yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Comparing with z-scores | Modeling data distributions | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Before applying to law school in the U.S., students need to take an exam called the LSAT. Before applying to medical school, students need to take an exam called the MCAT. Here are some summary statistics for each exam. For the LSAT, the mean score is 15…
Chris Dixon at Startup School 2013
So today I’m going to talk about good ideas that look like bad ideas. There’s a great, my clicker is not working, sorry, technical problems there. Okay, thanks, oops. So there’s a great PG blog post where he talks about Peter Thiel came to talk and said …
How To Make $100 Per Day With Index Funds
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So there comes a time in everyone’s life where you stop and think to yourself, “How do I make a hundred dollars a day investing in index funds?” Alright, fine, maybe it doesn’t exactly happen like that, but chances are …
2015 AP Physics 1 free response 3c
All right, now let’s tackle part C. Use quantitative reasoning, including equations as needed, to develop an expression for the new final position of the block. Express your answer in terms of D. All right, I’m going to set up a little table here for par…
How to Get and Test Startup Ideas - Michael Seibel
There’s a common misconception that your idea has to be great in order to start a company, and the first thing I want to do is destroy that misconception. Personally, I was one of the cofounders of a company called Justin.tv. It later became a company cal…
4 FACTS.
Come here. Come here. My webcam doesn’t even work. You know what these are? What are they? Nuts. You don’t know what these are? Hazelnuts? These are hazelnuts. No! That’s not what it is. They’re kinda weird. What are these one? Those are cashews. I hate c…