yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Constant of proportionality from tables | 7th grade | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We are asked which table has a constant of proportionality between y and x of 0.6. Pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, so just as a reminder, the constant of proportionality between y and x, one way to think about it is that y is equal to some constant times x. Y is proportional to x, and this constant right over here is our constant of proportionality. So if that's going to be 0.6, in our tables or in the table that has a constant of proportionality of 0.6, y should be equal to 0.6 times x for every xy pair.

So let's look at these choices. So is seven 0.6 times four? Well, no, seven is larger than four. 0.6 times four would actually be 2.4, so this one is definitely not going to have a constant of proportionality of 0.6. In fact, this table, this isn't even a proportional relationship, where for this first one I would have to multiply by seven-fourths, and then here I'm going to be multiplying by ten-sixths, which is equivalent to... and here I'm multiplying by 13 over eight. So I'm not multiplying by the same constant every time, so this isn't even a proportional relationship.

Now let's look at choice B. Well, to go from 4 to 2.4, that is, you would multiply by 0.6, but that's not enough for us to say that this is truly a proportional relationship. It would have to be 0.6 in every scenario. So let's see, 9 times 0.6... yeah, that is 5.4. 9 times 6 is 54, but now this is 9 times 6 tenths; it's 54 divided by 10, which is 5.4.

And let's see, 14 times 6 is 84, so 14 times 6 tenths would indeed be 8.4. So this looks like our choice, and we can verify that this would not be the case. Let's see, 3 to get to 2, we would be multiplying by two-thirds, and then here once again we're multiplying by two-thirds, and then here once again we're multiplying by two-thirds. So this is actually describing a proportional relationship, but our constant of proportionality here is two-thirds, which if you try to express it as a decimal would be 0.6 repeating. Two-thirds is equal to 0.6 repeating, and so it is proportional but does not have this constant of proportionality.

So we like our choice B.

More Articles

View All
More Compute Power Doesn’t Produce AGI
The artificial general intelligence crew gets this completely wrong too. Just add more compute power and you’ll get intelligence when we don’t really know what it is underneath that makes us creative and allows us to come up with good explanations. Peopl…
How To Be A Millionaire In 10 Years (Starting With $0)
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So here’s the deal: it was recently found that real wages have barely budged in decades. More than half of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, and the poorest 70% of U.S. households don’t even have a savings accou…
THE AMERICAN DREAM 🇺🇸 IS NO LONGER ATTAINABLE?
So many young Americans feel that the American dream is unattainable. You’ve got to remember these young people, this cohort of individuals, men and women, never lived in a time of rising interest rates or inflation. Obviously, these are great cycles, but…
Uncle Tom's Cabin part 2
So Becca and I have been talking about Uncle Tom’s Cabin, which is this book from the 1850s that Abraham Lincoln actually said started the Civil War. So how did this book start a war? In this video, we’ll tell you a little bit more about the plot. Um, bu…
Natural, cyclical, structural, and frictional unemployment rates | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
[Instructor] We’ve already discussed the notion of unemployment at length in other videos. And what we’re going to do in this video is dig a little bit deeper and think about what makes up the unemployment rate? And just as a review, the unemployment ra…
15 Investments You’ll Regret Not Making Today (20 Years from Now)
20 years ago. You should have invested in Amazon but didn’t. $10,000 invested in Amazon. That would have been $1.8 million today. You’ve seen these stories before. 15 years ago, you should have bought a cheap apartment or house but didn’t. Property prices…