yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Dear 2022
I don’t know if it’s just me, but it’s basically 2022 now, and I’m still mentally processing 2020. When I think back about 2021 and what it did for me as a person, it doesn’t feel like much of anything new, just a rehash of last year. It’s like they’ve me…
TRUMP JUST STORMED WALL STREET
What’s up, grab it’s guys here. So, normally I don’t make videos like this, and I tend to stay away from anything involving politics. But today we gotta talk about one of the most requested topics of investing that stands to make or lose people a lot of m…
How Engines Work - (See Through Engine in Slow Motion) - Smarter Every Day 166
Hey, it’s me Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. You’ve probably cranked a car engine thousands of times in your life, right? You’re familiar with that roar as the engine comes to life? Have you ever thought about what’s going on inside the engine?…
LA92 Panel - Live | National Geographic
[Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Laughter] [Music] [Laughter] [Music] [Laughter] [Music] [Laughter] [Music] [Laughter] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] you you [Music] you [Mus…
All Shower Thoughts I Had This Year
have you ever paused to think about how one of the most famous sentences of all time doesn’t make grammatical sense? Well, because we all apparently heard it wrong and continue to say it wrong. According to the man himself, Neil Armstrong, what he did say…
What’s the most effective way to offset the depreciation of your jet?
So what’s kind of the sweet spot in terms of how old the jet is where someone else is taking the depreciation and the big hit for you, but you’re not going to be stuck with something no one wants in 5 to 10 years? No, it’s a great question, Preo, because…