yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
15 Things You Can LEARN from LUXURY BRANDS
We all have our favorite luxury brands, brands that tug at our heartstrings when we see them in store windows, as we slow our pace down to absorb the beauty of the products on display. But it’s more than just the beautiful display, isn’t it? Everything ab…
Double Drug Bust | To Catch a Smuggler
♪ AGENT: It’s approaching target vehicle. DANIELLE: Copy. Thank you. We have a new vehicle. Unidentified at this time. DANIELLE: This is, is pretty typical. Either a driver swap or the addition of another, another person involved in, in the transportati…
Dividing a decimal by a whole number on the number line
In this video, we’re going to try to figure out what 0.6, or 6 tenths, divided by 2 is. I’ll give you a little bit of a hint; we have 6 tenths plotted on the number line right over here. One way to think about it is if I wanted to go from zero to six ten…
KNOWLEDGE! --- LEANBACK #7
Hello, Vsauce. Michael here, and today I have a brand new episode of Vsauce Leanback, a playlist that I host made out of awesome videos from all over YouTube. The theme for this one is stuff I didn’t know last week, but now I do. It’s fun and you can begi…
Bitcoin For The Intelligent Layperson. Part Two: Public Key Cryptography.
[Music] Bitcoins aren’t physical coins, but they’re not files on a computer either. They’re really numbers in a public ledger called the blockchain. This contains a record of every Bitcoin transaction that has ever happened. You can think of a transaction…
2015 AP Physics 1 free response 2 c and d
Let’s now tackle the rest of this problem. They say a light bulb is nonic if its resistance changes as a function of current. Your setup from part A, which we have right over here, is to be used or modified to determine whether the light bulb is nonic. H…