yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
The world depends on a collection of strange items. They're not cheap
Part of this video was sponsored by Google Domains. This is a US government warehouse that sells almost anything you can imagine: blueberries, steel, cigarettes, limestone, a standard bullet, and even some things you don’t want to imagine. I also see you …
Writing decimals and fractions from number lines
We’re told to express the point on the number line as both a fraction and a decimal, so pause this video and have a go at that. All right, now let’s do this together. We can see that the point in question is at a higher value than four and less than five…
Metaverse: Beyond Human
Imagine a world where you wake up, head to the office in the morning, to a party with friends in the evening, and then a live concert at midnight, all while sitting in the warmth of your home or from the comfort of your bed. That might just be part of hum…
Listening for Aliens | StarTalk
[Music] We’re all hoping that there’s some intelligent aliens trying to talk to us, sending us signals. But just because we want it to be true, doesn’t mean every radio signal from space that we can’t immediately understand must be some intelligent alien…
The Index Fund Problem Looming in 2024
I told you not to sell. I worry about it. A good.com. Do you happen to own index funds in your portfolio? Maybe SPY from State Street or VO from Vanguard or IVV from Black Rock? All these ETFs track the S&P 500, which is an index composed of the large…
Khan Academy and the Common Core
[Voiceover] A lot of users of Khan Academy, especially teachers, don’t fully know how much we have mapped and how much we have invested in the actual Common Core. As I often point out to folks, a standard is one thing, and the Common Core standards are de…