yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Eyes on the prize: Why optimists make superb leaders | Michio Kaku


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Leadership is understanding the challenges of the future, to working on scenarios of the future. Now, President Eisenhower, when he was a general, he was asked about his attitude toward victory, toward fights, and toward war. And he basically said that pessimists never win wars. Only optimists win wars. And optimists, what separates them from the pessimists? You see, the optimists see the future, the bright side of the future, the future that has opportunities, not the pessimist, who simply says, ah, can't do it, not possible, end of story. That's it, folks.

So you have to have not just optimism, but you have to have one eye on the future. Now, I'm a physicist. For me seeing the future is-- a large chunk of it is understanding the laws of science. When I was a kid, when I was a child, I had two role models. First was Einstein. I read that he couldn't finish his greatest work. And as a child, I said to myself, I'm going to help finish it. I'm going to help finish it, because it's the fundamentals of physics.

But the other role model I had was, well, I used to watch Flash Gordon on TV every Saturday morning. And he blew my mind away-- ray guns, cities in the sky, invisibility shields, monsters from outer space. And then I began to realize that the two loves of my life were actually the same thing, that if you want to understand the future, you have to understand science. You've got to pay your dues. That's where leadership will take you, because you can see the future.

That's what Eisenhower could do. He could see the future of a war, because he understood the mechanics of the war and how the war would progress. Seeing the future is the key to success in life. I think it's the key to intelligence. And it's also the key to leadership, as well. Now, you may say to yourself, now, wait a minute. I thought IQs were a good predictor of the future. Wrong. If you take a look at people with high IQs, yes, some of them do win the Nobel Prize. But a lot of them will end up as marginal people, petty criminals, people that are failures.

And then you wonder, why? Why is it that some people with high IQs never again anywhere? Well, the Air Force had this problem. You see, the Air Force devised a test. What happens if your airplane is shot down over enemy territory in Vietnam, and you're captured by the Vietnamese? Do something. What are you going to do? It turns out that the people with high IQs got paralyzed, flummoxed. They didn't know what to do. They were paralyzed.

What? You're captured behind enemy lines? What are you going to do? Give up? The people who came up with the most imaginative, the most creative ideas, they were the ones who did not score so high on the IQ exam, but they were creative. They saw the future. They came up with all sorts of schemes in which to escape. Now, I like to think of it this way.

Let's say you've got a bunch of people, kids, and you ask them to rob a bank. That's your job, rob a bank. How would you do it? I think the people with high IQs would get all embarrassed, flummoxed. They wouldn't know what to do. Even people who want to become policemen in the future, they would get all flummoxed. But criminals, they are constantly thinking about the future-- master criminals now, not the ones who are petty and just steal things off the grocery shelf.

But the master criminals are the ones who constantly simulate the future. How do you rob this bank? How do you nail down the police? How do you get away? Where's your getaway car? These are the ones who have high intelligence. These are, quote, the "future leaders."

More Articles

View All
One-step multiplication equations: fractional coefficients | 6th grade | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have the equation two-fifths x is equal to ten. How would you go about solving that? Well, you might be thinking to yourself it would be nice if we just had an x on the left-hand side instead of a two-fifths x, or if the coefficient on t…
Ian Somerhalder Goes on a Sub Adventure | Years of Living Dangerously
[Music] I’m aboard this amazing research and filming ship called the Aluia. It’s equipped with two deep diving submersibles. There’s one behind me, the Triton, and behind that is the Deep Rover, a two-man submarine. Both subs are rated for 1000 meters. We…
Shall We Play A Game…?
Shall we play a game? Perhaps the greatest strategy game yet devised: Rock, paper, scissors. On these three, through human history, have hung so many critical moments, their outcome determined by rock defeating scissors, scissors defeating paper, or paper…
360° Wingwalker - Part 2 | National Geographic
[Music] You know how sometimes you’re kind of the geek in class at school, and everybody’s always kind of bumping you around and pushing you around? You feel kind of dejected and alone. And then when you get into the lab, you’re just exploding all over th…
NFTs Will Be Bigger Than Bitcoin! | ft. guest shark Kevin Hart!
What are the one or two things that are necessary, um, for a software platform to succeed at scale? You mentioned speed, but what are some of the qualities that are necessary, um, for one of these platforms to win? You know, what in the end of the day det…
When to use z or t statistics in significance tests | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What I want to do in this video is give a primer on thinking about when to use a z statistic versus a t statistic when we are doing significance tests. So, there’s two major scenarios that we will see in an introductory statistics class. One is when we a…