yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Most Common Cognitive Bias


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

I'm gonna give you guys three numbers. A three number sequence, and I have a rule in mind that these three numbers obey. I want you to try to figure out what that rule is. But the way you can get information is by proposing your own set of three numbers, to which I will say yes, that follows my rule, or no, it doesn't follow my rule. And then you can propose what you think the rule is. Is that fair?

Okay, so here are the three numbers: 2, 4, 8. 2, 4, 8. You don't need to continue the sequence; you can propose a totally different sequence, whatever you want to propose, and I will simply say yes or no.

2, 4, 8?

16, 32, 16, 32, and 64? Those also follow my rule.

Okay, what's the rule you think?

Multiply by 2?

That is... not my rule.

What? That's not my rule. But you're allowed, if you want, to propose 3 other numbers.

3, 6, 12.

3, 6, 12? Follows my rule.

10, 20, 40.

That follows the rule.

I'm still multiplying by two.

I know [Laughter] I know what you're doing. And yes, it follows my rule, but no, it's not my rule.

5, 10, and 20?

Follows my rule.

100, 200, 400?

Follows my rule.

500, 1000, 2000?

Follows my rule.

You want me to keep going?

But do I just keep going? You going to tell me or what?

[Laughter] Am I doing it the wrong way? Am I approaching this the wrong way?

You're totally fine, but you're approaching the way most people approach it. Like, think strategically about this. You want information. I have information. The point of the three numbers, right, is to allow you to figure out what the rule is.

Okay, I'm going to give you the numbers that I don't think fit the sequence and see what you'll say. So I'll say 2, 4, 7.

Fits my rule.

So, whatever I propose is right?

So, is your rule like you can propose any number?

So, the rule is anything we say is yes?

No.

Damn it [Laughter] But you were on the right track now. Hit me with three numbers.

3, 6, 9.

Follows my rule.

Hmm... Oh, that didn't follow my rule.

This is good, right?

5, 10, 15.

That follows my rule.

What? Oh... Really?

Yeah, I don't believe this.

1, 2, 3?

Follows the rule.

What about 7, 8, 9?

[Laughter] Yes, that follows the rule.

8, 16, 39.

Fits the rule.

Excellent. But we're no closer to the rule. I want you to get to the rule.

How about 1, 7, 13?

Follows the rule.

11, 12, 13?

How does this make sense?

Follows the rule.

10, 9, 8?

I don't know how to do this.

Does not follow the rule.

10, 9, 8 does not.

Oh, so, is it all in ascending order?

Boo yeah! Up top! Yes. First ones to get it. You guys nailed it. That's the rule.

That's the rule. Numbers in increasing order.

Awww.

Numbers in ascending order: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 15, 25, doesn't matter. Any numbers in ascending order.

I was inspired to make this video by the book "The Black Swan" by Nassim Taleb.

Now, "The Black Swan" is a metaphor for the unknown and the unexpected. I mean, in the old world, the theory was that all swans were white. So, each instance of a white swan would make you think, "Yeah, that theory is pretty good."

But the point is, you can never prove a theory true, and in fact, when people found Australia, they realized that there were black swans.

What was interesting for me was that everyone I spoke to came up with a rule very early on and then only proposed numbers that fit with that rule they were thinking.

I was looking for you guys to propose a set of numbers that didn't follow your rule and didn't follow my rule.

I was looking for you guys not to try to confirm what you believe. You're always asking something where you expect the answer to be yes, right? Like, you're trying to get at it.

But, instead, you want to get the no's. You want to get the no because that's much more informational for you than yes. Like, everything is a yes.

That is true. That is really true, and once you say that.

That is what's so important about the scientific method. We set out to disprove our theories, and it's when we can't disprove them that we say this must be getting at something really true about our reality.

So, I think we should do that in all aspects of our lives. If you think that something is true, you should try as hard as you can to disprove it.

Only then can you really get at the truth and not fool yourself.

More Articles

View All
On the Hunt: Crossing the Beaver Dams | Alaska: The Next Generation
If I didn’t go about teaching my children tradition and culture, it would be a whole gap and we might not be able to give back. Then my family would be lost in tradition and culture. That little spot back here, just there, Beaver Dam blocking it but ther…
Watch Artisans Craft a Beautiful Indian Bedspread | Short Film Showcase
To me, by John is the Serling eye of Isaiah; someone who understands the nuances because he has a knowledge of the process of creation. By John, of this Rezaï is the originality of his design, which actually has been designed to evoke a memory of fields o…
What was the Articles of Confederation? | US Government and Civics | Khan Academy
So John, people are always talking about the Constitution, but the Constitution was not the first founding document of the United States. What were the Articles of Confederation, and why did they need to get replaced? Well, the Articles of Confederation w…
How to Value a Stock like a Wall Street Analyst | Discounted Cash Flow and Comps
Wow! Do I have a special video for you today that will help you learn a ton about investing. This video is going to cover how to value a stock like the pros do to help you better identify stocks to buy. Let’s jump right into the video. There are two ways…
Marc Andreessen at Startup School SV 2016
Okay, so, uh, up next we have a fireside chat with, uh, Mark Andreessen. Uh, come on out, Mark! I think he’s right back. [Applause] There, they know who you are. No introductions needed. So, uh, thanks for coming back. This is, uh, your third startup scho…
Type casting | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy
Have you ever tried to make your print output a bit more descriptive, like this, only to get a type error? Why does that happen, and how do we fix it? Let’s put our debugging skills to work. We saw that my program last worked when I was just printing the…