yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Passing Obama’s Stimulus Bill | Obama: The Price of Hope
NARRATOR: Obama needs just two Republican senators to defy their party. He turns to the veteran leader of the Senate Democrats. None of the Republicans who wanted to do something to help wanted to be the 60th vote. So I had to get 61 votes on everything. …
The ONE thing most Millionaires do that makes them Millionaires
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, this is something that so many people seem to miss entirely or just don’t fully understand. This is also something that the most financially successful people all seem to do on autopilot without ever even thinkin…
Cool Things on YouTube and More! DONG #19
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. Do you remember that Italian researcher I met in an airplane a couple of months ago? Well, I had to learn more, and so we’re gonna meet tomorrow here in Rome, Italy. In the meantime, here’s some cool things on the internet that …
Mega Dust Storms | MARS
[music playing] JIM GREEN: We’ve been studying the dust storms of Mars for quite some time. And there’s a particular season where some of the dust storms can actually go global. Not just regional, but global. Dust storms on Mars can be absolutely enormou…
Semicolons and complex lists | The colon and semicolon | Punctuation | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians! So, if you’ve ever written a list of items or actions, you know that we use commas to separate the elements of that list. Sometimes, though, our lists get a bit complicated, and we have something called a complex list. When that’s the …
Solving equations and inequalities through substitution example 2
Mario started the day with five fire flowers. He used some, and now only has three left. If u is the number of flowers he’s used, we can write the following equation: how many fire flowers did Mario use? So, he started with five, he uses some of them, so…