yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts.

The first fallacy, which I believe is the most fundamental falsehood that leads to other false ideas, is the notion that stocks are equity instruments that represent ownership. Finance professionals will argue the stock market can't be a Ponzi scheme because the value of a stock represents value in a company, and ownership instruments are being exchanged in the transactions.

But there's practically no truth to this idea because the value of a stock has no legitimacy. It is just an arbitrary number derived from a Ponzi exchange process, and the value is not backed by anything. A share of Google can trade around nine hundred dollars, but Google explicitly states in writing that the par value of their stock is only 0.001 cent.

Google also says they do not pay their investors any dividends, and their Class C shareholders have no voting rights. So if you own a share of Google, you won't receive any money from Google's business activities, you won't be allowed to vote on any corporate issues, and Google isn't obligated to pay you anything more than 0.001 cent for that share you bought for nine hundred dollars.

Does that really sound like a legitimate ownership instrument? If I mail you a chair that was missing three legs, the seat cushion, and the backrest, whatever I sent you, can I really call it a chair? For a value to have legitimacy, there must be someone or something in place to back that value.

The value of the dollar is backed by the United States government; the value of a house is backed by the intrinsic physical value of the house itself. But the value of stocks is not legitimately backed by anyone or anything. The idea that today's common stock represents the real intrinsic value of a company is a baseless and unproven idea, and if people are selling such an idea to make money, then it is also a fraudulent idea.

More Articles

View All
15 Life-Changing Decisions Self-Made Billionaires Had to Make to Be Successful
There are 2,640 billionaires in the world that we know of. About 65 to 70% built their fortune through their own efforts, and at each pivotal point in their lives, these people had to make a decision that would change their lives. The road is far from eas…
Planet or Plastic? | Explorer's Fest
[Applause] Some of you may have seen or heard about that classic film called The Graduate, starring Dustin Hoffman. As a young graduate was advised by the crusty businessman, “The future, my boy, is plastics.” Think 1960s, when plastics in our society wer…
Death by Black Hole
As of lately, it seems that everybody is trying to tell you when and how the world will end. Some scenarios are far more familiar and likely than others. Those that are widely discussed in the media range from infectious diseases to nuclear war, all the w…
Predator prey cycle | Ecology | Khan Academy
What I want to do in this video is think about how different populations that share the same ecosystem can interact with each other and actually provide a feedback loop on each other. There are many cases of this, but the most cited general example is the…
Charlie Munger – The Man Who Built Berkshire Hathaway | A Documentary
[Music] America looked at capitalism as a failed experiment. This is the example of the time when capitalism broke. There was a terrible deflation, a shortage of money so little money that people made their own monopoly money, their own script. It was so …
Impact of removing outliers on regression lines | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
The scatter plot below displays a set of bivariate data along with its least squares regression line. Consider removing the outlier at (95, 1). So, (95, 1) we’re talking about that outlier right over there and calculating a new least squares regression li…