yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Counting faces and edges of 3D shapes
How many faces does the following shape have? Pause this video and see if you can figure that out. All right, I’m assuming you paused it, and I’ll see if we can work through it together. I’m going to actually try to color the faces. So, we have this face…
Why the Sky ISN'T Blue
Happy 500,000! Thank you guys so much for subscribing to my channel and for joining me on this scientific adventure. You know, if you got 500,000 people together and we all held hands in a line, it would stretch from Sydney to Melbourne or from San Franci…
What Does Mars FEEL Like?
Want to know what the surface of Mars feels like? Well, this is MGS1, a precision Martian regolith simulant used by NASA, ISRO, private space companies, and universities to simulate the ground on Mars. It’s manufactured by Space Resource Technologies righ…
A Survivor's Story as a Guide at Rwanda's Genocide Memorial | Short Film Showcase
I would say like more than majority of the people, they are very smart. It’s a great pleasure you welcome to Kar Genocide Memorial. My name is Gamba. I’m the head guide of the place we’re visiting. The tour starts by laying the leaf of flowers as a sign o…
Adding multi digit numbers with regrouping
What we’re going to do in this video is add 48,029 to 233,930. And like always, pause this video, and I really encourage you to try to figure it out on your own. Let’s see if we get the same answer, and if we don’t, why. All right, so the way I’m going t…
David Friedman. What About The Poor?
Some people have no money, no friends, and no assets. Would these people also have no rights in an anarcho-capitalist society? Now, if you have somebody with no money at all, and nobody who likes them is willing to help him out, he may not be able to affo…