yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Trump’s not the problem. He’s a symbol of 4 bigger issues | Big Think Top 10 2018 | Ian Bremmer


5m read
·Nov 3, 2024

[Music] The problem is not Trump. Trump is a symptom of the problem. If the problem with Trump, it wouldn't be happening other places around the world. We actually see all sorts of countries—advanced industrial democracies—where people are getting angrier, and they're voting more and more against the establishment.

We saw that with the Brexit referendum, which was before the U.S. presidential election. We saw in Germany with the rise of the Alternatives for Deutschland, an actively Euroskeptic party for the first time since World War Two. We have nationalists in the German parliament. We saw with recent Italian elections where they threw out all of the establishment parties, and instead, it's the Five Star Movement and the League—again Euroskeptic, anti-immigration populist political forces. This is very unusual, and it's not coincidence.

So why is it happening? One reason is because you have lots of members of the working and middle classes that feel like they are not doing well economically, and no one in the establishment is gonna help them. So let's vote for some change. Let's vote against free trade. Let's vote against the support of the establishment. Let's bring in something new.

A second point: a lot of this is anti-immigration. Demographics have changed an awful lot in the United States, in Canada, and in Europe over the past decades. A lot of people feel, people that have come before, say wait a second, you're not taking care of me, but you're gonna bring in these new people. And these new people, who I don't necessarily like or understand or trust, these new people who are getting benefits—but what about my benefits? It's gonna cost a lot of money to bring them in. Are they gonna steal my jobs? Are they gonna cause crime?

Even though in the United States, we know that first-generation immigrants don't actually cause more crime than those that have lived here, nonetheless, the willingness to believe that those other people are bad and a problem goes up a lot when you feel like your government's not taking care of you. So that's been a big piece of it.

A third piece has been the military. You know, the foreign policy establishment in the United States has been very willing to support the U.S. getting into wars around the world, but most of the sons and daughters of the foreign policy establishment don't actually fight in those wars themselves. That's also true of the political leaders that are responsible.

As we know, you know, it's the poor people, it's the enlisted men and women they get sent off. Their families are left broken, their communities are hindered. They come back from Iraq and Afghanistan—billions upon billions of dollars wasted on these wars, enormous numbers of people that are killed or wounded or have post-traumatic stress disorder. They come back; they're not seen as heroes. The Americans and the Allies didn't win these wars. The Veterans Administration doesn't take care of them.

So, as a consequence, you see those people getting really angry and not voting for Hillary or Jeb; they're voting for Bernie Sanders or for Donald Trump. And then you have technology, which is that technology today is increasingly driving people apart. We get most of our information in the United States from advertising companies that view us as commodities, products. They want—they sell our eyeballs and our time on their sites to companies that pay money to ensure that we spend as much time as possible on Facebook and on Twitter and the rest.

That's how we get our information. We'll spend more time on their sites if we are divided and we are narrower and only follow the things we like, which means Democrats are watching pro-Democrat sites and conservatives and Republicans are watching pro-Republican sites. And there's virtually no overlap.

So it's fake news for everybody; it's us versus them. That's happening across Europe. It's happening in Canada. Those four factors are driving us apart; they're ripping at the fabric of civic nationalism across all of the advanced industrial economies. And by the way, it's happening when the economy is doing really well. The United States today, and the UK and Canada and Germany, feel more divided than at any time in my lifetime, and yet that's when we can spend a lot of money.

So if that's true, what do you think it's gonna feel like when interest rates go up and growth goes down and we start laying people off, and we don't have the budgetary space to give everybody a tax break? It's gonna get worse.

So it's very clear that this is a structural condition that we have been living with and ignoring for decades, and it's getting worse. One interesting point: there's one country among the advanced industrial democracies that's not experiencing this problem at all, and that's Japan.

If you go to Japan, you'll actually find that the people are pretty much just as happy and trusting of their political institutions, their leaders, their media, as they were 30, 40 years ago. Now let's look at all of the factors that I just described that are causing problems in our countries.

Economic erosion of the working class in Japan: the population is shrinking fast. From now to 2050, it's gonna shrink by another 15%, which means that even though the Japanese economy is not growing per capita, they're doing a lot better, so they don't feel so bad.

Immigration: Japanese actually let in almost nobody, so as a consequence, there's no one that they really have a backlash against. It's all Japanese. Right? Number three: the military. The United States fights in lots of wars that our allies—in Japan, it does not. Their military is constitutionally forbidden from going abroad and fighting in wars.

When they did support us in Iraq, they sent a few hundred Japanese; they kept them far away from any fighting. Every soldier had like a million dollars of insurance; they made sure that they were calling their families every week. They really didn't have backlash against the military.

And finally, social media technology, where the Japanese government has worked hard to keep social media out of the political space, and the average Japanese adult isn't on social media—only about thirty-nine percent of them are, compared to well over a majority in the West.

So the one country in the world among the wealthy democracies that isn't experiencing a crisis of democracy is the one that kind of rejected globalism and its precepts over the last 40 years. [Music]

More Articles

View All
Fatherlessness Is Increasing Across Communities | Matt Walsh
We don’t exactly know what it’s what’s necessary in a culture to instantiate that ethos of self-sacrifice and conscientiousness, but it does seem to be the case that it’s more prevalent among the immigrant communities that do particularly well. Would you …
Why We Should Be Worried About Apple Vision Pro
On the 5th of July 2016, Nintendo launched what would become one of the most popular mobile games of all time: Pokémon Go. The game was an instant cultural phenomenon, breaking multiple world records in its first month. After just 20 days, it passed over …
Is Something in Space Talking to Us? | StarTalk
So there are some signals that exist in the record books. Right? And to some, that means the aliens have already tried to contact us. In 1977, the Ohio State University had a big radio telescope. It’s been turned, I think, into a golf course now. But one …
Sal Khan & John Dickerson: introduction | US government and civics | Khan Academy
So, Sal here from Khan Academy, and I’m excited to be here with John Dickerson, co-host of CBS This Morning. And I’m excited to be here too! Some of y’all might be wondering what we are doing together. We are going to be talking about civics and governme…
Mr. Freeman, part 59
Have you noticed what happened to words? What are you saying there, again? Ew-w-w! Your words seem to have decayed! Spoiled! Well, they still look and sound the same, but you know, what is the problem? THEY MEAN BUGGER ALL!!! Look for yourself. At some p…
Fall of the Roman Empire | World History | Khan Academy
[Instructor] In the last video, we talked about the first 200 years of Rome being an official empire, starting with Augustus in 27 BCE, going all the way to Marcus Aurelius. That time period is referred to as Pax Romana, Roman Peace. It’s a relatively sta…