yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Cost minimizing choice of inputs | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
We are now going to continue our discussion of factor markets, and we’re going to go beyond just thinking about labor as a factor. In fact, in this video, we’re going to start thinking about capital as well, which we know is another one of the factors of …
Should You BUY or RENT a Home in 2021?
Let’s talk about owning your own home. Owning your own home is no doubt a dream for a lot of people. A place to call your own, your home base, you know, a place to raise a family. However, particularly with rising house prices across the past 10 years, th…
8 Surprising Facts
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here… Coming to you from the Barbican in London. It’s beautiful, it’s like living inside the Regenstein Library. That’s a concrete joke. But, I’ve put together a leanback of videos all around YouTube that I really like, that I host a…
What If You Just Keep Digging?
If you’ve ever thought, “What if I just dug a really, really deep hole?”, that’s what the USSR did right here! That hole is deeper than the deepest part of the ocean. It’s deeper than Mount Everest is tall. They started digging it in the 1970s as part of …
109-Year-Old Veteran and His Secrets to Life Will Make You Smile | Short Film Showcase
[Music] Yeah, a lot of people say God kept you here to help others, but I don’t know why he kept me here. I can’t tell you. I ain’t talk to him; he ain’t talk to me. My name is Richard Ain Overton. I am 109 years old! [Music] I still walk, I still talk, a…
A monopsonistic market for labor | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
So let’s continue with our conversation around factors of production for a firm, and we’re going to focus on the labor market. So we’ve already drawn axes like this multiple times, where our horizontal axis this is the quantity, quantity of labor that’s …