yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Thermodynamics vs. kinetics | Applications of thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

In chemistry, it's important to distinguish between thermodynamics and kinetics. For example, if we think about the conversion of carbon as a solid in the diamond form to carbon as a solid in the graphite form, thermodynamics tells us what will happen. Will this conversion happen at a specific temperature? Whereas kinetics tells us when the conversion could happen.

Let's start with thermodynamics. We can calculate if this conversion will happen at room temperature of 25 degrees Celsius by calculating the standard change in free energy for this reaction at that temperature. To calculate the standard change in free energy for this reaction, we need to know the standard change in free energy of formation of the products. From that, we subtract the standard change in free energy of formation of the reactants.

For this conversion, our product is carbon in the graphite form. Because carbon in the graphite form is the most stable elemental form of carbon at a pressure of one atmosphere, the standard change in free energy of formation of carbon in the graphite form is equal to zero. Next, we think about our reactant, which is carbon in the form of diamond. The standard change in free energy of formation of carbon in the diamond form is 2.84 kilojoules per mole.

Looking at our balanced equation for this conversion, we're converting one mole of diamond into one mole of graphite. Since there's a one as a coefficient in front of diamond, we multiply the standard change in free energy of formation of diamond by one mole of diamond. Moles cancel, and we get negative 2.84 kilojoules as the standard change in free energy for this reaction. Instead of kilojoules, the units could have been written as kilojoules per mole of reaction.

Because there's one mole of carbon in the diamond form for how the balanced equation is written, we could write a conversion factor of one mole of carbon in the diamond form per mole of reaction. Because the standard change in free energy of formation of diamond is equal to 2.84 kilojoules per mole of diamond, moles of diamond would cancel out and give kilojoules per mole of reaction as the units. Because the standard change in free energy for this reaction is negative, we know that the conversion of diamond into graphite at 25 degrees Celsius is thermodynamically favorable.

Next, let's think about the kinetics of this reaction. If we look at the structure of diamond, each carbon atom is covalently bonded to four other carbons. For example, this carbon right here is bonded to four other carbon atoms in a tetrahedral geometry around this central carbon atom.

Graphite has a very different structure. In graphite, carbon atoms form covalently bonded layers or sheets, and these layers or sheets are held together by London dispersion forces. So, in order to convert diamond into graphite, we would have to break a lot of carbon-carbon bonds, and that would take a lot of energy.

Since it takes a lot of energy to break the carbon-carbon bonds in diamond, if we look at the energy profile for this reaction, this reaction would have a very high activation energy, symbolized by Ea. The higher the activation energy for the reaction, the slower the rate of the reaction. At room temperature, it's estimated this reaction could take billions of years. Therefore, we would say this reaction is kinetically unfavorable.

Finally, let's summarize what we've learned about the conversion of diamond into graphite. Thermodynamics answers the question, will the reaction go? And the answer to that question is yes. At room temperature, diamond will convert into graphite because ΔG° for the reaction was negative. Kinetics answers the question, how long will it take? And the answer to that question is it would take billions of years for diamond to turn into graphite at room temperature.

The reason why the reaction is so slow is because of the extremely high activation energy. So, even though the reaction is thermodynamically favorable at room temperature, because the reaction is so slow, the reaction is kinetically unfavored. For all practical purposes, the reaction doesn't happen.

More Articles

View All
Still Human | Nobel Peace Prize Shorts
[Music] Don’t you talk about it. [Music] Ahem, of Kundalini. Yeah, near question item cool. Alexander returneth to cool. Remove a new drama for their which my basket. Could you rather lag in the belief that it would man build over be our mother the way an…
Are Programmers Obsolete?
The democratization of apps will continue. But remember, the web made it a lot easier to build web pages too. So then the bar went up, and you needed interactive web pages. A lot more people learned how to build interactive web pages, so the bar went up. …
A Grim Warning For All Investors
What’s up, guys? It’s Graham here. So originally, I had another video that was planned to post today, but with everything going on, I felt like it would be more appropriate to address everybody’s concerns and share my own thoughts about what’s actually ha…
Time to Sell Stocks and Take Profits?
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel. In the last video, we were talking all about how expensive the market has gotten based on the turnaround that we’ve seen the last few months, and actually how far detached the market is from the economic reality that…
Recognizing binomial variables | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is get some practice classifying whether a random variable is a binomial variable, and we’re going to do it by looking at a few exercises from Khan Academy. So this is a manager who oversees 11 female employees and 9 …
Warren Buffett's Hidden Warning to Investors for 2024
This is Warren Buffett, the best investor the world has ever seen. This is the list of his top 10 stock holdings as of our last update on the 30th of June 2024. As we know, we get these updates every 3 months thanks to a very handy SEC filing called the 1…