yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Differentiating rational functions | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let's say that Y is equal to five minus three X over x squared plus three X, and we want to figure out what is the derivative of Y with respect to X. Now, it might immediately jump out at you that look-look, Y is being defined as a rational expression here, as the quotient of two different expressions.

We could even view this as two different functions. You could view this one up here as U of X, so you could say this is the same thing. This is the same thing as U of X over— you could view the one in the denominator as V of X. So that one right there is V of X.

If you're taking the derivative of something that can be expressed in this way, as the quotient of two different functions, well then you could use the quotient rule. And I'll give you my little aside like I always do: the quotient rule, if you ever forget it, can be derived from the product rule, and we have videos there because the product rule is a little bit easier to remember.

But what I can do is just say, look, dy/dx, if Y is just U of X over V of X, I'm just going to restate the quotient rule. This is going to be the derivative of the function in the numerator, so d/dx of U of X times the function in the denominator times V of X, minus the function in the numerator U of X times the derivative of the function in the denominator times d/dx V of X, and we're almost there.

And then over the function in the denominator squared, the function in the denominator squared. So this might look messy, but all we have to do now is think about, well, what is the derivative of U of X? What is the derivative of V of X? And we should just be able to substitute those things back into this expression we just wrote down.

So let's do that. The derivative with respect to X of U of X is equal to, let's see, 5 minus 3x. So the derivative of 5 is 0, the derivative of negative 3x, well, that's just going to be negative 3. That's just negative 3. If any of that looks completely unfamiliar to you, I encourage you to review the derivative properties and maybe the power rule.

And now let's think about what is the derivative with respect to X, derivative with respect to X of V of X? Well, the derivative of x squared, we just bring that exponent out front. It's going to be 2 times X to the 2 minus 1, or 2 X to the first power, or just 2 X. And then the derivative of 3x is just 3. So, 2x plus 3.

Now we know everything we need to substitute back in here. The derivative of U with respect to X: this right over here is just negative 3. V of X, this we know, is x squared plus 3x. We know that this right over here is V of X, and then U of X we know is 5 minus 3x.

The derivative of V with respect to X we know is 2x plus 3, and then finally V of X we know is x squared plus 3x. So this is x squared plus 3x. And so what do we get? Well, we are going to get— and it's going to look a little bit hairy.

It's going to be equal to negative—I’ll focus. So first, we have this business up here, so it's negative 3 times x squared plus 3x. So I'm just going to distribute the negative 3. So it's negative 3x squared minus 9x.

And then from that, we are going to subtract the product of these two expressions. So let's see, what is that going to be? Well, we have a 5 times 2x which is 10x, of 5 times 3 which is 15. We have a negative 3x times 2x, so that is going to be negative 6x squared, and then a negative 3x times 3, so negative 9x.

And let's see, we can simplify that a little bit. 10x minus 9x, well that's just going to leave us with X. If we take 10x minus 9x, it's just going to be X.

And then in our denominator, we're almost there. In our denominator, we could just write that as x squared plus 3x squared, or if we want, we could expand it out. I'll just leave it like that: x squared plus 3x squared.

And so if we want to, let's just simplify or attempt to simplify this a little bit. It's going to be negative 3x squared minus 9x, and then let's see, you're going to have a negative minus X, minus X, and then minus 15, and then minus negative 6x squared, so plus 6x squared—all of that over x squared plus 3x squared or x squared plus 3x squared, I should say it that way.

Now let's see, this numerator I can simplify a little bit. Negative 3x squared plus 6x squared, that's going to be positive 3x squared.

And then, we have, other than orange, we have negative 9x minus an X, well that's going to be minus 10x, minus 10x. And then we have minus 15, so minus 15.

And so there you have it. We finally have finished. This is all going to be equal to—this is all going to be equal to 3x squared minus 10x minus 15 over x squared plus 3x squared, and we are done.

More Articles

View All
Mistakes when finding inflection points: not checking candidates | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Olga was asked to find where f of x is equal to x minus two to the fourth power has inflection points. This is her solution. So we look at her solution, and then they ask us: Is Olga’s work correct? If not, what’s her mistake? So pause this video and see…
Earthquakes 101 | National Geographic
The ground starts to quiver; glasses rattle. Soon, walls shift, and everything begins to collapse—telltale signs of what could be a devastating earthquake. We’ve seen the destruction they unleash. Some of us may have even lived through one, and we know th…
This is how much YouTube paid me for my 1,000,000 viewed video...
Ah, YouTube! The place where dreams are made and crushed. The place where your monthly income is essentially left up to the gods and whatever the YouTube gods deem you are worthy of for that month. Well, you just have to live with that. But seriously, You…
Introduction to Middle school biology | Khan Academy
Hi everyone! Sal Khan here and welcome to middle school biology. I have Iman Howard here who manages our STEM content. Welcome, Iman! And why should folks care about middle school biology? Biology is the study of life and so in this course, it really ans…
Underestimating the problem of induction
I’m going to talk about two of the biggest problems I can see with the presupposition lists. Attempts to establish a rational basis for inductive reasoning. Hum’s writing on inductive inference draws our attention to the fact that inductive inferences are…
2002 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting (Full Version)
Here but a seconder or anybody would like to speak that motion might now work their way over to the microphone in zone one. Could we have a spotlight on where there it is? And that way when we get to that point of the program, if anybody that would like t…