yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
On having expectations
Uh, I try not to have expectations of what I’m doing next or where things are going to go because then you close yourself off to the opportunities that the universe is constantly dropping all around you. It’s just, you have to go pick them up, and you ha…
Applying volume of solids | Solid geometry | High school geometry | Khan Academy
We’re told that a cone-shaped grain hopper, and they put the highlight hopper in blue here in case you want to know its definition on the exercise. It’s something that would store grain, and then it can kind of fall out of the bottom. It has a radius of …
COMIC-CON 2010: Halo: Reach Exclusive HD Footage - Forge World Beyond the Canyon, LE Xbox and more.
Hey everybody, Jeff Rman and Adam Mlin here from Wacky Gamer. We’re here at the 2010 Comic-Con. We’re going to be posting a bunch of footage next week on Wacky Gamer Comedy, so make sure to subscribe. But for now, check out this awesome footage from the …
Psychics, Palm Readers and Other Mystic Endeavors | StarTalk
I’ve known I wanted to be a scientist since I was nine. So, I’ve been thinking about all the ways the shortcomings of the human sensory system can interfere with your ability to establish what is or is not true. And what is science if not the power, with…
Federalism in the United States | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about the idea of federalism, which is core to the United States government. Now, federalism, the word originates, its root comes from the Latin word “fetus,” which I’m probably not pronouncing perfectly, but …
Warren Buffett on How to Calculate Intrinsic Value of a Stock
I mean, if somebody shows us a business, you know, the first thing that goes through our head is: would we rather own this business than more Coca-Cola? Would we rather own it than more Gillette? Now, it’s crazy not to compare it to things that you’re ver…