yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Solving proportions 2 exercise examples | Algebra Basics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

  • [Instructor] We have the proportion ( x - 9 ) over ( 12 ) is equal to ( \frac{2}{3} ), and we wanna solve for the ( x ) that satisfies this proportion. Now, there's a bunch of ways that you could do it. A lot of people, as soon as they see a proportion like this, they wanna cross-multiply. They wanna say, "Hey, three times ( x - 9 ) is going to be equal to two times ( 12 )." And that's completely legitimate. You would get, let me write that down.

So three times ( x - 9 ), three times ( x - 9 ) is equal to two times ( 12 ). So it would be equal to two times ( 12 ). And then you can distribute the three. You'd get ( 3x - 27 ) is equal to ( 24 ). And then you could add ( 27 ) to both sides, and you would get, let me actually do that. So let me add ( 27 ) to both sides, and we are left with ( 3x ) is equal to, is equal to, let's see, ( 51 ). And then ( x ) would be equal to ( 17 ). ( x ) would be equal to ( 17 ). And you can verify that this works. ( 17 - 9 ) is ( 8 ). ( \frac{8}{12} ) is the same thing as ( \frac{2}{3} ). So this checks out.

Another way you could do that, instead of just straight up doing the cross-multiplication, you could say, "Look, I wanna get rid of this ( 12 ) in the denominator right over here. Let's multiply both sides by ( 12 )." So if you multiply both sides by ( 12 ), on your left-hand side, you are just left with ( x - 9 ). And on your right-hand side, ( \frac{2}{3} ) times ( 12 ), well, ( \frac{2}{3} ) of ( 12 ) is just ( 8 ). And you could do the actual multiplication, ( \frac{2}{3} ) times ( \frac{12}{1} ). ( 12, 12 ) and ( 3 ), so ( 12 ) divided by ( 3 ) is ( 4 ). ( 3 ) divided by ( 3 ) is ( 1 ). So it becomes ( \frac{2 \cdot 4}{1} ), which is just ( 8 ).

And then you add ( 9 ) to both sides. So the fun of algebra is that as long as you do something that's logically consistent, you will get the right answer. There's no one way of doing it. So here you get ( x ) is equal to ( 17 ) again. And you can also, you can multiply both sides by ( 12 ) and both sides by ( 3 ), and then that would be functionally equivalent to cross-multiplying.

Let's do one more. So here, another proportion, and this time the ( x ) is in the denominator. But just like before, if we want, we can cross-multiply. And just to see where cross-multiplying comes from, that it's not some voodoo, that you still are doing logical algebra, that you're doing the same thing to both sides of the equation, you just need to appreciate that we're just multiplying both sides by both denominators.

So we have this ( 8 ) right over here on the left-hand side. If we wanna get rid of this ( 8 ) on the left-hand side in the denominator, we can multiply the left-hand side by ( 8 ). But in order for the equality to hold true, I can't do something to just one side. I have to do it to both sides. Similarly, similarly, if (laughs) I, if I wanna get this ( x + 1 ) out of the denominator, I could multiply by ( x + 1 ) right over here. But I have to do that on both sides if I want my equality to hold true.

And notice, when you do what we just did, this is going to be equivalent to cross-multiplying. Because these ( 8s ) cancel out, and this ( x + 1 ) cancels with that ( x + 1 ) right over there. And you are left with, you are left with ( (x + 1) ) times ( 7 ), and I could write it as ( 7(x + 1) ), is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ), is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ). Notice, this is exactly what you have done if you would've cross-multiplied. Cross-multiplication is just a shortcut of multiplying both sides by both the denominators.

We have ( 7(x + 1) ) is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ). And now we can go and solve the algebra. So distributing the ( 7 ), we get ( 7x + 7 ) is equal to ( 40 ). And then subtracting ( 7 ) from both sides, so let's subtract ( 7 ) from both sides, we are left with ( 7x ) is equal to ( 33 ). Dividing both sides by ( 7 ), we are left with ( x ) is equal to ( \frac{33}{7} ). And if we wanna write that as a mixed number, this is the same thing, let's see, this is the same thing as ( 4 \frac{5}{7} ), and we're done.

More Articles

View All
How I sell private jets to billionaires!
My name is Steve Varsano and I have a company called The Jet Business, and we’re involved with the buying and selling of corporate jets. I live in the UK; I work in the UK. I set up my business in the UK, but my business is global. The final purchase pric…
How Coffee Fuels Intellectual Discourse and Innovation #Shorts
In Europe, coffee and cafés similarly provided societal hubs for creative and intellectual discourse. It’s where philosophers and scientists such as Voltaire and Isaac Newton could meet and discuss their work with great enthusiasm. It’s famously where Jea…
How our actions are making raccoons smarter | Webby Award Winner | Nat Geo Explores
[Narrator] These little creatures can be complicated. They’re cute, but mischievous. It’s my pizza. They may have earned a bad rap from their antics, but their problem-solving skills inspire scientific studies. Interactions with them are unpredictable, an…
15 Things You Should Know About Your Haters
Fifteen things you should know about your haters. Welcome to A Lux, the place where future billionaires come to get inspired. Hey there, A Luxers! So, we have a juicy video for you today. As you know, success and haters go hand-in-hand. In fact, a good i…
Clattering Penguins and Naughty Seals | Epic Adventures with Bertie Gregory on Disney+
Chin straps get their name from that black marking that runs under their chin. Uh, and they’re also sometimes called stone breaker penguins because of that ear-piercing screech. They’re really sociable birds that waddle ashore in these massive numbers to…
There is no axiomatic proof of property rights
Uh, to avoid confusion, I’ll preface this by saying that, um, I’m personally strongly in favor of property rights and their enforcement. So if you’re new to my channel, please bear that in mind. Uh, Stefan Molyneux made a video a while back attempting to…