yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
What Does An Astronaut Dream About? | Short Film Showcase
On the odd occasion that I do remember my dreams, and quite often I have a dream where I’m back in space. I’m floating down one of the very long mere modules, so I would be going past. It’s a nice sort of slow rate, really sedate. Then there’s a window a…
Warren Buffett: How to Make Your First $100,000 (5 Steps)
If you want to make your first or next one hundred thousand dollars, you need to follow these five simple lessons from Warren Buffett. The majority of content out there about Warren Buffett gets it completely wrong. That content focuses on how Warren Buff…
THE FED JUST FLIPPED | Major Changes Explained
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So throughout the last month, there have been non-stop headlines about how the Federal Reserve is crashing the market, and in a way, they kind of did. January of 2022 quickly became the worst month on record ever for…
SPOT THE FAKE !! -------- DONG
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here, coming from Kansas for the 4th of July. Why Kansas? Well, because out here you can do anything. You can even put a firework store next to a gas station. But enough about the real world, let’s talk about DONGs, things you can d…
Organelles in eukaryotic cells | The cellular basis of life | High school biology | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is give ourselves a little bit of a tour of eukaryotic cells. The first place to start is just to remind ourselves what it means for a cell to be eukaryotic. It means that the inside of the cell there are membrane-boun…
Justification using first derivative | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
The differentiable function f and its derivative f prime are graphed. So let’s see. We see the graph of y is equal to f of x here in blue, and then f prime we see in this brownish orangish color right over here. What is an appropriate calculus based justi…