yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
$90,000 Audemars Piguet 11.59 DOUBLE Your Investment Value | Kevin O'Leary
[Music] Please, last time you could grew a beard. You know, I had one about two years ago, and I liked it. I mean, it’s just… but when I went back to TV land and said like, “I wanna do it,” your shows have the beard on this city. Not a chance of him! Why …
The 'Value Investing' Strategy Explained - The Young Investors Podcast | Episode 1
Hey guys and welcome to our investing podcast! We’re doing a podcast, can you believe it? My name is Brandon, and I’m joined, gonna be joined each and every week by Hamish Hotter. Hello, how’s it going? Oh, I’m going quite well. How are you doing? Yeah…
Daylight Saving Time Explained
Every year some countries move their clocks forward in the spring only to move them back in the autumn. To the vast majority of the world who doesn’t participate in this odd clock fiddling, it seems a baffling thing to do. So what’s the reason behind it? …
A Man Among Wolves: Photographing Yellowstone’s Iconic Predators | National Geographic
This is so cool! I was in Yellowstone for a year and a half. My job was to shed light on wolf behavior in a natural landscape. A lot of times, wolves get persecuted, and this was an opportunity for me to just show wolves for what they were; for being larg…
It’s Rare to Have Competing, Viable, Scientific Theories
Edition that’s similar to Bayesianism, isn’t it? In both cases, they’re assuming that you can enumerate all the possible theories, but you can’t, because that’s the creativity coming in. It’s very rare in science to have more than one viable theory in phy…
2015 AP Biology free response 3
The amino acid sequence of cytochrome c was determined for five different species of vertebrates. The table below shows the number of differences in the sequences between each pair of species. So just to give us some context for what we’re talking about,…