yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Cavalieri's principle in 3D | Solid geometry | High school geometry | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So we have two cylinders here, and let's say we know that they have the exact same volume, and that makes sense because it looks like they have the same area of their base, and they have the same height.

Now, what I'm going to do is start cutting up this left cylinder here and shifting things around. So, if I just cut it in two and take that bottom cylinder, that bottom half, and shift it a bit, have I changed its volume? Well, clearly, I have not changed its volume. I still have the same volume—the combined volume of both of these half cylinders, I could say, are equal to the original cylinder.

Now, what if I were to cut it up even more? So, let me cut it up now into three. Well, once again, I still haven't changed my original volume; it's still the same volume as the original. Now, just cut it up into thirds, and if I shift them around a little bit, I'm not changing the volume.

I could keep doing that. I could cut it up into a bunch of them. Notice this still has the same original volume. I've just cut it up into a bunch of sections—a bunch. I've cut it horizontally, and now I'm just shifting things around, but that doesn't change the volume. I can do it a bunch of times. This looks like some type of poker chips or gambling chips, where I could have my original cylinder, and now I've cut it horizontally into a bunch of these, I guess you could say, chips.

But clearly, it has the same combined volume. I can shift it around a bit, but it has the same volume. And this leads us to an interesting question, and it's actually a principle known as Cavalieri's principle.

Which is if I have two figures that have the same height, and at any point along that height, the cross-sectional area is the same, then the two figures have the same volume.

Now, how does what I just say apply to what's going on here? Well, both clearly—both of these figures have the same height, and then at any point here, wherever I did the cuts at this point, at the same point on this original cylinder, well, my cross-sectional area is going to be the same because it's going to be the same area as the base in the case of this cylinder.

And so, it meets Cavalieri's principle. But Cavalieri's principle is nothing exotic; it comes straight out of common sense. I can just do more cuts like this, and you can see that I have, you could say, a more continuous-looking skewed cylinder, but this will have the same volume as our original cylinder.

When I shift it around like this, it's not changing the volume, and that's not just true for cylinders. I could do the exact same argument with some form of a prism. Once again, they have the same volume. I could cut the left one in half and shift it around; it doesn't change its volume.

I could cut it more and shift those around; it still doesn't change the volume. So, Cavalieri's principle seems to make a lot of intuitive sense here. If I have two figures that have the same height, and at any point along that height, the cross-sectional area is the same, then the figures have the same volume.

So these figures also have the same volume, and I could do it with interesting things like, say, a pyramid. These two pyramids have the same volume, and if I were to cut the left pyramid halfway along its height and shift the bottom like this, that doesn't change its volume.

And I can keep doing that with more and more cuts, and because at any point here, these figures have the same height, and at any point on that height, the cross-sectional area is the same, and so they have the same volumes. But once again, it is intuitive, and it goes all the way to the case where you have, you could view it as a continuous pyramid right over here that has been skewed.

So no matter how much you skew it, it's going to have the same volume as our original pyramid because they have the same height, and the cross-sectional area at any point in the height is going to be the same.

We can actually do this with any figure. So, these spheres have the same volume. I could cut the left one in half halfway along its height and shift it like this; clearly, I'm not changing the volume. And I could make more cuts like that, and clearly, it has still the same volume.

And this meets Cavalieri's principle because they have the same height, and the cross-section at any point along that height is going to be the same. So even though I can cut that one up and I can shift it, it looks like a different type of object—a different type of thing—but they have the same height, and the cross-sections at any point are the same area.

So we have the same volume, which is a useful thing to know—not just to know the principle, but hopefully this video helps you gain some of the intuition for why it makes intuitive sense.

More Articles

View All
How Bill Ackman Lost $400 Million in 90 Days
Billionaire investor Bill Ackman recently lost 400 million dollars in less than 90 days, and in this video, we’re going to talk about what happened. Ackman is one of the most closely followed and highly respected investors on Wall Street, and rightfully s…
Is Regulation A Threat To Bitcoin? | Bitcoin Magazine
It’s not what I want or you want; it’s what the institutions want. Institutions that are just stepping in or considering getting involved in allocating to crypto want one thing: Bitcoin. We’re not gonna print two trillion dollars worth of paper; that curr…
Bivariate relationship linearity, strength and direction | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What we have here is six different scatter plots that show the relationship between different variables. So for example, in this one here, in the horizontal axis, we might have something like age, and then here could be accident frequency. Accident frequ…
Khan Academy Ed Talks with Adam Green, PhD - Wednesday, August 18
Hello and welcome to Ed Talks with Khan Academy, where we talk education with a variety of experts in the field. Today, I am excited to talk to my own teammate Dr. Adam Green about new content that we have just released on Khan Academy for the start of th…
What I’ve learnt after selling private jets to billionaires for 40 years
If I was 21 again, what would I do differently? Wow, and a lot of times people ask, if you started from zero today, you know, what would you do first? It’s so tough out there in the world. We calculated 1,500 millionaires that travel past the window every…
Input approach to determining comparative advantage | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
In other videos, we have already looked at production possibility curves and output tables in order to calculate opportunity costs of producing a certain product in a certain country. Then we use that to think about comparative advantage. We’re going to d…