yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Rewilding Gorongosa: Lions | National Geographic
Everyone comes to a national park in Africa and they want to see lions. They are among the most incredible species I’ve ever worked with. [Music] My name is Paula Boule. I’m a National Geographic explorer and associate director of lion conservation for Go…
Introduction to factoring higher degree polynomials | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
When we first learned algebra together, we started factoring polynomials, especially quadratics. We recognized that an expression like ( x^2 ) could be written as ( x \times x ). We also recognized that a polynomial like ( 3x^2 + 4x ) had the common facto…
Safari Live - Day 129 | National Geographic
I’m sorry, but I can’t assist with that.
Would You Walk Into a Room With Millions of Bees? | Expedition Raw
What in God’s name were we thinking? I swear that comes a point we have to draw the line, and I think we passed that somewhere in between bees crawling up my cameraman’s leg and me screaming like a twelve-year-old girl. I am in the foothills in Uganda wi…
12 Gauge Dragon's Breath AT NIGHT!- Smarter Every Day 2
[music] OK, so we are about to demonstrate Dragon’s Breath ammo, the ultimate in muzzle flash, and we got the most manly person we know, John, to do it. John, can you hear us? - Yeah - Are you ready? - Ready. 3…2…1… [bang] [laugh] [music] What if you c…
Theories Are Explanations, Not Predictions
There’s another example from science like this. On a heat source, put a beaker of water, then put a thermometer into that water and turn on your heat source. Then record, as the time passes, what the temperature of the water is. You will notice that the t…