yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

There Can Be No Final Theory of Gravity


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

In almost all cases, you only ever have one theory on offer. In the case of gravity, there literally is only one theory on offer at the moment: there's general relativity. Previously, we did have two theories; we had Newtonian gravity, and we had general relativity. But we did a crucial experiment. This idea of a crucial experiment is the cherry on top of science.

You've got these two competing theories, and you have a particular experiment that if it goes one way, one theory is ruled out, but the other theory is not, in which case you keep that theory for so long as no problems arise. This vision of knowledge enables us to have an open-ended quest for progress, which is completely unlike any other idea about knowledge. The overwhelming majority of physicists are still Bayesian.

The reason they're still Bayesian is because this is typically what's taught in universities, and this is what passes for an intellectually rigorous way of understanding the world. But all it is, is what I would call a species of scientism. It's because they have a formula behind them: Bayes' theorem, which is a perfectly acceptable statistical formula. People use it all the time in perfectly legitimate ways. It's just that it's not an epistemology; it's not a way of guaranteeing or even being confident that your theory is actually true.

My favorite example of this is prior to 1919. Approximately every single experiment that was done on Newton's theory of gravity showed that it was consistent with Newton's theory of gravity. What does a Bayesian say in that situation? What a Bayesian has to say is getting more and more confident in Newton's theory. How does that make sense? How do you square that circle? The day before it was shown to be false was the day when you were most confident in it.

Now, Papyrion doesn't have this problem. Peperion just says at no point was Newton's theory actually true. It contains some truth, but that truth isn't a thing that we can measure. I say it contains some truth because it's certainly got more direct connection to reality than some other random person's guess about what the nature of gravity is. Gravity does indeed approximately vary as the inverse square law, but not exactly, and so we need general relativity to correct the errors in Newton's theory of gravity.

Even though general relativity is our best theory right now, it can't ultimately be the final theory of gravity. There can be no final theory of gravity. All we have is better and better approximations to reality. I think the reason we fall into Bayesianism so easily is probably related to why we found the pessimism so easily. We're evolutionarily hardwired for Bayesianism.

Every other animal on the planet that can't form good explanations is a Bayesian. They're just looking at repeated events and saying, "The sun rose yesterday; the sun will rise tomorrow." If I touch that thing, it's hot; it's probably going to be hot in the future. So that is how most of our biological systems and how most of our evolutionary heritage worked.

It's just now we have this neocortex that can form good explanations, that can explain the seen in terms of the unseen, and that gives us a higher level of reasoning. But that higher level of reasoning is not instinctual to us. It requires effort; it requires deep thinking. But we default to Bayesianism because that is how a lot of the natural world around us seems to work, at least at the purely biological level.

More Articles

View All
Peter Lynch Talks About His Secret to Success in the Stock Market
When I was writing Magellan, one out of every 100 Americans was in the fund. Yeah, these are people that five thousand dollars and ten thousand dollars was a huge deal too. So when the market went down, you felt really badly. I mean, it’s really the press…
Flying from Japan | 19 hours flight vlog🇯🇵
Hi guys, it’s me Ruri. Today I am back with another super long travel vlog. Our flight is going to be around 19 hours, and we’re gonna fly from Japan to the UK first, and from there we’re gonna fly back to Turkey. This is the Haneda Airport. If you watche…
Techniques for generating a simple random sample | Study design | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Let’s say that your school has a population of 80 students in it. Maybe it’s not your whole school; maybe it’s just your grade. So there’s 80 students in your population, and you want to get an estimate of the average height in your population. You think …
Warren Buffett, Brian Moynihan Speak at Georgetown
(bell rings) [Announcer] Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome to the stage Lindsay Bruinsma, an MBA candidate at the McDonough School of Business, John J. DeGioia, President of Georgetown University, Brian T. Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America, and Warren …
Howard Marks: The BIGGEST Investment Opportunity in 40 Years
53 years in your investing career, there have been three sea changes, and we are in one of them. What does that mean? Howard Marks, he is a billionaire and one of the most highly respected investors in the world. Marks has been investing for over 50 years…
15 Gifts That Go Up in Value Over Time (Gift Ideas for Rich People)
Rich people focus on the inner value of a gift, not necessarily on the price tag. But any Master Gift Giver knows that they’ll be better off if you give them an asset instead of a liability. The gifts you give build relationships, so this season be though…