yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Neuroscience of Lies, Honesty, and Self-Control | Robert Sapolsky | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So when we look at the world’s ills, one of the biggest sources of it is us failing to do the right thing when it’s the harder thing to do—giving in to temptation, giving in to impulse. Giving in to emotional sort of immediacy.

And the part of the brain that’s most central to whether or not that happens is the frontal cortex. Most recently evolved part of the brain, we’ve got more of it proportionally or more complexly than any other primate species out there. It’s the part of the brain that does impulse control, long term planning, emotional regulation.

It does all the stuff where it’s the frontal cortex that whispers in your ear saying, “Do you really really want to do that right now? If you do that you’re going to regret it. It seems like a great idea.” Frontal cortex about that.

Okay, so when we look at our moments of life where there’s that enormous temptation to do the impulsive thing and—what’s going to determine whether the world will be freed of impulsive horrors? “If only we could all get stronger frontal cortices trained in childhood to be able to hold out where you could have one marshmallow right now, but if you wait you can get two later, and training from early age so that your frontal cortex has the most like fabulous aerobic metabolism ever, and it could just make you—“

And what the studies suggest is: at all sorts of junctures of doing the harder thing, yes, having a really robust studly frontal cortex may do you a lot of good there. But when you do sort of the truly difficult thing, when you see people who are the ones who run into the burning building to save the child, and they leap into the river when everybody else is standing there like headless chickens—when you look at those people they’re not doing it because they’ve got the most amazing frontal cortexes on earth that could reason through the long-term consequences of “oh, what if nobody in society came to the aid of strangers?”

What they do is: they do it automatically. You ask anybody who does one of these heroic acts what were you thinking when you jumped in the river. And the answer is always the same: “I wasn’t thinking. Before I knew it I had jumped in.”

When we do our most amazingly wondrous altruistic acts, it’s not because we’ve got the most incredible frontal cortexes on earth that could like reason us. It’s because it’s out of the realm of the frontal cortex and it’s out of the realm of temptation and limbic stuff. We do the harder thing in a case like that because for us it’s not the harder thing.

It’s become automatic, and that’s where you see it. You see the best success with temptation when it isn’t tempting, when it’s automatic, when we’ve distracted ourselves. All of that frontal like “work your way through the right decision” gets you only so far. A fabulous study addressing this.

This was work by a guy at Harvard named Josh Green who put people in a study in a brain scanner, of some task where if they got it right they get a reward afterward. So there’s an incentive to get it right. And this wonderful manipulative setup where at various points people were under the impression that there was a glitch in the system and the computer wasn’t registering their answers, so all they had to do was think what their answer was and then tell you afterward when they heard the correct answer had they had the right answer or not.

In other words, they could cheat. And what you would see is it was a random task, so most of the time people were having about a 50 percent success rate and along comes the opportunities to cheat. And if people’s accuracy suddenly jumps up at that point, aha, that’s how you detect a cheater or someone who’s lying at that point.

So the question becomes what’s going on with brains of people who cheated at those opportunities, and what you saw was as soon as that act came up their frontal cortexes activated like mad. They’re wrestling with Satan! They’re wondering if they should do it or not! They’re wondering if they should have done it…

More Articles

View All
Can You Solve This Shadow Illusion?
We have that card with a little round hole in it, and what I want you to do is hold it up, um, and try to cast a shadow on that wall there. I want you, before you do it, to predict what we’re going to see. Shadow of the card? Shadow of the card with a lit…
Planet or Plastic? | Explorer's Fest
[Applause] Some of you may have seen or heard about that classic film called The Graduate, starring Dustin Hoffman. As a young graduate was advised by the crusty businessman, “The future, my boy, is plastics.” Think 1960s, when plastics in our society wer…
Will OpenAI Kill All Startups?
This is Michael Seibel with Dalton Caldwell, and today we’re going to talk about how OpenAI is going to kill all startups. This is our last video; might as well pack it in, we’re done. OpenAI is going to do this. They’re going to make the videos—next vide…
Candle Trick
Tonight we’re going to show you a candle trick that you can use to impress your date at your next candlelit dinner. What we’re going to show you is how you can light a candle without touching the wick. Okay, so Nigel is going to, uh, light up a wooden sp…
Example free response question from AP macroeconomics | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
Video, I want to tackle an entire AP Macroeconomics free response exercise with you. Assume that the economy of Country X has an actual unemployment rate of seven percent, a natural rate of unemployment of five percent, and an inflation rate of three perc…
Conditions for a t test about a mean | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Sunil and his friends have been using a group messaging app for over a year to chat with each other. He suspects that, on average, they send each other more than 100 messages per day. Sunil takes a random sample of seven days from their chat history and r…