yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

To Be a Better Philanthropist, Think Like a Poker Player | Liv Boeree on Effective Altruism


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So effective altruism is basically applying the scientific method and evidence and analysis to the whole concept of charity. It's about sort of looking in the world—you know, the world has a gazillion problems. A lot of them are very, very bad, but some are easier to solve than others. Some are cheaper to solve than others.

And so there are some sort of actions that we can take that are more effective than others in reducing suffering or increasing the happiness in the world. Effective altruism is basically about identifying: what are those methods of improving the world as quickly as possible and as effectively as possible.

So within the community, there are sort of teams of analysts looking at these problems and figuring out the best interventions, the best charities that are out there, and then raising awareness of it. Picking a charity is tough, and the things to look for—I guess to start with, is the cause area in itself neglected?

There's countless different problems in the world, and some of them are far more researched or receive a lot more funding than others. Similarly, there are some problems that are actually—that there's just a ton more room for funding, where your money can make a very big difference.

So that's the first thing to look for: if it's neglected. Next thing is: is the charity that you're going to donate for giving you the maximum bang for your buck? Will it help the most people per dollar that's donated? Another thing to look for is: are the results that it is likely to generate measurable?

Because if we can't measure what the charity is doing, well, then we just don't really know how effective it is. So yeah, those are sort of some key indicators to look for. Also: is the charity transparent? Not all charities that aren't completely transparent—it doesn't mean that they're necessarily bad, but at the same time if they're doing very sort of actionable positive things, then they should be able to demonstrate that clearly.

Those are sort of the four key points I'd look for. Since starting to play poker about ten years ago, I've been so fortunate with my results and the opportunities that I've been given through it. But after a while, I started realizing I should probably be doing something else with this.

Is there a way I can continue playing the game that I love but also have a more positive impact on the world? And at the same time, some friends and I met some effective altruists who wanted to chat to us about could we fundraise through the industry.

And after they sort of explained to me how effective altruism works, how some charities are just hundreds of times more effective than others, and the arguments were just so compelling. I was like, okay, how do we get involved? How do we do this?

So we decided to create an organization that fundraises for these charities, called Raising for Effective Giving. “Raising” is a play on words there because… that's what you do in poker. So we started this organization two and a half years ago, and we fundraise for about eight or so highly effective charities across a number of different cause areas.

We have some that are direct suffering alleviation, most of those are sort of in the poverty sphere. We fundraise for similarly the most effective animal charities and a couple of research organizations that are looking into potential existential risks (that are hopefully unlikely to happen, but if they do happen could be so catastrophic, and they're very sort of underresearched right now).

We have quite a broad spectrum of charities that we raise for, but all of them are either highly effective or projected to be very effective. So we started it two and a half years ago. So far we've raised just over $2 million through the poker industry for these charities, and it's been an amazing learning experience...

More Articles

View All
Justification using second derivative: maximum point | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We’re told that given that h prime of negative four is equal to zero, what is an appropriate calculus-based justification for the fact that h has a relative maximum at x is equal to negative four? So, right over here we actually have the graph of our fun…
Life Lessons College Didn't Teach You
My life completely changed in my final year of college. After spending the first 3 years as an introvert who only really went to school to get the best grades, I started communicating more with my professors and other students in my program. I started mak…
The irregular verb gets taken for a ride | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians. Broadly, we’re talking about irregular verbs, but more specifically, today we’re going to talk about the “en” ending, which is why I’m calling this lecture “Taken for a Ride.” Because this little “en” thing… So we’ve spoken previously …
Dogs: (Prehistoric) Man's Best Friend | National Geographic
There are more dog burials in prehistory than there are burials of any other animals, including cats, for example, or horses. Dogs seem to have a very special place in human communities in the past. As soon as we see in the archaeological record skeletal …
Did People Used To Look Older?
Hey, Vsauce! Michael here. At the age of 18, Carl Sagan looked like a teenager. But it doesn’t take long in an old high school yearbook to find teenagers who look surprisingly old. These people are all in their 20s, but so are these people. This is Elizab…
Backcountry Basics: Navigating With or Without Technology | Get Out: A Guide to Adventure
My name is Hillary O’Neal and I am a professional ski mountaineer and adventurer. Today, we are going to talk about backcountry navigation. There are a lot of uses in many different environments that would require some level of skill in backcountry naviga…