yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Information Paradox: Do Black Holes "Bleach" Cosmic History? With Christophe Galfard.


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

The interesting thing about trying to unravel the laws of nature is that yes, we have found some laws. We understand gravity to some extent. We understand the quantum world with some extent. But we don’t understand everything. We know that there are some laws missing, laws that we haven’t found yet.

Now, what theoretical physicists do is the following. They try to learn what we know so far and they try to see where the limits of today’s knowledge lie and they try to go beyond. They try to make one step beyond what is known. And that is what is called theoretical physics. Theoretical physics is trying to see a law beyond the laws we have.

There are at least two places in our universe where we know that we do not know what laws apply. Those two places are inside black holes and at the big bang. In both cases, the conditions surrounding everything are so extreme that the laws we know they break down. And that is why both these – that is one reason why both these places are so interesting to look at.

For a long time, gravity has told us that nothing can escape the gravitational grip of a black hole. But then, in 1976 or 75, Professor Stephen Hawking discovered that it was not the case. That actually things could escape black holes. How did that come about?

Picture yourself in outer space. There is a black hole right in front of you. You don’t see anything. No light can come out of it. So it’s like a dark patch that distorts the stars that are around. But there is this dark patch right in front of you and you’re far away and you look at it and it’s scary and you don’t want to get closer, which is normal. But – and respectable. But what you know is that gravity is not everything.

The matter that surrounds you, the light that surrounds you obeys a different kind of law. They obey quantum physics. They obey the law of the quantum world. And everything we had known about black holes until the mid-1970s was only related to gravity. Now, what Hawking did at the mid-1970s is to add some quantum aspects to all this.

He took a quantum particle and threw it in his mind towards the black hole to see what would happen to it. And he found out that some part of that particle was getting out of the black hole. That the black hole was evaporating. It was not the exact same particle he had sent inside and that was, that’s what’s tricky about this problem and that’s what’s interesting about this problem. He realized, which is something that became known as the black hole information paradox.

In a way, that means that the information gets bleached by a black hole. Why is that? You could imagine that it’s the same with an encyclopedia that you would throw in the fire. You take an encyclopedia, you throw it in the fire, it’s gone. Well, not quite. If you could get back the ashes, if you could collect all the light that was shown during the fire, if you could get the heats and everything, you could build back the encyclopedia. It’s not gone. It’s just difficult to retrieve.

For a black hole, it’s worse. If you throw an encyclopedia inside, what the black hole will evaporate has nothing to do with the encyclopedia whatsoever. You could have thrown in something else. So, why is that a problem? It is a problem because it means that our universe has memory losses. It means that whatever a black hole has swallowed would get inside, never get back out, and we would never be able to understand the past of our universe.

There are some things that are not retrievable at all. Not just in practice, but also in theory. And as it evaporates, the black hole eventually disappears completely maybe. And if it’s gone, where did the information go about the encyclopedia? Where did it go? We don’t know.

And that’s a problem because that’s called non-unitarity. That’s the technical term for it and it means that you do not, you cannot use physics to understand the history of what happened before. In a sense, the information paradox says that physics is not going to give you the history of our universe. And you can fairly easily understand ...

More Articles

View All
Encounter | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Hello wordsmiths! I hope luck is with us today because on the high seas of vocabulary, there’s no telling what word we’ll encounter. Encounter. It’s a verb, a noun too. The verb means to unexpectedly meet with someone or something, to come face to face w…
15 Things That Make Rich People Dislike You
In your life, there are going to be a handful of times when you’re around rich people. This is your opportunity to make powerful connections with people who are affluent and influential. Their insights, network input, or sometimes even financial backing w…
Why Facts Don't Change Minds
After almost two years of this mess, I decided I needed a break and wanted to do some traveling. I booked all the tickets, got the paperwork done, and was all set to go. Then I noticed on the corner of the screen the plane I was about to fly, not once but…
Caught in a mangrove rip tide | Primal Survivor: Extreme African Safari
The current’s already taking me. I can feel it, so I’ll just let it do its thing. Not far down the channel, we spot something. “Look at that! The fish trap!” So that’s obviously the Michikenda. Send it from tribes whose ancient ancestors migrated out of…
2 step estimation example
We are told a teacher bought 12 sheets of stickers to use on the homework of her students. Each sheet had 48 stickers. At the end of the year, the teacher had 123 stickers remaining. Which is the best estimate for the number of stickers the teacher used? …
The Student's Guide To Becoming A Successful Startup Founder
Your job is to be an optimist. Your job is to believe amazing things about what you can do with your life and what you do in the world when you’re young. That’s the point. That’s the point. That’s why the world needs young people. [Music] This is Michae…