yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
See How Termites Inspired a Building That Can Cool Itself | Decoder
In 1991, architect Mick Pearce had a problem. An investment group in Harare, Zimbabwe, hired him to design the largest office and retail building in the country. But they didn’t want to pay for the expensive air conditioning needed to cool such a large bu…
What Would Elon Musk Work On If He Were 22?
You famously said when you were younger there were five problems that you thought were most important for you to work on. If you were 22 today, what would the five problems that you would think about working on be? Well, I think if somebody is doing some…
Brave New Words - Kevin Roose & Sal Khan
Hi everyone, it’s here from Khan Academy, and as some of you all know, I have released my second book, Brave New Words, about the future of AI in education and work. It’s available wherever you might buy your books. But as part of the research for that bo…
The Philosophy Of Cold Showers
Taking cold showers has become a normal part of my life. Even though I’ve taken many, cold showers still suck every single time to this day, but it takes me considerably less effort than the first time I took one. Besides the many physical benefits of col…
All Shower Thoughts I Had This Year
have you ever paused to think about how one of the most famous sentences of all time doesn’t make grammatical sense? Well, because we all apparently heard it wrong and continue to say it wrong. According to the man himself, Neil Armstrong, what he did say…
What I wish I knew as a Teenager
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, all right, here we go. This topic has been requested a lot lately. So when you ask, you shall receive. Here’s exactly what I wish I knew as a teenager. From all my videos, I really feel like this one is especially…