yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Mark Zuckerberg on Taking Risks and Finding Talented People
And just to make this point, how far into Facebook did it actually become a company? Um, I don’t know. I think probably it
Transformations, part 2 | Multivariable calculus | Khan Academy
So in the last video, I introduced Transformations and how you can think about functions as moving points in one space to points in another. Here, I want to show an example of what that looks like when the input space is two-dimensional. This over here i…
A capacitor integrates current
So now I have my two capacitor equations; the two forms of the equation. One is I in terms of V, and the other is V in terms of I. We’re going to basically look at this equation here and do a little exercise with it to see how it works. I’m going to draw…
Exploring the danger & beauty of an ice cave for the first time | Never Say Never with Jeff Jenkins
OSKAR: So there are a few things we need to have in mind. JEFF: Okay. OSKAR: Before we go in. So we can see like the roof here. JEFF: Yeah. OSKAR: How thin it is. And this part can collapse, and it does. And then inside the ice cave, you can hear the …
Three Incorrect Laws of Motion
Nearly 350 years ago, Isaac Newton came up with three laws of motion that govern how everything moves. There are three pretty famous laws of motion. And they’re not very complicated, but if I told them to you as clearly as I can, you would think that you’…
Getting Started with Khan Academy for Remote Learning
Hey everyone! This is Jeremy Schieffling with Khan Academy. Super excited to be joining you this evening for our session on getting started with remote learning. Just to sort of set the tone for the evening, we know that there’s some challenging times out…