yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
The $2000 Per Month Stimulus | What You MUST Know
What’s up you guys! It’s Graham here. So, within the last 24 hours, I’ve seen a lot of talk and discussion about a brand new proposed stimulus plan that would give every single eligible American not only a one-time check for $1,200 but instead $2,000 per …
ATP synthase | Cellular energetics | AP Biology | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about what is arguably my favorite enzyme, and that is ATP synthase. You might be able to predict from its name what it does: it synthesizes ATP. Now, you’ve probably seen it before. We saw it when we looked at respirat…
Expansion of presidential power | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to talk about in this video is the expansion of presidential power. We’ve already seen that the Constitution talks about the different powers that a president would have, but as we’ve gone forward in history, the Constitution hasn’t imagi…
Why are people mean on Twitter? - Smarter Every Day 214
You’ve probably heard a lot of talk lately about bots on Twitter or even foreign involvement in our political process. For example, the president of the United States publicly thanked a Twitter account which we now know was run by malicious actors located…
'Indian' or 'Native American'? [Reservations, Part 0]
The first people who lived here named themselves. Across the continent, in hundreds of languages, the word for people - or the First People - was what they used. Other people existed, to trade and talk and fight with. But the continent was vast and travel…
How to Stop Procrastinating Homework - The Secret Force That's Stopping You
So I just finished watching Budweiser’s new Superbowl ad called “Born the Hard Way,” and while a lot of people are using it as a means to get into a political flame war, another one, my first reaction when I saw it was that it reminded me of a concept tha…