yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Conservation of energy | Physics | Khan Academy
We place a ball on this ramp, and we want to now figure out what happens to the speed of the ball as it goes forward. If you try to do this using forces and accelerations, it’s going to be really tough. But instead, we’re going to use energy conservation …
Compare decimals word problems
Al is comparing two recipes for homemade bread. The recipe for white bread calls for 4⁄10 of a kilogram of flour. The recipe for whole wheat bread calls for 0.385 kilograms of flour. Which bread takes less flour? So, the white bread calls for 4⁄10 of a …
The Problem With Financial Minimalism
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So lately, I’ve noticed a big push towards the concept of financial minimalism. For those of you that are not aware, this is the concept in which you cut out every expense in your life that does not add to your overall e…
Naive Optimism Will Change Your Life
Imagine you’re an Olympic athlete; you could be a track star, a distant swimmer, or a figure skater. Whatever sport you choose, chances are you’ve been training for it since the moment you could walk. You have your gym routine down to a science. You’ve hi…
State of the aviation industry amidst war in Europe
Most of the globally aware and affected population were a bit shocked last week when Russia actually initiated its invasion of Ukraine. Of course, I’m not a political accommodator, but war is horrible no matter how you look at it. My heart goes out to all…
Are Guitars Worth Investing In? | Walt Grace PT III
People come from all over the world to come here. It’s a destination. You’re not a typical guitar retail store. There’s nothing like this I’ve ever seen. What is this thing in this case? That’s also a Martin. This one is twenty thousand dollars. Uh, yeah,…