yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Sci-Fi Monsters: Past, Present, Future | StarTalk
Who doesn’t love the zombies? You know, they’re always chasing you. There’s always more of them, and they keep you alert. But also, who doesn’t love a good alien? We all want to meet the aliens. So, when I think of these forces that rise up in the storyt…
YouTube vs Grey: A Ballad of Accidental Suspension
‘Twas a Sunday morning when I woke up, happy and ready for the day, when suddenly… [alarm sounding] (as YouTube bot) Your access to YouTube has been suspended. (as Grey) Wha… why? (as YouTube bot) Because of a perceived violation of the terms of servic…
Michael Burry Calls Extreme Overvaluation and Reduces His Exposure
All right, 13-F season continues, folks, and we’re moving right along to Michael Burry, who quite honestly is here, there, and everywhere at the moment. So, in this video, we’re going to talk about the two big moves he’s pulled with his own portfolio tha…
Khan Academy Districts Overview
Foreign [Music] The benefit that Khan Academy brings to our school district is being able to provide a platform that provides individualized practice study skill. The ability for students to increase their knowledge proficiency. The support that Khan Aca…
Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic
Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can’t account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because acco…
How to Analyze an Income Statement Like a Hedge Fund Analyst
Being able to understand and analyze a company’s income statement is one of the most foundational pieces of being a great investor. If you want to invest successfully, this is one of the most important skills in helping you make money by investing. In thi…