yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Voltage divider | Circuit analysis | Electrical engineering | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Now I'm going to show you a circuit that's called a voltage divider. This is a name we give to a simple circuit of two series resistors. So I'm just going to draw two series resistors here, and it's a nickname in the sense of it's just a pattern that we see when we look at circuits.

I'll show you what the pattern is. The pattern is we have two resistors in series. It's no more than that. We assume that there's a voltage over here; we hook up a voltage over here like this. So that's called an input voltage. We'll call it (V_i) for (V_{in}). Then the midpoint of the two resistors, and typically the bottom, that's called (V_{out}).

So we basically just have a pattern here with a series resistor driven by some voltage from the ends of the two resistors, and we're curious about the voltage across one of them. So now we're going to develop an expression for this. Let's also label our resistors; this will be (R_1) and this will be (R_2). That's how we tell our resistors apart, and we're going to develop an expression for this.

Let's first put a current through here; we'll call that current (I). We'll make an assumption that this current here is zero; there's no current going out of our little circuit here, and that means, of course, that this current here is also (I). So it's continuous all the way down.

Now we want to develop an expression that tells us what (V_{out}) is in terms of these two resistors and the input voltage. So let's go over here and do that. The first thing we're going to write is, we know that using Ohm's law, we can write an expression for these series resistors.

On this side here, Ohm's law, we'll put over here (V = I \cdot R). In the specific case here, (V_N = I \cdot \text{what} \cdot \text{times the series combination of} , R_1 \text{ and } R_2), and the series combination is the sum (R_1 + R_2). I'm going to solve this for (I):

[ I = \frac{V_N}{R_1 + R_2} ]

All right, next step is going to be let's solve for let's write an expression that's related to (V_{out}), and (V_{out}) only depends on (R_2) and this current here. So we can write:

[ V_{out} = I \cdot R_2 ]

I'll solve this equation for (I) the same way:

[ I = \frac{V_{out}}{R_2} ]

Now we have two expressions for (I) in our circuit because we made this assumption of zero current going out. Those two (I)s are the same. So let's set those equal to each other and see what we get:

[ \frac{V_{out}}{R_2} = \frac{V_N}{R_1 + R_2} ]

So now I'm going to take (R_2) and move it over to the other side of the equation, and we get:

[ V_{out} = V_N \cdot \frac{R_2}{R_1 + R_2} ]

And this is called the voltage divider expression right here. It gives us an expression for (V_{out}) in terms of (V_{in}) and the ratio of resistors. Resistors are always positive numbers, and so this fraction is always less than one, which means that (V_{out}) is always somewhat less than (V_{in}) and it's adjustable by adjusting the resistor values.

It's a really handy circuit to have. Let's do some examples; we'll put that up in the corner so we can see it. I'm going to real quick build a voltage divider that we can practice on. Let's make this 2k ohms, 2000 ohms; we'll make this 6k ohms, or 6000 ohms, and we'll hook it up to an input source that looks like, let's say it's 6 volts.

Like that, and we'll take an output off of this right here is where the output of our voltage divider is, and we'll say that that is (V_{out}).

So let's solve this using the voltage divider expression:

[ V_{out} = V_N \cdot \frac{R_2}{R_1 + R_2} ]

Which is (6) volts times the ratio of resistors, and (R_2) is (6k) ohms divided by (2k) ohms plus (6k) ohms.

Notice this always happens; the k's all cancel out. That's nice, and that equals (6 \times \frac{6}{2 + 6}) is (8). And if I do my calculations right, (V_{out}) is (4.5) volts. So that's what a voltage divider is.

And if you remember at the beginning, we made an assumption that this current going out here was about zero. If that current is really small, you can use this voltage divider expression, which as we see up here is the ratio of the bottom resistor to both resistors.

That's how I remember it; it's the bottom resistor over the two resistors added together. If you think the current is not very small, what you do is you go back, and you do this analysis; you do the same analysis again but you account for the current that's in here.

So that's the story on voltage dividers.

More Articles

View All
Making Custard | Live Free or Die: How to Homestead
[Music] Custard utilizes ingredients that we tend to have a lot of, so I want to teach you how to make custard. All you need is milk, eggs, and honey, and then you can add some flour or corn starch and some vanilla. Okay, all right, let’s just use up all …
Khan Academy Live: SAT Reading (Hangouts on air)
Hello and welcome to KH Academy live SAT! I’m Eric. I’m an SAT tutor and one of the SAT experts here at KH Academy, and I’m so excited to be with you today to talk through SAT reading. Now, if you’ve joined one of our past live streams, you’ll notice that…
Life Beyond Earth
Starring Galaxy was born out of a singularity that brought about our whole existence: the Big Bang. An isolated moment in space and time created something out of nothing. For eons, we didn’t know much about the universe, but through advancements in scienc…
The insanely scary "Tailless Whip Scorpion" - Smarter Every Day 77
Are you about to grab that with your mother? What the quick? Oh golly, what is this? Call the tailless whip. Let’s whip scorpion. Let me grab it with my hand. It’s fighting them. It’s fighting! Oh fighting! What is going on? Describe what you’re feeling.…
Using matrices to transform the plane: Mapping a vector | Matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have the vector (3, 2). We know that we can express this as a weighted sum of the unit vectors in two dimensions, or we could view it as a linear combination. You could view this as (3) times the unit vector in the (x) direction, which i…
Inside the Paris Climate Conference | Years of Living Dangerously
This is the Olympics of climate change. If you’re not here, you’re not in the game, and the game is to do something urgently. We have the political will to change, and it really is the seminal meeting of leaders to determine what we do to combat this prob…