yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Most Common Cognitive Bias


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

I'm gonna give you guys three numbers. A three number sequence, and I have a rule in mind that these three numbers obey. I want you to try to figure out what that rule is. But the way you can get information is by proposing your own set of three numbers, to which I will say yes, that follows my rule, or no, it doesn't follow my rule. And then you can propose what you think the rule is. Is that fair?

Okay, so here are the three numbers: 2, 4, 8. 2, 4, 8. You don't need to continue the sequence; you can propose a totally different sequence, whatever you want to propose, and I will simply say yes or no.

2, 4, 8?

16, 32, 16, 32, and 64? Those also follow my rule.

Okay, what's the rule you think?

Multiply by 2?

That is... not my rule.

What? That's not my rule. But you're allowed, if you want, to propose 3 other numbers.

3, 6, 12.

3, 6, 12? Follows my rule.

10, 20, 40.

That follows the rule.

I'm still multiplying by two.

I know [Laughter] I know what you're doing. And yes, it follows my rule, but no, it's not my rule.

5, 10, and 20?

Follows my rule.

100, 200, 400?

Follows my rule.

500, 1000, 2000?

Follows my rule.

You want me to keep going?

But do I just keep going? You going to tell me or what?

[Laughter] Am I doing it the wrong way? Am I approaching this the wrong way?

You're totally fine, but you're approaching the way most people approach it. Like, think strategically about this. You want information. I have information. The point of the three numbers, right, is to allow you to figure out what the rule is.

Okay, I'm going to give you the numbers that I don't think fit the sequence and see what you'll say. So I'll say 2, 4, 7.

Fits my rule.

So, whatever I propose is right?

So, is your rule like you can propose any number?

So, the rule is anything we say is yes?

No.

Damn it [Laughter] But you were on the right track now. Hit me with three numbers.

3, 6, 9.

Follows my rule.

Hmm... Oh, that didn't follow my rule.

This is good, right?

5, 10, 15.

That follows my rule.

What? Oh... Really?

Yeah, I don't believe this.

1, 2, 3?

Follows the rule.

What about 7, 8, 9?

[Laughter] Yes, that follows the rule.

8, 16, 39.

Fits the rule.

Excellent. But we're no closer to the rule. I want you to get to the rule.

How about 1, 7, 13?

Follows the rule.

11, 12, 13?

How does this make sense?

Follows the rule.

10, 9, 8?

I don't know how to do this.

Does not follow the rule.

10, 9, 8 does not.

Oh, so, is it all in ascending order?

Boo yeah! Up top! Yes. First ones to get it. You guys nailed it. That's the rule.

That's the rule. Numbers in increasing order.

Awww.

Numbers in ascending order: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 15, 25, doesn't matter. Any numbers in ascending order.

I was inspired to make this video by the book "The Black Swan" by Nassim Taleb.

Now, "The Black Swan" is a metaphor for the unknown and the unexpected. I mean, in the old world, the theory was that all swans were white. So, each instance of a white swan would make you think, "Yeah, that theory is pretty good."

But the point is, you can never prove a theory true, and in fact, when people found Australia, they realized that there were black swans.

What was interesting for me was that everyone I spoke to came up with a rule very early on and then only proposed numbers that fit with that rule they were thinking.

I was looking for you guys to propose a set of numbers that didn't follow your rule and didn't follow my rule.

I was looking for you guys not to try to confirm what you believe. You're always asking something where you expect the answer to be yes, right? Like, you're trying to get at it.

But, instead, you want to get the no's. You want to get the no because that's much more informational for you than yes. Like, everything is a yes.

That is true. That is really true, and once you say that.

That is what's so important about the scientific method. We set out to disprove our theories, and it's when we can't disprove them that we say this must be getting at something really true about our reality.

So, I think we should do that in all aspects of our lives. If you think that something is true, you should try as hard as you can to disprove it.

Only then can you really get at the truth and not fool yourself.

More Articles

View All
How to Calculate the Intrinsic Value of a Stock in 2023 (Full Example)
All right guys, today we are going to be tackling a very big topic that I’m sure a lot of you guys are very interested in, and that is how to value a stock. So, at the end of this video, you’ll understand the step-by-step process to find the intrinsic val…
See How Life Has Changed in the Middle East Over 58 Years | Short Film Showcase
That’s right across the Lebanese Syrian border. I stopped, pulled out my camera because I had resolved that the entire time I was in the Middle East, that I was going to keep a detailed photographic record of all my landscapes and have a real collection o…
Introduction to hands-on science activities
Hi everyone! I’m Donna and I’m Via. We create the science courses on KH Academy. We’re excited to introduce new physics and chemistry activities sponsored by Adobe, and new biology activities sponsored by Amen. You can find all of these middle school and…
Safari Live - Day 4 | National Geographic
Viewer discretion is advised. Well, it appears as if it’s blue skies with wonderful white clouds this afternoon and this is Safari Live, ready. Standing by. 5, 4, 3, 2, 1… you are live. You are [Music] live. Good afternoon everyone and welcome to Safari L…
Understanding Evil | The Story of God
To understand why evil exists, we have to know where it comes from. Some faiths see it as an unseen force that pervades the entire world—demons that lurk in the darkness. For Christianity, it could be the Devil Himself. Or is evil something that comes fro…
Why Are We Morbidly Curious?
Hey Vsauce. Michael here. In 1924, psychologist Carney Landis drew lines on people’s faces and then photographed them in various scenarios to study facial expressions. But he didn’t use actors, and he didn’t tell the participants to pretend to feel emoti…