yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

SpaceX and Commercial Space Exploration | StarTalk


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

I think people conflate two different things here when they talk about the moving frontier of space exploration. If you're going to advance a space frontier, you have gone farther than anyone has gone before. To me, that's advancing a space frontier. Anything else could be an engineering frontier, and of course, there's overlap between the two.

So, uh, SpaceX launched, went into orbit, came back, and landed. That's great; we've never done that before. Now we ask who is going to advance the space frontier. The history of this exercise at high risk with little promise of economic return for doing it first tells me that governments do it, and they sign the tasks. The patents get made and discovered to accomplish these previous untapped goals. Once that's quantified, then you have private enterprise come in and make a buck off of it.

The first Europeans to the New World were not the Dutch East India Trading Company; it was Columbus, sent by Spain. Spain had other objectives. They have a baseline of time much longer than a quarterly report or an annual report. It's a country. Countries can make those kinds of investments, particularly if the long-term return on that investment is for the greater glory of the country itself.

I don't see SpaceX as being like the private company that's going to take us to Mars. They could do it on a SpaceX rocket; that's not a new thing. The relationship between NASA and all the rest—what would be new is if SpaceX said, "We're going to Mars, and we don't need any governmental help, and we're going to do this as a complete commercial exercise." I just don't see that happening.

Imagine the conversation: I'm CEO of a company, and I want to be the first to put a colony on Venus. But I'm a private company, so I bring in investors, and they ask me questions. They say, "How much does it cost?" I don't know, but more than has ever been spent in space before. "Okay, is it dangerous?" Yes, people will probably die. But what's the return on the investment? I don't know; probably nothing for a long time.

That's a really quick meeting. The government can say, "We want to go to Venus because that's strategic value, possible long-term economic value." That venture capitalist investors don't have the patience to wait out. So, I'm just trying to be practical here in the way civilizations have behaved ever since there's been civilization.

More Articles

View All
Signs You are Moving From Middle Class to Wealthy
You know, it’s easy to tell when someone moves up from middle class, when you know the signs you see. It’s not just about the bank balance. It’s a complete overhaul of your life’s blueprint. Here are ten clear signs you’re moving from middle class to wea…
Why I Stopped Spending Money
What’s up guys? It’s Graham here. So, I think it’s no surprise that for anyone to see my channel for a while, I’m pretty frugal. To be honest, even calling it that could be generous. I’m, uh, extremely thrifty, or maybe we could just call it fiscally cons…
Living Up Close and Personal With an Active Volcano | National Geographic
It matters that there’s a volcano. It matters. It matters a lot because that’s, um, 75% of the identity of this place. The volcano is present; the volcano is breathing. The, uh, the volcano really is a living creature. It’s a bit of a romantic representa…
What skills you need to sell private jets.
Everybody asks what kind of skill sets they need to get into selling jets and how they can get into this business. First of all, you have to have passion for aviation. You have to really have it in your blood, as far as I’m concerned. Really, watching ai…
these inventions changed the world..
The latrine, the porcelain throne, the Oval Office toilets… do I really need to say anything here? Before toilets, we would literally use buckets or just went into the forest or peed on a tree or something. We didn’t really have any efficient way of getti…
Le Chȃtelier’s principle: Changing temperature | Equilibrium | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Le Chatelier’s principle says if a stress is applied to a reaction at equilibrium, the net reaction goes in the direction that relieves the stress. One possible stress is to change the temperature of the reaction at equilibrium. As an example, let’s look …