yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Information Paradox: Do Black Holes "Bleach" Cosmic History? With Christophe Galfard.


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

The interesting thing about trying to unravel the laws of nature is that yes, we have found some laws. We understand gravity to some extent. We understand the quantum world with some extent. But we don’t understand everything. We know that there are some laws missing, laws that we haven’t found yet.

Now, what theoretical physicists do is the following. They try to learn what we know so far and they try to see where the limits of today’s knowledge lie and they try to go beyond. They try to make one step beyond what is known. And that is what is called theoretical physics. Theoretical physics is trying to see a law beyond the laws we have.

There are at least two places in our universe where we know that we do not know what laws apply. Those two places are inside black holes and at the big bang. In both cases, the conditions surrounding everything are so extreme that the laws we know they break down. And that is why both these – that is one reason why both these places are so interesting to look at.

For a long time, gravity has told us that nothing can escape the gravitational grip of a black hole. But then, in 1976 or 75, Professor Stephen Hawking discovered that it was not the case. That actually things could escape black holes. How did that come about?

Picture yourself in outer space. There is a black hole right in front of you. You don’t see anything. No light can come out of it. So it’s like a dark patch that distorts the stars that are around. But there is this dark patch right in front of you and you’re far away and you look at it and it’s scary and you don’t want to get closer, which is normal. But – and respectable. But what you know is that gravity is not everything.

The matter that surrounds you, the light that surrounds you obeys a different kind of law. They obey quantum physics. They obey the law of the quantum world. And everything we had known about black holes until the mid-1970s was only related to gravity. Now, what Hawking did at the mid-1970s is to add some quantum aspects to all this.

He took a quantum particle and threw it in his mind towards the black hole to see what would happen to it. And he found out that some part of that particle was getting out of the black hole. That the black hole was evaporating. It was not the exact same particle he had sent inside and that was, that’s what’s tricky about this problem and that’s what’s interesting about this problem. He realized, which is something that became known as the black hole information paradox.

In a way, that means that the information gets bleached by a black hole. Why is that? You could imagine that it’s the same with an encyclopedia that you would throw in the fire. You take an encyclopedia, you throw it in the fire, it’s gone. Well, not quite. If you could get back the ashes, if you could collect all the light that was shown during the fire, if you could get the heats and everything, you could build back the encyclopedia. It’s not gone. It’s just difficult to retrieve.

For a black hole, it’s worse. If you throw an encyclopedia inside, what the black hole will evaporate has nothing to do with the encyclopedia whatsoever. You could have thrown in something else. So, why is that a problem? It is a problem because it means that our universe has memory losses. It means that whatever a black hole has swallowed would get inside, never get back out, and we would never be able to understand the past of our universe.

There are some things that are not retrievable at all. Not just in practice, but also in theory. And as it evaporates, the black hole eventually disappears completely maybe. And if it’s gone, where did the information go about the encyclopedia? Where did it go? We don’t know.

And that’s a problem because that’s called non-unitarity. That’s the technical term for it and it means that you do not, you cannot use physics to understand the history of what happened before. In a sense, the information paradox says that physics is not going to give you the history of our universe. And you can fairly easily understand ...

More Articles

View All
US taxation trends in post war era | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
[Instructor] In a previous video, we looked at this diagram over here, which shows the growth in per capita GDP since 1947, and it compares to that the growth in after-tax income of the bottom 90%. And what we said in that video is it looks like somethi…
Introduction to the Vedic Period | World History | Khan Academy
First civilization that we have evidence of around modern-day India and Pakistan is the Indus Valley Civilisation. It’s right around the Indus River in modern-day Pakistan and Northwest India. In other videos, we talked about how it really comes into bein…
Bill Belichick & Ray Dalio on Identifying and Addressing Mistakes: Part 1
Bill, what you do? You have a game Sunday, and you come and you look at the videos, and you look at the mistakes made, and you analyze the mistakes made and how to get better, right? Yes, we do an assessment after every game. We do an assessment after ea…
Sine and cosine from rotating vector
Now I’d like to demonstrate one way to construct a sine wave. What we’re going to do is we’re going to construct something that looks like ( S(\Omega t) ). So, we have our function of time here and we have our frequency. Now this little animation is goin…
2d curl formula
So after introducing the idea of fluid rotation in a vector field like this, let’s start tightening up our grasp on this intuition to get something that we can actually apply formulas to. A vector field like the one that I had there, that’s two-dimension…
Worked examples: Definite integral properties 2 | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So what we’re going to do in this video is several examples where we evaluate expressions with definite integrals. Right over here we have the definite integral from -2 to 3 of 2 F of x DX plus the definite integral from 3 to 7 of 3 F of x DX. All we know…