yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Eyes on the prize: Why optimists make superb leaders | Michio Kaku


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Leadership is understanding the challenges of the future, to working on scenarios of the future. Now, President Eisenhower, when he was a general, he was asked about his attitude toward victory, toward fights, and toward war. And he basically said that pessimists never win wars. Only optimists win wars. And optimists, what separates them from the pessimists? You see, the optimists see the future, the bright side of the future, the future that has opportunities, not the pessimist, who simply says, ah, can't do it, not possible, end of story. That's it, folks.

So you have to have not just optimism, but you have to have one eye on the future. Now, I'm a physicist. For me seeing the future is-- a large chunk of it is understanding the laws of science. When I was a kid, when I was a child, I had two role models. First was Einstein. I read that he couldn't finish his greatest work. And as a child, I said to myself, I'm going to help finish it. I'm going to help finish it, because it's the fundamentals of physics.

But the other role model I had was, well, I used to watch Flash Gordon on TV every Saturday morning. And he blew my mind away-- ray guns, cities in the sky, invisibility shields, monsters from outer space. And then I began to realize that the two loves of my life were actually the same thing, that if you want to understand the future, you have to understand science. You've got to pay your dues. That's where leadership will take you, because you can see the future.

That's what Eisenhower could do. He could see the future of a war, because he understood the mechanics of the war and how the war would progress. Seeing the future is the key to success in life. I think it's the key to intelligence. And it's also the key to leadership, as well. Now, you may say to yourself, now, wait a minute. I thought IQs were a good predictor of the future. Wrong. If you take a look at people with high IQs, yes, some of them do win the Nobel Prize. But a lot of them will end up as marginal people, petty criminals, people that are failures.

And then you wonder, why? Why is it that some people with high IQs never again anywhere? Well, the Air Force had this problem. You see, the Air Force devised a test. What happens if your airplane is shot down over enemy territory in Vietnam, and you're captured by the Vietnamese? Do something. What are you going to do? It turns out that the people with high IQs got paralyzed, flummoxed. They didn't know what to do. They were paralyzed.

What? You're captured behind enemy lines? What are you going to do? Give up? The people who came up with the most imaginative, the most creative ideas, they were the ones who did not score so high on the IQ exam, but they were creative. They saw the future. They came up with all sorts of schemes in which to escape. Now, I like to think of it this way.

Let's say you've got a bunch of people, kids, and you ask them to rob a bank. That's your job, rob a bank. How would you do it? I think the people with high IQs would get all embarrassed, flummoxed. They wouldn't know what to do. Even people who want to become policemen in the future, they would get all flummoxed. But criminals, they are constantly thinking about the future-- master criminals now, not the ones who are petty and just steal things off the grocery shelf.

But the master criminals are the ones who constantly simulate the future. How do you rob this bank? How do you nail down the police? How do you get away? Where's your getaway car? These are the ones who have high intelligence. These are, quote, the "future leaders."

More Articles

View All
The Science of Thinking
For most of us, thinking is at least somewhat unpleasant. We try to avoid it, where possible. For example: I asked these guys how long does it take for the earth to go around the Sun. What do you reckon, cuz? Isn’t it 24 hours? Obviously a day, yes. O…
Example: Analyzing the difference in distributions | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Suppose that men have a mean height of 178 centimeters, with a standard deviation of 8 centimeters. Women have a mean height of 170 centimeters, with a standard deviation of 6 centimeters. The male and female heights are each normally distributed. We inde…
New Hampshire Summer Learning Series Session 2: Unlock Potential with “Khanmigo Teacher Tools”
All right. Good morning everyone! Welcome back to our summer learning series for New Hampshire. Today we are going to do a deep dive with Kigo Teacher Tools. And you know what, I just realized I hope I shared my sound, but we’ll see when we play this vide…
Comparative roles of women in Rome and Han China | World History | Khan Academy
I’m here with Iman L. Sheikh, Khan Academy’s World History fellow, and the question I have, Iman, is: history often focuses on men, but clearly women were playing a significant role. How much can we know about women, say, 2,000 years ago? When we talk ab…
Place value tables
What we’re going to do in this video is think a little bit about place value tables, and sometimes they’re referred to as place value charts. In previous videos, we’ve already talked about the idea of place value, and a place value table or place value ch…
3 Reasons Why Nuclear Energy Is Terrible! 2/3
Three reasons why we should stop using nuclear energy. One. Nuclear weapons proliferation. Nuclear technology made a violent entrance onto the world stage just one year after the world’s first-ever nuclear test explosion in 1944. Two large cities were de…