yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Second partial derivative test example, part 1


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So one common type of problem that you see in a number of multivariable calculus classes will say something to the effect of the following: find and classify all of the critical points of, and then you'll insert some kind of multivariable function.

So first of all, this idea of a critical point basically means anywhere where the gradient equals zero. So you're looking for places where the gradient of your function at some kind of input, some specified input (x) and (y) that you're solving for, is equal to zero. As I've talked about in the last couple videos, the reason you might want to do this is because you're hoping to maximize the function or to maybe minimize the function.

Now, the second requirement of classifying those points, that's what the second derivative test is all about. Once you find something where the gradient equals zero, you want to be able to determine: is it a local maximum, is it a local minimum, or is it a saddle point?

So let's go ahead and work through this example. The first thing we're going to need to do, if we're solving for when the gradient equals 0, and remember when we say equal 0, we really mean the zero vector, but it's just a convenient way of putting it all on one line. We take both partial derivatives.

So the partial derivative with respect to (x) is, well, this first term, when we take the derivative of (3x^2 \cdot y) with respect to (x), that 2 hops down, so we have (6xy^3). Well, (y) looks like a constant, so (y^3) looks like a constant, minus (3x^2). So that 2 comes down, so we're subtracting off (6x). Again, this (3y^2) term, (y) looks like a constant, so everything here looks like a constant with zero derivative as far as the (x) direction is concerned.

Now, we do the partial of (f) with respect to (y). Then this first term looks like some sort of constant (3x^2); (x) looks like a constant, so some kind of constant times (y). So the whole thing looks like (3x^2). The second term, minus (x^3), minus (y^3), excuse me, looks like minus (3y^2) when we take the derivative, minus (3y^2).

Then this next term only has an (x), so it looks like a constant as far as (y) is concerned. Then this last term, we take down the 2 because we're differentiating (y^2), and you'll get (-6y), (-6 \cdot y).

So when we are finding the critical points, the first step is to set both of these guys equal to 0. So this first one, when we do set it equal to zero, we can simplify a bit by factoring out (6x). So this really looks like (6x \cdot (y - 1)) and then that's what we're setting equal to zero.

What this equation tells us is that either it's the (6x) term that equals 0, in which case that would mean (x) is equal to 0, or it's the case that (y - 1 = 0), in which case that would mean that (y = 1). So at least one of these things has to be true. That's kind of the first requirement that we've found.

Let me scroll down a little bit here. For the second equation, when we set it equal to 0, it's not immediately straightforward how you would solve for this in a nice way in terms of (x) and (y). But because we've already solved one, we can kind of plug them in and say, for example, if it was the case that (x = 0), and we kind of want to see what that turns our equation into, then we would have, well (3x^2) is nothing, that would be (0) and we'd just be left with (-3y^2 - 6y = 0).

We can factor out a bit, so I'm going to factor out a (-3y). So I'll factor out (-3y), which means that first term just has a (y) remaining, and then that second term has a (2), a positive (2) since I factored out (-3). So positive (2), and that equals (0). So what this whole situation would imply is that either (-3y = 0), which would mean (y = 0), or it would be the case that (y + 2 = 0), which would mean that (y = -2).

So that's the first situation where we plug in (x = 0). Now alternatively, there's the possibility that (y = 1). So we could say (y = 1) and what that gives us in the entire equation, we still have that (3x^2) because we're kind of solving for (x) now. (3x^2) and then the rest of it becomes, let's see, (-3 \cdot 1^2), so minus (3). We're plugging in (1) for (y), and we subtract off (6), plugging in that (1) for (y) again, and that whole thing is equal to (3x^2), then minus (3 - 6), so I'm subtracting off (9).

From here, I can factor out a little bit, and this will be (3 \cdot (x^2 - 3)). What that implies then, since this whole thing has to equal (0), what that implies is that (x^2 - 3 = 0). So we have (x = \pm \sqrt{3}).

Maybe I should kind of specify these are distinct things that we found. One of them was in the circumstance where (x = 0), and then the other was what we found in the circumstance where (y = 1). So this gives us a grand total of three different critical points because in the first situation where (x = 0), the critical points that we have, well both of them are going to have an (x) coordinate of (0) in them, an (x) coordinate of (0), and the two corresponding (y) coordinates are (0) or (-2). So you have (0) or (-2).

There's kind of two possibilities, and then there's another two possibilities here where if (y = 1), when (y = 1), we'll have (x) as positive or negative (\sqrt{3}). So we have positive (\sqrt{3}) and (y = 1), and then we have negative (\sqrt{3}) and (y = 1).

So these are the critical points, critical points which basically means all partial derivatives are equal to (0). In the next video, I will classify each of these critical points using the second partial derivative test.

More Articles

View All
Jessica Livingston on Cofounder Disputes and Making Something People Want
All right, so now we’re going to move on to another monster: co-founder disputes. I think people underestimate how critical founder relationships are to the success of a startup. Unfortunately, I’ve seen more founder breakups than I care to even count, an…
Visit Her at Your Peril | Barkskins
[birds chirping] You are Mari, the housekeeper. He’s told me of you. [thud] Some creatures must go back to go wild, it seems. Monsieur Trepagny smashes them with his stick at night, and they know to stay away from our bed. He does have dominion over all. …
New Zealand's Stunning Landscapes | National Geographic
First thing you’re struck by is the landscape, like it’s absolutely stunning the entire way. The landscape changes so quickly from one amazing vista to the next. As a photographer, like you can’t really ask for anything else. There’s a lot of inspiring pl…
Researching How to Live With Coyotes | Short Film Showcase
[Applause] [Music] Into a security guard arm one. No, I was raised in Wyoming, a large commercial sheep operation. We had probably about 4,000 head of sheep that ranged on the public lands in Wyoming. One of my jobs as a kid when I was growing up there w…
Intensifiers and adverbs of degree | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hey Grim, marians! So we’ve already talked about the idea of the comparative modifiers, right? So you know the difference between saying something is cute and then saying that something is cuter than that thing. And then looking at, like, I don’t know, le…
The Stock Market Is About To Snap
Hey Graham, it’s our final attempt to reach you regarding your car’s expiring warranty. Guys, here. So anyway, we need to talk. If you’ve recently checked your stock prices and wondered why they’ve been violently dragged down for seemingly no reason at a…