yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

There Can Be No Final Theory of Gravity


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

In almost all cases, you only ever have one theory on offer. In the case of gravity, there literally is only one theory on offer at the moment: there's general relativity. Previously, we did have two theories; we had Newtonian gravity, and we had general relativity. But we did a crucial experiment. This idea of a crucial experiment is the cherry on top of science.

You've got these two competing theories, and you have a particular experiment that if it goes one way, one theory is ruled out, but the other theory is not, in which case you keep that theory for so long as no problems arise. This vision of knowledge enables us to have an open-ended quest for progress, which is completely unlike any other idea about knowledge. The overwhelming majority of physicists are still Bayesian.

The reason they're still Bayesian is because this is typically what's taught in universities, and this is what passes for an intellectually rigorous way of understanding the world. But all it is, is what I would call a species of scientism. It's because they have a formula behind them: Bayes' theorem, which is a perfectly acceptable statistical formula. People use it all the time in perfectly legitimate ways. It's just that it's not an epistemology; it's not a way of guaranteeing or even being confident that your theory is actually true.

My favorite example of this is prior to 1919. Approximately every single experiment that was done on Newton's theory of gravity showed that it was consistent with Newton's theory of gravity. What does a Bayesian say in that situation? What a Bayesian has to say is getting more and more confident in Newton's theory. How does that make sense? How do you square that circle? The day before it was shown to be false was the day when you were most confident in it.

Now, Papyrion doesn't have this problem. Peperion just says at no point was Newton's theory actually true. It contains some truth, but that truth isn't a thing that we can measure. I say it contains some truth because it's certainly got more direct connection to reality than some other random person's guess about what the nature of gravity is. Gravity does indeed approximately vary as the inverse square law, but not exactly, and so we need general relativity to correct the errors in Newton's theory of gravity.

Even though general relativity is our best theory right now, it can't ultimately be the final theory of gravity. There can be no final theory of gravity. All we have is better and better approximations to reality. I think the reason we fall into Bayesianism so easily is probably related to why we found the pessimism so easily. We're evolutionarily hardwired for Bayesianism.

Every other animal on the planet that can't form good explanations is a Bayesian. They're just looking at repeated events and saying, "The sun rose yesterday; the sun will rise tomorrow." If I touch that thing, it's hot; it's probably going to be hot in the future. So that is how most of our biological systems and how most of our evolutionary heritage worked.

It's just now we have this neocortex that can form good explanations, that can explain the seen in terms of the unseen, and that gives us a higher level of reasoning. But that higher level of reasoning is not instinctual to us. It requires effort; it requires deep thinking. But we default to Bayesianism because that is how a lot of the natural world around us seems to work, at least at the purely biological level.

More Articles

View All
BEST IMAGES OF THE WEEK: IMG! episode 4
A family photo that’s not at all creepy, except for that guy. Super Mario Brothers turns 25 years old today. It’s Episode Four of IMG. Today, Kotaku brought us the 10 most bizarre iPad mods: a USB typewriter, an iPad arcade, and even an iPad skateboard. …
Making inferences in informational texts | Reading | Khan Academy
[Music] From the moment she strolled into my office, I could tell she was gonna be a difficult sentence to read. You could tell from the way she walked that she was carrying a lot of information, but getting it out of her wouldn’t be easy. I was gonna nee…
Warren Buffett: How To Achieve A 20% Return Per Year
The first role in investment is don’t lose, and the second rule of investment is don’t forget the first rule. And that’s all the rules there are. I mean, that if you buy things for far below what they’re worth and you buy a group of them, you basically do…
Voltage | Physics | Khan Academy
You probably know that power lines are very dangerous because they have very high voltage, right? So we should stay away from them. But then what about these birds? Why don’t they get electrocuted? To answer that question, we need to dig deeper into this …
Road to Extinction | Years of Living Dangerously
Climate change here is disrupting a way of life that has allowed humans and animals to live side-by-side for centuries. Yes, the were in what is a key leader within the African Wildlife Foundation, one of the premier conservation groups on the continent. …
The Past and Future of YC Bio
Uh, all right, so now Serbia and I are going to talk a bit about the past and future of YC bio. We have a clicker. Cool, look at that! So, those of you who’ve had me as their group partner know that I like to cut to the chase and talk about the elephant i…