yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Fossils and rock layers | The geosphere | Middle school Earth and space science | Khan Academy
Have you ever wanted to travel back in time? Would you go meet your younger self? Would you go and ride a dinosaur, or would you meticulously create a timeline of the earth’s 4.6 billion year long history based on major geological events? Even though geo…
Those “Real Estate Investor Seeks Trainee” Signs: Make $120k/yr With No Experience?!
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, after posting a video the other week explaining the truth behind the “We Buy Houses Fast Cash” signs, a new question kept coming up and that was, what about the real estate investors’ “Sheiks Trainee” signs? After…
Did Apple Just Have Its Moat Blocked? (Epic Games Lawsuit)
So here on the channel, I love talking long-term Warren Buffett-style value investing, and that strategy largely boils down to four key points. There’s understanding the business, so you know what you’re getting yourself into. Then you find a competitive …
Probably not.
Should I be spending money to market my free app? The answer is no. You should not be spending money to acquire users for your free app. It’s going to make a bunch of numbers go up, and all of those numbers are going to go back down. You will find yoursel…
Satya Nadella on the journey to becoming Microsoft's CEO & reimagining technology's impact
YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU NEXT TIME. NEXT TIME.
Finishing the intro lagrange multiplier example
So, in the last two videos, we were talking about this constrained optimization problem where we want to maximize a certain function on a certain set: the set of all points ( x, y ) where ( x^2 + y^2 = 1 ). We ended up working out, through some nice geom…