yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
The Oldest Unsolved Problem in Math
This is a video about the oldest unsolved problem in math that dates back 2000 years. Some of the brightest mathematicians of all time have tried to crack it, but all of them failed. In the year 2000, the Italian mathematician Piergiorgio Odifreddi listed…
Camp Khan Parent Webinar
Hi everyone, good afternoon or good evening, depending on where you’re joining us um in the country. My name is Roy, and I’m here to give you a quick overview of Camp Con, our new summer camp. Quick agenda here: we’re going to do intros real quickly, talk…
Dealing cards with functions | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy
Let’s design a program with functions and nested function calls. We want to build a program that lets the user play several different car games. That means every game is going to need to share functionality for dealing a deck of playing cards. The first …
Cecily Strong: Why I'm Involved | Years of Living Dangerously
Working in comedy, I spend all my off time watching a lot of documentaries. So this was so exciting! It’s like a little kid getting to jump into a video game. You’re the sunniest state, ignoring the sun. Exactly, the Sunshine State, and you’re not allowe…
Do Technical Founders Need Business Co-Founders?
Oh yeah, well Michael, I could go do sales. That’s not hard. I can definitely reply to emails. Yes, you know, I could. Well, doter, are you going to do that? [Laughter] Welcome to Dalton Plus, Michael! Today we’re going to talk about, do you need a busi…
Division resulting in decimals example 2
Let’s say that we wanted to compute 78 divided by 12. What would this be? Pause this video and try to figure that out. Well, one way to think about it is, this is the same thing as 78 divided by 12, heh. I know when I said it in English, it sounds the sa…