yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

A mind-blowing explanation of symmetry | Frank Wilczek for Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

In the Industrial Revolution, it was a great discovery that the use of interchangeable parts was a powerful principle that would allow you to do mass production, to make things efficiently. And people worked hard to make precise machinery so that you could have these reproducible parts. Nature has been using that principle, however, for billions of years with great artistry to create the world around us. People sometimes ask, "What does it all mean?" That's a very hard question to address because it's not clear what an answer would look like. The question that I found much more fruitful is: "Does the world embody beautiful ideas?" "What is the world and what is beauty?" What is beauty is something that art and philosophy and human culture address. What is the world, of course, is the kind of question that science addresses.

We've gotten this extraordinary grip on the fundamental laws. They're very strange, but they have a kind of internal logic and beauty. Some of the things that people at the beginning of this adventure were hoping for, and had in their visions, was the idea that the world embodies harmonies. They were hoping that our sense of harmony somehow agreed with what nature likes to use in her construction of the world – the idea that symmetry and mathematical perfection provide the building principles that the world embodies. Einstein was a great hero of mine, and he's played an important role in my life. He advanced the idea that symmetry is what's very basic to the operation of fundamental law.

Consider a circle: A circle is a very symmetric object. You can rotate it around its center by any angle and, although every point on the circle may move, the circle as a whole doesn't change. And that's what makes it symmetric in the intuitive sense. You can change it, you can make changes on it, which might've changed it, but although they transform each part of it, don't transform the thing as a whole. The great advantage of that definition is that you can apply it in very broad contexts, not only to describing the symmetry of objects, but to describing the symmetry of physical laws or the symmetry of equations. The idea that the laws of physics don't change as a function of time is also a symmetry. Symmetry is a very powerful constraint on our description of the world that nature seems to respect in many ways.

The kind of symmetry that leads to quantum chromodynamics or general relativity or quantum electrodynamics is mathematically considerably more complex, but it's the same idea. There are transformations of the equations that change the different terms in them. So they might change an electric field into a magnetic field or a magnetic field into a combination of electric and magnetic – that change the way the equations look, but don't change their consequences. That's the kind of equations that are like the circles among equations; are ones that have this symmetry property.

What leaps out from profound understanding of the fundamental laws of nature that we seem to have achieved is that you get much more out than you put in. So nature manages to use fundamentally simple principles to power emergent complexity. It's striking when you look at it that the equations have this kind of generative power. That you start with simple building blocks that have very precisely determined properties, and like LEGO blocks, you can put them together to make chemistry and pharmaceuticals and Large Hadron Colliders; all these very complex engineering projects. You can reliably produce, because you know how the little parts work.

By example, in the 19th century with Maxwell's synthesis of the laws of electricity and magnetism, physicists started to realize that what we perceive as light is deeply understood as a kind of disturbance in electric and magnetic fields. That gave us a new concept of the possibilities of perception of light. Visual imagery is very important to our understanding of the world because humans are intensely visual creatures. Depending on how you do the accounting, between 20 and 50% of our brain is de...

More Articles

View All
STRAPPED INTO A FALLING HELICOPTER - Smarter Every Day 154
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. One of the reasons I absolutely love helicopters is that you can get places that you can’t with any other device. So today, I’m with Bradley Friesen here in… where? Bradley: We’re, uh, right now in…
Kevin O'Leary Delivers THE COLD HARD TRUTH on Fox and Friends
Forgiving hopeful entrepreneurs the cold hard truth that he, these Shark Tank. I love the show. Joining us right now, Kevin O’Leary, author of “Cold Hard Truth on Men, Women, and Money.” Kevin, welcome. When you joined Shark Tank, did you think you were …
SCIENCE! What is the Rarest Precious Metal?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And I’m in Anaheim at VidCon. I hope to see some of you here, because I like you guys. But I can’t marry all of you. But if I did put a ring on it, what is the most precious thing you could make that ring out of? Silver, gold, p…
Contaminate | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Careful wordsmiths, mind where you step. This word’s been contaminated. Yes, contaminate! It’s a verb; it means to make something dirty or unsafe. You can think of it as another word for “pollute,” but it can also mean something’s been added that shouldn’…
Going All In - The BECKY ETF Explained
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, as much as we love to say that time in the market beats timing the market or index funds outperform 96 percent of actively managed investments, let’s be real. Deep down, there’s a small piece in all of us who wants t…
TIL: How to Transform Mars into Our Second Home | Today I Learned
Hey there, would you like to live on Mars? That’s a garbage idea! If you try to go out there right now, you would simultaneously freeze and choke to death. I’m Brendan Mullin, an emerging explorer with National Geographic and an astrobiologist. I’m here …