yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Solving proportions 2 exercise examples | Algebra Basics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

  • [Instructor] We have the proportion ( x - 9 ) over ( 12 ) is equal to ( \frac{2}{3} ), and we wanna solve for the ( x ) that satisfies this proportion. Now, there's a bunch of ways that you could do it. A lot of people, as soon as they see a proportion like this, they wanna cross-multiply. They wanna say, "Hey, three times ( x - 9 ) is going to be equal to two times ( 12 )." And that's completely legitimate. You would get, let me write that down.

So three times ( x - 9 ), three times ( x - 9 ) is equal to two times ( 12 ). So it would be equal to two times ( 12 ). And then you can distribute the three. You'd get ( 3x - 27 ) is equal to ( 24 ). And then you could add ( 27 ) to both sides, and you would get, let me actually do that. So let me add ( 27 ) to both sides, and we are left with ( 3x ) is equal to, is equal to, let's see, ( 51 ). And then ( x ) would be equal to ( 17 ). ( x ) would be equal to ( 17 ). And you can verify that this works. ( 17 - 9 ) is ( 8 ). ( \frac{8}{12} ) is the same thing as ( \frac{2}{3} ). So this checks out.

Another way you could do that, instead of just straight up doing the cross-multiplication, you could say, "Look, I wanna get rid of this ( 12 ) in the denominator right over here. Let's multiply both sides by ( 12 )." So if you multiply both sides by ( 12 ), on your left-hand side, you are just left with ( x - 9 ). And on your right-hand side, ( \frac{2}{3} ) times ( 12 ), well, ( \frac{2}{3} ) of ( 12 ) is just ( 8 ). And you could do the actual multiplication, ( \frac{2}{3} ) times ( \frac{12}{1} ). ( 12, 12 ) and ( 3 ), so ( 12 ) divided by ( 3 ) is ( 4 ). ( 3 ) divided by ( 3 ) is ( 1 ). So it becomes ( \frac{2 \cdot 4}{1} ), which is just ( 8 ).

And then you add ( 9 ) to both sides. So the fun of algebra is that as long as you do something that's logically consistent, you will get the right answer. There's no one way of doing it. So here you get ( x ) is equal to ( 17 ) again. And you can also, you can multiply both sides by ( 12 ) and both sides by ( 3 ), and then that would be functionally equivalent to cross-multiplying.

Let's do one more. So here, another proportion, and this time the ( x ) is in the denominator. But just like before, if we want, we can cross-multiply. And just to see where cross-multiplying comes from, that it's not some voodoo, that you still are doing logical algebra, that you're doing the same thing to both sides of the equation, you just need to appreciate that we're just multiplying both sides by both denominators.

So we have this ( 8 ) right over here on the left-hand side. If we wanna get rid of this ( 8 ) on the left-hand side in the denominator, we can multiply the left-hand side by ( 8 ). But in order for the equality to hold true, I can't do something to just one side. I have to do it to both sides. Similarly, similarly, if (laughs) I, if I wanna get this ( x + 1 ) out of the denominator, I could multiply by ( x + 1 ) right over here. But I have to do that on both sides if I want my equality to hold true.

And notice, when you do what we just did, this is going to be equivalent to cross-multiplying. Because these ( 8s ) cancel out, and this ( x + 1 ) cancels with that ( x + 1 ) right over there. And you are left with, you are left with ( (x + 1) ) times ( 7 ), and I could write it as ( 7(x + 1) ), is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ), is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ). Notice, this is exactly what you have done if you would've cross-multiplied. Cross-multiplication is just a shortcut of multiplying both sides by both the denominators.

We have ( 7(x + 1) ) is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ). And now we can go and solve the algebra. So distributing the ( 7 ), we get ( 7x + 7 ) is equal to ( 40 ). And then subtracting ( 7 ) from both sides, so let's subtract ( 7 ) from both sides, we are left with ( 7x ) is equal to ( 33 ). Dividing both sides by ( 7 ), we are left with ( x ) is equal to ( \frac{33}{7} ). And if we wanna write that as a mixed number, this is the same thing, let's see, this is the same thing as ( 4 \frac{5}{7} ), and we're done.

More Articles

View All
How Finding Blue Whale Poop Changed My Life | Nat Geo Live
I was seeing six blue whales in an area the size of a soccer pitch. I’ve gone on to name them the “unorthodox whales,” because they actually break the stereotypes we had for this species. It has sent me on an incredible adventure. (audience clapping) It w…
Water potential
So right here I have a container of water that is open to the atmosphere. It’s standard atmospheric pressure up here. Let’s just assume that everything in our system—the air and the water, the container—everything is 21 degrees Celsius. Now, our chamber …
Jacobian prerequisite knowledge
Hello everyone. So, in these next few videos, I’m going to be talking about something called the Jacobian and more specifically, it’s the Jacobian matrix or sometimes the associated determinant. Here, I just want to talk about some of the background know…
❄️🇬🇧 London Snow Day 🇬🇧❄️
Wow, it finally snowed again in London! A snow day not to be squandered inside. I’m supposed to be working today, but does daily vlogging count? I’m not a daily vlogger, but I think if I make a vlog, that can totally count. Come join me as I do nothing m…
Probability with discrete random variable example | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Hugo plans to buy packs of baseball cards until he gets the card of his favorite player, but he only has enough money to buy at most four packs. Suppose that each pack has a probability of 0.2 of containing the card Hugo is hoping for. Let the random vari…
The Stock Market's Valuation is Getting Ridiculous...
It’s no secret that the stock market is currently overvalued, but what should we as investors do about it? I have a look at this chart, which is tracking a metric called the Shiller PE. This metric was created by the American economist Robert Shiller, who…