yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Eyes on the prize: Why optimists make superb leaders | Michio Kaku


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Leadership is understanding the challenges of the future, to working on scenarios of the future. Now, President Eisenhower, when he was a general, he was asked about his attitude toward victory, toward fights, and toward war. And he basically said that pessimists never win wars. Only optimists win wars. And optimists, what separates them from the pessimists? You see, the optimists see the future, the bright side of the future, the future that has opportunities, not the pessimist, who simply says, ah, can't do it, not possible, end of story. That's it, folks.

So you have to have not just optimism, but you have to have one eye on the future. Now, I'm a physicist. For me seeing the future is-- a large chunk of it is understanding the laws of science. When I was a kid, when I was a child, I had two role models. First was Einstein. I read that he couldn't finish his greatest work. And as a child, I said to myself, I'm going to help finish it. I'm going to help finish it, because it's the fundamentals of physics.

But the other role model I had was, well, I used to watch Flash Gordon on TV every Saturday morning. And he blew my mind away-- ray guns, cities in the sky, invisibility shields, monsters from outer space. And then I began to realize that the two loves of my life were actually the same thing, that if you want to understand the future, you have to understand science. You've got to pay your dues. That's where leadership will take you, because you can see the future.

That's what Eisenhower could do. He could see the future of a war, because he understood the mechanics of the war and how the war would progress. Seeing the future is the key to success in life. I think it's the key to intelligence. And it's also the key to leadership, as well. Now, you may say to yourself, now, wait a minute. I thought IQs were a good predictor of the future. Wrong. If you take a look at people with high IQs, yes, some of them do win the Nobel Prize. But a lot of them will end up as marginal people, petty criminals, people that are failures.

And then you wonder, why? Why is it that some people with high IQs never again anywhere? Well, the Air Force had this problem. You see, the Air Force devised a test. What happens if your airplane is shot down over enemy territory in Vietnam, and you're captured by the Vietnamese? Do something. What are you going to do? It turns out that the people with high IQs got paralyzed, flummoxed. They didn't know what to do. They were paralyzed.

What? You're captured behind enemy lines? What are you going to do? Give up? The people who came up with the most imaginative, the most creative ideas, they were the ones who did not score so high on the IQ exam, but they were creative. They saw the future. They came up with all sorts of schemes in which to escape. Now, I like to think of it this way.

Let's say you've got a bunch of people, kids, and you ask them to rob a bank. That's your job, rob a bank. How would you do it? I think the people with high IQs would get all embarrassed, flummoxed. They wouldn't know what to do. Even people who want to become policemen in the future, they would get all flummoxed. But criminals, they are constantly thinking about the future-- master criminals now, not the ones who are petty and just steal things off the grocery shelf.

But the master criminals are the ones who constantly simulate the future. How do you rob this bank? How do you nail down the police? How do you get away? Where's your getaway car? These are the ones who have high intelligence. These are, quote, the "future leaders."

More Articles

View All
Steve Varsano talks about his experience in aviation
When you’re selling a jet for a company, that company is either moving up to a bigger, newer jet, or the company’s having problems and they’re selling the jet and they’re getting out of the business of operating their own corporate jet. If it’s the latte…
United States v. Lopez | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about a relatively recent U.S. Supreme Court case, and this is the United States versus Lopez. The decision was made in 1995, and this is significant because many of the cases we have talked about are things th…
Names
Hey, Vsauce. My name is Michael. And my name is Kevin. Names. Humans give each other names, but so do dolphins. They use whistle sounds and will respond to their whistle name even when produced by a dolphin they don’t know. Personal names, personalized t…
Innovating to Improve the Human Condition with Bill and Melinda Gates | National Geographic
Well, Melinda and Bill Gates, thank you so much for joining me to talk about this Goalkeepers report with National Geographic. We really appreciate your time. Why did you decide to start doing this report in the first place? Well, we decided to start doi…
Evolution, Adaptive Beliefs and Tigers
Natural selection only cares about what’s adaptive. Both true and false beliefs can be adaptive as long as they increase an animal’s chance of survival. Why should we expect natural selection to favor true adaptive beliefs over false ones? Alvin Plantinga…
RFS: LLMs for manual back office processes in legacy enterprises
One thing I’d love to see more startups working on is the use of LLMs to automate complex back office processes in large enterprises. So, for example, in a bank, you might have a customer service team answering loads and loads of queries from customers. …