yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

5 Reasons Why Russia Is No Match for the US | Stephen Walt


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

The United States is much stronger than Russia, and will be for the rest of my professional lifetime, and I would guess for the entirety of the 21st century unless we commit a series of almost unimaginable self-inflicted wounds. The United States first of all has a much larger economy. Our economy is now about $17 trillion, Russia’s is less than $2 trillion and has actually been declining in recent years. So we are already close to eight or nine or ten times stronger economically.

The United States is much more powerful militarily: We spend four or five times more than Russia does on defense every year. We have much more sophisticated weaponry than Russia does. The United States is still blessed with allies in many parts of the world. These allies are for the most part rich, relatively powerful and stable. We’re talking about countries like Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and others. Russia, by contrast, has no allies of any real consequence.

It has something of a friendly relationship with China, but it’s not really an alliance. And lastly, Russia has a terrible demographic situation. Its population is much older than ours on average, and it’s aging rapidly; the population is projected to decline dramatically by 30 or 40 million people over the next 50 years or so. So, for all of those reasons, the United States has far more power potential.

Last but not least, Russia’s only real economic asset now is oil and gas. People are not lining up to buy the next Russian smartphone or anything like that, so Russia’s long-term potential strikes me as not nearly as promising as that of the United States. Well, weaker states can still do a lot of things that cause trouble, and what Russia did in the 2016 election—the full extent of which and the importance of which we are still trying to figure out—certainly has roiled American politics in a variety of ways.

So, it does show that even much weaker powers can find various ways to interfere or cause problems. Now, it was in part because we were vulnerable to that kind of manipulation, and that’s our fault, not theirs. I would say a little bit more about this too, though: what Russia did is not unprecedented. The United States has interfered in democratic elections in lots of countries around the world, and you could argue that we've been doing a variety of things to try and encourage democratic forces, promote civil society, both in Russia or in countries close to Russia, in ways that they regard as alarming.

We might think that we’re doing the right thing, spreading our values in various places, but you could certainly understand how Russia might regard that as threatening, and might even view what they did in 2016 as a form of payback: “If you want to manipulate politics in Ukraine, if you want to interfere in Russia in various ways, well we can do things to you as well.” So again, without knowing the full extent of what Russia may or may not have done, we shouldn’t view this as unprecedented, and we shouldn’t view it as coming completely out of the blue.

It doesn’t mean we have to like it, but it’s important I think to keep just how heinous it may or may not be in some context here. Again, Russia is simply not the kind of global superpower that the Soviet Union was. It doesn’t pose a significant ideological challenge to us, it seems to me. And to the extent that the United States is going to worry about a rival/peer/competitor, it’s not going to be Russia—it’s going to be China.

But having said that, you can imagine circumstances where a confrontation between the two countries could begin to spin out of control, conceivably over what’s happening in Syria. If things in Ukraine were to heat up again and the United States got more actively involved there, one could imagine some kind of clash arising. I don’t think that leaders in Washington or leaders in Moscow actually want something like that to happen—Remember, we are still talking about two nuclear powers with thousands of nuclear weapons that could still be fired at each other, but I don’t…

More Articles

View All
Matched pairs experiment design | Study design | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
The last video, we constructed an experiment where we had a drug that we thought might help control people’s blood sugar. We looked for something that we could measure as an indicator of whether blood sugar is being controlled, and hemoglobin A1c is actua…
Brass Trunk Corner | Diggers
Kg and I are in Montana at decision point with our archaeologist marked, and we’re on the hunt for Lewis and Clark nectar. In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson hand-selected Meriwether Lewis to lead a top-secret army Expedition into the lands Northwest of …
Expedition Amazon – Into the Waters | National Geographic
[Music] Rivers really are a little bit like stories. They have a beginning, a middle, and an end. And just like any good story, you really have to start at the beginning. 4,000 miles from the Andes to the Atlantic flows the iconic Amazon River, depended u…
How Much Is A Bird in The Hand Worth?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And as they say, “a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.” What it means is that it’s better to have a certain advantage than to have nothing, except the possibility of a greater one. But two birds in the bush? Who calcula…
TRACTOR PULLS: It's Not What You Think - Smarter Every Day 276
This is an absolutely preposterous tractor and it’s pulling [Music]. Something; all these people are in these stands to watch what’s called a tractor pull because it’s awesome. The winner is whoever pulls this sled the farthest before getting bogged down …
Exploring scale copies
We are told drag the sliders, and then they say which slider creates a scale copy of the shape, or which slider creates scale copies of the shape. So, let’s just see, explore this a little bit. Okay, that’s pretty neat! These sliders seem to change the s…