yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is science about to end? | Sabine Hossenfelder


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

  • Starting in the 1970s and 1980s, a lot of physicists became very optimistic that we're pretty close to finding a theory of everything that would explain all the interactions in nature in one coherent whole. And string theory was one of the biggest candidates for this.

And partly in response to this overoptimism, John Horgan wrote "The End of Science" where he picked up several disciplines of science and tries to argue that actually, we're pretty close to the end. And I have to admit that it's a very good question to ask. You could have the perspective that there is a certain period in the history of mankind where we make those big fundamental discoveries in nature, and it's just behind us. It's not going to happen that we'll discover another continent.

And it's a good question to ask. Like, is the same the case with science? Have we just discovered all the big things that there are to discover? And Horgan is not saying that we'll stop doing science or we'll stop doing research but he's saying that there'll be no new big discoveries. We'll just add some bits and pieces to the stuff we already have.

And as someone who has worked in the foundations of physics, I have to totally disagree with him on his perspective on being close to a theory of everything. And I guess this also puts me in disagreement with a lot of my colleagues in the foundations of physicists. A theory of everything in the foundations of physics is a theory that combines all the fundamental forces of nature.

We currently know four of those forces. That's the electromagnetic force, which pretty much everyone has heard of. Then there's the strong and the weak nuclear force. A strong nuclear force holds together the particles that make up atomic nuclei, and the weak nuclear force is responsible for nuclear decay. Those are all quantum theories.

And then we have gravity. This is the fourth force. And it's not a quantum theory. And this is kind of the problem. It's kind of the weird outlier. And a theory of everything would combine all those four forces into one coherent whole. And I think we're nowhere close to such a theory.

One of the reasons is that we still don't have a theory for quantum gravity that would combine the standard model with particle physics. And yes, string theory was a contender for this. But it's fallen out of favor. It's not even clear that'd actually solve the problem it was meant to solve in the first place. And pretty much the same thing could be said about other approaches to quantum gravity.

So this thing is still unsolved. But maybe even more importantly, we have a much bigger problem in the foundations of physics, which is the measurement process in quantum mechanics. It's created some practical problems in how we analyze experiments. Physicists are just confused about what exactly it means, that we have to do this measurement update.

Exactly what is the measurement? What does it take to do a measurement? We don't know. The theory can't answer this question. And I think that an answer is needed. And indeed, when we find this answer, it'll lead to a lot of progress.

And it's not just progress in our theoretical understanding, it's also progress by way of new technology because if you look at all the technological devices that we use today, they're all based on quantum mechanics. So if we manage to improve this theory of quantum mechanics by eventually understanding how a measurement process works, I think this will also help us to improve our technological gadgets, and it'll have a huge impact on the entire world.

So I don't think we're anywhere close to the end of science. Now, I'm actually quite optimistic that we'll be able to solve the measurement problem in quantum mechanics within the next one to two decades or so because it falls into an area, quantum technologies and quantum computing, quantum information, quantum optics where there is a lot of technological progress at the moment.

So sooner or later, they'll just stumble over something new, something that they can't explain, and then they will call for the theorists to please explain this. And this is when a lot of progress is going to happen very suddenly.

More Articles

View All
Tracing arithmetic expressions | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy
How does the computer evaluate expressions with multiple operators, multiple function calls, or even nested function calls? That’s a function call inside the parentheses of another function call. To examine this order of operations, let’s trace a program …
Planning Our Route to Mars | MARS: How to Get to Mars
Before we get through the first half of this century, humans will be living and working on Mars. We can do it with the kinds of technology we either have today or know how to build today. Let’s think about how we go about this thing, okay? This journey to…
Why Optimism Makes Us Sad | Are We Better Off Being Pessimists?
Philosopher Michel de Montaigne once heard a story about a Roman fleeing his tyrannical rulers. He managed to escape his pursuers (which were many) a thousand times but lived in constant fear. The Roman had two choices: to keep living his miserable life o…
The BIGGEST Stimulus Check JUST RELEASED
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here! So lately, I’ve had quite a few people bring this to my attention, so much so that I felt I should make a video about it explaining exactly what’s going on in the entire situation. Because when you see a title like th…
Taoism: The Philosophy of Flow
Your alarm rings, waking you up from an unrestful sleep. You stretch across the bed and tap your phone to silence the disturbing noise. You’re tempted to pick it up and see what’s going on in the world, but you try really hard to stay away from it. Remind…
Subtracting vectors with parallelogram rule | Vectors | Precalculus | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to think about what it means to subtract vectors, especially in the context of what we talked about as the parallelogram rule. So, let’s say we want to start with vector A, and from that, we want to subtract vector B. We have v…