yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Will AI Result in Mass Unemployment or a New Middle Class? | Luis Perez : Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Luis Perez-Breva: A lot of people are scared about AI. And the reason is, I think we’ve seen too many Terminator movies. So we’re mixing many things up. It is true, Terminator is not the scenario we are planning for. But when it comes to artificial intelligence, people get all these things confused. It’s robots, it’s awareness, it’s people smarter than us to some degree.

So we’re effectively afraid of robots that will move and are stronger and smarter than we are, like Terminator. So that’s not our aspiration. That’s not what I do when I’m thinking about artificial intelligence. When I’m thinking about artificial intelligence, I’m thinking about it in the same way that mass manufacturing has brought forth a whole new economy.

Mass manufacturing allowed people to get new jobs that were unthinkable before. And those new jobs actually created the middle class. To me, artificial intelligence is about developing... making computers better partners, effectively. And you’re already seeing that today. You’re already doing it, except that it’s not really artificial intelligence.

Today, whenever you want to engage in a project, you go to Google. Google uses advanced machine learning, really advanced. And you engage in a very narrow conversation with Google, except that your conversation is just key words. So a lot of your time is spent trying to come up with the actual key word that you need to find the information, and Google gives you the information.

Then you go out and try to make sense of it on your own and come back to Google for more. And then go back out, and that’s the way it works. So imagine that instead of being a narrow conversation with key words, you could actually engage for more actual information, meaning to have the computer reason with you about stuff that you may not know about.

It’s not so much about the computer being aware. It’s the computer being a better tool to partner with you. Then you would be able to go much further. The same way that Google allows you to go much further already today because before, through the exact same process, you would have had to go to a library every time you wanted to search for information.

So what I’m looking for when I do AI is I want the machine that partners with me to help me set up or solve real-world problems, thinking about them in ways we have never thought about before. But it’s a partnership. And you can take this partnership in so many different directions: through additions to your brain like Elon Musk proposes, or through better search engines, or through a robotic machine that helps you out.

But it’s not so much they’re going to replace you for that purpose. That is not the real purpose of AI. The real purpose is for us to reach further, the same way that we were able to reach further when Ford invented automation, or when Ford brought automation to mass market.

People fear that automation might actually remove jobs. And what I want to stress is that that’s not artificial intelligence. Automation is something we’ve been doing for ages, all of us. You do it at your home. You do it with the way you set up your own schedules. You do it for many, many things. In some cases, it involves computers, in some cases it doesn’t.

Now, the purpose of automation is to free time so that we can reach further. So when a company starts using automation and it erases certain jobs but doesn’t figure out how to create new ones, then they’re mostly just looking at cost savings. They’re not looking really at expanding their own market.

And that turns out to be a lack of imagination. So with the free time and the expertise that was left free now, because of the automation, they should be able to build and reach further. If they don’t, it has little to do with the actual machine, which is somewhat dumb. It has more to do with lack of imagination on the part of whomever. But certainly not the worker, right.

More Articles

View All
Drugs for a Fine (Clip) | To Catch a Smuggler | National Geographic
You said this was what, again? Okay, just give me a second to positive for ketamine hydrochloride, which is a DEA controlled substance. It’s illegal to transport into the U.S. It’s illegal to have in the U.S. without a prescription. I honestly didn’t kno…
Elk Conservation in Yellowstone, LIVE! | Yellowstone Live
Yeah, it’s more like my hair. You look, you know people pay to have wind blow swings, right? Great! Hi, I’m Amber Ghoshal here with Arthur Middleton. He’s an animal ecologist and a NatGeo Explorer. We are in very windy West Yellowstone at Under Canvas. It…
How To Change The World? Get The Small Things Right – Dalton Caldwell and Michael Seibel
Let’s say that changing the world is like uprooting a tree, like a big old tall tree. Imagine there were two founders. One founder knew that trees have roots, and the other founder had no idea. Right? Like the trees with roots person, they have an advanta…
One of the Most Important Decisions You'll Make (Hint: It's About Love)
Who do we give our love to and who do we receive love from? I think it’s a huge decision, the most, maybe the most important one, one of the most important decisions. I use the word love. Um, I think different people mean different things by love, so I’m …
Believe the no, but not the why.
There are a couple pieces of advice that we give to YC founders when talking to investors. I think the first is: believe the “no,” but don’t believe the “why.” You’re going to get a lot of “no”s when pitching, and more often than not, the investor will no…
Transforming exponential graphs | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told the graph of y = 2^x is shown below. All right, which of the following is the graph of y = 2^(-x) - 5? So there’s two changes here: instead of 2^x, we have 2^(-x) and then we’re not leaving that alone; we then subtract five. So let’s take them…