yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
The Role of Role Models | StarTalk
[Music] It’s often said that it’s easier to be something if you can see it; if you can imagine yourself in that position. Role models have always played an important role in that. Role models have that role. I have a slightly contrarian view of role mode…
Pope Francis: The Story Behind National Geographic's Cover Photo | Nat Geo Live
[Music] Dave: What was tougher, covering the pope for six months or slogging through a Honduran jungle looking for a lost city? Oh well, it was definitely much harder to access the Vatican than the jungle. For me, when you work around the pope, you have…
Wicked Laugh | Wicked Tuna
There’s your balloon ball! Get that! The wicked pissah team fell apart for a little bit, but now we’re running on all cylinders. We had a great week last week; we had a really good time. We caught two fish through at a time on the pizza. We made 16 grand;…
Calculating angle measures to verify congruence | Congruence | High school geometry | Khan Academy
We have four triangles depicted here, and they’ve told us that the triangles are not drawn to scale. We are asked which two triangles must be congruent, so pause this video and see if you can work this out on your own before we work through this together.…
Squishy Robot Fingers: A Breakthrough for Underwater Science | National Geographic
We’re in the northern part of the Red Sea, and the reason we’re here is we’re trying to test out our squishy robot fingers for the first time in a reef. So we tested these squishy fingers in a swimming pool, and now we wanted to put them to the true test…
Thought Experiments No One Can Solve
What if I told you that you died last night in your sleep and that your body and mind have been replaced by an exact replica of you, a clone who has all the same characteristics and memories that you had? Impossible, you’d probably reply. But can you prov…