yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Stock are not backed by the company. Simple Logic


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Busted open, our stock went down to six. It went from 113 to six in less than a year. That whole period is very interesting because the stock is not the company, and the company is not the stock. Stocks are not backed by the company; that is why investors don't know how much their stocks are backed by.

If something is backed, it means you're going to get a definitive amount of money back for whatever you're holding, or there's some kind of accessible collateral. So if Google is trading for two thousand dollars, and the assets on their balance sheet amount to something like a thousand dollars a share, it would be fair for you to assume that Google stocks are backed by a thousand dollars.

The problem is, that's not how it works. If you look at their SEC filings, there isn't a single public company that says they will back their stocks by some defined price. So in practice, they don't have to give you anything.

Now, hypothetically speaking, stocks are backed in the sense that if Google goes out of business, liquidates, pays back their debts, and insiders, whatever's left over will go to the shareholders. The problem is, when the hell is that going to happen? And how much is going to be left over in this hypothetical liquidation?

The potential for a future liquidation or buyout are considered unfalsifiable ideas. No one can show to be right or wrong. It is pseudoscience nonsense that cannot be used in a logical debate. Hypothetically speaking, anything can happen, but you can't use a hypothetical idea to debate the observable fact that if Google crashes tomorrow, as per their SEC filings, they have no definitive obligation to pay their shareholders anything for the stocks they are holding.

More Articles

View All
Interview: Donald Trump with Rona Barrett - October 6, 1980
Got this telegram from Rona Barett, and it said, “Would you stop fussing around after seven and a half years?” What do you think she meant by fussing? That’s very funny. And Elton said, “Leonard, obviously she couldn’t tell you what she really meant becau…
Encounter | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Hello wordsmiths! I hope luck is with us today because on the high seas of vocabulary, there’s no telling what word we’ll encounter. Encounter. It’s a verb, a noun too. The verb means to unexpectedly meet with someone or something, to come face to face w…
Charlie Munger's 2023 Recession Prediction
Visits partly fraud and partly delusion; that’s a bad combination. I don’t like either fraud or delusion, and the delusion may be more extreme than the fraud. This is a very, very bad thing. When Charlie Munger talks, we all better listen. Munger is the …
Jorge Paulo Lemann on building a more equitable future in Brazil | Homeroom with Sal
Support all of you in other ways with daily class schedules to kind of approximate keeping the learning going on during the closures. Webinars for teachers and parents, and also this home room is really just a way to stay connected, talk to interesting pe…
Relationships between scientific ideas in a text | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers, this is Professor Mario Molina, a scientist who won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry. Now, I’m going to use the example of Professor Molina to teach us about connections, or drawing connections between scientific information in a text, in a pi…
Second partial derivative test intuition
Hey everyone! So, in the last video, I introduced this thing called the second partial derivative test. If you have some kind of multi-variable function, or really just a two-variable function, is what this applies to—something that’s f of X, Y—and it out…