yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Explained: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

You have made your prediction, and now it is time to see what happens when I release the balance. Ready? In three, two, one.

The balance tips towards the right, towards the hanging, heavier ball. But why does this happen? Well, the best way I can think of to explain this is that both balls displace the same amount of water. So they both experience the same upward buoyant force, which is equal to the weight of the water they displace. That is just Archimedes' Principle.

But by Newton’s Third Law, that means there must be equal and opposite forces down on the water in both beakers. So you would think that both beakers would get heavier by this same amount. Now, for the hanging ball, the beaker does get heavier by this amount because the buoyant force is now supporting some of the weight that used to be supported by this tension in the string. But it is now reduced, and so the beaker actually has more weight.

But for the ping pong ball, the downward force on the water is almost entirely counteracted by the upward force of the tension in that string on the bottom of the beaker. Therefore, the weight of this beaker only increases by the weight of the ping pong ball itself, whereas for the hanging ball, the weight increases by the weight of the water it displaces. So, obviously, this beaker is going to end up being heavier.

Now I want to propose an additional experiment. What if instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of this beaker, I just got a free ping pong ball and submerged it with my finger, just barely under the surface of the water? In that case, what do you think would happen when the scale was allowed to rotate? Would it tilt down A) towards the hanging acrylic ball or B) down towards the ping pong ball, which is now just barely submerged under the water or C) would the balance remain perfectly balanced?

So I want you to make your selection, make your prediction by leaving a comment starting with either A, B, or C, and then giving me your explanation. And I will tally up the votes and let you know the answer next time.

More Articles

View All
Jim Crow part 3 | The Gilded Age (1865-1898) | US History | Khan Academy
In the last video, we were talking about the era of Reconstruction and how after the Civil War, when the 13th Amendment to the Constitution outlawed slavery, many Southern states enacted laws known as Black Codes. These codes, in many cases, were really j…
The Mysteries of the Moai on Easter Island | National Geographic
[Music] Imposing stone sentinels stand guard on Rapanui, a volcanic island that anchors the western point of the Polynesian triangle in the South Pacific. You might know it as Easter Island. [Music] About 42% of the island is Rapa Nui National Park, a wo…
ATP synthase | Cellular energetics | AP Biology | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about what is arguably my favorite enzyme, and that is ATP synthase. You might be able to predict from its name what it does: it synthesizes ATP. Now, you’ve probably seen it before. We saw it when we looked at respirat…
Sal Khan chats with Google CEO Sundar Pichai
It’s huge treat to have Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, here. And you know I will give a little bit of a preamble more than I normally do. I think a lot of the team knows this, but it’s always worth reminding the team we wouldn’t be here on many levels if i…
10 Ways to AutoPilot Wealth Creation (The Truth)
We hate to break it to you, but the only way to get rich without working is by working so hard. You get to a point where you have other people work hard on your behalf. You cannot escape the hard work, but you can be smart about it. The smarter you are, t…
The Dark Side of Latest Tech
In 2010, around 40,000 people died from drug overdoses in the United States. Quantifying the importance and meaning of individual human life in a single statistic is impossible, but that number might already seem high, especially if you knew one of those …