yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

First and secondhand accounts | Reading | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Hello readers! I just got back from the library with these books. Oh, big surprise, you say? I went to the library! I found two books. No, I get it, but these books will help us talk about the difference between a first and second-hand account.

You see, this is a travel diary written by a young man on the Oregon Trail like 150 years ago, whereas this is a book about the Oregon Trail written last year. A first-hand account is created by the person who experienced an event. First-hand accounts are also called primary sources. Primary is another way to say first or original. It uses pronouns like I or me; it's told from one person's perspective.

A second-hand account is more distant from the event, like a book or a newspaper article. The author wasn't there, but they use first-hand accounts, like interviews, diaries, photos, or video recordings to stitch the story together. The story uses pronouns like they, she, or he, not I or we.

Let me show you more specifically by comparing these two passages. Okay, so this one—our first hand account comes from the diary of Horus Griggs, our young migrant on the Oregon Trail, July 18th, 1871. We're in the Wyoming Territory now, and it's been a few days since we had good water. I'm starting to worry. It's been at least a week since any of us saw a tree, but the buffalo chips remain plentiful. At least the darn things burn hot!

And here's an excerpt from a secondary source—our book about the Oregon Trail that came out last year. The Oregon Trail didn’t have many trees. The pioneers used buffalo chips, dried buffalo dung, as fuel for their fires. In fact, some children played games with buffalo chips; they tossed them around like frisbees.

So we've got here two passages, both about buffalo droppings. Good job, me! Let me be clear: it's not gross; they're mostly made of dried grass. Honestly, what are the big differences between these two passages? Look at how Horus uses first-person pronouns like I or we or us. He's telling the story from his perspective and the perspective of other people traveling with him. It's like he's telling us a story, and it's his story to tell. He was right there starting fires with buffalo chips!

We can see how he felt about not having access to water. He was worried. First-hand accounts connect us more closely with the emotions of the writer, and because he was there, he can accurately describe his experiences. However, this guy can only describe his own experience. He doesn't know what it was like in other wagon trains. He doesn't know what it was like to be a native community encountering these settlers. He's writing from one perspective, and it's his perspective.

Now look at the second passage. It uses the pronouns there and they to refer to the pioneers and their kids. What does that tell us? The writer is not part of the group, wasn't there, and doesn't consider themselves part of the “us,” the way that Horus considers himself part of an “us.” The author is more distant. It's not the author's individual story; instead, they're trying to tell the stories of other people through research.

This is what makes it a secondary source, a second-hand account. Because second-hand accounts are more distant from the events they describe, they're usually less emotional. The author of this second passage, for example, isn't worried about anything that's happening to the pioneers. They're not even referring to a specific set of pioneers; they're talking about what these migrants did in general. They're giving you background knowledge, general knowledge.

That kind of distance lets the author of a second-hand account cover more ground. They don't have to stick to the narrative of one family or one person or even one moment in time. First and second hand accounts are both important.

When I was a kid, they used to advertise sugary cereals as part of a balanced breakfast. Little bowl of sugary cereal, a glass of milk, a bowl of fruit, maybe a sausage, some toast. Well, think of primary and secondary sources as part of a balanced information diet—a little column A, a little column B. You just gotta take your knowledge spoon and dig in deep into your perspectives bowl. That's a thing that I made up just now.

Diversity of perspectives does a body good! You can learn anything.

David out.

More Articles

View All
YC Women in Tech: Breaking Into Product
All right, hi everyone! It’s uh thanks for joining us today. I’m Captain Yala. I’m excited to have you join us for our work at a startup panel on getting into product. We have three PMs with us today and will be joined also by YC alumni Helena Merk, and w…
Time: The History & Future of Everything – Remastered
Time… makes sense in small pieces. But when you look at huge stretches of time, it’s almost impossible to wrap your head around things. So, let’s start small—with minutes, hours, days. You probably spent the last 24 hours mostly sleeping and working, and …
Peter Lynch: How to invest in 2023
If you want to learn how to get rich investing in the stock market, Peter Lynch is someone you need to be learning from. Lynch has arguably the best track record of any stock picker that has managed large amounts of money during his time running the famou…
15 Small Things That Make People Instantly Like You
In a world where social interactions are the stepping stones to a successful life, charisma is the biggest unfair advantage that you can train in yourself. Even better, there are tiny secrets that you can deploy to give yourself an edge in life. By the en…
WE DID IT! Thank you all and Merry Christmas!
[Music] We did it, guys! We did it! Come on, that’s so awesome! Guys, 25 YouTube videos in 25 days! The new money advent calendar is successfully completed. Well done, everyone! Well done for keeping up to speed. There’s been about, you know, three to fo…
Watch Expert Reveals: The Secret Market of Million-Dollar Timepieces (Pt.2)
In the year 1900 this little pocket watch cost 250 dollars. Yeah, today it’s worth six thousand dollars. Is it a good relative investment? How do you know when you buy this that it is authentic? It’s over 100 years old. How do you know with certainty? I …