yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Factoring polynomials using complex numbers | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told that Ahmat tried to write ( x^4 + 5x^2 + 4 ) as a product of linear factors. This is his work, and then they tell us all the steps that he did, and then they say in what step did Ahmad make his first mistake. So pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we're starting with ( x^4 + 10x^2 + 9 ), and it looks like Ahmad tried to factor that into ( (x^2 + 9)(x^2 + 1) ). And this indeed does make sense because if we said that let's say ( u ) is equal to ( x^2 ), we could rewrite this right over here as ( u^2 + 10u + 9 ). The whole reason why you would do this is so that you could write this higher order expression in terms of a second degree expression.

Then we've learned how to factor things like this many times. We look, and we say, "Okay, what two numbers when I add them I get 10, and when I multiply them I get 9?" It would be 9 and 1. So you could write this as ( (u + 9)(u + 1) ). And of course, if ( u ) is equal to ( x^2 ), this would be ( (x^2 + 9)(x^2 + 1) ), which is exactly what Ahmad has right over here. So step 1 is looking great.

All right, now let's think about what Ahmad did in step two. They didn't do anything to ( x^2 + 9 ), but it looks like they tried to further factor ( x^2 + 1 ). And this does seem right; we just have to remind ourselves, just as you have a difference of squares if you're dealing with non-complex numbers. So we could rewrite this right over here as ( (x + a)(x - a) ).

We could have a sum of squares if we're thinking about complex numbers; this is going to be ( (x + ai)(x - ai) ). And in this situation, well, the ( x ) is ( x ), and then our ( a ) would be 1. So we're going to have ( (x + i)(x - i) ). So step 2 is looking great, and now let's go to step three.

So in step three, there’s no change to this part of the expression, and it looks like Ahmad is trying to factor ( x^2 + 9 ) based on the same principle. Now, ( x^2 + 9 ) is the same thing as ( x^2 + 3^2 ). So if you use this exact same idea here, if you factor it, it should be ( (x + 3i)(x - 3i) ).

But what we see over here is Ahmad took the square root of three instead of just having a three here. Ahmad treated it instead of having a nine here as if we actually had a three. So they made a little bit of an error there. So this is the step where Ahmad makes his first mistake, and we're done.

More Articles

View All
Introduction to inference about slope in linear regression | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about regression lines. But it’s not going to be the first time we’re talking about regression lines. And so, if the idea of a regression is foreign to you, I encourage you to watch the introductory videos on it. Here, w…
Why Vertical LLM Agents Are The New $1 Billion SaaS Opportunities
This is their first ever experience talking to this Godlike feeling, you know, AI that was all of a sudden doing these tasks that would take me, when I practice, like a whole day. And it’s being done in a minute and a half. The whole company, all 120 of u…
15 RULES of MONEY
Ah, money. Some people say it makes the world go round. Some people chase it tirelessly, like a hamster running on a wheel. Some people speak about money, and others actually have it. Money doesn’t care about your self-esteem, about your religion, about w…
Thought Experiments No One Can Solve
What if I told you that you died last night in your sleep and that your body and mind have been replaced by an exact replica of you, a clone who has all the same characteristics and memories that you had? Impossible, you’d probably reply. But can you prov…
How Horses Save Humans From Snakebites
[Zac] Are you all right to grab the back end? [Derek] Uh, well, not at the moment. Not yet. Get him up. You gotta lock him in. A scratch from this species will knock you. Knock you down… Could kill you? Or… Oh definitely, yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay. So I am…
We Don’t Need to Seek Love. We Just Have to Stop Resisting It | The Wisdom of Rumi
The 13th-century Sufi mystic Jalāl ad-Dīn Muhammad Rūmī, also known as Mevlana or simply as Rumi, observed that all phenomena of nature are bound together by love. Love is what keeps planets orbiting their stars, stars encircling the centers of their gala…