yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Position vector valued functions | Multivariable Calculus | Khan Academy


5m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let's say I have some curve C and it's described; it can be parameterized. I can't say that word as, let's say, x is equal to X of t, y is equal to some function y of T, and let's say that this is valid for T between A and B, so T is greater than or equal to A and then less than or equal to B.

So, if I were to just draw this on a... let me see... I could draw it like this. I'm staying very abstract right now; this is not a very specific example. This is the x-axis; this is the y-axis. My curve, let's say, this is when T is equal to A and then the curve might do something. It might do something like this. I don't know what it does, let's say it's over there. This is T is equal to B.

This actual point right here will be X of B. That would be the x-coordinate you evaluate this function at B, and Y of B. This is, of course, when T is equal to A. The actual coordinate in R² on the Cartesian coordinates will be X of A, which is this right here, and then Y of A, which is that right there.

We've seen that before; that's just a standard way of describing a parametric equation or curve using two parametric equations. What I want to do now is describe this same exact curve using a vector-valued function. So, if I define a vector-valued function, and if you don't remember what those are, we'll have a little bit of review here.

Let me say I have a vector-valued function R, and I'll put a little vector arrow on top of it. In a lot of textbooks, they'll just bold it and they'll leave scalar-valued functions unbolded, but it's hard to draw a bold, so I'll put a little vector on top. Let's say that R is a function of T, and these are going to be position vectors.

I'm specifying that because in general, when someone talks about a vector, this vector and this vector are considered equivalent as long as they have the same magnitude and direction. No one really cares about what their start and end points are as long as their direction is the same and their length is the same. But when you talk about position vectors, you're saying no, these vectors are all going to start at zero, at the origin.

When you say it's a position vector, you're implicitly saying this is specifying a unique position; in this case, it's going to be in two-dimensional space, but it could be in three-dimensional space or really even four, five, whatever n-dimensional space. So, when you say it's a position vector, you're literally saying, "Okay, this vector literally specifies that point in space."

So, let's see if we can describe this curve as a vector, a position vector-valued function. We could say R of t... let me switch back to that pink color; I'll just stay in green. R of T is equal to X of T times the unit vector in the x-direction. The unit vector gets a little caret on top, a little hat; that's like the arrow for it, that just says it's a unit vector, plus Y of T times J.

If I was dealing with a curve in three dimensions, I would have plus Z of T times K, but we're dealing with two dimensions right here. The way this works is, you're just taking your... well, for any T, and still we're going to have T is greater than or equal to A and then less than or equal to B.

This is the exact same thing as that. Let me just redraw it. So, let me draw our coordinates, our coordinates right here, our axes. So, that's the y-axis and this is the x-axis. So, when you evaluate R of A, right? That's our starting point. So let me do that.

R of A, maybe I'll do it right over here. Our position vector-valued function evaluated at T is equal to A is going to be equal to X of A times our unit vector in the x-direction plus Y of A times our unit vector in the vertical direction or in the y-direction. And what's that going to look like?

Well, X of A is this thing right here, so it's X of A times the unit vector. So, it's really, you know, maybe the unit vector is this long; it has length one. So now we're just going to have a length of X of A in that direction. Then, same thing in Y of A; it's going to be Y of A length in that direction.

But the bottom line, this vector right here, if you add these scaled values of these two unit vectors, you're going to get R of A looking something like this—it’s going to be a vector that looks something like that, just like that. It's a vector; it's a position vector. That's why we're kneeling it at the origin but drawing it in standard position, and that right there is R of A.

Now, what happens if A increases a little bit? What is R of A plus a little bit? I don't know; we could call that R of A plus Delta or R of A plus h. We do it in a different color. So, let's say R... let's say we increase A a little bit, R of A plus some small h. Well, that's just going to be X of A plus h times the unit vector i plus Y of A plus h times the unit vector j.

And what's that going to look like? Well, we're going to go a little bit further down the curve; that's like saying the coordinate X of A plus h and Y of A plus h might be that point right there. So, we're going to... it'll be a new unit vector. It'll be a new vector, a position vector, not a unit vector; these don't necessarily have length one. That might be right here.

I'm doing that same color as this, so it might be just like that. So, that right here is R of A plus h. So, you see, as you keep increasing your value of T until you get to B, these position vectors are going to keep specifying points along this curve.

So, the curve—let me draw the curve in a different color—the curve looks something like this. It's meant to look exactly like the curve that I have up here. And, for example, R of B is going to be... is going to be a vector that looks like this. It's going to be a vector that looks like that.

Let me—I want to draw it relatively straight. That vector right there is R of B. So, hopefully, you realize that these position vectors really are specifying the same points on this curve as this original, I guess, straight-up parameterization that we did for this curve.

I just want to do that as a little bit of a review because we're now going to break into the idea of actually taking a derivative of this vector-valued function, and I'll do that in the next video.

More Articles

View All
Why Jet Boats are AWESOME (U.S. Coast Guard's Workhorse) - Smarter Every Day 272
Hey. What’s up? I’m Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. We are right in the middle of a Deep Dive series into the US Coast Guard and all the crazy stuff they do because it’s impressive. Like we’ve already looked at how they respond to distress sign…
What I wish I knew as a Teenager
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, all right, here we go. This topic has been requested a lot lately. So when you ask, you shall receive. Here’s exactly what I wish I knew as a teenager. From all my videos, I really feel like this one is especially…
How to Operate with Keith Rabois (How to Start a Startup 2014: Lecture 14)
Um, so I’m going to talk about how to operate. I’ve watched some of the prior classes, and I’m going to assume that you’ve already sort of hired a bunch of relentlessly resourceful people, that you built a product at least some people love, that you prob…
Transforming exponential graphs (example 2) | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told the graph of y equals 2 to the x is shown below. So that’s the graph; it’s an exponential function. Which of the following is the graph of y is equal to negative 1 times 2 to the x plus 3 plus 4? They give us 4 choices down here, and before we …
They Turn Ice Into Ice Cubes | Continent 7: Antarctica
[Music] The Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star is the most powerful icebreaker in the world. Our mission is to cut a channel that’s 18 miles long through 8 to 12 feet of ice so that the supply ships can resupply the continent. This is where we earn our money. …
Can Chess, with Hexagons?
Chess, the game of war on 64 squares. But I wondered, can chess be played with hexagons? There have been several attempts, the most successful published in a book in the UK in 1973, which I promptly ordered to investigate. While waiting for one of the re…