yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
China’s Economic Collapse Just Got Worse
Zero Kovitz became one of the select drivers of global recession. If a company is relying on China for any type of material, if you slow China down, the world slows down. What’s up, guys? It’s Graham here. So throughout the last few weeks, you’ll probabl…
Why the Smart Money is Buying Alibaba Stock
So we’ve talked about the business. We’ve talked about the risks. Now I wanted to explore why our super investors are buying into Alibaba. So if you’ve been living under a rock, in Q1 Charlie Munger and Monish Pabrai were buying. Then in Q2, Monash Pabrai…
THIS is what it will cost to fight Climate Change
But I know you. You focus on the big picture, what’s practical. So when you look at what it’s going to take globally to fight climate change in terms of who has the money, what their motivations are, and what exactly it’s going to take to unlock those fun…
The Eighth Amendment | National Constitution Center | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Today I’m learning about the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the government from imposing excessive fines and bail, or inflicting cruel and unusual punishment on individuals accused or convicte…
Can China Reverse the Economic Crisis?
As you’ve probably seen over the past few months, China’s economy has suffered some pretty serious setbacks, and its citizens have felt the impact. As this chart from Simply Wall Street shows, most sectors have been very deep in the red over the past 12 m…
Warren Buffett's Timeless Investing Wisdom – 1988 Interview
To meet the wizard of Omaha, Warren Buffett, next on Adam Smith’s Money World. He doesn’t generally do interviews, but I called on him recently to get some of the wisdom and apherisms of Warren Buffett on the record. It is characteristic of Warren that he…