yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Interpreting y-intercept in regression model | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Adriana gathered data on different schools' winning percentages and the average yearly salary of their head coaches in millions of dollars in the years 2000 to 2011. She then created the following scatter plot and trend line.

So this is salary in millions of dollars in the winning percentage. Here we have a coach who made over $4 million, and it looks like they won over 80% of their games. But then you have this coach over here who has a salary of a little over $1.5 million, and they are winning over 85%.

Each of these data points is a coach, and it's plotting their salary or their winning percentage against their salary. Assuming the line correctly shows the trend in the data, and it's a bit of an assumption, there are some outliers here that are well away from the model.

It looks like there's a positive linear correlation here, but it's not super tight. There are a bunch of coaches right over here in the lower salary area, going all the way from 20-something percent to over 60%.

Assuming the line correctly shows the trend in the data, what does it mean that the line's Y-intercept is 39? Well, if you believe the model, then a Y-intercept of being 39 would suggest that if someone makes no money, the model would expect them to win 39% of their games, which seems a little unrealistic because you would expect most coaches to get paid something.

But anyway, let's see which of these choices actually describe that. So let me look at the choices:

  1. The average salary was $39 million. No, no one on our chart made 39 million on average.
  2. Each million dollar increase in salary was associated with a 39% increase in winning percentage. Now that would be something related to the slope, and the slope was definitely not 39.
  3. The average winning percentage was 39%. No, that wasn't the case either.
  4. The model indicates that teams with coaches who had a salary of $0 million will average a winning percentage of approximately 39%.

Yeah, this is the closest statement to what we just said. If you believe that model—and that's a big if—if you believe this model, then this model says someone making $0 will get 39%.

This is frankly why you have to be skeptical of models; they're not going to be perfect, especially at extreme cases oftentimes. But who knows?

Anyway, hopefully, you found that useful.

More Articles

View All
Consumer credit unit overview | Teacher Resources | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
Hi teachers, Welcome to the unit on consumer credit. So, just as a high level, this is going to cover everything from credit scores—what is it? How it’s able to give people who might give someone credit a sense of how likely you are to pay back that cred…
Alex Honnold Explores Sustainability at Epcot | ourHOME | National Geographic
[Music] Hey, I’m Alex Honald and I’m here at Walt Disney World Resort learning a little bit about what the park has done with solar energy to power the park through solar and also learning about the interplay with nature and the park. [Music] Here, hello…
Debugging with stack traces | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy
Debugging is just a fancy term for fixing errors in programs. It’s the process of removing bugs, so we call it “debug” since it’s something we’ll be doing often. Let’s learn how to work together with our IDE to track down and fix bugs in our programs. He…
How Were the Pyramids Built?
Okay, so we’re going for a ride around the pyramids. The Great Pyramid was the tallest man-made structure for nearly 4,000 years, only surpassed by a large margin by the Eiffel Tower in 1889, 147 m high. You are interested in climbing? Yeah, it’s climbing…
Multiplying and dividing by powers of 10
In another video, we introduce ourselves to the idea of powers of 10. We saw that if I were to just say 10 to the first power, that means that we’re just really just going to take 1. If we have 10 to the second power, that means that we’re going to take …
Simple and compound sentences | Syntax | Khan Academy
Hello Garans, hello Paige, hi David. I say hello to you, and I say hello to the Garans. That was an interesting thing to say. Yeah, it’s because there was a compound sentence. I see, so there’s this distinction made in grammar between simple and compound…