yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Value added approach to calculating GDP | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In previous videos, we talked about GDP as the market value of final goods and services produced in a country in a given time period, let's say in a given year. We gave the example of producing jeans, where maybe the farmer helps produce the cotton, and then the thread maker takes that cotton and makes thread. Then the fabric maker takes the thread and makes fabric, and then the jean maker takes the fabric and produces jeans and so on. The market value of those jeans was 50, and so assuming all of this happened in one year, in the time period that we're measuring GDP for, then we would just count the fifty dollars.

If we're looking at the final market value, or the market value of final goods and services, you would say the GDP for at least for this component of the GDP from these jeans is 50. But I do want to clarify that there are multiple ways that you can measure GDP, and you could even think about it from a value-added approach. But the key idea is, no matter how you measure it, you should get to the same value.

So let's think about the various actors here and what their value add was. First, let's think about the farmer. Right over here, this is the farmer, my not so elegantly drawn rectangle around what he's doing. So the farmer's value add is what? Well, before, you just had some dirt and things, and so maybe you could say that the market value was zero. Then he's able to produce something, or she's able to produce something that now has a market value of ten dollars. So their value add is ten dollars.

Now, from there, the cotton goes to the thread maker. The thread maker, they take that ten dollar cotton. So this is thread. The thread maker takes the ten dollar cotton and are able to produce twenty dollars' worth of thread. What is their value add? Value add here, well, they took something worth ten dollars and they were able to do something to it to make it worth twenty dollars. So their value add is now another ten dollars.

Then this is the thread maker, and then from there it goes to the fabric maker. The fabric maker—and I think you see where this is going. The fabric maker is this part of our process. Fabric maker, and their value add is what? Pause this video and think about it. Well, they take something worth 20 and they're able to create it. They're able to turn it into something that has a market value of 30. So their value add is also 10.

And then last but not least, you have the gene company, so the gene manufacturer. I’ll call them the gene producer. The gene producer, they take something that has a market value of 30 and they're able to sell it for 50. So their value add, value add here, if you take something from 30 and you make it worth 50, then you've added 20 dollars of value.

The value-added approach to GDP will just sum up these value adds. This is going to be this 10 from the farmer, plus the value add of the thread maker, plus ten dollars from the thread maker, plus ten dollars from the fabric maker, plus twenty dollars from the gene maker. What will that all add up to? Well, that's all going to add up to ten plus ten is twenty, plus ten is thirty, plus twenty is fifty dollars.

Lucky for us, that has added up to the same amount as we had before, where we just looked at the market value of the final goods and services. Now, one benefit of the value-added approach is that real supply chains are quite complex. Things might be going from one country to another. They might, as we've talked about in another video, the year might end right over here. When something is made in China and there's value add in China, but then it's shipped to the U.S. and some value add is placed on it and then shipped back to China or Mexico, you have to be careful to only count the value add in the country for which you are measuring the GDP.

So that's one useful way of—or one useful reason or one way in which the value-added approach might be useful. The key idea, though, is that you're getting to the same value. You should get to the same value as the market value of the final goods and services produced in a given time period.

More Articles

View All
Avoid the NIGHTMARE tenant and eviction: My Tenant screening process
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So, so many of you have requested I make a video about how I properly vet tenants to avoid the nightmare tenant situation where I had an eviction and the tenant was absolutely crazy. So these are a few of the things …
John Bogle on How to Build Wealth in the Stock Market
But I think the idea of buying and holding forever and not trying to make adjustments requires that you’ve gotten it right in the first place. That you can only hold tight if you’ve bought right, if you will. And that is to say, have an asset allocation t…
Dataset individuals and categorical variables
So we have this question that says millions of Americans rely on caffeine to get them up in the morning, and that is probably true. Although for me, if I drink even a little bit of caffeine in the morning, I won’t be able to sleep that night. Here’s nutri…
Make Abundance for the World
Yeah, I think there’s this notion that making money is evil, right? It’s like rooted all the way back down to money’s the root of all evil. People think that the bankers steal our money, and you know, it’s somewhat true in that in a lot of the world, ther…
Inverse relationship between capital price and returns | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
So much of Piketty’s book is about this idea of more, more, and more returns to capital. That the return to capital is going to grow faster than the growth of the economy. We see charts like this, where we have the value of private capital as a percentage…
Introduction to remainders
We’re already somewhat familiar with the idea of division. If I were to say 8 divided by 2, you could think of that as 8 objects: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Divided into equal groups of two. So how many equal groups of two could you have? Well, you could hav…