yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is science about to end? | Sabine Hossenfelder


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

  • Starting in the 1970s and 1980s, a lot of physicists became very optimistic that we're pretty close to finding a theory of everything that would explain all the interactions in nature in one coherent whole. And string theory was one of the biggest candidates for this.

And partly in response to this overoptimism, John Horgan wrote "The End of Science" where he picked up several disciplines of science and tries to argue that actually, we're pretty close to the end. And I have to admit that it's a very good question to ask. You could have the perspective that there is a certain period in the history of mankind where we make those big fundamental discoveries in nature, and it's just behind us. It's not going to happen that we'll discover another continent.

And it's a good question to ask. Like, is the same the case with science? Have we just discovered all the big things that there are to discover? And Horgan is not saying that we'll stop doing science or we'll stop doing research but he's saying that there'll be no new big discoveries. We'll just add some bits and pieces to the stuff we already have.

And as someone who has worked in the foundations of physics, I have to totally disagree with him on his perspective on being close to a theory of everything. And I guess this also puts me in disagreement with a lot of my colleagues in the foundations of physicists. A theory of everything in the foundations of physics is a theory that combines all the fundamental forces of nature.

We currently know four of those forces. That's the electromagnetic force, which pretty much everyone has heard of. Then there's the strong and the weak nuclear force. A strong nuclear force holds together the particles that make up atomic nuclei, and the weak nuclear force is responsible for nuclear decay. Those are all quantum theories.

And then we have gravity. This is the fourth force. And it's not a quantum theory. And this is kind of the problem. It's kind of the weird outlier. And a theory of everything would combine all those four forces into one coherent whole. And I think we're nowhere close to such a theory.

One of the reasons is that we still don't have a theory for quantum gravity that would combine the standard model with particle physics. And yes, string theory was a contender for this. But it's fallen out of favor. It's not even clear that'd actually solve the problem it was meant to solve in the first place. And pretty much the same thing could be said about other approaches to quantum gravity.

So this thing is still unsolved. But maybe even more importantly, we have a much bigger problem in the foundations of physics, which is the measurement process in quantum mechanics. It's created some practical problems in how we analyze experiments. Physicists are just confused about what exactly it means, that we have to do this measurement update.

Exactly what is the measurement? What does it take to do a measurement? We don't know. The theory can't answer this question. And I think that an answer is needed. And indeed, when we find this answer, it'll lead to a lot of progress.

And it's not just progress in our theoretical understanding, it's also progress by way of new technology because if you look at all the technological devices that we use today, they're all based on quantum mechanics. So if we manage to improve this theory of quantum mechanics by eventually understanding how a measurement process works, I think this will also help us to improve our technological gadgets, and it'll have a huge impact on the entire world.

So I don't think we're anywhere close to the end of science. Now, I'm actually quite optimistic that we'll be able to solve the measurement problem in quantum mechanics within the next one to two decades or so because it falls into an area, quantum technologies and quantum computing, quantum information, quantum optics where there is a lot of technological progress at the moment.

So sooner or later, they'll just stumble over something new, something that they can't explain, and then they will call for the theorists to please explain this. And this is when a lot of progress is going to happen very suddenly.

More Articles

View All
Independence movements in the 20th Century | World History | Khan Academy
As we’ve seen in other videos, this is a map of the European possessions, especially the Western European possessions in much of the world. As we enter into the 20th century, before World War I, you see significant possessions by the French, not just in A…
Regrouping with decimals
We are told to fill in the table with whole numbers to make ten point seven four in two different ways. So, pause this video and see if you can figure that out. So, we really need to fill out what would be what would you put in here for this to be a repr…
What Happens if Earth Suddenly Stops Rotating? #kurzgesagt #shorts
What happens if the Earth suddenly stops rotating? A thing that isn’t attached to its surface remains at its initial speed—not just cars, buildings, and people, but also water and our atmosphere—causing giant tsunami waves and global windstorms. Areas ne…
Chinese Imperial Dynasties | World History | Khan Academy
In other videos, we talk about some of the truly ancient Chinese dynasties: the Shang Dynasty, the Joe Dynasty. As we get to the end of the Joe Dynasty, China falls into chaos in the Warring States period, which is a really tough time for China. But the s…
Climate 101: Ozone Depletion | National Geographic
(upbeat piano music) [Narrator] 15 to 35 kilometers above Earth’s surface, a gas called ozone surrounds the planet. The ozone layer acts as a barrier between Earth and ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. However, pollution has caused the ozone layer to t…
There, their, and they're | Frequently confused words | Usage | Grammar
Hello Grim Marians! Today, I want to talk about one of the absolute thorniest issues in usage of English, and it’s the difference between “there,” “their,” and “they’re.” If you can’t tell the difference from the way I’m saying it, that’s because it’s rea…