yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Susan Sarandon Holds Star Stuff | StarTalk
This is what I brought to your son’s birthday party. Cuz if you have a birthday party at the Museum, we got to do, got to take you places you haven’t been before. Exactly! So don’t you feel that? So does this mean… Ah, it’s heavier than the Academy Award.…
How to sell a corporate jet!
Budget is about $5 million. Looking for a plane to fit seven to eight people. Are you familiar with any of the aircraft models that they might be interested in? One of the partners currently has a plane right now. I’ll get you the specifics on it. I think…
Inductor kickback 1 of 2
I want to talk about a new example of an inductor circuit, and we have one shown here where this inductor is now controlled by a switch. This is a push button switch that we move in and out, and this metal plate here will touch these two contacts and comp…
Michael Burry BUYS Alibaba Stock
So as of the time of recording, we’ve just ticked over that 45-day period after the end of each quarter, which means the 13F filings are out. So in this video, let’s have a look at exactly what Michael Murray is up to with his portfolio and particularly w…
Biden's Corporate Tax Is Madness! | Squawk Box
What are we trying to fix? The economy is on fire. Leave it alone! People living in cities like New York, Los Angeles, to San Francisco, if Biden’s plan went through, they would be the highest taxed individuals on Earth. Is that American? Nah, I don’t thi…
How a broken, screwed-up life can be beautiful (Kintsugi)
Imagine having a beautiful vase decorating your living room. And it’s not just a vase; it’s a genuine nineteenth-century, hand-painted piece of porcelain created in the Satsuma province in Japan. One day, your neighbor’s dog sneaks into your garden, walks…