yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
The Next Market Crash | How To Get Rich In The 2023 Recession
What’s up Graham, it’s guys here. So I’ve got some good news and some bad news. The bad news is that more than half of Americans are already behind in the retirement savings. Elon Musk is bracing for a painful recession throughout 2023, and the housing ma…
Lungs 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] Breathe in, breathe out. With every breath, the body is replenished and cleansed. A process made possible by two of the body’s most important and delicate organs. The lungs are two major components of the respiratory system. Soft, light, and …
Why 25% Of Workers Just Quit Their Job
Does anybody want to work anymore? It seems like quiet quitting is everywhere now. They’re saying half of people are thinking about quiet quitting. Late-night emails, ignore those. Quiet quitting is a really bad idea. What’s up, guys? It’s Graham here. S…
Everybody wants to love - Ingrid Michaelson cover
One two three [Music] four. We have fallen down again tonight. In this world, it’s hard to get it right, trying to make your heart fit like a glove. [Music] What you need is love, love, love. Everybody, everybody wants to love. Everybody, everybody wants…
Adding rational expression: unlike denominators | High School Math | Khan Academy
Pause the video and try to add these two rational expressions. Okay, I’m assuming you’ve had a go at it. Now we can work through this together. So, the first thing that you might have hit when you tried to do it is you realize that they have different de…
What is Random?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here and Derek. Generate(!) 78? That’s so random. Or is it? What does it mean to be random? Can anything really be random? What’s the most random thing ever? Today let’s stop being random and become ‘ransmart’. If something is unpred…