yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Khan Academy Ed Talk with Mike Flanagan
Hello and welcome to Ed Talks with Khan Academy. I’m Kristin Disarro, the Chief Learning Officer at Khan Academy, and I am excited today to talk to Mike Flanagan, the CEO of the Mastery Transcript Consortium. We’ll find out what that is and what it means …
It Was Med School or the Circus | StarTalk
It just so happens we have on our video call. I think we’ve brought them in. We have someone who’s a tight RPP instructor, Sonia Harpstead. She teaches at the Circus Warehouse here in New York. Uh, Sonia, do we have you on the line? Yeah, I’m here. Oh …
Warren Buffett on How He Values the Class A Shares | 1996 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting
Shares, yeah, well, that’s obviously a key question. As I’ve said, we try to give you the information, but I think people, to the extent they’ve made a mistake in the past in valuing Berkshire—and they have made this mistake over time, including many comm…
The Weirdness of Boxes | Brain Games
We’ve placed weights inside of each of these boxes. We asked our volunteers, without peeking, to tell us which is heavier. “That wouldn’t seem to have,” here definitely, yeah, definitely. “Uh, this is lighter. Yeah, this one feels a little bit heavier, …
Worked example: finding a Riemann sum using a table | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Imagine we’re asked to approximate the area between the x-axis and the graph of f from x equals 1 to x equals 10 using a right Riemann sum with three equal subdivisions. To do that, we are given a table of values for f. I encourage you to pause the video …
How To SLEEP With Mario!! -- Mind Blow 10
[Music] Brain controlled robot arm. In four years, and Pokémon’s Ekans backwards is Snake. Arbok is Cobra, and Muk backwards is uh, Bees. Sauce! Kevin here, this is mind blow. Okay, so connect hacks let you control your TV with your hands, but the NES ac…