yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Explained: Beaker Ball Balance Problem


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

You have made your prediction, and now it is time to see what happens when I release the balance. Ready? In three, two, one.

The balance tips towards the right, towards the hanging, heavier ball. But why does this happen? Well, the best way I can think of to explain this is that both balls displace the same amount of water. So they both experience the same upward buoyant force, which is equal to the weight of the water they displace. That is just Archimedes' Principle.

But by Newton’s Third Law, that means there must be equal and opposite forces down on the water in both beakers. So you would think that both beakers would get heavier by this same amount. Now, for the hanging ball, the beaker does get heavier by this amount because the buoyant force is now supporting some of the weight that used to be supported by this tension in the string. But it is now reduced, and so the beaker actually has more weight.

But for the ping pong ball, the downward force on the water is almost entirely counteracted by the upward force of the tension in that string on the bottom of the beaker. Therefore, the weight of this beaker only increases by the weight of the ping pong ball itself, whereas for the hanging ball, the weight increases by the weight of the water it displaces. So, obviously, this beaker is going to end up being heavier.

Now I want to propose an additional experiment. What if instead of tethering the ping pong ball to the base of this beaker, I just got a free ping pong ball and submerged it with my finger, just barely under the surface of the water? In that case, what do you think would happen when the scale was allowed to rotate? Would it tilt down A) towards the hanging acrylic ball or B) down towards the ping pong ball, which is now just barely submerged under the water or C) would the balance remain perfectly balanced?

So I want you to make your selection, make your prediction by leaving a comment starting with either A, B, or C, and then giving me your explanation. And I will tally up the votes and let you know the answer next time.

More Articles

View All
Identifying and verifying a solution to a system | Grade 8 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
We’re told the system of linear equations below is graphed on the coordinate grid. So we can see the graph of ( y = -2X - 2 ) in blue here, and then ( Y = -\frac{1}{4}x + 5 ) in brown here. What I want you to first do before I do it with you is see if yo…
Definite and indefinite articles | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
So we’ve covered the basic idea that divides the usage of the from “a” and “an.” You know, “the” is the definite article, and “a” or “an” is the indefinite. So when you’re being non-specific in language, you would use the indefinite article, as in “May I …
Expressing a quadratic form with a matrix
Hey guys, there’s one more thing I need to talk about before I can describe the vectorized form for the quadratic approximation of multivariable functions, which is a mouthful to say. So let’s say you have some kind of expression that looks like ( ax^2 ).…
Fentanyl Explained #shorts
Why does fentanyl feel so good? Let us try it so you don’t have to. Fentanyl reaches your brain in seconds, and like other opioids, binds to opioid receptors. It stops pain signals and also releases a flood of dopamine, so the pain melts away as you slide…
250,000 DOMINOES! - The American Domino Record - Smarter Every Day 178
DESTIN>> That’s right! You stand on the right. Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I’m teaching my kids that you’re supposed to stand on the right. Stand on the right. He’s standing… she’s there… you go. All right, we’re in Detr…
Why Are Things Cute?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And The Pet Collective offers 24-hour coverage of puppies and kittens. It’s really cute. But what is cute, scientifically? I mean, why do we like soft, cuddly things and why do cute things have a unique effect on us? Well, the …