yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Which bag should you use? - Luka Seamus Wright and Imogen Ellen Napper


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

You’ve filled up your cart and made it to the front of the grocery line when you’re confronted with yet another choice: what kind of bag should you use? If you’ve seen the images of plastic bags strewn across the ocean, it might seem obvious that plastic is bad for the environment. Surely a paper bag or a cotton tote would be the better option. But is that really true?

Each of these three materials has a unique environmental impact that’s determined by its carbon footprint, its potential to be reused and recycled, and its degradability. So, to get the full story on these grocery bags, we need to look at how they’re made, how they’re used, and where they ultimately go.

Let’s start with plastic. The typical thin and flimsy plastic bag is made of high-density polyethylene, commonly known as HDPE. Producing this material requires extracting petroleum from the ground and applying extreme heat. The resulting polymer resin is then transported alongside additional ingredients like titanium oxide and chalk to a bag manufacturing plant. Here, coal-powered machines melt the materials down and spin them into sheets of plastic, which are then folded into bags.

By the time a bag reaches its final destination, it’s contributed an estimated 1.6 kg of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. That’s the same amount of carbon a car produces, driving a little over 6 kilometers. But the alternatives actually possess a much larger carbon footprint. Paper is made from wood pulp, and when you account for the carbon cost of removing trees from their ecosystems, a single paper bag can be responsible for about 5.5 kg of carbon dioxide. Meanwhile, growing cotton is an extremely energy and water-intensive process. The production of a single cotton tote emits an estimated 272 kg of carbon dioxide.

When we compare carbon footprints, plastic bags are the clear winner. But environmental impact is also determined by how the bag is used. Reusing or recycling these bags significantly offsets their environmental toll by reducing demand for new production. To quantify that offset, we can divide the bag’s carbon footprint by the number of times it’s reused. For example, if a typical paper bag is reused three times, it has a lower net impact than a single-use plastic bag. The carbon footprint of a cotton tote can similarly be lowered if it’s reused 131 times.

Of these three options, durable cloth totes are most likely to be reused. Evidence shows paper bags are quickly discarded due to their tendency to tear. This issue plagues HDPE plastic bags as well. But even when they’re made to avoid tearing, their widespread availability makes it easy to treat them as single-use items. Fortunately, researchers estimate that 40% of HDPE bags are reused at least once for throwing out waste. Recycling these bags also offsets their carbon footprint, but it’s not universally possible for each material. Many countries lack the infrastructure to efficiently recycle plastic bags.

Cotton totes are perhaps even more difficult to break down and process, but since they’re often reused for long periods, they’re still least likely to end up in landfills. Whenever these bags aren’t recycled, the third factor in calculating environmental impact comes into play: degradability. Since HDPE bags are heat-resistant and insoluble, they stick around long after we’re done with them. Partially broken down plastic can circulate in ecosystems for centuries. Cotton, on the other hand, degrades substantially in a matter of months, and paper bags break down completely in just 90 days.

So, which bag should you use? It turns out the most environmentally friendly bags have features of several materials we've discussed. They’re durable and reusable, like cotton, but made of plastic, which has a lower carbon footprint than cotton or paper. These sturdy shopping bags consist of polyester, vinyl, and other tough plastics, and are already used worldwide. Most importantly, they should last a lifetime—making them the best option for the planet and your groceries.

More Articles

View All
Love and Science | Genius
[Music] No, it must be an anomaly. Tight again! I already have 20 times. It’s not an anomaly. This sample must contain a new element, a radioactive element. It would have to be hundreds, no thousands of times stronger than uranium. We must isolate it. We…
Organism life history and fecundity | Ecology | Khan Academy
We’re going to talk about in this video is what I consider one of the most fascinating subjects in biology, and that’s the variation we see from species to species in life histories and life spans and their rate of reproduction. For example, we have thre…
Photosynthesis in organisms | Matter and energy in organisms | Middle school biology | Khan Academy
Hey, I’m going to let you in on a little secret of mine. I love gardening! In fact, I have a huge garden with apples, blueberries, pumpkins, and tomatoes. I give my plants micronutrients and maybe some fertilizer, but I don’t give them food in the same wa…
Mule Mayhem | Live Free or Die
Oh, oh, damn it! Oh, God damn it! Hold, hold, hold! Damn it! Goddamn mules! Hold! No, you hold! Too much traffic, motorcycles, bicyclists—everything was too much for the mule. And once he started plunging down that hill and the jugs were hitting the bush…
Stealth Wealth (Explained)
They say to live happy, live hidden. Something you’re not yet aware of is happening in the markets, and the implication it has will most likely impact you. Rich people are changing their behaviors to accommodate the current moment in time, and the average…
Half the universe was missing... until now
This episode was sponsored by KiwiCo. More about them at the end of the show. Until recently, half the universe was missing or hidden or just… undetected. And no, I’m not talking about dark matter or dark energy, which make up 27 and 68 percent of our un…