yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Stare decisis and precedent in the Supreme Court | US government and civics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

As we've talked about in many videos, the United States Supreme Court has a very different role than the executive or the legislative branches. The executive branch, of course, runs the government. The legislative branch, they make the laws and set the budgets. The Supreme Court can rule that a law is unconstitutional, or it can interpret laws in a specific case.

When the Supreme Court justices make these decisions, they try to follow the principle of stara decisis, which is Latin for "let the decision stand." It's this idea of taking previous decisions as an example, and if we're in a similar case now, then just use that decision as an example for this one. This is closely associated with the idea of precedent. Precedent, in everyday language, means something that has happened before, an action or decision that we can use as a guide or as an example. That's exactly what the Supreme Court tries to do.

If the Supreme Court has made a previous ruling on a similar case, that would be considered a precedent for this case. The Supreme Court has been often described as umpires, like umpires in a baseball game. Even Chief Justice John Roberts described it as such during his confirmation hearings. It's this idea that they should be these objective arbiters of what the truth is, of what is constitutional, what is not, and what does the law actually mean.

But we know, in reality, these are human beings. No matter how unbiased and no matter how objective they try to be, they still bring to the table their views and their experiences. So, even though this seems like a very clean process, there's definitely a large degree of subjectivity here. Because the executive branch, in particular, the president, can appoint Supreme Court justices, there are definitely examples in history of changes in politics having long-term effects on changes in the Supreme Court.

For example, a significant case of overturning precedent happens from 1896 to 1954. In 1896, you have the Plessy versus Ferguson case, that we cover in several other videos, where the then Supreme Court rules that laws that involve segregation are okay. But then, you fast forward almost 60 years, and then the Supreme Court, in Brown versus Board of Education of Topeka, ruled that "no, separate but equal" is not constitutional; that segregation is not okay. This was influenced by this idea of, over time, you had presidents who were able to make judicial appointments to the Supreme Court as members of the Supreme Court died or retired.

It went through a Senate confirmation process, and then these justices have life tenure. They can stay on the Supreme Court until they pass away or until they decide to retire. So, many historians would say that this overturning of precedent was due to a change in politics from the 1930s through the early 1950s. You had several terms of FDR, and then you have President Truman, who appointed justices to the Supreme Court that would eventually rule on Brown versus Board of Education, and they would be more pro-civil rights.

What's interesting about this is, even though presidents try to appoint folks who they believe would maybe vote the way they would or have similar views, many times it doesn't always work that way. For example, President Eisenhower, who was a Republican, appointed Justice Earl Warren, who was a Republican governor of California. But Warren ended up being famous for taking more liberal stances than not, including on Brown versus Board of Education.

More Articles

View All
Obscuring Reality - Tech+Art | Genius: Picasso
[Music] Most people think about art as objects that you put something in a gallery, like a sculpture or painting. But for us, art is a system, a feeding system; it’s almost like a layer of magic on top of reality. I would say that we are artists who work …
How Cape Town's Residents Are Surviving the Water Crisis—For Now | National Geographic
Cape Town is facing an unprecedented ecological crisis, never before in the history of the modern world, as a whole city of this kind is threatened to run out of water for its citizens completely. Cape Town residents have been told not to use more than 50…
Ben Silbermann at Startup School SV 2016
Good morning! Nice to see everyone here. Uh, my name is Ali Rani. I’m a partner at Y Combinator. I run our late-stage fund; it’s called the Y Combinator Continuity Fund. I couldn’t be happier to be here today to conduct a fireside chat with Ben Berman, wh…
Bond enthalpies | Thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Bond enthalpy is the change in enthalpy, or delta H, for breaking a particular bond in one mole of a gaseous substance. If we think about the diatomic chlorine molecule, so Cl₂, down here is a little picture of Cl₂. Each of the green spheres is a chlorine…
Generating Wind Power | Live Free or Die
We got a whole slew of scrap line around our property, and we happen to have a treadmill that we could probably salvage the motor from and, uh, use it for a generator. Whoa, crazy! That was nuts! That was easy! What are you doing? I’m taking this thing a…
The Court in Action | AP US Government and Politics | Khan Academy
Of the three branches of the US government, the judicial branch is the one that is least bound by public opinion. Supreme Court justices aren’t elected; they’re appointed, and they serve for life or until they decide to retire. Usually, justices serve on …