yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
More Lies About the World You Believe
So you’re 11 years old. You’ve just scarfed down some mac and cheese and birthday cake. You and your friends run wildly, eager to jump in the pristine blue pool on a hot summer day. And then your mom stops you, saying, “No swimming yet! Wait 30 minutes!” …
Congratulations Kendrick Lamar and Dave Free of pgLang on winning a Webby
Man, bro, let me tell you what had went down. I was two beds away from getting, bro, whole barbershop, bro. Yeah, oh my mama, bro, Peanut gonna call my phone talking about I just got paid. I looked at the phone, “You just got paid?” What, man? What the di…
The 2020 Mortgage Crisis Explained
What’s up guys? It’s Graham here. So lately I’ve been hearing a lot of talk about this upcoming mortgage crisis. Not to mention, pretty much every single news website in existence is mentioning it. So let’s talk about it. And instead of creating some sor…
The Inverse Leidenfrost Effect
Now you’ve probably heard of the Leidenfrost effect. That’s when a volatile droplet like water levitates over a hot surface because it’s floating on a little cushion of its own vapor. Here I’m gonna try to create the inverse Leidenfrost effect where we le…
I Am Associated With Red Straps Now #shorts
Are there any watches where you think you shouldn’t put a red strap on? I own a 5711 in its mintage form. I wear it; the bracelet for that is part of the heritage of the piece. But it means it can’t take the journey with me onto television because I’m ass…
Simplify a ratio from a tape diagram
We’re told that the following diagram describes the volume of yellow and red paint in an orange mixture. So we can see that for every 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 parts of yellow, we have one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight parts of re…