yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Eyes on the prize: Why optimists make superb leaders | Michio Kaku


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Leadership is understanding the challenges of the future, to working on scenarios of the future. Now, President Eisenhower, when he was a general, he was asked about his attitude toward victory, toward fights, and toward war. And he basically said that pessimists never win wars. Only optimists win wars. And optimists, what separates them from the pessimists? You see, the optimists see the future, the bright side of the future, the future that has opportunities, not the pessimist, who simply says, ah, can't do it, not possible, end of story. That's it, folks.

So you have to have not just optimism, but you have to have one eye on the future. Now, I'm a physicist. For me seeing the future is-- a large chunk of it is understanding the laws of science. When I was a kid, when I was a child, I had two role models. First was Einstein. I read that he couldn't finish his greatest work. And as a child, I said to myself, I'm going to help finish it. I'm going to help finish it, because it's the fundamentals of physics.

But the other role model I had was, well, I used to watch Flash Gordon on TV every Saturday morning. And he blew my mind away-- ray guns, cities in the sky, invisibility shields, monsters from outer space. And then I began to realize that the two loves of my life were actually the same thing, that if you want to understand the future, you have to understand science. You've got to pay your dues. That's where leadership will take you, because you can see the future.

That's what Eisenhower could do. He could see the future of a war, because he understood the mechanics of the war and how the war would progress. Seeing the future is the key to success in life. I think it's the key to intelligence. And it's also the key to leadership, as well. Now, you may say to yourself, now, wait a minute. I thought IQs were a good predictor of the future. Wrong. If you take a look at people with high IQs, yes, some of them do win the Nobel Prize. But a lot of them will end up as marginal people, petty criminals, people that are failures.

And then you wonder, why? Why is it that some people with high IQs never again anywhere? Well, the Air Force had this problem. You see, the Air Force devised a test. What happens if your airplane is shot down over enemy territory in Vietnam, and you're captured by the Vietnamese? Do something. What are you going to do? It turns out that the people with high IQs got paralyzed, flummoxed. They didn't know what to do. They were paralyzed.

What? You're captured behind enemy lines? What are you going to do? Give up? The people who came up with the most imaginative, the most creative ideas, they were the ones who did not score so high on the IQ exam, but they were creative. They saw the future. They came up with all sorts of schemes in which to escape. Now, I like to think of it this way.

Let's say you've got a bunch of people, kids, and you ask them to rob a bank. That's your job, rob a bank. How would you do it? I think the people with high IQs would get all embarrassed, flummoxed. They wouldn't know what to do. Even people who want to become policemen in the future, they would get all flummoxed. But criminals, they are constantly thinking about the future-- master criminals now, not the ones who are petty and just steal things off the grocery shelf.

But the master criminals are the ones who constantly simulate the future. How do you rob this bank? How do you nail down the police? How do you get away? Where's your getaway car? These are the ones who have high intelligence. These are, quote, the "future leaders."

More Articles

View All
Mr. Freeman, part 07 [посвящается Стивену Хокингу, RIP]
Supported by MFCoin. Supported by Rocketbank. Supported by Exness. Music by “B-2”. I do know what you do not. This knowledge bothers me a lot. Dead tired from the everyday hustle and bustle, I fell asleep and saw a crazy dream. So nuts that all the soph…
Foundations of American Democracy - Course Trailer
Welcome to Foundations of American Democracy. This is where it all begins. You might think it’s just about the United States, but here we’re going to go much deeper and much further back than that. We’re going to go to the original ideas, dive into philos…
How to Build An MVP | Startup School
[Music] All right, uh today I’d like to talk to you about how to build an MVP or a minimum viable product. So if you haven’t seen this before, this is a meme that we love to talk about when trying to help founders with their MVP. It’s called the midwit me…
Finding your footing in uncertain times: Balancing multiple kids with multiple schedules
The broadcast is now starting. All attendees are in listen-only mode. Hi everybody, thanks so much for joining us today. I’m Vicki Lang. I’m our learning scientist here at Khan Academy, and I’m joined by Dan from our marketing team who will be facilitati…
Change in period and frequency from change in angular velocity: Worked examples | Khan Academy
We’re told that a large tire spins with angular velocity (4 \Omega). A smaller tire spins with half the angular velocity. I’m assuming half the angular velocity of the large tire. How does the period (T{\text{large}}) of the large tire compare with the pe…
Groups Search for Consensus, Individuals Search for Truth
Truth is very fought over. When we say truth, the biggest problem we’re going to run into is that what society wants for you is not what’s always good for you. Society is the largest group, and groups search for consensus; individuals search for truth. It…