yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Conclusion for a two sample t test using a P value


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told a sociologist studying fertility in Argentina and Bolivia wanted to test if there was a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have. The sociologist obtained a random sample of women from each country. Here are the results of their test.

So they take a sample of 75 women in Argentina, and these women had a mean of 2.4 babies each, with a standard deviation of 1.5. Then the standard error of the mean was 0.17. Then they calculated similar statistics for Bolivia.

Then they give us the t-test for the means being different. We were able to calculate these statistics, and they say assume that all conditions for inference have been met at the alpha equals 0.05 level of significance. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have?

So pause this video and see if you can answer that.

All right, now let's work through this together. So this is classic hypothesis testing right over here, where your null hypothesis is actually going to be that your means are the same—so that the mean in Argentina is equal to the mean in Bolivia.

And then your alternative hypothesis is that your means are different. What you do is you say, all right, if we assume the null hypothesis, what is the probability that we would have gotten means this far apart? That's what our p-value tells us. We have a 0.31 probability, or 31 percent probability, of getting means this far apart.

Now, if your probability, assuming the null hypothesis, is below your level of significance, your alpha right over here, then you would say all right, that seems like such a low probability. I'll reject the null hypothesis, which suggests the alternative hypothesis.

But in this situation here, if we compare our p to our alpha, we see that our p-value is for sure greater than our alpha. So in this situation, I mean, you could see it right over here: 0.31 is for sure greater than 0.05.

So in this situation, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. Cannot reject our null hypothesis, and so there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have.

More Articles

View All
Daylight Saving Time 101 | National Geographic
Daylight saving time adds extra hours of daylight during the summer season while making the day shorter during the winter months. But who came up with the concept of daylight saving time, and how does it work? The concept of shifting our clocks to adjust…
15 Ways Rich People SHOW OFF
To flex is to show how much money you can afford to unnecessarily waste in order to draw attention, admiration, or envy of those you perceive as lesser than you. If you’ve been around rich people long enough, you realize that some of them still need valid…
Similar triangles & slope: proportion using coordinates | Grade 8 (TX) | Khan Academy
We’re told that triangle DF and triangle DKL are similar right triangles. Complete the proportion to show that the slope of DF, so that’s this segment right over here DF, equals the slope of DL. So pause this video and see if you can complete it. They sta…
Fishing Tips: Maximizing Your Outrigger | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
[Applause] [Music] [Applause] Hi, my name is Brittain Shak, and I’m captain of the Dogghouse. One of the things that is pretty vital to, uh, trolling to me, in order to get a spread, to get my bait spread out covering as much of the water column as possi…
Warren Buffett’s Most Iconic Interview Ever
Secular approach who have also been very successful. Let’s take Warren Buffett of Omaha, Nebraska. If you would put $10,000 in 1965 into his company, Berkshire Hathaway, you would have 1 million today. Warren was a chapter in my 1972 book, Super Money, so…
The 5 WORST Investing Mistakes for 2023 (Investing for Beginners)
This video is sponsored by Morning Brew. Sign up to their free daily newsletter using the link in the description. Okay, so 2023 is your year. You’re finally getting serious about your investing, and you’re going to take the time to knuckle down and set …