yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
My Investing Plan For 2023 (How To Prepare)
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So 2023 is probably going to be one of the most confusing years for investing. After all, stocks are the cheapest they’ve been in two years, but there’s a chance they could drop even further. Real estate has only starte…
‘Paris to Pittsburgh’ - Trailer | National Geographic
DONALD TRUMP: The United States will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord. I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris. Pittsburgh? Now what was upsetting about that, and that alliteration, was the stereotype of our past. But Pittsb…
How to buy a $25,000,000 private jet!
Hey Steve, I have 25 million dollars and I want a jet from London to Dubai. No problem, we got a few we can choose from. Let’s take a look on the video. Let’s do it! 125 million dollars! How many passengers do you want to carry? It’s only me, I don’t h…
Eulers formula
So in this video, we’re going to talk about Oilers formula. One of the things I want to start out with is why. Why do we want to talk about this rather oddly looking formula? What’s the big deal about this? And there is a big deal, and the big deal is e. …
Homemade FLAMETHROWER: Mind Blow 6
A tree that bleeds, and if less than 10 of your asparagus contains beetle eggs, it’s good to eat. Vsauce, Kevin here; this is mind blow! Many claim Castlevania 2: Simon’s Quest is the first game to feature multiple endings, which would be true, except for…
A warning about Investing in Gold...
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here! So here’s a question that I get pretty frequently: “Graham, what do you think of gold? Should I invest in gold? How much gold should I have?” And honestly, unless you’re talking about Runescape, my answer is pretty m…