yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Conclusion for a two sample t test using a P value


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told a sociologist studying fertility in Argentina and Bolivia wanted to test if there was a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have. The sociologist obtained a random sample of women from each country. Here are the results of their test.

So they take a sample of 75 women in Argentina, and these women had a mean of 2.4 babies each, with a standard deviation of 1.5. Then the standard error of the mean was 0.17. Then they calculated similar statistics for Bolivia.

Then they give us the t-test for the means being different. We were able to calculate these statistics, and they say assume that all conditions for inference have been met at the alpha equals 0.05 level of significance. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have?

So pause this video and see if you can answer that.

All right, now let's work through this together. So this is classic hypothesis testing right over here, where your null hypothesis is actually going to be that your means are the same—so that the mean in Argentina is equal to the mean in Bolivia.

And then your alternative hypothesis is that your means are different. What you do is you say, all right, if we assume the null hypothesis, what is the probability that we would have gotten means this far apart? That's what our p-value tells us. We have a 0.31 probability, or 31 percent probability, of getting means this far apart.

Now, if your probability, assuming the null hypothesis, is below your level of significance, your alpha right over here, then you would say all right, that seems like such a low probability. I'll reject the null hypothesis, which suggests the alternative hypothesis.

But in this situation here, if we compare our p to our alpha, we see that our p-value is for sure greater than our alpha. So in this situation, I mean, you could see it right over here: 0.31 is for sure greater than 0.05.

So in this situation, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. Cannot reject our null hypothesis, and so there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have.

More Articles

View All
15 Ways Rich People Prepare for WW3
We’ve had World War One. World War Two. The question of a World War Three is not an if, but a when. And in the last couple of years, there’s this feeling floating around in the air of political, economic, and social unrest. Somebody screws up a nuke, goes…
Never Let A Man Control Your Financial Destiny
50% of marriages within 7 years fail, not because of infidelity, but because of financial stress. The other issue that’s so important after you turn 18 as a woman is that you have to maintain a financial identity in our system. Yes, if you don’t have a cr…
Elephant Cleverly Steals Sugar Cane off a Truck in Thailand | Secrets of the Elephants
Thailand Highway 3259 is a sugarcane transport road. Thousands of farmers use it to get their crops to the refinery. But this highway has a toll collector. Locals call him the Don. And this is his territory. He’s a master dealmaker, calculating risk vers…
Determining sample size based on confidence and margin of error | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
We’re told Della wants to make a one-sample z-interval to estimate what proportion of her community members favor a tax increase for more local school funding. She wants her margin of error to be no more than plus or minus two percent at the 95% confidenc…
Mule Mayhem | Live Free or Die
Oh, oh, damn it! Oh, God damn it! Hold, hold, hold! Damn it! Goddamn mules! Hold! No, you hold! Too much traffic, motorcycles, bicyclists—everything was too much for the mule. And once he started plunging down that hill and the jugs were hitting the bush…
I found the WORST thing money can buy: Virtual Real Estate for $200,000
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, it’s 2018, and I thought we’ve seen it all—from an elderly lady suing her nephew over their split lottery winnings, two people eating Tide Pods, to the worst of all: the closing of Toys R Us. But no! I opened my …