yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Cavalieri's principle in 3D | Solid geometry | High school geometry | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So we have two cylinders here, and let's say we know that they have the exact same volume, and that makes sense because it looks like they have the same area of their base, and they have the same height.

Now, what I'm going to do is start cutting up this left cylinder here and shifting things around. So, if I just cut it in two and take that bottom cylinder, that bottom half, and shift it a bit, have I changed its volume? Well, clearly, I have not changed its volume. I still have the same volume—the combined volume of both of these half cylinders, I could say, are equal to the original cylinder.

Now, what if I were to cut it up even more? So, let me cut it up now into three. Well, once again, I still haven't changed my original volume; it's still the same volume as the original. Now, just cut it up into thirds, and if I shift them around a little bit, I'm not changing the volume.

I could keep doing that. I could cut it up into a bunch of them. Notice this still has the same original volume. I've just cut it up into a bunch of sections—a bunch. I've cut it horizontally, and now I'm just shifting things around, but that doesn't change the volume. I can do it a bunch of times. This looks like some type of poker chips or gambling chips, where I could have my original cylinder, and now I've cut it horizontally into a bunch of these, I guess you could say, chips.

But clearly, it has the same combined volume. I can shift it around a bit, but it has the same volume. And this leads us to an interesting question, and it's actually a principle known as Cavalieri's principle.

Which is if I have two figures that have the same height, and at any point along that height, the cross-sectional area is the same, then the two figures have the same volume.

Now, how does what I just say apply to what's going on here? Well, both clearly—both of these figures have the same height, and then at any point here, wherever I did the cuts at this point, at the same point on this original cylinder, well, my cross-sectional area is going to be the same because it's going to be the same area as the base in the case of this cylinder.

And so, it meets Cavalieri's principle. But Cavalieri's principle is nothing exotic; it comes straight out of common sense. I can just do more cuts like this, and you can see that I have, you could say, a more continuous-looking skewed cylinder, but this will have the same volume as our original cylinder.

When I shift it around like this, it's not changing the volume, and that's not just true for cylinders. I could do the exact same argument with some form of a prism. Once again, they have the same volume. I could cut the left one in half and shift it around; it doesn't change its volume.

I could cut it more and shift those around; it still doesn't change the volume. So, Cavalieri's principle seems to make a lot of intuitive sense here. If I have two figures that have the same height, and at any point along that height, the cross-sectional area is the same, then the figures have the same volume.

So these figures also have the same volume, and I could do it with interesting things like, say, a pyramid. These two pyramids have the same volume, and if I were to cut the left pyramid halfway along its height and shift the bottom like this, that doesn't change its volume.

And I can keep doing that with more and more cuts, and because at any point here, these figures have the same height, and at any point on that height, the cross-sectional area is the same, and so they have the same volumes. But once again, it is intuitive, and it goes all the way to the case where you have, you could view it as a continuous pyramid right over here that has been skewed.

So no matter how much you skew it, it's going to have the same volume as our original pyramid because they have the same height, and the cross-sectional area at any point in the height is going to be the same.

We can actually do this with any figure. So, these spheres have the same volume. I could cut the left one in half halfway along its height and shift it like this; clearly, I'm not changing the volume. And I could make more cuts like that, and clearly, it has still the same volume.

And this meets Cavalieri's principle because they have the same height, and the cross-section at any point along that height is going to be the same. So even though I can cut that one up and I can shift it, it looks like a different type of object—a different type of thing—but they have the same height, and the cross-sections at any point are the same area.

So we have the same volume, which is a useful thing to know—not just to know the principle, but hopefully this video helps you gain some of the intuition for why it makes intuitive sense.

More Articles

View All
Capturing the Iditarod - Behind the Scenes | Life Below Zero
We are here to document the lives of people living in Alaska. The harsh reality is the environment we’re up against. It makes it tough to do our job. Working on Life Below Zero can be very dangerous. Guns here, cameras; you never know what to expect. You …
Your Subconscious Mind is Ridiculously Powerful
Paulo, one of the main hosts of the World Cup, was anything but festive. Entire parts of the city remained shut, as cars were stuck on stretches of tarmac as far as the eye could see. The effects soon extended well beyond the city, as the entire country o…
Linkage institutions and political parties | US government and civics | Khan Academy
In many videos, we have talked about the makeup of government at either the federal or the state level. We’ve talked about branches of government; we’ve talked about checks and balances. What we’re going to talk about in this video is how people interface…
Vlog: I counted almost $30,000,000 worth of cars in this parking lot!
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So it seems like every 10,000 subscribers, I end up doing another vlog, and since I just hit 30,000 subscribers, here’s another vlog! I actually think it’s more like 34,000 by the time I’m actually doing this. I’m pro…
A monopsonistic market for labor | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
So let’s continue with our conversation around factors of production for a firm, and we’re going to focus on the labor market. So we’ve already drawn axes like this multiple times, where our horizontal axis this is the quantity, quantity of labor that’s …
Opportunity cost and comparative advantage using an output table | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is draw a connection between the idea of opportunity cost of producing a good in a certain country and comparative advantage between countries in a certain good. Below right over here, we have a chart that shows the pr…