yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Factoring polynomials using complex numbers | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told that Ahmat tried to write ( x^4 + 5x^2 + 4 ) as a product of linear factors. This is his work, and then they tell us all the steps that he did, and then they say in what step did Ahmad make his first mistake. So pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we're starting with ( x^4 + 10x^2 + 9 ), and it looks like Ahmad tried to factor that into ( (x^2 + 9)(x^2 + 1) ). And this indeed does make sense because if we said that let's say ( u ) is equal to ( x^2 ), we could rewrite this right over here as ( u^2 + 10u + 9 ). The whole reason why you would do this is so that you could write this higher order expression in terms of a second degree expression.

Then we've learned how to factor things like this many times. We look, and we say, "Okay, what two numbers when I add them I get 10, and when I multiply them I get 9?" It would be 9 and 1. So you could write this as ( (u + 9)(u + 1) ). And of course, if ( u ) is equal to ( x^2 ), this would be ( (x^2 + 9)(x^2 + 1) ), which is exactly what Ahmad has right over here. So step 1 is looking great.

All right, now let's think about what Ahmad did in step two. They didn't do anything to ( x^2 + 9 ), but it looks like they tried to further factor ( x^2 + 1 ). And this does seem right; we just have to remind ourselves, just as you have a difference of squares if you're dealing with non-complex numbers. So we could rewrite this right over here as ( (x + a)(x - a) ).

We could have a sum of squares if we're thinking about complex numbers; this is going to be ( (x + ai)(x - ai) ). And in this situation, well, the ( x ) is ( x ), and then our ( a ) would be 1. So we're going to have ( (x + i)(x - i) ). So step 2 is looking great, and now let's go to step three.

So in step three, there’s no change to this part of the expression, and it looks like Ahmad is trying to factor ( x^2 + 9 ) based on the same principle. Now, ( x^2 + 9 ) is the same thing as ( x^2 + 3^2 ). So if you use this exact same idea here, if you factor it, it should be ( (x + 3i)(x - 3i) ).

But what we see over here is Ahmad took the square root of three instead of just having a three here. Ahmad treated it instead of having a nine here as if we actually had a three. So they made a little bit of an error there. So this is the step where Ahmad makes his first mistake, and we're done.

More Articles

View All
Impostor Syndrome: What Is Your Worth?
Hi there. We’ve been looking for you. Yes, you. We know everything about you: how you’ve pretended to know things you have no idea about, how you’ve slept through years of your education, how you’ve received awards that you never deserved, and how you’ve …
Safari Live - Day 292 | National Geographic
This program welcomes you to this afternoon’s sunset Safari, where we have just caught up with their little chief himself who seems to be after something. No, it’s just after a different shady spot. A very good afternoon to you! My name is Jamie, and thi…
Personal Pronouns | The Parts of Speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians! Let’s talk about personal pronouns. But first, let me lay some sentences on you. Jake and I baked a loaf of bread. We baked a loaf of bread. You can learn anything! My friends are cool. They are cool. Now, I’m gonna circle a few of the…
Did Apple Just Have Its Moat Blocked? (Epic Games Lawsuit)
So here on the channel, I love talking long-term Warren Buffett-style value investing, and that strategy largely boils down to four key points. There’s understanding the business, so you know what you’re getting yourself into. Then you find a competitive …
Snake vs. Roadrunner Face-off | National Geographic
[mysterious music] NARRATOR: The tongue of western diamondback rattlesnake cautiously tastes the air. She flicks airborne particles against the roof of her mouth to be analyzed, sorting out potential food from potential threat, like this other icon of th…
Jeff Bezos: The electricity metaphor
When you think about resilience and technology, it’s actually much easier. You’re going to see some other speakers today, I already know, who are going to talk about breaking-bones stuff, and, of course, with technology it never is. So it’s very easy, com…