yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
The Physics of Lightsabers | StarTalk
[Applause] Star Talk, we’re back featuring my interview with the British physicist Brian Cox. So I had to bring up the fact that he and I had, like, a Twitter argument over the physics of lightsabers. Aha, yeah! And I just had to bring it up and just ope…
5 Websites I use as a Value Investor
[Music] Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, uh, coming at you from my computer today because a common question that I get from a lot of you guys is what websites am I going to to kind of source all my information and what you know websit…
Acacia Ants Vs. Elephant | A Real Bug's Life | National Geographic
Up against the largest land animal, no bug is safe. The elephant is headed straight for our old-timer’s tree. She’s so shortsighted, she can’t see more than a few inches ahead. But she can feel through her feet, and she’s picking up bad vibes. Mammoth mon…
Do You Have a Free Will?
Are you free? Free to choose what you do and make decisions? Or are you an NPC, unable to decide anything for yourself? You feel that you have control over your life, or at least what you’ll have for breakfast. But this may be an illusion. Physics actual…
Science of Laser Hair Removal in SLOW MOTION
Uh, we are driving to a very strange location somewhere I have never been, and it’s because of the woman in the back seat. This is Dianna, ‘Physics Girl.’ Yeah, uh, we are gonna go get a consultation for something very special right now. It is… Look, I’m …
Should you buy your private jet in cash?
Steve, I’m about to buy my first jet. Should I pay cash or should I finance it? I really think it depends. If you can make more money than they’re going to charge with the bank, obviously then borrow the money. But I’d say about 80% of the people finance…