yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Dot Com Makes Good | Wicked Tuna
We’re gonna go over to Dave and check his fish out. Steam it, steam it, baby! You having fun yet? Huh? Yeah, huh? This is no round just drive-bys, right? We mark that man big. The meat is pink, beautiful! Here, we’re gonna make a lot of money here. Till …
Do Sharks Hunt Cooperatively? | Shark Attack Files
In a remote atoll near Tahiti, Corey Garza, Andy Casagrande, and safety diver Perrick Seibold put themselves in the line of fire. These investigators test the theory that some tiger sharks may work together and hunt in packs. Before they know it, they’re …
Jeff Dean’s Lecture for YC AI
So I’m going to tell you a very not super deep into any one topic but very broad brush sense of the kinds of things we’ve been using deep learning for the kinds of systems we’ve built around making deep learning faster. This is joint work with many, many,…
Warren Buffett: Why Real Estate is a Lousy Investment
We don’t have any competitive advantage over experienced real estate investors in the field, and we wouldn’t have if we were operating with our own money as a partnership. If you operate as a corporation, such as ours, which is taxable under chapter C of …
Threats to the U.S system and what we need to do
Would you agree with this? We have the greatest system of government ever since the beginning of time. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights have a lot of safeguards built in. As Churchill said, when it comes down to it, we try everything else, but we e…
How he made $200,000 in commissions his 2nd year in Real Estate
So just that alone, just sifting through all the bull, it’s gonna save you the time that you can spend finding and working with people who are serious. Yeah, and I think that difference alone should easily equate to an actual twenty percent in business ju…