yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Neuroscience of Lies, Honesty, and Self-Control | Robert Sapolsky | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So when we look at the world’s ills, one of the biggest sources of it is us failing to do the right thing when it’s the harder thing to do—giving in to temptation, giving in to impulse. Giving in to emotional sort of immediacy.

And the part of the brain that’s most central to whether or not that happens is the frontal cortex. Most recently evolved part of the brain, we’ve got more of it proportionally or more complexly than any other primate species out there. It’s the part of the brain that does impulse control, long term planning, emotional regulation.

It does all the stuff where it’s the frontal cortex that whispers in your ear saying, “Do you really really want to do that right now? If you do that you’re going to regret it. It seems like a great idea.” Frontal cortex about that.

Okay, so when we look at our moments of life where there’s that enormous temptation to do the impulsive thing and—what’s going to determine whether the world will be freed of impulsive horrors? “If only we could all get stronger frontal cortices trained in childhood to be able to hold out where you could have one marshmallow right now, but if you wait you can get two later, and training from early age so that your frontal cortex has the most like fabulous aerobic metabolism ever, and it could just make you—“

And what the studies suggest is: at all sorts of junctures of doing the harder thing, yes, having a really robust studly frontal cortex may do you a lot of good there. But when you do sort of the truly difficult thing, when you see people who are the ones who run into the burning building to save the child, and they leap into the river when everybody else is standing there like headless chickens—when you look at those people they’re not doing it because they’ve got the most amazing frontal cortexes on earth that could reason through the long-term consequences of “oh, what if nobody in society came to the aid of strangers?”

What they do is: they do it automatically. You ask anybody who does one of these heroic acts what were you thinking when you jumped in the river. And the answer is always the same: “I wasn’t thinking. Before I knew it I had jumped in.”

When we do our most amazingly wondrous altruistic acts, it’s not because we’ve got the most incredible frontal cortexes on earth that could like reason us. It’s because it’s out of the realm of the frontal cortex and it’s out of the realm of temptation and limbic stuff. We do the harder thing in a case like that because for us it’s not the harder thing.

It’s become automatic, and that’s where you see it. You see the best success with temptation when it isn’t tempting, when it’s automatic, when we’ve distracted ourselves. All of that frontal like “work your way through the right decision” gets you only so far. A fabulous study addressing this.

This was work by a guy at Harvard named Josh Green who put people in a study in a brain scanner, of some task where if they got it right they get a reward afterward. So there’s an incentive to get it right. And this wonderful manipulative setup where at various points people were under the impression that there was a glitch in the system and the computer wasn’t registering their answers, so all they had to do was think what their answer was and then tell you afterward when they heard the correct answer had they had the right answer or not.

In other words, they could cheat. And what you would see is it was a random task, so most of the time people were having about a 50 percent success rate and along comes the opportunities to cheat. And if people’s accuracy suddenly jumps up at that point, aha, that’s how you detect a cheater or someone who’s lying at that point.

So the question becomes what’s going on with brains of people who cheated at those opportunities, and what you saw was as soon as that act came up their frontal cortexes activated like mad. They’re wrestling with Satan! They’re wondering if they should do it or not! They’re wondering if they should have done it…

More Articles

View All
The Moment I knew I was going to be RICH | Jaspreet Singh
That’s what happens to people that really get blown up. They don’t follow any diversification rules, and they end up with one or two stocks representing 40, 50, 60 percent of their net worth. And when they correct, they get killed. In order to be success…
Buffett & Munger Expose Investment Lies: Real Returns vs. Pure Fiction
Speaker: We don’t formally have discount rates. I mean, every time I start talking about all this stuff, Charlie reminds me that I’ve never prepared a spreadsheet, but I do. You know, in in effect, in my mind, I do. But uh we are going to want to get a si…
Introduction to integral calculus | Accumulation and Riemann sums | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So I have a curve here that represents ( y ) is equal to ( f(x) ), and there’s a classic problem that mathematicians have long thought about: how do we find the area under this curve, maybe under the curve and above the x-axis, and let’s say between two b…
Suing Robinhood
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So as most of you know, I really like to keep this channel centered around personal finance and investing. But every now and then, something comes up that I think is worth talking about further, and today, it’s impor…
Formal and informal powers of the US president | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about the powers of the President of the United States, and we’re going to broadly divide them into two categories. Formal powers are those that are explicitly listed in the United States Constitution, and we’…
2015 AP Biology free response 3
The amino acid sequence of cytochrome c was determined for five different species of vertebrates. The table below shows the number of differences in the sequences between each pair of species. So just to give us some context for what we’re talking about,…