yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Thermodynamics vs. kinetics | Applications of thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

In chemistry, it's important to distinguish between thermodynamics and kinetics. For example, if we think about the conversion of carbon as a solid in the diamond form to carbon as a solid in the graphite form, thermodynamics tells us what will happen. Will this conversion happen at a specific temperature? Whereas kinetics tells us when the conversion could happen.

Let's start with thermodynamics. We can calculate if this conversion will happen at room temperature of 25 degrees Celsius by calculating the standard change in free energy for this reaction at that temperature. To calculate the standard change in free energy for this reaction, we need to know the standard change in free energy of formation of the products. From that, we subtract the standard change in free energy of formation of the reactants.

For this conversion, our product is carbon in the graphite form. Because carbon in the graphite form is the most stable elemental form of carbon at a pressure of one atmosphere, the standard change in free energy of formation of carbon in the graphite form is equal to zero. Next, we think about our reactant, which is carbon in the form of diamond. The standard change in free energy of formation of carbon in the diamond form is 2.84 kilojoules per mole.

Looking at our balanced equation for this conversion, we're converting one mole of diamond into one mole of graphite. Since there's a one as a coefficient in front of diamond, we multiply the standard change in free energy of formation of diamond by one mole of diamond. Moles cancel, and we get negative 2.84 kilojoules as the standard change in free energy for this reaction. Instead of kilojoules, the units could have been written as kilojoules per mole of reaction.

Because there's one mole of carbon in the diamond form for how the balanced equation is written, we could write a conversion factor of one mole of carbon in the diamond form per mole of reaction. Because the standard change in free energy of formation of diamond is equal to 2.84 kilojoules per mole of diamond, moles of diamond would cancel out and give kilojoules per mole of reaction as the units. Because the standard change in free energy for this reaction is negative, we know that the conversion of diamond into graphite at 25 degrees Celsius is thermodynamically favorable.

Next, let's think about the kinetics of this reaction. If we look at the structure of diamond, each carbon atom is covalently bonded to four other carbons. For example, this carbon right here is bonded to four other carbon atoms in a tetrahedral geometry around this central carbon atom.

Graphite has a very different structure. In graphite, carbon atoms form covalently bonded layers or sheets, and these layers or sheets are held together by London dispersion forces. So, in order to convert diamond into graphite, we would have to break a lot of carbon-carbon bonds, and that would take a lot of energy.

Since it takes a lot of energy to break the carbon-carbon bonds in diamond, if we look at the energy profile for this reaction, this reaction would have a very high activation energy, symbolized by Ea. The higher the activation energy for the reaction, the slower the rate of the reaction. At room temperature, it's estimated this reaction could take billions of years. Therefore, we would say this reaction is kinetically unfavorable.

Finally, let's summarize what we've learned about the conversion of diamond into graphite. Thermodynamics answers the question, will the reaction go? And the answer to that question is yes. At room temperature, diamond will convert into graphite because ΔG° for the reaction was negative. Kinetics answers the question, how long will it take? And the answer to that question is it would take billions of years for diamond to turn into graphite at room temperature.

The reason why the reaction is so slow is because of the extremely high activation energy. So, even though the reaction is thermodynamically favorable at room temperature, because the reaction is so slow, the reaction is kinetically unfavored. For all practical purposes, the reaction doesn't happen.

More Articles

View All
Science Advances One Funeral at a Time
I had a bunch of the sides that I wanted to dive into, like finding path integrals, because it seems to me that there’s some kind of a deep symmetry between multiverse theory and feminine path integrals. You’re absolutely right; he believed in multiple h…
Gordon Ramsay Learns the Art of Braai Cooking | Gordon Ramsay: Uncharted
[Music] At least I can hear that. Yeah, yeah, loud and clear. I’ve been fishing in some remote places, but never in front of an audience of hippos. I’m cause you’re looking over because those things. Josh, lonely, yes? How that thing’s getting closer. Ye…
Watching a Rocket Launch at SpaceX with Elon Musk!
That I’ve never seen something like that, and the noise of it when it was going up was insane. I asked Grandpa, “What do you go in it?” and he goes, “What up, guys? Welcome back to the channel! Today, we are on Trump Force One, going to see the Starship r…
Less versus fewer | Frequently confused words | Usage | Grammar
Hello Garian, hello Rosie, hi David. Uh, so you’ve called me into the recording booth today? Yes, because uh, you have a bone to pick with me—just a little bit. Yeah, so I have always, in my usage, I always drawn a distinction between less and fewer. I w…
Re: The Trouble With The Electoral College – Cities, Metro Areas, Elections and The United States
Hello, internet. Let’s talk about this map, this argument, and the Electoral College in general. In my “Trouble With The Electoral College” video from 2011, I was wrong to use the city limits for that part of the argument, rather than the more expansive m…
Brian Keating: I’m Spending $200 Million To Explore Existence! How God Fits Into Science Explained!
This is the shrapnel of an exploded star, and this is a meteorite schem from over 4 billion years ago, and this is what Elon will kill for. Wow! And all of this is to understand that fundamental question people want to know: how did we get here, and how d…