yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Refugees Welcomed in New York | Explorer
[music playing] HOST: Of approximately 61,000 residents in Utica, New York, nearly 11,000 are immigrants and refugees. And 450 or more arrive here each year. Utica was a manufacturing town in the 1970s and 1980s. Some of our factories began to leave, and…
Nat Geo Staff Ranks Top 8 BEST Walking Shoes for Men and Women | National Geographic
Heyo! I’m Starlight Williams, a digital editor at National Geographic and your go-to gal for information you didn’t know you needed. Today I’m teaming up with my fellow walking aficionado, Ruben Rodriguez Perez, to talk to you about our picks for the best…
Khan Academy Live: AP Calculus
Hi and welcome to live tutoring for the AP Calculus exams provided by Con Academy! In case you are curious, I am not Sal Con; my name is Dave. I first took the AP Calculus test back in 2006, and before joining KH Academy, I was an AP Calculus teacher. So…
The 5 WORST Investing Mistakes for 2023 (Investing for Beginners)
This video is sponsored by Morning Brew. Sign up to their free daily newsletter using the link in the description. Okay, so 2023 is your year. You’re finally getting serious about your investing, and you’re going to take the time to knuckle down and set …
8 STOIC TIPS FOR SOLVING PROBLEMS WITH PEOPLE | STOICISM INSIGHTS
Have you ever felt utterly overwhelmed by the noise around you, the endless stream of opinions, expectations, and the relentless pressure of ‘keeping up’? Imagine this: ancient stoic philosophers over 2,000 years ago faced the same human emotions, struggl…
Darwinism vs. Social Darwinism part 2 | US History | Khan Academy
So Emily and I have been talking about how natural selection, Darwin’s theory of evolution, has differed from some of the ways that people have interpreted evolution over time. I was specifically interested in this group known as the social Darwinists, wh…