rule to evaluate this.

Then, we would have to undo the substitution. Once we figure out what this antiderivative is, we would then reverse substitute the (X) expression back in for the (U).

More Articles

View All
The Market Is About To Go INSANE
What’s up Graham? It’s guys here. So, in the midst of a new variant, a rollercoaster stock market, and the reveal that inflation may no longer be transitionary, there’s a chance that the entire market could soon be preparing for a topic that no one could …
Why you feel so stuck in life
[Music] So the past year and a half, I’ve really been made aware of the intimate relationship between our psychology and our physiology. It seemed like, as we were locked down physically, we were also locked down mentally. As we felt kind of stuck in our …
The Trouble with the Electoral College
In a fair democracy, everyone’s vote should count equally, but the method that the United States uses to elect its president, called the electoral college, violates this principle by making sure that some people’s votes are more equal than others. The Ele…
Camp Hailstone | Life Below Zero
My name is Ignacio Stone. I’m married to Edward Hale Stone. We call him Chip. I’m Edward Hale Stone, master of systems, hunter. I’m a subsistence gatherer, fisherman. I’m married to Agnes, and I have five daughters. I tried to get them all involved in eve…
Will COVID-19 Kill the Music Industry? | Ask Mr. Wonderful #25 Kevin O'Leary ft CEO of Rolling Stone
Hello everybody, and welcome to another episode of Ask Mr. Wonderful. Who’s my guest? This is fantastic! It’s Gus Winner, son of Young Winner, founder of Rolling Stone magazine, cultural icon, rock and roll music, fashion, politics— you name it! So much t…
Risking My Life To Settle A Physics Debate
This propeller craft was built to settle a physics debate because what its creators claim it can do is so counterintuitive that it seems to violate the law of conservation of energy. So I’ve come here to drive it myself and see if it really works. And is …