yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Predicting bond type (electronegativity) | Types of chemical bonds | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

In other videos, we had started talking about the types of bonds that might form between atoms of a given element. For example, if you have two metals forming a bond, well, you are going to have a metallic bond. If you have two non-metals engaged in some type of bonding activity, this is likely to be a covalent bond. The general rule of thumb is if you have one metal and one non-metal, not one non-metal, that this is likely to be an ionic bond. These are the general rules of thumb.

What I want to do in this video is to better appreciate that bonding is really more of a spectrum. There are bonds, and we've talked about things like polar covalent bonds that start to look a little bit more and more ionic in nature. That's what we're going to talk about in this video and think about it in the context of electronegativity.

Just as a reminder, we talk about electronegativity in many videos, but this is the property of an atom that's in a bond to hog electrons; to want the electron density to be closer to it, for the electron pairs to spend more time around that particular atom. So, something with a high electronegativity is going to be greedier with the electrons than something with a low electronegativity.

We could think about the spectrum between, at this end, you have ionic, and at this end, you have covalent. One way to think about it is at the extreme left end you don't have much difference in electronegativities; both atoms that are participating in the bond are roughly equal in how badly they want the electrons. While in an ionic bond, you have a very big difference in electronegativities, so much so that one of the atoms swipes an electron from the other.

So, one way to think about it is let me draw a little bit of an arrow here. This is increased electronegativity difference as you go from left to right, and somewhere in the middle, or as you go from left to right, you're becoming more and more polar covalent. For example, if you have a bond between oxygen and hydrogen, these are both non-metals, so this will be a covalent bond by our general rule of thumb. Actually, the division between metals and non-metals, I'm going to make it right over here. This blue line is one division you could view, although things that straddle it are a little bit more interesting.

But oxygen and hydrogen are both non-metals. However, you have a pretty big difference in electronegativities. This right over here is electronegativity measured on a Pauling scale named after the famous biologist and chemist Linus Pauling. You can see on that scale, oxygen is a 3.44, one of the most electronegative atoms. Electronegativity trends we talked about in other videos go from bottom left to top right. The things at the top right that are not the noble gases are the ones that really are greedy with electrons, and oxygen is one of the greediest, while hydrogen is not electronegative but it's lower at 2.20.

So, in this scenario, those electrons are going to spend more time around the oxygen. If they spend an equal amount of time, that oxygen might be neutral, but since they're spending a little bit more time here, we'll say that has a partial negative charge—the Greek lowercase letter delta. On the hydrogen side, because the shared electrons are spending more time around the oxygen than around the hydrogen, you would have a partially positive charge right over there. So, this would be a polar covalent bond. Maybe on the spectrum, it sits right over there, depending on how you want to view this scale.

Now, the other question says, okay, this is a spectrum between covalent and ionic—what about metallic? Well, metallic bonds are, in general, going to be formed if you have two things that are not so different in electronegativity, and they both have reasonably low electronegativities. That's why things on the bottom left, right over here, if you have two of these forming bonds with each other, somehow that you're likely to have metallic bonds.

That makes sense because in metallic bonds, you have all the electrons kind of mixing in a shared pool, which gives some of the properties like conductivity. So, if you have a lot of things that are fairly similar in electronegativity and they're all low in electronegativity, they might be more willing to share those valence electrons in a communal pool.

More Articles

View All
Why you can't stop checking your phone
If I were to ask you why you originally created your social media accounts, you might come up with something similar to, “Well, to keep up with friends and family and see what they’re doing and stuff like that.” And that’s not a bad reason at all; in fact…
Announcing ThinkerCon! - A Celebration of Online Educational Content
Announcing ThinkerCon! Remember several years ago, five of us educational content creators got together, and we did this live event. It was really fun, but people came from like 40 states and 12 different nations for it. So, clearly, there’s a lot of dema…
How to get over your FEAR…this is what I was afraid of
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So today, I’m going to be making a video about fear and why it took me 3 years just to get up the courage to upload a video onto YouTube. Because when I hear myself saying that, I realize it sounds [ __ ] ridiculous.…
Warren Buffett, Chairman, Berkshire Hathaway Investment Group | Terry Leadership Speaker Series
Good morning. It certainly got quiet quickly. That surprised me. Can you hear me? Are you there? Back well for business school, you know, it doesn’t get much better than this. Having the world’s greatest investor come to our campus is quite a bore. Office…
Facebook Freebooting - Smarter Every Day 128
Hey, it’s me Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I want to do something a little bit different today; let’s start with a story. Once there was a kingdom where wealth was determined by what sheep you owned. There was a rich man who had many, many s…
"America's Best Idea" - President Obama on National Parks | National Geographic
Two of your predecessors felt very much the same thing, didn’t they? Teddy Roosevelt walked these very trails through these redwood trees along with John Muir, the father of the American conservation movement, and these granite mountains. They lit a fire …