yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Factoring polynomials using complex numbers | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told that Ahmat tried to write ( x^4 + 5x^2 + 4 ) as a product of linear factors. This is his work, and then they tell us all the steps that he did, and then they say in what step did Ahmad make his first mistake. So pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we're starting with ( x^4 + 10x^2 + 9 ), and it looks like Ahmad tried to factor that into ( (x^2 + 9)(x^2 + 1) ). And this indeed does make sense because if we said that let's say ( u ) is equal to ( x^2 ), we could rewrite this right over here as ( u^2 + 10u + 9 ). The whole reason why you would do this is so that you could write this higher order expression in terms of a second degree expression.

Then we've learned how to factor things like this many times. We look, and we say, "Okay, what two numbers when I add them I get 10, and when I multiply them I get 9?" It would be 9 and 1. So you could write this as ( (u + 9)(u + 1) ). And of course, if ( u ) is equal to ( x^2 ), this would be ( (x^2 + 9)(x^2 + 1) ), which is exactly what Ahmad has right over here. So step 1 is looking great.

All right, now let's think about what Ahmad did in step two. They didn't do anything to ( x^2 + 9 ), but it looks like they tried to further factor ( x^2 + 1 ). And this does seem right; we just have to remind ourselves, just as you have a difference of squares if you're dealing with non-complex numbers. So we could rewrite this right over here as ( (x + a)(x - a) ).

We could have a sum of squares if we're thinking about complex numbers; this is going to be ( (x + ai)(x - ai) ). And in this situation, well, the ( x ) is ( x ), and then our ( a ) would be 1. So we're going to have ( (x + i)(x - i) ). So step 2 is looking great, and now let's go to step three.

So in step three, there’s no change to this part of the expression, and it looks like Ahmad is trying to factor ( x^2 + 9 ) based on the same principle. Now, ( x^2 + 9 ) is the same thing as ( x^2 + 3^2 ). So if you use this exact same idea here, if you factor it, it should be ( (x + 3i)(x - 3i) ).

But what we see over here is Ahmad took the square root of three instead of just having a three here. Ahmad treated it instead of having a nine here as if we actually had a three. So they made a little bit of an error there. So this is the step where Ahmad makes his first mistake, and we're done.

More Articles

View All
Bill Belichick & Ray Dalio on Dealing with Arrogant Players
Do you get paraders that are too arrogant? Well, I would say sometimes when we get the rookies in from college, there’s a decru process that goes on. Uhhuh, some of his players come out in college, he gets drafted. You know, he’s the best player on the t…
COVERED IN CHICKS -- IMG! #41
A rooster… cat? And Ronald orders a number three. It’s episode 41 of IMG! City life. Oh hi. And here’s a necktie that’s formal and manly, though, of course, I prefer one piece cat faces. Too much coverage? Well, try on one of these or just wear a slice of…
The Black Woman | Genius: MLK/X | National Geographic
Sister Betty, The Honorable Elisha Muhammad has provided an answer to the central question amongst us all: Who is the original man? The original man is the Asiatic black man, the maker, the owner, the creator of the planet Earth, god of the universe, the…
PURPOSE of WEALTH (Pt2): SECURITY
Hello Alux, or welcome back to part two of our Purpose of Wealth series. In the first part, we discussed wealth as a facilitator of freedom. Now we’re going to discuss wealth in a different light: one of protection, safety nets, and more. Now, since our …
Buying the New Tudor Black Bay Chrono 'Pink'
[Applause] [Music] Hey, Mr. Wonderful here, back in New York City, and one of my favorite watch stores in the world. This is the Meat Packing District, the Tudor Boutique. Tudor has come on my radar screen in the last 3 years as a maverick brand because I…
Abstinence-Only Sex Ed | Original Sin: Sex
By the 1990s in the U.S., most of the advances to public sex education made since the 50s are political roadkill. Late 90s, there is this increase in abstinence-only sex education. In 1993, the Southern Baptists asked American teens to put a ring on it a…