yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is science about to end? | Sabine Hossenfelder


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

  • Starting in the 1970s and 1980s, a lot of physicists became very optimistic that we're pretty close to finding a theory of everything that would explain all the interactions in nature in one coherent whole. And string theory was one of the biggest candidates for this.

And partly in response to this overoptimism, John Horgan wrote "The End of Science" where he picked up several disciplines of science and tries to argue that actually, we're pretty close to the end. And I have to admit that it's a very good question to ask. You could have the perspective that there is a certain period in the history of mankind where we make those big fundamental discoveries in nature, and it's just behind us. It's not going to happen that we'll discover another continent.

And it's a good question to ask. Like, is the same the case with science? Have we just discovered all the big things that there are to discover? And Horgan is not saying that we'll stop doing science or we'll stop doing research but he's saying that there'll be no new big discoveries. We'll just add some bits and pieces to the stuff we already have.

And as someone who has worked in the foundations of physics, I have to totally disagree with him on his perspective on being close to a theory of everything. And I guess this also puts me in disagreement with a lot of my colleagues in the foundations of physicists. A theory of everything in the foundations of physics is a theory that combines all the fundamental forces of nature.

We currently know four of those forces. That's the electromagnetic force, which pretty much everyone has heard of. Then there's the strong and the weak nuclear force. A strong nuclear force holds together the particles that make up atomic nuclei, and the weak nuclear force is responsible for nuclear decay. Those are all quantum theories.

And then we have gravity. This is the fourth force. And it's not a quantum theory. And this is kind of the problem. It's kind of the weird outlier. And a theory of everything would combine all those four forces into one coherent whole. And I think we're nowhere close to such a theory.

One of the reasons is that we still don't have a theory for quantum gravity that would combine the standard model with particle physics. And yes, string theory was a contender for this. But it's fallen out of favor. It's not even clear that'd actually solve the problem it was meant to solve in the first place. And pretty much the same thing could be said about other approaches to quantum gravity.

So this thing is still unsolved. But maybe even more importantly, we have a much bigger problem in the foundations of physics, which is the measurement process in quantum mechanics. It's created some practical problems in how we analyze experiments. Physicists are just confused about what exactly it means, that we have to do this measurement update.

Exactly what is the measurement? What does it take to do a measurement? We don't know. The theory can't answer this question. And I think that an answer is needed. And indeed, when we find this answer, it'll lead to a lot of progress.

And it's not just progress in our theoretical understanding, it's also progress by way of new technology because if you look at all the technological devices that we use today, they're all based on quantum mechanics. So if we manage to improve this theory of quantum mechanics by eventually understanding how a measurement process works, I think this will also help us to improve our technological gadgets, and it'll have a huge impact on the entire world.

So I don't think we're anywhere close to the end of science. Now, I'm actually quite optimistic that we'll be able to solve the measurement problem in quantum mechanics within the next one to two decades or so because it falls into an area, quantum technologies and quantum computing, quantum information, quantum optics where there is a lot of technological progress at the moment.

So sooner or later, they'll just stumble over something new, something that they can't explain, and then they will call for the theorists to please explain this. And this is when a lot of progress is going to happen very suddenly.

More Articles

View All
Basic derivative rules: find the error | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we have two examples here of someone trying to find the derivative of an expression. On the left-hand side, it says Avery tried to find the derivative of 7 - 5x using basic differentiation rules; here is her work. On the right-hand side, it says Hann…
Linear equations with unknown coefficients | Mathematics I | High School Math | Khan Academy
So we have an equation. It says ( ax + 3x = bx + 5 ). And what I want to do together is to solve for ( x ). If we solve for ( x ), it’s going to be in terms of ( a ), ( b ), and other numbers. So pause the video and see if you can do that. All right, no…
How I Bought A Tesla Roadster For $6,000
So I never thought that this would be possible, but it’s official: I just purchased a mint-conditioned Tesla Roadster for $6,000. And if that sounds absolutely insane, here’s how I did it. First of all, the Tesla Roadster is not just another all-electric…
Interpreting general multiplication rule | Probability & combinatorics
We’re told that two contestants are finalists in a cooking competition. For the final round, each of them spins a wheel to determine what star ingredient must be in their dish. I guess the primary ingredient could be charred spinach, romaine lettuce, cabb…
The Market Revolution - part 3
So why do we care about the market Revolution? The Industrial Revolution and the transportation and communication Revolutions of the early 19th century had a major impact on American society both in the short term and in the long term. In this video, I wa…
What Could Survive An Atomic Bomb?
According to popular myth, cockroaches would inherit a post-nuclear disaster world. But it looks like the real winners might actually be fungi. In 1999, fungi were found to be thriving in highly radioactive conditions inside the Chernobyl reactor. These f…