yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Surviving a Coyote Ambush | Something Bit Me!
Ambushed on a desolate road at night, Andrew repels a coyote attack, but the coyote isn’t alone. As soon as I hit the initial coyote on the head with the flashlight, that’s when the other two, you know, saw the aggression from me and started to attack. It…
The Tween Brain | Brain Games
While it might be easy to recognize twins growing older, predicting what their brains will do is not so simple. To gain insight to the tween brain, we’re asking people on the boardwalk some questions about good and bad ideas. Is it a good idea to eat sal…
3 FREE ways to future-proof your skills in the AI age
With the rise of AI, the job market is shifting fast. Here are three things you can practice for free on Khan Academy to future-proof your job skills. Number one is critical thinking. While AI can handle vast amounts of data, in the end, it’s humans who …
Armies of the Future | StarTalk
[Music] Rise of the robots. I. This is a story that’s never ending, heavily treated in science fiction platforms. Uh, for all, for in all frontiers: servant robots, military robots, sex robots. And maybe that’s inevitable, given the direction technolog…
Ponzi Factor | V-Log 1 | Tesla and Market Crash
Hey y’all doing! This time my first V log, a very impromptu V log. So it’s Sunday morning, July 29th, and I apologize for the casualness, but there are some ideas that my friends have been bugging me about to get out there because it’s gonna be a big week…
Passing atmospheric levels of cool 🧑‍🚀🌏 #womeninstem #space
This is how many tampons Sally Ride was offered on her first space mission, which lasted about six days. Like a lot of STEM fields, NASA was male-dominated, and Sally Ride was their first female astronaut. After her death, we learned something very privat…