yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
How To Build Product As A Small Startup - Michael Seibel
A lot of the problems that I faced in the early stages of my companies were because I didn’t have a process to get product out of the door. Um, instead, my co-founders and I would have long debates, which would often turn into arguments. We wouldn’t write…
A String of Shark Attacks in San Diego | When Sharks Attack
[Music] It’s just a really tight-knit ocean loving community. Uh, everybody generally has the same sort of healthy ocean lifestyle vibe. It’s what makes this area so unique. Scott Bass has called San Diego home for over 40 years. “I love living here; you…
You Can't Touch Anything
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And today we’re going to get close, like really close. In fact, I want to answer the question: what’s the closest we can get to other objects and other people? Now, it might sound like kind of a simple, easy question, but when …
Is Most Published Research Wrong?
In 2011, an article was published in the reputable “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”. It was called “Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect,” or, in other words, proof that peopl…
Finding 1 on the number line
I’m here at the Khan Academy exercise called “Find One on the Number Line,” and they’re asking us to do exactly that. It says move the dot to one on the number line, and it’s a little interactive dot that I could move around. So let’s think about how I wo…
Proportionality constant from table
[Instructor] We’re told the quantities x and y are proportional, and then they give us a table where they give us a bunch of x’s and they give us the corresponding y’s. When x is four, y is 10. When x is five, y is 12.5, and so on and so forth. Find th…