yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Explained: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

You have made your prediction, and now it is time to see what happens when I release the balance. Ready? In three, two, one.

The balance tips towards the right, towards the hanging, heavier ball. But why does this happen? Well, the best way I can think of to explain this is that both balls displace the same amount of water. So they both experience the same upward buoyant force, which is equal to the weight of the water they displace. That is just Archimedes' Principle.

But by Newton’s Third Law, that means there must be equal and opposite forces down on the water in both beakers. So you would think that both beakers would get heavier by this same amount. Now, for the hanging ball, the beaker does get heavier by this amount because the buoyant force is now supporting some of the weight that used to be supported by this tension in the string. But it is now reduced, and so the beaker actually has more weight.

But for the ping pong ball, the downward force on the water is almost entirely counteracted by the upward force of the tension in that string on the bottom of the beaker. Therefore, the weight of this beaker only increases by the weight of the ping pong ball itself, whereas for the hanging ball, the weight increases by the weight of the water it displaces. So, obviously, this beaker is going to end up being heavier.

Now I want to propose an additional experiment. What if instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of this beaker, I just got a free ping pong ball and submerged it with my finger, just barely under the surface of the water? In that case, what do you think would happen when the scale was allowed to rotate? Would it tilt down A) towards the hanging acrylic ball or B) down towards the ping pong ball, which is now just barely submerged under the water or C) would the balance remain perfectly balanced?

So I want you to make your selection, make your prediction by leaving a comment starting with either A, B, or C, and then giving me your explanation. And I will tally up the votes and let you know the answer next time.

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett's BIG Warning for Investors (2021)
I would like to, uh, just go over two items that I would like particularly new entrants to the stock market to, uh, ponder just a bit before they try and do 30 or 40 trades a day, uh, in order to profit from what looks like a very, uh, easy game. So, uh, …
STRAPPED INTO A FALLING HELICOPTER - Smarter Every Day 154
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. One of the reasons I absolutely love helicopters is that you can get places that you can’t with any other device. So today, I’m with Bradley Friesen here in… where? Bradley: We’re, uh, right now in…
Rival and excludable goods
In this video, we’re going to do a bit of a deep dive in classifying different types of goods. Before we even get into the thick of things, I’m going to make some definitions. So the first definition is that of a rival good. Now, a rival good—one way to …
Mr. Freeman, part 49
I constantly hear - Freeman, what should we do? Give us a sign! Make a revolution! We will follow you! Aaah… You know all the answers to all of your questions, but you like it so much to pose as gifted with naivety girls… All right, I’ll retrieve the ans…
Warren Buffett Shares His 2,600 Year Old Investment Advice
First investment primer that I know of, and it was pretty good advice, was delivered in about 600 BC by Aesop. And Aesop, you’ll remember, said a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Incidentally, Aesop did not know it was 600 BC; he was smart, but …
The age of empire | Rise to world power (1890-1945) | US History | Khan Academy
So I have a map here of United States possessions in the Pacific and in the Caribbean today, and they’re kind of all over the place. I mean, some of them are pretty tiny. There’s Guam, which is just barely a little speck on the map, and American Samoa. An…