yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
#shorts Type-B Dial
So this is a brand known as Loo. There are type A style dials and there are type B style dials. Type B is going to have a different orientation of the hours and minutes. So the hours in this case are on the inside; the minutes are on the outside. That wa…
SpaceX and Commercial Space Exploration | StarTalk
I think people conflate two different things here when they talk about the moving frontier of space exploration. If you’re going to advance a space frontier, you have gone farther than anyone has gone before. To me, that’s advancing a space frontier. Anyt…
Polynomial special products: difference of squares | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
Earlier in our mathematical adventures, we had expanded things like ( x + y \times x - y ). Just as a bit of review, this is going to be equal to ( x \times x ), which is ( x^2 ), plus ( x \times \text{negative } y ), which is negative ( xy ), plus ( y \t…
Graphical limit at asymptotic discontinuity
All right, we have a graph of ( y ) is equal to ( f(x) ), and we want to figure out what is the limit of ( f(x) ) as ( x ) approaches negative three. If we just look at ( x = -3 ), it’s really hard to see, at least based on how this graph looks, what ( f(…
Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage | World History | Khan Academy
As we enter into the 3rd century BCE, we see the Roman Republic, which was founded in 509 BCE, has now exerted control over most of the Italian Peninsula. But it’s not the only power in the Mediterranean. We have the remnants of Alexander the Great’s empi…
Laplacian intuition
So here I’m going to talk about the Lan laian, and the lassan is a certain operator in the same way that the Divergence, or the gradient, or the curl, or even just the derivative are operators—the things that take in some kind of function and give you ano…