yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Multiplying and dividing decimals by 10
We’ve already learned that when we multiply by ten, let’s say we took the number 53 and we were to multiply it by ten, it has the effect of shifting all the digits one place to the left. So this should be a review for you, but this was going to be 530. We…
Sunni and Shia Islam part 1 | World History | Khan Academy
We’re now going to talk about the main division that emerges in Islam shortly after the death of Muhammad, and that division is between Sunnis and Shias. This division even exists today, where roughly 90% of the world’s 1.5 or 1.6 billion Muslims are Sunn…
$1 Trillion Joke | Market Cap (Short)
We’re gonna talk about the Apple one trillion dollar market cap and explain why this is such a silly number, and it’s actually based on false math. The problem is this formula for market cap, the math here, if you just multiply the spot and shares outstan…
Acorn Thieves | America's National Parks
This Pine is the Central Bank and Trust of the acorn woodpecker, and every inch is studded with neatly arranged holes—the woodpecker’s safe deposit boxes. Finding the absolutely perfect little vault for every acorn can be quite the puzzle. Each hole has b…
The Original Double Slit Experiment
What is light? What is light? Light is… light is… what is light? That’s a good question, isn’t it? What is light? Isn’t it an element? Light is brightness, I guess. We have auras? We all have auras. Which are light? Yes, they are. It lights up the roo…
Panda School: (EXCLUSIVE) How the National Zoo Trains Its Panda Cub | National Geographic
I’m one of a very select group of people to get to interact with this animal, and I don’t take that for granted. It’s really cool for me to get to do something like that. Beibei is just absolutely a joy to work with. There is something about him; he’s so …