yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Solving square-root equations: two solutions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let's say that we have the equation ( 6 + 3w = \sqrt{2w + 12} + 2w ).

See if you can pause the video and solve for ( w ), and it might have more than one solution, so keep that in mind.

All right, now let's work through this together. The first thing I'd like to do whenever I see one of these radical equations is just isolate the radical on one side of the equation. So let's subtract ( 2w ) from both sides. I want to get rid of that ( 2w ) from the right-hand side. I just want the radical sign. If I subtract ( 2w ) from both sides, what am I left with? Well, on the left-hand side, I am left with ( 6 + 3w - 2w ). Well, ( 3 ) of something take away ( 2 ) of them, you're going to be left with ( w ).

So, ( 6 + w = \sqrt{2w + 12} ).

Now, to get rid of the radical, we're going to square both sides. We've seen before that this process right over here is a little bit tricky because when you're squaring a radical in a radical equation like this and then you solve, you might find an extraneous solution. What do I mean by that? Well, we're going to get the same result whether we square this or whether we square that because when you square a negative, it becomes a positive. But those are fundamentally two different equations.

We only want the solutions that satisfy the one that doesn't have the negative there. So that's why we're going to test our solutions to make sure that they're valid for our original equation.

If we square both sides, on the left-hand side we're going to have ( (6 + w)^2 ). It's going to be ( w^2 + 2(6)(w) + 6^2 ). So, ( w^2 + 12w + 36 ) is equal to ( 2w + 12 ).

Now we can subtract ( 2w ) and ( 12 ) from both sides. So let's do that, so then we can get it into kind of a standard quadratic form.

So let's subtract ( 2w ) from both sides and let's subtract ( 12 ) from both sides. Once again, I just want to get rid of this on the right-hand side. I am going to be left with ( w^2 + (12w - 2w) + (36 - 12) = 0 ).

So, ( w^2 + 10w + 24 = 0 ). Let's see, to solve this, is this factorable? Are there two numbers that add up to ( 10 ) and whose product is ( 24 )? Well, what jumps out at me is ( 6 ) and ( 4 ).

So we can rewrite this as ( (w + 4)(w + 6) = 0 ).

If I have the product of two things equaling zero, to solve this, either one or both of them could be equal to zero. Zero times anything is going to be zero. So, ( w + 4 = 0 ) or ( w + 6 = 0 ).

Over here, if you subtract ( 4 ) from both sides, you get ( w = -4 ) or subtract ( 6 ) from both sides here, ( w = -6 ).

Now, let's verify that these actually are solutions to our original equation. Remember, our original equation was ( 6 + 3w = \sqrt{2w + 12} + 2w ).

So let's see if ( w = -4 ) works.

If ( w = -4 ), that gives us ( 6 + 3(-4) = \sqrt{2(-4) + 12} + 2(-4) ).

So this would be ( 6 - 12 = \sqrt{-8 + 12} - 8 ).

This simplifies to ( -6 = \sqrt{4} - 8 ), or ( -6 = 2 - 8 ).

That indeed holds true, ( -6 = -6 ).

So this is definitely a solution.

Now, let's try ( w = -6 ).

So if ( w = -6 ), we get ( 6 + 3(-6) = \sqrt{2(-6) + 12} + 2(-6) ).

This gives us ( 6 - 18 = \sqrt{-12 + 12} - 12 ).

So we have ( -12 = 0 - 12 ), which is also true.

So we get ( -12 = -12 ).

Therefore, these are actually both solutions to our original radical equation.

More Articles

View All
Michael Seibel: How do you decide what to build next?
So the question is basically how do we figure out what to build next? Here’s my answer: the reason why you have a part development cycle is that you can work on multiple things. Usually, there isn’t a right answer. Usually, all of the things that you want…
Groups Never Admit Failure
Groups never admit failure. A group would rather keep living in a mythology of “we were oppressed” than ever admit failure. Individuals are the only ones who admit failure. Even individuals don’t like to admit failure, but eventually, they can be forced t…
You'll NEVER want to be SMART ever again: Schopenhauer's Secret
Ruling over others is an art, and many philosophers have offered different ways to master it. However, the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer suggested a unique approach: playing dumb. You can achieve success and be labeled as an arrogant person, but …
How The Rich Live Longer
When your life looks exactly as you dreamed of, you want to live forever. Which is exactly what the ultra-rich are trying to do. Well, forever might be a bit of a stretch, but not entirely excluded, as you’ll see later. So what if money could buy you not …
The Jacobian matrix
In the last video, we were looking at this particular function. It’s a very non-linear function, and we were picturing it as a transformation that takes every point (x, y) in space to the point (x + sin(y), y + sin(x)). Moreover, we zoomed in on a specif…
The Constant Fear of Driving While Black | National Geographic
I have this a lot of police of about four times in the last sixty days. A total of five times I’ve been probably more than 20 times. It’s more times than I care to remember. But what you do know is how a very familiar feeling comes each time I’m stopped. …