yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Solving proportions 2 exercise examples | Algebra Basics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

  • [Instructor] We have the proportion ( x - 9 ) over ( 12 ) is equal to ( \frac{2}{3} ), and we wanna solve for the ( x ) that satisfies this proportion. Now, there's a bunch of ways that you could do it. A lot of people, as soon as they see a proportion like this, they wanna cross-multiply. They wanna say, "Hey, three times ( x - 9 ) is going to be equal to two times ( 12 )." And that's completely legitimate. You would get, let me write that down.

So three times ( x - 9 ), three times ( x - 9 ) is equal to two times ( 12 ). So it would be equal to two times ( 12 ). And then you can distribute the three. You'd get ( 3x - 27 ) is equal to ( 24 ). And then you could add ( 27 ) to both sides, and you would get, let me actually do that. So let me add ( 27 ) to both sides, and we are left with ( 3x ) is equal to, is equal to, let's see, ( 51 ). And then ( x ) would be equal to ( 17 ). ( x ) would be equal to ( 17 ). And you can verify that this works. ( 17 - 9 ) is ( 8 ). ( \frac{8}{12} ) is the same thing as ( \frac{2}{3} ). So this checks out.

Another way you could do that, instead of just straight up doing the cross-multiplication, you could say, "Look, I wanna get rid of this ( 12 ) in the denominator right over here. Let's multiply both sides by ( 12 )." So if you multiply both sides by ( 12 ), on your left-hand side, you are just left with ( x - 9 ). And on your right-hand side, ( \frac{2}{3} ) times ( 12 ), well, ( \frac{2}{3} ) of ( 12 ) is just ( 8 ). And you could do the actual multiplication, ( \frac{2}{3} ) times ( \frac{12}{1} ). ( 12, 12 ) and ( 3 ), so ( 12 ) divided by ( 3 ) is ( 4 ). ( 3 ) divided by ( 3 ) is ( 1 ). So it becomes ( \frac{2 \cdot 4}{1} ), which is just ( 8 ).

And then you add ( 9 ) to both sides. So the fun of algebra is that as long as you do something that's logically consistent, you will get the right answer. There's no one way of doing it. So here you get ( x ) is equal to ( 17 ) again. And you can also, you can multiply both sides by ( 12 ) and both sides by ( 3 ), and then that would be functionally equivalent to cross-multiplying.

Let's do one more. So here, another proportion, and this time the ( x ) is in the denominator. But just like before, if we want, we can cross-multiply. And just to see where cross-multiplying comes from, that it's not some voodoo, that you still are doing logical algebra, that you're doing the same thing to both sides of the equation, you just need to appreciate that we're just multiplying both sides by both denominators.

So we have this ( 8 ) right over here on the left-hand side. If we wanna get rid of this ( 8 ) on the left-hand side in the denominator, we can multiply the left-hand side by ( 8 ). But in order for the equality to hold true, I can't do something to just one side. I have to do it to both sides. Similarly, similarly, if (laughs) I, if I wanna get this ( x + 1 ) out of the denominator, I could multiply by ( x + 1 ) right over here. But I have to do that on both sides if I want my equality to hold true.

And notice, when you do what we just did, this is going to be equivalent to cross-multiplying. Because these ( 8s ) cancel out, and this ( x + 1 ) cancels with that ( x + 1 ) right over there. And you are left with, you are left with ( (x + 1) ) times ( 7 ), and I could write it as ( 7(x + 1) ), is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ), is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ). Notice, this is exactly what you have done if you would've cross-multiplied. Cross-multiplication is just a shortcut of multiplying both sides by both the denominators.

We have ( 7(x + 1) ) is equal to ( 5 \times 8 ). And now we can go and solve the algebra. So distributing the ( 7 ), we get ( 7x + 7 ) is equal to ( 40 ). And then subtracting ( 7 ) from both sides, so let's subtract ( 7 ) from both sides, we are left with ( 7x ) is equal to ( 33 ). Dividing both sides by ( 7 ), we are left with ( x ) is equal to ( \frac{33}{7} ). And if we wanna write that as a mixed number, this is the same thing, let's see, this is the same thing as ( 4 \frac{5}{7} ), and we're done.

More Articles

View All
Panda School: (EXCLUSIVE) How the National Zoo Trains Its Panda Cub | National Geographic
I’m one of a very select group of people to get to interact with this animal, and I don’t take that for granted. It’s really cool for me to get to do something like that. Beibei is just absolutely a joy to work with. There is something about him; he’s so …
Just Because You Think It, Doesn’t Mean It’s True
When Seneca the Younger was accused of adultery with the emperor’s niece, he was banished to Corsica. Seneca’s exile caused his mother, Helvia, tremendous grief; she had difficulties coping with her son’s absence. So, he wrote her several letters in which…
Ray Dalio: STOP Trying to Time the Market
Wouldn’t it be great if we as investors could know right when the stock market was about to fall so we could get out and not lose money? And then jump right back in at the bottom of the market? Based on some of the videos on YouTube and articles written o…
How to use social media to sell private jets!
Uh, we’ve had a guy walk in the door here and say, you know, I saw you guys on TikTok yesterday and I’m looking to buy this jet. I made this offer four days ago. I don’t know if it’s going to succeed, but what do you think? He showed us the offer, and we…
Inside Bill Gates' $17B Defensive Stock Portfolio. (Mid 2020)
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we’re going to be running through the top 10 stock positions that Bill Gates holds in his portfolio. So, his portfolio is worth about 17 billion dollars. Technically, it’s not his portfolio; it is the…
Photon Momentum | Quantum physics | Physics | Khan Academy
[Music] A while back I was teaching physics in California. I got to class and I was all like, “Hey class, you want to hear a physics joke?” “Yeah, okay totally!” “Does light hold mass?” “I don’t know, does it?” “No, it’s not even Catholic!” Oh man, …