yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Cost and duration of modern campaigns | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about modern campaigns. In particular, we’re going to talk about the cost and the duration of modern campaigns, especially in the United States. This graphic here, which comes from the Campaign Finance Institut…
Worked example: Measuring enthalpy of reaction using coffee-cup calorimetry | Khan Academy
A constant pressure calorimeter can be used to find the change in enthalpy for a chemical reaction. Let’s look at the chemical reaction between an aqueous solution of silver nitrate and aqueous solution of sodium chloride to form a precipitate of silver c…
Standard normal table for proportion above | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A set of philosophy exam scores are normally distributed with a mean of 40 points and a standard deviation of 3 points. Ludwig got a score of 47.5 points on the exam. What proportion of exam scores are higher than Ludwig’s score? Give your answer correct …
These Indoor Wildfires Help Engineers Study the Real Thing | National Geographic
Fire, especially wildfire, is a really complex phenomenon. I hear people talking about being able to control fire; I don’t think that’s something that will happen soon. But here we are, at least trying to understand fire. There are factors that affect fir…
Free-Tailed Bats: On Location | Hostile Planet
Humans and animals are hardwired to endure, and that includes our “Hostile Planet” crew who had to go through so much to bring you this incredible footage. RENEE GODFREY: We were filming the bat sequence in New Mexico in the middle of the baking hot dese…
Underestimating the problem of induction
I’m going to talk about two of the biggest problems I can see with the presupposition lists. Attempts to establish a rational basis for inductive reasoning. Hum’s writing on inductive inference draws our attention to the fact that inductive inferences are…