yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Scott Cook - Founder and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Intuit | Khan Academy
All right, I think we’re ready to start. Anyone who wants to—anyone else wants to join us for the talk with Scott Cook, founder of Intuit? So I’ll just start. You know, for everyone here at Khan Academy who doesn’t know both Scott and Cigna Cook are, you …
Review of revenue and cost graphs for a monopoly | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
What I want to do in this video is review a little bit of what we’ve learned about monopolies and in the process get a better understanding for some of the graphical representations which we have talked about in the past. But I want to put it all togethe…
The TRUTH About Tesla Model 3 After 1 Year... (w/ @LudicrousFeed)
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we are talking about the Tesla Model 3 because recently my good friend Tom from Ludacris Feed was down in Canberra, and he reached out to me. He said, “Hey Brandon, you want to go for a drive?” You guy…
Two Chapters From Our New Book – Exclusive Preview!
Hello everybody! Today we’re doing something different: an exclusive preview. We’ll listen to the introduction and a chapter from the KTZ Gazar book Immune: A Journey into the Mysterious System that Keeps You Alive, written by KTZ Gazar founder and headwr…
Subtracting vectors with parallelogram rule | Vectors | Precalculus | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to think about what it means to subtract vectors, especially in the context of what we talked about as the parallelogram rule. So, let’s say we want to start with vector A, and from that, we want to subtract vector B. We have v…
Become Unconquerable | Stoic Philosophy
Bound upon me, rush upon me, I will overcome you by enduring your onset: whatever strikes against that which is firm and unconquerable merely injures itself by its own violence. Wherefore, seek some soft and yielding object to pierce with your darts. Sen…