yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

High Tech or No Tech: Should You Unplug in National Parks? | National Geographic


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

How much more I spend on my phone than what I used to is ridiculous. I look at my little brothers and stuff. There are definitely weekends where me and him will sit inside and play on our computers. All they do is sit on video games and the computer. I technically do too for a living. Technology isn't the enemy; I think it can help bring people into parks too, if you let them know.

My generation is a reconnaissance to the wilderness, and I think that is spurred by social media. Is the point for me to share this with people on the internet? Look what I did, and isn't this great for people in my generation who come through? Kind of have a checklist, is what I've noticed. "Oh, this spot, this spot, this spot, I'm going to go there." Or is it to inspire other people to get out?

The different way that we're experiencing parks is that we're doing it in a more interactive way. So, we'll tweet it, we'll Instagram it, we use Google Maps to find all sorts of parks to go camping in. Airbnb, and you can go look at trails too. Maps, you know, I use birding apps to identify birds. It's easier than ever.

The question is, where's the line? There's always this debate of people who are like, how much are you actually looking at what you're seeing? Even though they're in nature, they're seeing it still through a screen. I've tried that before. I've not taken my camera out, and I'll see a beautiful sunset or something, and I just regret it. For me personally, it's a motivator.

There is a big drive to have that perfect picture. I can really appreciate what I'm seeing while capturing it, and I like to have those memories. I love that social media can capture those moments, not that that's the driving force for our generation to come out to national parks, but I think that plays a part in it. I see something cool, and I want to take a picture of it or I want to film it or something like that.

Then I'm going to go out further. Meanwhile, people are crashing drones into thermal features in Yellowstone. So, yeah, if you have Wi-Fi in a park, sometimes you'll see the kids sitting around the visitor center. There's a lot of visitors that come here that are so wrapped up in technology, tweeting about it, and they don't really want to walk anywhere.

Maybe they don't realize when they come to Yosemite National Park that it's basically a black hole for all cell phone service. I would be so sad if the whole park had Wi-Fi. Subtleties like natural places become a lot more difficult. People are afraid to be alone in nature without anything to occupy their time, and then that's when they start to realize, "Wow, there's like more to life than technology."

I don't know where my phone is. I don't know where my phone is either. It's really nice to get a chance to just like... at the same time, someone's going to see their tweet who's never been to a park. One person goes and visits it, and then they get to see pictures and they get to see how much you enjoyed it.

People are constantly kind of bombarded with images of these places, and it makes them want to go. The more you see it, the more accessible it feels. Or, on Instagram, like "Let's go here, let's go here." I can't even tell you since I've lived here how many people have reached out to me on social media that don't know me at all.

Like, "Wow, you live such an amazing life! Hey, I've never been to Yosemite before, but I really want to go in the future." Maybe some of the visitation in national parks will be... It's one thing to have it with technology, and that's probably fine. It's another thing to live it, and they say, authentically experience the ecosystems.

Don't care; they'll still be here. You took data from Star Wars terrain. It's simply naked, except it's going to be a little bit cleaner. It's like a Midwestern desert pretty much. The quietest place you could ever come. Places that feel like rainforests, and everything is covered in moss. 4,000 ft walls on either side of us. But then you get up higher, and there's these jagged peaks and the steepness. We're all dwarfed in these mountains. It is so romantic.

More Articles

View All
A Brief History of Dogs | National Geographic
Long before we raised livestock and grew crops, humans lived side by side with dogs. It’s widely accepted among scientists that dogs are descendants of wolves. In fact, their DNA is virtually identical. But how exactly did a fierce wild animal become our …
Elon Musk's Plan for the US National Debt.
Basically, we’re on a path to bankruptcy. America’s on a path to bankruptcy, so we have to cut government spending, or we’re just going to go bankrupt just like a person would. As we all know, recently, Donald Trump won the US election, and one person tha…
See What It Takes to Hide a Secret Tracker in a Rhino Horn | Short Film Showcase
[Music] Africa’s got the greatest number and diversity of large mammals. It’s the continent that’s been blessed with the most wildlife. Many of these animals, like the black rhino, are down to a few thousand. This is it; in the next hundred years, years m…
Meet the preposition | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hey Garans, I want to talk about prepositions. But before I do, I’m going to draw you a little hamster. Is it a hamster? Is it a tiny bear? Who knows? We’re just going to call it a hamster, a little, little rodent-type creature. Now, I’m going to use thi…
Personal Pronouns | The Parts of Speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians! Let’s talk about personal pronouns. But first, let me lay some sentences on you. Jake and I baked a loaf of bread. We baked a loaf of bread. You can learn anything! My friends are cool. They are cool. Now, I’m gonna circle a few of the…
AP Chemistry multiple choice sample: Boiling points
Consider the molecules represented above and the data in the table below. We have the structure up here for non, the structure for 2, 3, 4-triopentane, which is really hard to say, so I’m going to abbreviate that TFP. Um, and we have this data in the tabl…