yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Ice sheet collapse: The greatest unknown in climate science | Jon Gertner | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

For scientists who study climate change, one of the great challenges has been trying to figure out if these great ice sheets, these old remnants of the ice age in Greenland and Antarctica, are shrinking or growing. And we're used to, I think now, all the news stories, you know, that Greenland's losing ice, and Antarctica is melting, and that this glacier seems unstable. But really, this was a kind of epic discovery of how to do it.

A lot of the ways we figured it out are through satellites and other kinds of airborne observational tools, such as laser altimeters that read the ice by sending laser bursts down and trying to measure decreases in the altitude of the ice. And, at least in Greenland, what we've discovered is that since, really, the early 1990s, this ice sheet has been losing mass. So that ice that's on top of Greenland, the frosting on the cupcake, is slowly moving into the ocean.

And it moves into the ocean two ways: It melts on the surface in the summertime, and that's when you see these beautiful azure beads of lakes on the surface that eventually drain into the ocean and meltwater rivers, too. It also, at the edges, has these glaciers that reach into the ocean, and they break off as these huge icebergs that, in turn, float away and melt also. And those all raise sea levels.

The bigger picture is that, at the moment, our ocean sea levels are rising by about three millimeters per year, which is actually a pretty small amount. And the reasons that it's melting are, one, as the earth gets warmer, there's something called thermal expansion, which means that the oceans literally expand, just as hot water expands; it gets larger and higher. The other reason is that there are mountain glaciers all over the world in the Himalayas and Canada and Alaska, and those, too, are draining into the water, and they make a contribution.

And the third reason is that Greenland and Antarctica are losing ice, both through -- especially Greenland's -- surface melting and through these glaciers that break off into icebergs, and they're raising sea levels. At the moment, Greenland's contribution is one millimeter per year. And we could maybe put that aside and say, well, one millimeter a year isn't very much, but that's accelerating.

What we also know is that things don't necessarily move in a linear way with ice sheets. A lot of the science of glaciology and ice sheets is pretty new. It's not like we can go back 100 years and try and sort of figure out -- or that we knew at that point how ice sheets work. In fact, we can look at an ice sheet now, in Greenland or in Antarctica, in West Antarctica, for instance, and we know that no human being has ever seen what we're seeing now.

Nobody's ever really witnessed the collapse of an ice sheet. There's nothing in recorded history that explains how an ice sheet collapses in warmer temperatures. So we're in this place now where what we know is that the climate is warming dramatically. We know the ice sheets become more unstable in warmer temperatures. We know they have vulnerabilities. We also don't know precisely how the physics of big ice sheets work.

And we try and create models; scientists do try and create models, but those models aren't necessarily as good as some other models that predict, say, future temperatures. We've heard, well, if the earth, you know, if we put so much CO2 into the air, we're going to warm the atmosphere by 2 degrees or 3 degrees -- those have proven pretty accurate.

But trying to model an ice sheet and say, well, by the year 2050, Greenland is going to lose so many tons of ice, or Antarctica will, we're not sure. I mean, partly we're not sure because we don't know if human beings can actually stop burning so many fossil fuels and if we can change the way we're going, the trajectory we're going in warming.

But also we can't know because glaciers can start up and slow down. They can pause when they hit bumps before they break off into the sea. Greenland can have some variability, or cold weather can set in. What we know now is that Greenland is losing between 250 to ...

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett gives advice on calculating the intrinsic value of a company
This is Phil McCall from Connecticut. I wondered if you could comment on a subject I don’t think you like to talk about very much, which is intrinsic value and the evolution over the past 10 or 12 years of going to off and on, but giving us investments an…
Applying the chain rule and product rule | Advanced derivatives | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is try to find the derivative with respect to X of (x^2 \sin(X)) all of that to the third power. And what’s going to be interesting is that there are multiple ways to tackle it. I encourage you to pause the video and …
Warren Buffett Keeps Buying These 3 Stocks...
Well, as of the time of recording, we’ve now ticked 45 days past the end of Q2, and that means the 13F filings are out. These are regulatory filings that portfolio managers with at least 100 million in assets under management must submit to the SEC every …
Is this the coolest office?
Hey Steve, I love your office! Could you show me around? Sure! What would you like to see? I guess the pictures. Cool, let’s do that. Well, let’s see. Starting from Piers to switch with Ronald Reagan. This is when I was about, I don’t know, 26 or 27 ye…
How To QUIT Your Job With Passive Income (Step By Step)
What’s up, Grambids? Guys, here. So, some of you know I’ve been obsessed with the concept of passive income ever since I learned about the financial independence retire early community in my early 20s. Over those last 12 years, I have done everything poss…
Analyzing unbounded limits: rational function | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let f of x be equal to negative 1 over x minus 1 squared. Select the correct description of the one-sided limits of f at x equals 1. And so we can see we have a bunch of choices where we’re approaching x from the right-hand side and we’re approaching x f…