yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Thermodynamics vs. kinetics | Applications of thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

In chemistry, it's important to distinguish between thermodynamics and kinetics. For example, if we think about the conversion of carbon as a solid in the diamond form to carbon as a solid in the graphite form, thermodynamics tells us what will happen. Will this conversion happen at a specific temperature? Whereas kinetics tells us when the conversion could happen.

Let's start with thermodynamics. We can calculate if this conversion will happen at room temperature of 25 degrees Celsius by calculating the standard change in free energy for this reaction at that temperature. To calculate the standard change in free energy for this reaction, we need to know the standard change in free energy of formation of the products. From that, we subtract the standard change in free energy of formation of the reactants.

For this conversion, our product is carbon in the graphite form. Because carbon in the graphite form is the most stable elemental form of carbon at a pressure of one atmosphere, the standard change in free energy of formation of carbon in the graphite form is equal to zero. Next, we think about our reactant, which is carbon in the form of diamond. The standard change in free energy of formation of carbon in the diamond form is 2.84 kilojoules per mole.

Looking at our balanced equation for this conversion, we're converting one mole of diamond into one mole of graphite. Since there's a one as a coefficient in front of diamond, we multiply the standard change in free energy of formation of diamond by one mole of diamond. Moles cancel, and we get negative 2.84 kilojoules as the standard change in free energy for this reaction. Instead of kilojoules, the units could have been written as kilojoules per mole of reaction.

Because there's one mole of carbon in the diamond form for how the balanced equation is written, we could write a conversion factor of one mole of carbon in the diamond form per mole of reaction. Because the standard change in free energy of formation of diamond is equal to 2.84 kilojoules per mole of diamond, moles of diamond would cancel out and give kilojoules per mole of reaction as the units. Because the standard change in free energy for this reaction is negative, we know that the conversion of diamond into graphite at 25 degrees Celsius is thermodynamically favorable.

Next, let's think about the kinetics of this reaction. If we look at the structure of diamond, each carbon atom is covalently bonded to four other carbons. For example, this carbon right here is bonded to four other carbon atoms in a tetrahedral geometry around this central carbon atom.

Graphite has a very different structure. In graphite, carbon atoms form covalently bonded layers or sheets, and these layers or sheets are held together by London dispersion forces. So, in order to convert diamond into graphite, we would have to break a lot of carbon-carbon bonds, and that would take a lot of energy.

Since it takes a lot of energy to break the carbon-carbon bonds in diamond, if we look at the energy profile for this reaction, this reaction would have a very high activation energy, symbolized by Ea. The higher the activation energy for the reaction, the slower the rate of the reaction. At room temperature, it's estimated this reaction could take billions of years. Therefore, we would say this reaction is kinetically unfavorable.

Finally, let's summarize what we've learned about the conversion of diamond into graphite. Thermodynamics answers the question, will the reaction go? And the answer to that question is yes. At room temperature, diamond will convert into graphite because ΔG° for the reaction was negative. Kinetics answers the question, how long will it take? And the answer to that question is it would take billions of years for diamond to turn into graphite at room temperature.

The reason why the reaction is so slow is because of the extremely high activation energy. So, even though the reaction is thermodynamically favorable at room temperature, because the reaction is so slow, the reaction is kinetically unfavored. For all practical purposes, the reaction doesn't happen.

More Articles

View All
Worked example: problem involving definite integral (algebraic) | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We are told the population of a town grows at a rate of ( e^{1.2t} - 2t ) people per year, where ( t ) is the number of years. At ( t = 2 ) years, the town has fifteen hundred people. So first, they ask us approximately by how many people does the popula…
Can Bitcoin Hit 100K? | Kitco Interview
There’s a lot of misinformation about the mining in Bitcoin. They are not going to buy Bitcoin until this ESG issue is resolved, period. Let me be very blunt about this: I would say right now less than one percent of global institutions and sovereign fund…
The Courage To Be Disliked
I made my first video on this channel in July 2017 after months of going back and forth on whether or not I actually wanted to create a YouTube channel. What would people think? What if people hate the videos and tell me that I don’t know what I’m talking…
David Zeevi on Personalized Nutrition Based on Your Gut Microbiome
So today, we have David CV on the podcasts, and you are an author on many papers. But the paper that I initially contacted you about is called “Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses,” and this is a quick summary: people eating identic…
Make Abundance for the World
Yeah, I think there’s this notion that making money is evil, right? It’s like rooted all the way back down to money’s the root of all evil. People think that the bankers steal our money, and you know, it’s somewhat true in that in a lot of the world, ther…
REAL NYAN CAT ... and more! IMG #38
This is what heaven is like. And things just got a little too real. It’s episode 38 of IMG! Okay, so this is Katy Perry and this is Paula Deen. Uh-oh. Because this is Tom Hanks and this is 50 Cent. Coincidence? Here’s a caterpillar whose pattern resembl…