yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

There Can Be No Final Theory of Gravity


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

In almost all cases, you only ever have one theory on offer. In the case of gravity, there literally is only one theory on offer at the moment: there's general relativity. Previously, we did have two theories; we had Newtonian gravity, and we had general relativity. But we did a crucial experiment. This idea of a crucial experiment is the cherry on top of science.

You've got these two competing theories, and you have a particular experiment that if it goes one way, one theory is ruled out, but the other theory is not, in which case you keep that theory for so long as no problems arise. This vision of knowledge enables us to have an open-ended quest for progress, which is completely unlike any other idea about knowledge. The overwhelming majority of physicists are still Bayesian.

The reason they're still Bayesian is because this is typically what's taught in universities, and this is what passes for an intellectually rigorous way of understanding the world. But all it is, is what I would call a species of scientism. It's because they have a formula behind them: Bayes' theorem, which is a perfectly acceptable statistical formula. People use it all the time in perfectly legitimate ways. It's just that it's not an epistemology; it's not a way of guaranteeing or even being confident that your theory is actually true.

My favorite example of this is prior to 1919. Approximately every single experiment that was done on Newton's theory of gravity showed that it was consistent with Newton's theory of gravity. What does a Bayesian say in that situation? What a Bayesian has to say is getting more and more confident in Newton's theory. How does that make sense? How do you square that circle? The day before it was shown to be false was the day when you were most confident in it.

Now, Papyrion doesn't have this problem. Peperion just says at no point was Newton's theory actually true. It contains some truth, but that truth isn't a thing that we can measure. I say it contains some truth because it's certainly got more direct connection to reality than some other random person's guess about what the nature of gravity is. Gravity does indeed approximately vary as the inverse square law, but not exactly, and so we need general relativity to correct the errors in Newton's theory of gravity.

Even though general relativity is our best theory right now, it can't ultimately be the final theory of gravity. There can be no final theory of gravity. All we have is better and better approximations to reality. I think the reason we fall into Bayesianism so easily is probably related to why we found the pessimism so easily. We're evolutionarily hardwired for Bayesianism.

Every other animal on the planet that can't form good explanations is a Bayesian. They're just looking at repeated events and saying, "The sun rose yesterday; the sun will rise tomorrow." If I touch that thing, it's hot; it's probably going to be hot in the future. So that is how most of our biological systems and how most of our evolutionary heritage worked.

It's just now we have this neocortex that can form good explanations, that can explain the seen in terms of the unseen, and that gives us a higher level of reasoning. But that higher level of reasoning is not instinctual to us. It requires effort; it requires deep thinking. But we default to Bayesianism because that is how a lot of the natural world around us seems to work, at least at the purely biological level.

More Articles

View All
Strategy in finding limits | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Multiple videos and exercises we cover the various techniques for finding limits, but sometimes it’s helpful to think about strategies for determining which technique to use, and that’s what we’re going to cover in this video. What you see here is a flowc…
Simulating a beehive with for loops | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy
Let’s design a simulation with for loops. We want to answer the question: How much honey does a beehive produce over a certain period of time? Now, there are a lot of variables that might impact honey production, like the geography, the weather, and what…
Safari Live - Day 76 | National Geographic
I’m sorry, but I can’t assist with that.
15 Reasons You’re Lost With NO Direction
So it’s 2024, 2025, 2044, and you’re lost. You’ve got no idea where to go, what you want to do, what you should be doing, and how to move forward. But why is that? What is stopping you? Realizing what is holding you back can help you finally move forward,…
Michael Burry: The next huge crash is coming soon | This is his stock portfolio
Michael Burry hasn’t been shy about saying that the stock market is extremely overvalued and on the brink of collapse. This is the same investor who became a legend by accurately predicting and betting on a different crash: the crash of the U.S. housing m…
Warren Buffett Just Made a Huge $6.7B Investment.
Over the past few months, Warren Buffett has been hiding something: a secret stock, a secret position that was deliberately not disclosed to the public in his periodic 13F filings. And the SEC let him do it. They gave Buffett permission to buy up a stock …