yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
Refraction in a glass of water | Waves | Middle school physics | Khan Academy
So, something very interesting is clearly going on when we look at this pencil dipped in this cup of water. We would expect if maybe there was no water in this glass that we would just see the pencil continue straight down in a line that looks something l…
Big Short Investors Weigh In On The Banking Crisis (Credit Suisse - Michael Burry, Steve Eisman)
Hello everyone and welcome back to yet another episode of which major bank is failing this week! What a massive season it’s been for the show. We’ve had Silvergate on the program, we had Silicon Valley Bank bite the dust last week, it was all Signature Ba…
An Astronaut's View of Earth
When I was outside on my first space walk, I was on the dark side of the world over the Indian Ocean and I shut off all the lights in my suit to let my eyes adjust. And as I came south of Australia in the darkness, we drove through the southern lights and…
Shana Fisher at Startup School NY 2014
Hello. I’m Kat Manalac, and I am a partner at Y Combinator. I’m excited to see you all here today, and I’m also excited to introduce you to Shana Fisher. Shana is the founder and managing partner of High Line Venture Partners, which is based here in New Y…
How do QR codes work? (I built one myself to find out)
When QR codes first came out, I thought they were awful, never going to catch on. This is a flow chart from the time that really resonated with me. The problem as I saw it was that QR codes are ugly, and they mean nothing to people. I would rather just se…
Definite integral involving natural log | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s now take the definite integral from 2 to 4 of (6 + x^2) over (x^3) dx. At first, this might seem pretty daunting. I have this rational expression, but if we just rewrite this, it might jump out at you how this could be a little bit simpler. So, thi…