yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Follow THESE Watch Brands For Your Collection | Kitco
[Music] And Jordan is still alive today. He’s not, uh, you know, he’s still with us. If you had to ask him one question, you had to ask Jordan today, what would that be? Well, I see FP quite a bit. We were at Watch Week in Dubai just a few weeks ago. I w…
5 AMAZING Experiments and "Sauciest of the Week" !
Hey, Vsauce. It’s Michael with two big announcements. Count them, two. First of all, there’s a brand new episode of Vsauce Leanback that you can start by clicking the link at the top of this video’s description. This week the topic is crazy and classic s…
Packing the Shrimp Pots | Port Protection
Ahoy there mate! It’s absolutely flat calm and glassy out, so we have to seize the moment. Mother nature can squash you like a bug. The only thing you can really do is just put your boots on and see what’s gonna happen once you get out there. And there’s…
Introduction to infinite limits | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
In a previous video, we’ve looked at these graphs. This is y equal to one over x squared. This is y is equal to one over x. We explored what’s the limit as x approaches zero in either of those scenarios. In this left scenario, we saw as x becomes less an…
Multiplying using area models and the standard algorithm
What we’re going to do in this video is multiply the numbers 352 and 481, and we’re gonna do it in two different ways. But realize that the underlying ideas are the same. So first, let’s just appreciate that 352 can be rewritten as 300 plus 50 plus 2, or…
Confidence intervals and margin of error | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
It is election season, and there is a runoff between Candidate A versus Candidate B. We are pollsters, and we’re interested in figuring out, well, what’s the likelihood that Candidate A wins this election? Well, ideally, we would go to the entire populati…