yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Division as equal groupings
So it looks like we have some angry cats on our hands. Yeah, yeah, they seem angry. What we want to do is think about how can we separate these angry cats. Because the only thing worse than an angry cat is 12 of them coordinating potentially to take over …
Lithium 101 | National Geographic
(clanging) [Narrator] Over the course of human history, fuel for industry has come in many forms. But one of the major drivers of development in the current technological age is a highly volatile element that makes up only 0.002% of the Earth’s crust. Su…
Make Bold Guesses and Weed Out the Failures
Going even further, it’s not just science. When we look at innovation and technology and building, for example, everything that Thomas Edison did and Nikola Tesla did, these were from trial and error, which is creative guesses and trying things out. If y…
Envy Can Be Useful, or It Can Eat You Alive
Do you want to tell us about some of the jobs that you had as a youth and the specific job that kicked off your fanatical obsession with creating wealth? This gets a little personal, and I don’t want to do the humble brag thing. There was some thread goin…
15 Expensive Things That Are Worth The Money
Remember the banana duct tape to a wall that sold for 120,000? Yeah, okay, not everything that’s expensive is worth the money, but some things are. When you finally get rich, you’ll want to know where you should focus your spending. So here are 15 expensi…
Buy, Borrow, Die: How America's Ultrawealthy Stay That Way
Some of the very richest Americans pay little in taxes compared with how fast their fortunes grow each year. How? They use a tax strategy known as “buy, borrow, die.” It’s like the ultrawealthy are living on another planet. Average people need income to p…