yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Defending Virunga's Treasures | Explorer
[Music] I am hunting down the story, but I’m not your standard, uh, correspondent. I’m a wide-eyed, enthusiastic guy that loves the world we live in. I mean, of course, I’ve heard a lot about Congo, but I can’t sort of get away from these, uh, romantic no…
Making Custard | Live Free or Die: How to Homestead
[Music] Custard utilizes ingredients that we tend to have a lot of, so I want to teach you how to make custard. All you need is milk, eggs, and honey, and then you can add some flour or corn starch and some vanilla. Okay, all right, let’s just use up all …
Why Does the Moon Orbit Earth?
Now tell me what does the moon do? Uh, the moon orbits the Earth. I know it. Let’s do an orbit. Can we do an orbit? Okay, so go like this. I’m guessing, I’m guessing around, around. If you will, you spinning it? Are you going to… doesn’t it stay? Isn’t it…
The Warning Of Hyper Inflation | DO THIS NOW
What’s up, grandma’s guys here, and welp, it just got a lot worse. As of today, the inflation rate came in at 9.1 percent, which was the highest amount ever reported since 1981 and significantly higher than every other analyst expected. Not to mention, wh…
50 Founders Share How They Got Their First Customers
Did you find your first customer surprisingly? “A cold email? That’s a good question. A lot of calls and emailing on Reddit, actually. We don’t have them yet; we are currently looking.” [Music] “The first one was actually just kind of very crafted cold…
The Multiverse
So we have to come to a deeper understanding of how to explain what is going on in this double state experiment. Because if we fire either a photon or an electron at that double-slit apparatus, and we put a detector at either of those slits, then we will …