yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Eyes on the prize: Why optimists make superb leaders | Michio Kaku


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Leadership is understanding the challenges of the future, to working on scenarios of the future. Now, President Eisenhower, when he was a general, he was asked about his attitude toward victory, toward fights, and toward war. And he basically said that pessimists never win wars. Only optimists win wars. And optimists, what separates them from the pessimists? You see, the optimists see the future, the bright side of the future, the future that has opportunities, not the pessimist, who simply says, ah, can't do it, not possible, end of story. That's it, folks.

So you have to have not just optimism, but you have to have one eye on the future. Now, I'm a physicist. For me seeing the future is-- a large chunk of it is understanding the laws of science. When I was a kid, when I was a child, I had two role models. First was Einstein. I read that he couldn't finish his greatest work. And as a child, I said to myself, I'm going to help finish it. I'm going to help finish it, because it's the fundamentals of physics.

But the other role model I had was, well, I used to watch Flash Gordon on TV every Saturday morning. And he blew my mind away-- ray guns, cities in the sky, invisibility shields, monsters from outer space. And then I began to realize that the two loves of my life were actually the same thing, that if you want to understand the future, you have to understand science. You've got to pay your dues. That's where leadership will take you, because you can see the future.

That's what Eisenhower could do. He could see the future of a war, because he understood the mechanics of the war and how the war would progress. Seeing the future is the key to success in life. I think it's the key to intelligence. And it's also the key to leadership, as well. Now, you may say to yourself, now, wait a minute. I thought IQs were a good predictor of the future. Wrong. If you take a look at people with high IQs, yes, some of them do win the Nobel Prize. But a lot of them will end up as marginal people, petty criminals, people that are failures.

And then you wonder, why? Why is it that some people with high IQs never again anywhere? Well, the Air Force had this problem. You see, the Air Force devised a test. What happens if your airplane is shot down over enemy territory in Vietnam, and you're captured by the Vietnamese? Do something. What are you going to do? It turns out that the people with high IQs got paralyzed, flummoxed. They didn't know what to do. They were paralyzed.

What? You're captured behind enemy lines? What are you going to do? Give up? The people who came up with the most imaginative, the most creative ideas, they were the ones who did not score so high on the IQ exam, but they were creative. They saw the future. They came up with all sorts of schemes in which to escape. Now, I like to think of it this way.

Let's say you've got a bunch of people, kids, and you ask them to rob a bank. That's your job, rob a bank. How would you do it? I think the people with high IQs would get all embarrassed, flummoxed. They wouldn't know what to do. Even people who want to become policemen in the future, they would get all flummoxed. But criminals, they are constantly thinking about the future-- master criminals now, not the ones who are petty and just steal things off the grocery shelf.

But the master criminals are the ones who constantly simulate the future. How do you rob this bank? How do you nail down the police? How do you get away? Where's your getaway car? These are the ones who have high intelligence. These are, quote, the "future leaders."

More Articles

View All
The 2020 Mortgage Crisis Explained
What’s up guys? It’s Graham here. So lately I’ve been hearing a lot of talk about this upcoming mortgage crisis. Not to mention, pretty much every single news website in existence is mentioning it. So let’s talk about it. And instead of creating some sor…
Is Political Difference Biological? | StarTalk
And so there’s a recent book called “Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences.” It was like, yeah, let’s get some science! It’s like, roll some science into this conversation! And it suggests that political views may …
David Deutsch: Knowledge Creation and The Human Race, Part 1
My goal would be not to do yet another podcast with David Deutsch; there are plenty of those. I would love to tease out some of the very counter-intuitive learnings, put them down canonically in such a way that future generations can benefit from them, an…
Will OpenAI Kill All Startups?
This is Michael Seibel with Dalton Caldwell, and today we’re going to talk about how OpenAI is going to kill all startups. This is our last video; might as well pack it in, we’re done. OpenAI is going to do this. They’re going to make the videos—next vide…
How your image can MAKE or BREAK you
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So, how important is your image? Now, we all hear that a book shouldn’t be judged by its cover, that we should get to know somebody first and give them a chance, but in reality, this rarely ever happens. Now, whether…
Periodicity of algebraic models | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told Divya is seated on a Ferris wheel at time T equals zero. The graph below shows her height H in meters T seconds after the ride starts. So at time equals zero, she looks like about two. What is this? This would be one and a half, so it looks lik…