yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
How Big Can a Person Get?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. Ten centimeters - about four inches. This is how much taller on average people are today than they were 150 years ago. Better nutrition and medical care early in life has allowed us to better take advantage of the blueprints wi…
Why Scientists Are Puzzled By This Virus
Very recently, scientists discovered that your body is teeming with trillions of the most bizarre viruses. These viruses are not your enemies but critical to your health, protecting you from disease, maybe even killing cancer. A new frontier of science, s…
Carrot Sharpener. LÜT #27
Why would anybody peel a carrot when they could use an oversized pencil sharpener built just for them? And the same goes for cigarette…pencils. It’s episode 27 of LÜT. For pencils that are more musical, grab yourself a pair of drumstick pencils. And Davi…
Michael Burry Calls Extreme Overvaluation and Reduces His Exposure
All right, 13-F season continues, folks, and we’re moving right along to Michael Burry, who quite honestly is here, there, and everywhere at the moment. So, in this video, we’re going to talk about the two big moves he’s pulled with his own portfolio tha…
Office Hours at Startup School NY 2014
So next up, all right, Gary Tan and I are going to do onstage office hours. This is most of what happens during Y.C. The partners meet individually with startups, and we give them advice about whatever problems they’re facing. It’s usually 25 minutes per …
Strategies for eliminating variables in a system examples
We’re asked which of these strategies would eliminate a variable in the system of equations. Choose all answers that apply. So this first one says add the equations. Pause this video. Would adding the equations eliminate a variable in this system? All ri…