yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
How To Get Out of Bed More Easily | Wake Up Early with ENERGY
Looks pretty good, what can I say? Bed. When you don’t feel like—do you have a hard time getting out of bed in the morning? Well, I don’t. So in this video, I’m gonna teach you how to be less like you and more like me. That’s not true; I still struggle o…
Unadopted amendments to the Bill of Rights | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Did you know that what we call the First Amendment today was actually the Third Amendment in the original draft of the Bill of Rights? In fact, there were more than 200 proposed amendments, which were whittled down to ju…
Khan Academy Live: SAT Reading (Hangouts on air)
Hello and welcome to KH Academy live SAT! I’m Eric. I’m an SAT tutor and one of the SAT experts here at KH Academy, and I’m so excited to be with you today to talk through SAT reading. Now, if you’ve joined one of our past live streams, you’ll notice that…
a chill day in my life
Good morning guys, it’s currently 11:20 a.m. - answering YouTube comments - okay so now it’s 12 and I think it’s enough scrolling so I’m just gonna delete all of the social media apps because it takes a lot of time. Let’s do my skincare - skincare time -…
2015 AP Calculus AB/BC 3b | AP Calculus AB solved exams | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Part B using correct units, explain the meaning of the definite integral. So, it’s the definite integral from zero to tal 40 of the absolute value V of T DT. In the context of the problem, approximate the value of that integral using a right Riemann sum …
Roe v. Wade | National Constitution Center | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Today we’re learning more about Roe versus Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court case that ruled that the right of privacy extends to a woman’s decision to have an abortion. To learn more about Roe versus Wade, I spoke to two exp…