yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Solving proportions 2 exercise examples | Algebra Basics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

  • [Instructor] We have the proportion ( x - 9 ) over ( 12 ) is equal to ( \frac{2}{3} ), and we wanna solve for the ( x ) that satisfies this proportion. Now, there's a bunch of ways that you could do it. A lot of people, as soon as they see a proportion like this, they wanna cross-multiply. They wanna say, "Hey, three times ( x - 9 ) is going to be equal to two times ( 12 )." And that's completely legitimate. You would get, let me write that down.

So three times ( x - 9 ), three times ( x - 9 ) is equal to two times ( 12 ). So it would be equal to two times ( 12 ). And then you can distribute the three. You'd get ( 3x - 27 ) is equal to ( 24 ). And then you could add ( 27 ) to both sides, and you would get, let me actually do that. So let me add ( 27 ) to both sides, and we are left with ( 3x ) is equal to, is equal to, let's see, ( 51 ). And then ( x ) would be equal to ( 17 ). ( x ) would be equal to ( 17 ). And you can verify that this works. ( 17 - 9 ) is ( 8 ). ( \frac{8}{12} ) is the same thing as ( \frac{2}{3} ). So this checks out.

Another way you could do that, instead of just straight up doing the cross-multiplication, you could say, "Look, I wanna get rid of this ( 12 ) in the denominator right over here. Let's multiply both sides by ( 12 )." So if you multiply both sides by ( 12 ), on your left-hand side, you are just left with ( x - 9 ). And on your right-hand side, ( \frac{2}{3} ) times ( 12 ), well, ( \frac{2}{3} ) of ( 12 ) is just ( 8 ). And you could do the actual multiplication, ( \frac{2}{3} ) times ( \frac{12}{1} ). ( 12, 12 ) and ( 3 ), so ( 12 ) divided by ( 3 ) is ( 4 ). ( 3 ) divided by ( 3 ) is ( 1 ). So it becomes ( \frac{2 \cdot 4}{1} ), which is just ( 8 ).

And then you add ( 9 ) to both sides. So the fun of algebra is that as long as you do something that's logically consistent, you will get the right answer. There's no one way of doing it. So here you get ( x ) is equal to ( 17 ) again. And you can also, you can multiply both sides by ( 12 ) and both sides by ( 3 ), and then that would be functionally equivalent to cross-multiplying.

Let's do one more. So here, another proportion, and this time the ( x ) is in the denominator. But just like before, if we want, we can cross-multiply. And just to see where cross-multiplying comes from, that it's not some voodoo, that you still are doing logical algebra, that you're doing the same thing to both sides of the equation, you just need to appreciate that we're just multiplying both sides by both denominators.

So we have this ( 8 ) right over here on the left-hand side. If we wanna get rid of this ( 8 ) on the left-hand side in the denominator, we can multiply the left-hand side by ( 8 ). But in order for the equality to hold true, I can't do something to just one side. I have to do it to both sides. Similarly, similarly, if (laughs) I, if I wanna get this ( x + 1 ) out of the denominator, I could multiply by ( x + 1 ) right over here. But I have to do that on both sides if I want my equality to hold true.

And notice, when you do what we just did, this is going to be equivalent to cross-multiplying. Because these ( 8s ) cancel out, and this ( x + 1 ) cancels with that ( x + 1 ) right over there. And you are left with, you are left with ( (x + 1) ) times ( 7 ), and I could write it as ( 7(x + 1) ), is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ), is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ). Notice, this is exactly what you have done if you would've cross-multiplied. Cross-multiplication is just a shortcut of multiplying both sides by both the denominators.

We have ( 7(x + 1) ) is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ). And now we can go and solve the algebra. So distributing the ( 7 ), we get ( 7x + 7 ) is equal to ( 40 ). And then subtracting ( 7 ) from both sides, so let's subtract ( 7 ) from both sides, we are left with ( 7x ) is equal to ( 33 ). Dividing both sides by ( 7 ), we are left with ( x ) is equal to ( \frac{33}{7} ). And if we wanna write that as a mixed number, this is the same thing, let's see, this is the same thing as ( 4 \frac{5}{7} ), and we're done.

More Articles

View All
Caesar, Cleopatra and the Ides of March | World History | Khan Academy
[Instructor] Where we left off in the last video, we saw Julius Caesar had conquered Gaul as proconsul. And, near the end of his term as proconsul, the senators in Rome were afraid of him. He was this popular, populist, charismatic figure; he had just had…
The best way to have startup ideas is to just notice them organically.
Let’s talk about how to come up with startup ideas. The last way to have startup ideas is to just notice them organically. If you look at the YC top 100 companies, at least 70 percent of them had their startup ideas organically, rather than by sitting do…
Comparison word problems: roly-polies | Addition and subtraction | 1st grade | Khan Academy
Leah has nine roly polies. Let’s write that down. Leah has nine roly polies in her bug house; she has one more. She has one more than Dingan, is I think how I would say that name. How many roly polies does Dingan have? So that’s what we need to figure ou…
Ask me anything with Sal Khan: April 16 | Homeroom with Sal
Hi everyone! Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to our daily homeroom livestream. The whole goal of this is for all of us to stay connected during times of school closures. Depending on the day, this is a time for all of y’all to ask questions of my…
Meta VS Apple: What Their Battle Means For AI Startups
I think Apple doesn’t want the mobile battle to end. Yeah, I think Apple wants AI to perhaps be the reason why we have another 10-year phone upgrade cycle, and as long as the mobile battle is going, Apple’s got an advantage. All right, welcome to Dalton …
Ponzi Factor | V-Log 4 | Tesla SEC Settlement
Hi, this is Tong. Thanks for joining me again. It’s Saturday, and I needed to touch on this for you all. Long story short, the SEC settled with Elon after they said they were gonna go after him on Thursday. I’m not exactly happy about this because this s…