yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Thermodynamics vs. kinetics | Applications of thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

In chemistry, it's important to distinguish between thermodynamics and kinetics. For example, if we think about the conversion of carbon as a solid in the diamond form to carbon as a solid in the graphite form, thermodynamics tells us what will happen. Will this conversion happen at a specific temperature? Whereas kinetics tells us when the conversion could happen.

Let's start with thermodynamics. We can calculate if this conversion will happen at room temperature of 25 degrees Celsius by calculating the standard change in free energy for this reaction at that temperature. To calculate the standard change in free energy for this reaction, we need to know the standard change in free energy of formation of the products. From that, we subtract the standard change in free energy of formation of the reactants.

For this conversion, our product is carbon in the graphite form. Because carbon in the graphite form is the most stable elemental form of carbon at a pressure of one atmosphere, the standard change in free energy of formation of carbon in the graphite form is equal to zero. Next, we think about our reactant, which is carbon in the form of diamond. The standard change in free energy of formation of carbon in the diamond form is 2.84 kilojoules per mole.

Looking at our balanced equation for this conversion, we're converting one mole of diamond into one mole of graphite. Since there's a one as a coefficient in front of diamond, we multiply the standard change in free energy of formation of diamond by one mole of diamond. Moles cancel, and we get negative 2.84 kilojoules as the standard change in free energy for this reaction. Instead of kilojoules, the units could have been written as kilojoules per mole of reaction.

Because there's one mole of carbon in the diamond form for how the balanced equation is written, we could write a conversion factor of one mole of carbon in the diamond form per mole of reaction. Because the standard change in free energy of formation of diamond is equal to 2.84 kilojoules per mole of diamond, moles of diamond would cancel out and give kilojoules per mole of reaction as the units. Because the standard change in free energy for this reaction is negative, we know that the conversion of diamond into graphite at 25 degrees Celsius is thermodynamically favorable.

Next, let's think about the kinetics of this reaction. If we look at the structure of diamond, each carbon atom is covalently bonded to four other carbons. For example, this carbon right here is bonded to four other carbon atoms in a tetrahedral geometry around this central carbon atom.

Graphite has a very different structure. In graphite, carbon atoms form covalently bonded layers or sheets, and these layers or sheets are held together by London dispersion forces. So, in order to convert diamond into graphite, we would have to break a lot of carbon-carbon bonds, and that would take a lot of energy.

Since it takes a lot of energy to break the carbon-carbon bonds in diamond, if we look at the energy profile for this reaction, this reaction would have a very high activation energy, symbolized by Ea. The higher the activation energy for the reaction, the slower the rate of the reaction. At room temperature, it's estimated this reaction could take billions of years. Therefore, we would say this reaction is kinetically unfavorable.

Finally, let's summarize what we've learned about the conversion of diamond into graphite. Thermodynamics answers the question, will the reaction go? And the answer to that question is yes. At room temperature, diamond will convert into graphite because ΔG° for the reaction was negative. Kinetics answers the question, how long will it take? And the answer to that question is it would take billions of years for diamond to turn into graphite at room temperature.

The reason why the reaction is so slow is because of the extremely high activation energy. So, even though the reaction is thermodynamically favorable at room temperature, because the reaction is so slow, the reaction is kinetically unfavored. For all practical purposes, the reaction doesn't happen.

More Articles

View All
Volumes of cones intuition | Solid geometry | High school geometry | Khan Academy
So I have two different three-dimensional figures here. I have a pyramid here on the left, and I have a cone here on the right. We know a few things about these two figures. First of all, they have the exact same height. So this length right over here is…
How War Shaped Our Destiny | Origins: The Journey of Humankind
[music playing] The roots of war lie buried deep in the human past. It has been a part of us since before recorded history. At the dawn of civilization, our ties to the land drove us to protect what was ours. We began to raise our children not as hunters …
Iron triangles and issue networks | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Now, a related idea to just what a bureaucracy is in our federal government: another question is how do they get influenced? Now, one idea that you might see in many American government courses is the idea of an iron triangle. So, an iron triangle describ…
Ray Dalio’s BIG Warning of a Lost Decade for Investors (2022-2032)
Nowadays the structure of the markets and where everything is priced, um, if um and done the normal way, we’ll give you probably a return in the vicinity of, with a lot of risk around it, uh, maybe in the vicinity of four percent. Okay, three, three and t…
Sue's New System (Deleted Scene) | Life Below Zero
[Music] So you, I mean, this has been quite the process. The tanks were delivered overland this winter, and now they’re in place, painted, hoses in the right area. Just did the electric pumps, put everything in. The whole thing is new, and it envelopes a …
The Two Einsteins: Behind the Scenes | Genius
[music playing] RON HOWARD: We began thinking about how we would tell the story of Albert Einstein, and Geoffrey Rush instantly was at the top of our list. GIGI PRITZGER: The thing that has been so gratifying to watch in Geoffrey’s performance of Einste…