yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
15 Signs of a High Value Man
Some say women are born with inherited value, but men have to create value for themselves. Reality hits men harder than women. While many average women expect high-value men, average men understand where they fall in the hierarchy. High-value men sit at t…
Ratio example problems
Let’s do some example questions dealing with ratios. So we’re told the table shows the number of people waiting in line for different rides at an amusement park. So, 15 people are waiting in line for the roller coaster, four people for the slingshot, 12 …
A Dark Web Narcotics Seizure | To Catch a Smuggler
Right now, we’ve been seeing a huge increase from people ordering stuff off of the dark web. CUSTOMS OFFICER 1: The dark web is a criminal flea market anyone with the internet can access. There was a big website back in the day, Silk Road. My understandi…
AMZN 52 week low, Dot-Com crash?
Amazon closed at a 52-week low. The whole market’s confused at what’s going to happen next. Here’s what you should be worried about, and perhaps why you shouldn’t be worried at all. First off, as a reminder, Amazon, Netflix, and non-dividend stocks are n…
Warren Buffett: "Rule #1: Never lose money. Rule #2: Never forget rule #1."
Warren Buffett: The first rule of investment is: Don’t lose. And the second rule of investment is: Don’t forget the first rule. And that’s all the rules there are. I mean, if you buy things for far below what they’re worth, and you buy a group of them, yo…
Judicial activism and judicial restraint | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about the terms judicial activism and judicial restraint. In many videos, we have talked about how the judicial branch, one of its main powers, is to be a check on the executive and legislative branch; that it …