yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
15 Traps to Avoid in Life
Life is a long road made of choices that can change it right away in a positive or not so positive kind of way. Most of the time, how you live your life is only down to you and your choices. Be them important decisions or just small. What should we eat to…
Transforming Human Poop Into Eco-Friendly Fertilizer | Best Job Ever
I’m gonna go get in my poop dumping uniform. See you in a minute. Working with poop in Haiti may not necessarily seem like something you could really put your heart into, like a job you could really love. Okay, I’m ready! Yes, but basically we’ve create…
The Rules for Rulers
[Ominous music plays] Do you want to rule? Do you see the problems in your country and know how to fix them? If only you had the power to do so. Well, you’ve come to the right place. But before we begin this lesson in political power, ask yourself: why d…
Interpreting change in speed from velocity-time graph | Differential Calculus | Khan Academy
An object is moving along a line. The following graph gives the object’s velocity over time. For each point on the graph, is the object speeding up, slowing down, or neither? So pause this video and see if you can figure that out. All right, now let’s do…
15 Things You Can Do Today To Instantly Improve Your Life
Good things happen to those who wait, but what about those who don’t want to wait? Is there anything you can do now to instantly improve your situation? Is there anything that has an immediate impact on the quality of your life? Of course, there is. Okay…
How to Learn Faster with the Feynman Technique (Example Included)
There’s this pretty well known quote that gets thrown around a lot, and it’s often attributed to Albert Einstein, and it goes, “Now whether or not Einstein was the person who actually said this, let’s be real he probably wasn’t.” It’s still really insight…