yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Position vector valued functions | Multivariable Calculus | Khan Academy


5m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let's say I have some curve C and it's described; it can be parameterized. I can't say that word as, let's say, x is equal to X of t, y is equal to some function y of T, and let's say that this is valid for T between A and B, so T is greater than or equal to A and then less than or equal to B.

So, if I were to just draw this on a... let me see... I could draw it like this. I'm staying very abstract right now; this is not a very specific example. This is the x-axis; this is the y-axis. My curve, let's say, this is when T is equal to A and then the curve might do something. It might do something like this. I don't know what it does, let's say it's over there. This is T is equal to B.

This actual point right here will be X of B. That would be the x-coordinate you evaluate this function at B, and Y of B. This is, of course, when T is equal to A. The actual coordinate in R² on the Cartesian coordinates will be X of A, which is this right here, and then Y of A, which is that right there.

We've seen that before; that's just a standard way of describing a parametric equation or curve using two parametric equations. What I want to do now is describe this same exact curve using a vector-valued function. So, if I define a vector-valued function, and if you don't remember what those are, we'll have a little bit of review here.

Let me say I have a vector-valued function R, and I'll put a little vector arrow on top of it. In a lot of textbooks, they'll just bold it and they'll leave scalar-valued functions unbolded, but it's hard to draw a bold, so I'll put a little vector on top. Let's say that R is a function of T, and these are going to be position vectors.

I'm specifying that because in general, when someone talks about a vector, this vector and this vector are considered equivalent as long as they have the same magnitude and direction. No one really cares about what their start and end points are as long as their direction is the same and their length is the same. But when you talk about position vectors, you're saying no, these vectors are all going to start at zero, at the origin.

When you say it's a position vector, you're implicitly saying this is specifying a unique position; in this case, it's going to be in two-dimensional space, but it could be in three-dimensional space or really even four, five, whatever n-dimensional space. So, when you say it's a position vector, you're literally saying, "Okay, this vector literally specifies that point in space."

So, let's see if we can describe this curve as a vector, a position vector-valued function. We could say R of t... let me switch back to that pink color; I'll just stay in green. R of T is equal to X of T times the unit vector in the x-direction. The unit vector gets a little caret on top, a little hat; that's like the arrow for it, that just says it's a unit vector, plus Y of T times J.

If I was dealing with a curve in three dimensions, I would have plus Z of T times K, but we're dealing with two dimensions right here. The way this works is, you're just taking your... well, for any T, and still we're going to have T is greater than or equal to A and then less than or equal to B.

This is the exact same thing as that. Let me just redraw it. So, let me draw our coordinates, our coordinates right here, our axes. So, that's the y-axis and this is the x-axis. So, when you evaluate R of A, right? That's our starting point. So let me do that.

R of A, maybe I'll do it right over here. Our position vector-valued function evaluated at T is equal to A is going to be equal to X of A times our unit vector in the x-direction plus Y of A times our unit vector in the vertical direction or in the y-direction. And what's that going to look like?

Well, X of A is this thing right here, so it's X of A times the unit vector. So, it's really, you know, maybe the unit vector is this long; it has length one. So now we're just going to have a length of X of A in that direction. Then, same thing in Y of A; it's going to be Y of A length in that direction.

But the bottom line, this vector right here, if you add these scaled values of these two unit vectors, you're going to get R of A looking something like this—it’s going to be a vector that looks something like that, just like that. It's a vector; it's a position vector. That's why we're kneeling it at the origin but drawing it in standard position, and that right there is R of A.

Now, what happens if A increases a little bit? What is R of A plus a little bit? I don't know; we could call that R of A plus Delta or R of A plus h. We do it in a different color. So, let's say R... let's say we increase A a little bit, R of A plus some small h. Well, that's just going to be X of A plus h times the unit vector i plus Y of A plus h times the unit vector j.

And what's that going to look like? Well, we're going to go a little bit further down the curve; that's like saying the coordinate X of A plus h and Y of A plus h might be that point right there. So, we're going to... it'll be a new unit vector. It'll be a new vector, a position vector, not a unit vector; these don't necessarily have length one. That might be right here.

I'm doing that same color as this, so it might be just like that. So, that right here is R of A plus h. So, you see, as you keep increasing your value of T until you get to B, these position vectors are going to keep specifying points along this curve.

So, the curve—let me draw the curve in a different color—the curve looks something like this. It's meant to look exactly like the curve that I have up here. And, for example, R of B is going to be... is going to be a vector that looks like this. It's going to be a vector that looks like that.

Let me—I want to draw it relatively straight. That vector right there is R of B. So, hopefully, you realize that these position vectors really are specifying the same points on this curve as this original, I guess, straight-up parameterization that we did for this curve.

I just want to do that as a little bit of a review because we're now going to break into the idea of actually taking a derivative of this vector-valued function, and I'll do that in the next video.

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett: How the Average Person Can Become a Millionaire
So let’s not kid ourselves. The reason why we spend so much time learning about investing is to make money. Whether you’re saving up for a house or building wealth for retirement, we all have our own financial goals. In this video, Warren Buffett is going…
Tidepooling along the Pacific Coast | National Geographic
Nature, the most powerful creative force on Earth. I’m Chef Melissa King. Cooking has taken me to incredible places. Magical. (laughs) From TV competitions and celebrity galas to countries around the world, I’m heading out to places I’ve never been before…
Developing the Future of Transportation | National Geographic
(light music) [Jamie Hall] As we look ahead to an all-electric future, we really talk about not leaving anyone behind. (light music) The San Joaquin Valley in California. It has some major challenges. It’s got some of the most severe poverty and the wo…
The awkward truth about choosing charities | Peter Singer | Big Think
I think they’re clearly our objective criteria for saying that some causes are better than others. One example that I give in the book, there’s a charity called the Make-A-Wish Foundation which asks parents of very ill, often dying children, to write in i…
ADHD: The Misunderstood Disorder (Short Documentary)
What is ADHD? Really well, that’s not really smart of me to ask, seeing as you probably clicked on this video because that’s exactly what you’re wondering as well. Don’t worry, you’re not alone. ADHD is probably one of the most misunderstood conditions ou…
New Apple TV (iTV) and Our New MacRumors Application
Hey guys, this is Matt Kids, and I’m on with the video on the Apple TV rumored to be coming out. I don’t know exactly when, but in previous rumors, it’s been said that the next Apple TV would be an iOS running device that would have apps maybe and be a fu…