yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Computing a Jacobian matrix


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So just as a reminder of where we are, we've got this very nonlinear transformation. We showed that if you zoom in on a specific point while that transformation is happening, it looks a lot like something linear. We reasoned that you can figure out what linear transformation that looks like by taking the partial derivatives of your given function, the one that I defined up here, and then turning that into a matrix.

What I want to do here is basically just finish up what I was talking about by computing all of those partial derivatives. So first of all, let me just rewrite the function back on the screen so we have it in a convenient place to look at. The first component is X plus s of y, s of Y, and then y plus s of X was the second component.

So what I want to do here is just compute all of those partial derivatives to show what kind of thing this looks like. So let's go ahead and get rid of this word, then I'll go ahead and kind of redraw the matrix here. For that upper left component, we're taking the partial derivative with respect to X of the first component.

So we look up at this first component, and the partial derivative with respect to X is just one since there's 1 * X plus something that has nothing to do with X. Then below that, we take the partial derivative of the second component with respect to X down here, and that guy, the Y, well that looks like a constant, so nothing happens. The derivative of s of X becomes cosine of x.

Then up here, we're taking the partial derivative with respect to Y of the first component, that upper one here, and for that, you know, the partial derivative of x with respect to Y is zero. The partial derivative of s of Y with respect to Y is cosine of Y. Finally, the partial derivative of the second component with respect to Y looks like 1 because it's just 1 * y plus some constant.

This is the general Jacobian as a function of X and Y. But if we want to understand what happens around the specific point that started off at, well I think I recorded it here at -21. We plug that into each one of these values. When we plug in -21, so go ahead and just kind of again rewrite it to remember we're plugging in -21 as our specific point, that matrix as a function, kind of a matrix-valued function, becomes one.

Then next we have cosine, but we're plugging in -2 for x. Cosine of -2, and if you're curious, that is approximately equal to, I calculated this earlier, 0.42 if you just want to think in terms of a number there. Then for the upper right, we have cosine again, but now we're plugging in the value for Y, which is one, and cosine of 1 is approximately equal to 0.54.

Then bottom right, that's just another constant, one. So that is the matrix just as a matrix full of numbers. Just as kind of a gut check, we can take a look at the linear transformation this was supposed to look like and notice how the first basis vector, the thing it got turned into, which is this vector here, does look like it has coordinates 1 and 0.42.

Right, it's got this rightward component that's about as long as the vector itself started, and then this downward component, which I think that's, you know, pretty believable that that's 0.42. Likewise, this second column is telling us what happened to that second basis vector, which is the one that looks like this, and again, its y component is about as long as how it started, right? A length of one, and then the rightward component is around half of that, and we actually see that in the diagram.

But this is something you compute. Again, it's pretty straightforward; you just take all of the possible partial derivatives and you organize them into a grid like this. So with that, I'll see you guys next video.

More Articles

View All
Limits by rationalizing | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s see if we can find the limit as x approaches negative one of ( \frac{x + 1}{\sqrt{x + 5} - 2} ). So our first reaction might just be, okay, well let’s just use our limit properties a little bit. This is going to be the same thing as the limit as x …
I Secretly Pitched A Fake Business On Shark Tank
So do we have a deal? No, no, never. You need your head examined. That’s just terrible. Okay, so let’s back up for a second. This is Barbara Corcoran. She sold her real estate brokerage in 2001 for 66 million dollars. She’s a judge on the Emmy Award-winn…
Buy REAL Dino Teeth! ... and more! LÜT #20
An R2-D2 pepper mill and cologne that makes you smell like Play-doh. It’s episode 20 of LÜT. This wallet looks like a lot of hundreds, and these bars of soap from ThinkGeek contain caffeine, really. Each shower you take delivers the same as a cuppa coffe…
US taxation trends in post war era | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
[Instructor] In a previous video, we looked at this diagram over here, which shows the growth in per capita GDP since 1947, and it compares to that the growth in after-tax income of the bottom 90%. And what we said in that video is it looks like somethi…
15 Things You Didn't Know About GUCCI
Fifteen things you didn’t know about Gucci. Welcome to A Luxe Calm, the place where future billionaires come to get inspired. Hello, A Luxor’s, and welcome back to another fantastic video! Thanks to the huge response to our high-end fashion videos, we’ve …
Curvature formula, part 3
So continuing on with where we were in the last video, um, we’re looking for this unit tangent vector function given the parameterization. So the specific example that I have is a function that parameterizes a circle with radius capital R, but I also kin…