yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Will World War 3 Be Prevented Because of Global Interdependence? With Parag Khanna | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

There have been about nine major wars that have been predicted in the last 25 years. But interestingly, none of them have escalated to the level of a major regional war or a global conflict that we would describe as a World War III.

And I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that we are not just interdependent in terms of trade. Because as we all know, Britain and Germany traded a fair bit with each other prior to World War I breaking out 100 years ago.

But not only do we have trade interdependence today, we have a large amount of financial integration. We hold a lot of each other’s debt in terms of treasury bonds and corporate bonds. We are very invested in each other’s economies.

There is also supply chain dispersal. We now manufacture goods in even our own rival’s countries. The United States and the Soviet Union didn’t trade a whole lot with each other. Today, not only do the United States and China trade a great deal with each other, but many American goods are, of course, made in China.

Walmart, America’s largest retailer, makes most of its goods in China. If a war between the U.S. and China were to suddenly break out tomorrow, that would probably mean very bad news for the bottom line of America’s largest retailer.

So we are much more careful, of course, about stumbling into conflict because we not only have nuclear deterrence, and we have the lessons of the past. Those are all intellectual factors and strategic factors.

We also have the trade interdependence. We also have the financial integration. We also have the supply chain dispersal. And we have the allure of the size of the markets of our rivals and competitors.

Most of the American Fortune 500 generates more revenues from abroad than from home. It doesn’t want to fight wars with the countries on which it depends for its exports and for its revenues.

Leaders are wisely making these cost-benefit calculations and saying, “Yes, I have national pride at stake. Yes, I believe that my country has been aggrieved historically by this rival. Yes, we want to win in the relationship with them and in the race with them. We want to do all of those things, but it’s not worth the price of actually going into all-out warfare.”

More Articles

View All
BANNED Sega Ads!!!: Mind Blow 8
Meat flavored water and Japanese robot babies will someday rule the earth. Vsauce, Kevin here. This is Milo. Hey, it’s Mario. This is actually a Nintendo parody found in Sega’s Alex Kidd. But Nintendo paid the favor back in Donkey Kong Country 2 by stick…
Satya Nadella on the journey to becoming Microsoft's CEO & reimagining technology's impact
YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU NEXT TIME. NEXT TIME.
15 APPS RICH PEOPLE USE
Did you know there is an entirely different universe of apps that rich people use? Let’s get you plugged in. Here are 15 apps rich people use. Welcome to alux.com, the place where future billionaires come to get inspired. Number one: Twitter. You might b…
Does MONEY BUY Happiness? - The TRUTH About Money | Kevin O'Leary & Erik Conover
[Music] Everybody, welcome back to Ask Mr. Wonderful. Another fantastic episode about to happen! You know I love to collaborate with people, particularly those who travel all around the world, because all of our questions are global these days; we get th…
Law Without Government. Robert P. Murphy.
So what’s interesting, I think, is that actually the case for private defense is a piece of cake. That’s really not what trips people up. Really, when people give you all these zingers about “well, what if this happens? What if that happens? You know, wha…
Word problem subtracting fractions with like denominators
After a rainstorm, Lily measures the depth of several puddles in her backyard. She records her results in a table. So, here are three different puddles, and she measures the depth in inches. Then we’re asked: how much deeper was the puddle under the swin…