yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Philosophy For Breakups | STOICISM
A breakup can be excruciatingly painful. No doubt about it. Last months I’ve had several requests for a video about breakups. I think we can get a lot of information from philosophy to make a breakup a bit more bearable. So, I’ve decided to make a series …
The U.S. Faces a Major Debt Problem
I just got off the phone with the president. I talked to him twice today, and after weeks of negotiations, we have come to an agreement in principle. This is House Speaker Kevin McCarthy explaining to the media that finally the Republicans and the Democra…
Shaping American national identity from 1890 to 1945 | AP US History | Khan Academy
[Instructor] In 1890, the United States was not exactly a major player on the world stage. It was an industrial behemoth, attracting immigrants from all over the world, but it was focused on its own internal growth, not foreign affairs. There was little i…
Proof: parallel lines have the same slope | High School Math | Khan Academy
What I want to do in this video is prove that parallel lines have the same slope. So let’s draw some parallel lines here. So that’s one line, and then let me draw another line that is parallel to that. I’m claiming that these are parallel lines. Now I’m …
Interpreting graphs with slices | Multivariable calculus | Khan Academy
So in the last video, I described how to interpret three-dimensional graphs. I have another three-dimensional graph here; it’s a very bumpy guy. This happens to be the graph of the function ( f(x,y) = \cos(x) \cdot \sin(y) ). You know, I could also say th…
How to Simplify Your Life | Minimalist Philosophy
Transcendentalist philosopher Henry David Thoreau argued that, for humans, simplicity is the law of nature. We thrive in simplicity: it’s an optimal state free of clutter and without unnecessary weight. When our lives are simple, it’s easier to see where …